Helpful ReplyMysterious behavior after splitting audioclips

Page: 12 > Showing page 1 of 2
Author
THambrecht
Max Output Level: -73 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 867
  • Joined: 2010/12/10 06:42:03
  • Location: Germany
  • Status: offline
2016/12/10 10:41:33 (permalink)

Mysterious behavior after splitting audioclips

Since a few months, I watch a mysterious behavior after splitting audioclips.
I mark the whole clip and split it at a certain point.
In preferences I set: Selection after single split: "left portion".
So the left portion should be complete deleted - but every twentieth time a tiny bit of the audioclip remains at the left side. This tiny bit is so short (0,01 seconds), that is almost unvisible. 
I have been working for about 20 years with Sonar, earn my daily money with it,but I have only experienced that behavior since a few months.
This has effect to the clip when editing the visible main piece. Because Sonar holds the whole audiodata, even after "apply trimming" to the main piece, and references to the unvisible tiny bit. I also watch sometimes corrupt audiodata when normalising or applying an effect to an audioclip. I'm not surprised if problems occur by this behavior.

 
I also posted this for a few weeks. Mybe that is relateted:

These are very basic things that should work.
Every day I experience it and have to take attentions to this misconduct.
post edited by THambrecht - 2016/12/10 17:48:37

We digitize tapes, vinyl, dat, md ... in broadcast and studio quality for publishers, public institutions and individuals.
4 x Intel Quad-CPU, 4GHz Sonar Platinum (Windows 10 - 64Bit) and 14 computers for recording tapes, vinyl ...

4 x RME Fireface 800, 2 x Roland Octa Capture and 4 x Roland Quad Capture, Focusrite .... Studer A80, RP99, EMT948 ...

(Germany)  http://www.hambrecht.de
#1
Anderton
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 14070
  • Joined: 2003/11/06 14:02:03
  • Status: offline
Re: Mysterious behavior after splitting audioclips 2016/12/10 10:53:50 (permalink)
Regarding the first one, I've had something similar bite me when I snapped to zero-crossings. If the zero crossing was not on the beat and then I had another take that was snapped to the beat, there would be these tiny overlaps when cutting if the Take Lanes were folded up and I was working on the parent track. That may not be the cause of what's happening with you, but I end up with the same results.
 
Regarding the second, the people at Cakewalk are aware of this but can't reproduce it. I'm waiting until it happens in a project so  I can send the project to them, but it hasn't happened in months.

The first 3 books in "The Musician's Guide to Home Recording" series are available from Hal Leonard and http://www.reverb.com. Listen to my music on http://www.YouTube.com/thecraiganderton, and visit http://www.craiganderton.com. Thanks!
#2
mettelus
Max Output Level: -22 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5321
  • Joined: 2005/08/05 03:19:25
  • Location: Maryland, USA
  • Status: offline
Re: Mysterious behavior after splitting audioclips 2016/12/10 11:11:44 (permalink)
It is unfortunate to see a daily bread and butter user get a canned response of "no endpoint in sight." When companies who take pride in product rely on vendors who don't, decisions get made accordingly.

ASUS ROG Maximus X Hero (Wi-Fi AC), i7-8700k, 16GB RAM, GTX-1070Ti, Win 10 Pro, Saffire PRO 24 DSP, A-300 PRO, plus numerous gadgets and gizmos that make or manipulate sound in some way.
#3
THambrecht
Max Output Level: -73 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 867
  • Joined: 2010/12/10 06:42:03
  • Location: Germany
  • Status: offline
Re: Mysterious behavior after splitting audioclips 2016/12/10 11:21:34 (permalink)
Because we are digitazing analog recordings we have many terabytes of audiodata. Therefore we observe such problems more often. Some projects have up to 80 GB audiodata. I don't want to do this in Wavelab or Adobe Edition.
Sonar is unbeatable and the best and fastest software for such audio projects.
But sometimes it is sad when the new updates also make some basic things flawed.
 
 
 

We digitize tapes, vinyl, dat, md ... in broadcast and studio quality for publishers, public institutions and individuals.
4 x Intel Quad-CPU, 4GHz Sonar Platinum (Windows 10 - 64Bit) and 14 computers for recording tapes, vinyl ...

4 x RME Fireface 800, 2 x Roland Octa Capture and 4 x Roland Quad Capture, Focusrite .... Studer A80, RP99, EMT948 ...

(Germany)  http://www.hambrecht.de
#4
chuckebaby
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 13146
  • Joined: 2011/01/04 14:55:28
  • Status: offline
Re: Mysterious behavior after splitting audioclips 2016/12/10 11:28:15 (permalink)
Just for testing purposes, next time this happens, hit undo to start where you were previous.
Lasso the whole clip (to make sure every part of the clip is selected.
Selected "Bounce to clips" This will ensure there wont be any stray pieces of your audio clip hiding underneath the clips.
 
Now proceed to do the split again, check to see if this worked.
I have had similar things happen to me where slivers of a clip were hiding underneath a larger portion of a clip.
 
Please remember im just trying to help and not deny the fact you might have a different issue.
This might be something totally different, but I did take the time to write out these steps, so please just take it for what it is. Someone just trying to help.

Windows 8.1 X64 Sonar Platinum x64
Custom built: Asrock z97 1150 - Intel I7 4790k - 16GB corsair DDR3 1600 - PNY SSD 220GB
Focusrite Saffire 18I8 - Mackie Control
   
#5
Anderton
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 14070
  • Joined: 2003/11/06 14:02:03
  • Status: offline
Re: Mysterious behavior after splitting audioclips 2016/12/10 11:34:06 (permalink)
mettelus
It is unfortunate to see a daily bread and butter user get a canned response of "no endpoint in sight."



Are you referring to my response? If so, I'm simply another bread and butter user describing my experience. I'm a) confirming both phenomena, b) mentioning how the first one has happened to me and what caused it, and c) confirming that I've had the second occur but cannot reproduce, nor can Cakewalk. Cakewalk can't fix something they can't reproduce. Equating "no endpoint in sight" with "people are trying to reproduce and solve the problem" makes no sense. It's not my fault when something happens so rarely I can't summon it on command.
 
P.S. I do think it relates to mono files because I think it happened when I was working on narration. But this was almost a year ago so I can't be 100% I'm remembering the circumstances correctly. So you might think it's pointless for me to say anything, but if THambrecht reads this and the next time the second thing happens he was working on mono files, then we're starting to get somewhere...Cakewalk can then concentrate on trying to reproduce with mono files if that's a more common error mode (yes I know his screen shot shows stereo, but that may or may not be relevant to the cause...I don't know what the history of that waveform was).

The first 3 books in "The Musician's Guide to Home Recording" series are available from Hal Leonard and http://www.reverb.com. Listen to my music on http://www.YouTube.com/thecraiganderton, and visit http://www.craiganderton.com. Thanks!
#6
THambrecht
Max Output Level: -73 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 867
  • Joined: 2010/12/10 06:42:03
  • Location: Germany
  • Status: offline
Re: Mysterious behavior after splitting audioclips 2016/12/10 12:00:10 (permalink)
In our case it happens daily.
I also cannot reproduce it. I don't even notice when such a bit of audioclip remains. It's nearly unvisible.
When I mark all clips and export hundreds of clips, I see a few exported wav-files with only 5 kB of length.
I thought it was related to the fact that we have clips with 1 or 2 hours.
 
But I try to figure it out. I'm trying to reproduce it.
 
 
 

We digitize tapes, vinyl, dat, md ... in broadcast and studio quality for publishers, public institutions and individuals.
4 x Intel Quad-CPU, 4GHz Sonar Platinum (Windows 10 - 64Bit) and 14 computers for recording tapes, vinyl ...

4 x RME Fireface 800, 2 x Roland Octa Capture and 4 x Roland Quad Capture, Focusrite .... Studer A80, RP99, EMT948 ...

(Germany)  http://www.hambrecht.de
#7
Anderton
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 14070
  • Joined: 2003/11/06 14:02:03
  • Status: offline
Re: Mysterious behavior after splitting audioclips 2016/12/10 13:02:08 (permalink)
THambrecht
In our case it happens daily.
I also cannot reproduce it. I don't even notice when such a bit of audioclip remains. It's nearly unvisible.
When I mark all clips and export hundreds of clips, I see a few exported wav-files with only 5 kB of length.
I thought it was related to the fact that we have clips with 1 or 2 hours.
 
But I try to figure it out. I'm trying to reproduce it.

 
Is the sliver in a different Take Lane?
 

The first 3 books in "The Musician's Guide to Home Recording" series are available from Hal Leonard and http://www.reverb.com. Listen to my music on http://www.YouTube.com/thecraiganderton, and visit http://www.craiganderton.com. Thanks!
#8
chuckebaby
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 13146
  • Joined: 2011/01/04 14:55:28
  • Status: offline
Re: Mysterious behavior after splitting audioclips 2016/12/10 13:15:29 (permalink)
and you don't think "Bounce to clips" wont take care of this ?
 

Windows 8.1 X64 Sonar Platinum x64
Custom built: Asrock z97 1150 - Intel I7 4790k - 16GB corsair DDR3 1600 - PNY SSD 220GB
Focusrite Saffire 18I8 - Mackie Control
   
#9
Anderton
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 14070
  • Joined: 2003/11/06 14:02:03
  • Status: offline
Re: Mysterious behavior after splitting audioclips 2016/12/10 13:46:45 (permalink)
chuckebaby
and you don't think "Bounce to clips" wont take care of this ?

 
I think it probably would, but I'm still curious how the "microclips" are being generated in the first place in case they're coming from someplace unexpected. For example, I wonder if Split will snap to zero crossings if that's selected, thus leaving a sliver behind if the clip extends beyond a zero-crossing. Don't have much to go by, so grasping at straws.
 

The first 3 books in "The Musician's Guide to Home Recording" series are available from Hal Leonard and http://www.reverb.com. Listen to my music on http://www.YouTube.com/thecraiganderton, and visit http://www.craiganderton.com. Thanks!
#10
THambrecht
Max Output Level: -73 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 867
  • Joined: 2010/12/10 06:42:03
  • Location: Germany
  • Status: offline
Re: Mysterious behavior after splitting audioclips 2016/12/10 14:37:05 (permalink)
We don't work with take lanes.
But this brings me to an idea:
Now I have unchecked "Snap to nearest Audio zero Crossing". Maybe the zero crossing generates the problem. It may be that Sonar cuts the clip at the very left side at a zero point - instead of deleting the whole portion. Although then the microclips would appear more often.
I will check this.
 

We digitize tapes, vinyl, dat, md ... in broadcast and studio quality for publishers, public institutions and individuals.
4 x Intel Quad-CPU, 4GHz Sonar Platinum (Windows 10 - 64Bit) and 14 computers for recording tapes, vinyl ...

4 x RME Fireface 800, 2 x Roland Octa Capture and 4 x Roland Quad Capture, Focusrite .... Studer A80, RP99, EMT948 ...

(Germany)  http://www.hambrecht.de
#11
Klaus
Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 320
  • Joined: 2009/07/14 07:34:02
  • Location: Cologne, Germany
  • Status: offline
Re: Mysterious behavior after splitting audioclips 2016/12/10 15:08:13 (permalink)
For a test, you could also keep "Snap to nearest Audio zero Crossing" checked, but set "Selection after single split" to "None".
You have to select the left side of the clip you want to delete manually and that's more work and maybe not feasible for you, but it should ensure that the clip portion is selected entirely.
 

SONAR Platinum 
RME HDSPe AIO - Windows 10 64bit - Intel i7 2600K - 16 GB RAM
 
 
 
 
#12
THambrecht
Max Output Level: -73 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 867
  • Joined: 2010/12/10 06:42:03
  • Location: Germany
  • Status: offline
Re: Mysterious behavior after splitting audioclips 2016/12/10 15:35:43 (permalink)
Just happend again. 
I can reproduce it. 5 times tested.
No matter if "zero crossing" is checked or not.
No matter if "Selection after single split" is set to "None" or "Left portion". Even if I delete the selected clip manually.
Now I can reliable reproduce that the deletion of a selected clip leaves a microclip at his left side.
   
In this case 2 recorded tapes consisting of 4 clips (each tape has two sides).
With a full length of 4 hours and 22 minutes.
 
 

We digitize tapes, vinyl, dat, md ... in broadcast and studio quality for publishers, public institutions and individuals.
4 x Intel Quad-CPU, 4GHz Sonar Platinum (Windows 10 - 64Bit) and 14 computers for recording tapes, vinyl ...

4 x RME Fireface 800, 2 x Roland Octa Capture and 4 x Roland Quad Capture, Focusrite .... Studer A80, RP99, EMT948 ...

(Germany)  http://www.hambrecht.de
#13
THambrecht
Max Output Level: -73 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 867
  • Joined: 2010/12/10 06:42:03
  • Location: Germany
  • Status: offline
Re: Mysterious behavior after splitting audioclips 2016/12/10 16:00:24 (permalink)
I must correct myself.
The microclip is NOT the left side of the clip.
The microclip remains to the RIGHT side of the previous clip.
That was not to be seen immediately.
 
That is the evidence: (zipped 855 MB)
I have uploaded the project:

https://office.1und1.de/guest?path=K18936%20-%20info%40hambrecht.de&token=4849536D40C10A33&mandant=02&product=onlineoffice&locale=de&viewType=0&guestToken=cRgIUshXTuOTh2dBK1-7nw&loginName=info%40hambrecht.de

 
I have shortened the project to 1 audioclip:
- Just split at the end of the music at measure 1977.
- Delete the right portion.
- You will see a microclip at measure 1986
 
Fully reproducible - no coincidence.

We digitize tapes, vinyl, dat, md ... in broadcast and studio quality for publishers, public institutions and individuals.
4 x Intel Quad-CPU, 4GHz Sonar Platinum (Windows 10 - 64Bit) and 14 computers for recording tapes, vinyl ...

4 x RME Fireface 800, 2 x Roland Octa Capture and 4 x Roland Quad Capture, Focusrite .... Studer A80, RP99, EMT948 ...

(Germany)  http://www.hambrecht.de
#14
Klaus
Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 320
  • Joined: 2009/07/14 07:34:02
  • Location: Cologne, Germany
  • Status: offline
Re: Mysterious behavior after splitting audioclips 2016/12/10 16:09:19 (permalink)
I'm downloading...

SONAR Platinum 
RME HDSPe AIO - Windows 10 64bit - Intel i7 2600K - 16 GB RAM
 
 
 
 
#15
Klaus
Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 320
  • Joined: 2009/07/14 07:34:02
  • Location: Cologne, Germany
  • Status: offline
Re: Mysterious behavior after splitting audioclips 2016/12/10 16:28:27 (permalink)
I just looked at your project:
There is a second Lane (expand Take Lanes to see it) which contains the remaining portion of the clip (although in the same Lane).
 
You don't have to split the clip, the remaining microclip is already there.
 

SONAR Platinum 
RME HDSPe AIO - Windows 10 64bit - Intel i7 2600K - 16 GB RAM
 
 
 
 
#16
Klaus
Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 320
  • Joined: 2009/07/14 07:34:02
  • Location: Cologne, Germany
  • Status: offline
Re: Mysterious behavior after splitting audioclips 2016/12/10 16:33:22 (permalink)
I think this is a remaining of a not "Flattened Comp" track.
 
 
Edit: In this case it's faster to just delete the microclip than to use "Flatten Comp".
 

SONAR Platinum 
RME HDSPe AIO - Windows 10 64bit - Intel i7 2600K - 16 GB RAM
 
 
 
 
#17
THambrecht
Max Output Level: -73 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 867
  • Joined: 2010/12/10 06:42:03
  • Location: Germany
  • Status: offline
Re: Mysterious behavior after splitting audioclips 2016/12/10 16:46:41 (permalink)
--- deleteted ---
post edited by THambrecht - 2016/12/10 17:19:00

We digitize tapes, vinyl, dat, md ... in broadcast and studio quality for publishers, public institutions and individuals.
4 x Intel Quad-CPU, 4GHz Sonar Platinum (Windows 10 - 64Bit) and 14 computers for recording tapes, vinyl ...

4 x RME Fireface 800, 2 x Roland Octa Capture and 4 x Roland Quad Capture, Focusrite .... Studer A80, RP99, EMT948 ...

(Germany)  http://www.hambrecht.de
#18
THambrecht
Max Output Level: -73 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 867
  • Joined: 2010/12/10 06:42:03
  • Location: Germany
  • Status: offline
Re: Mysterious behavior after splitting audioclips 2016/12/10 17:15:44 (permalink)
Thank you a lot.
I have found the reason. I was completely wrong.
I record the first side of a tape as first clip. Then I stop the recording. 
Then I turn the tape and record the second side as second clip.
The problem is that the two recordings are "now" a little little bit overlapping. That was not yet a few months ago.
So this problem comes probably with Comping and the new take management.
 
It should not happen that after "stop" and the next "record" the clips are overlapped. But now I know that I must leave 1 measure empty to begin the next record.
 
I have been annoyed for months.
But without you and this forum I would never haved solved this problem.
Thank you.
 
 
 

We digitize tapes, vinyl, dat, md ... in broadcast and studio quality for publishers, public institutions and individuals.
4 x Intel Quad-CPU, 4GHz Sonar Platinum (Windows 10 - 64Bit) and 14 computers for recording tapes, vinyl ...

4 x RME Fireface 800, 2 x Roland Octa Capture and 4 x Roland Quad Capture, Focusrite .... Studer A80, RP99, EMT948 ...

(Germany)  http://www.hambrecht.de
#19
Klaus
Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 320
  • Joined: 2009/07/14 07:34:02
  • Location: Cologne, Germany
  • Status: offline
Re: Mysterious behavior after splitting audioclips 2016/12/10 17:28:41 (permalink)
I opened your test project again and actually you don't have to expand Take Lanes.
If you zoom way in you'll see the (muted) microclip right at the end on the main track.
 
So, the second empty Take Lane is probably not important, but a previously split (maybe inadvertently) seems to be done and since the remaining clip is also muted (which is not the case of usual splitting), it looks like "Comping" has been used.
 
But it would take a couple of inadvertently pressed keyboard shortcuts to get this result, so it doesn't look like an oversight or user error.
 

SONAR Platinum 
RME HDSPe AIO - Windows 10 64bit - Intel i7 2600K - 16 GB RAM
 
 
 
 
#20
Klaus
Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 320
  • Joined: 2009/07/14 07:34:02
  • Location: Cologne, Germany
  • Status: offline
Re: Mysterious behavior after splitting audioclips 2016/12/10 17:34:41 (permalink)
Hey, that's great!
I didn't read your last post while I wrote mine.
 
Really good to hear!
 
Best,
Klaus
 
 

SONAR Platinum 
RME HDSPe AIO - Windows 10 64bit - Intel i7 2600K - 16 GB RAM
 
 
 
 
#21
THambrecht
Max Output Level: -73 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 867
  • Joined: 2010/12/10 06:42:03
  • Location: Germany
  • Status: offline
Re: Mysterious behavior after splitting audioclips 2016/12/10 17:40:09 (permalink)
It is nevertheless strange.
When I split clip 1 at the right end - and the following next clip 2 at the left beginning, there should never be a microclip between this two clips. Even if they overlap.
I know now what I must make in order to prevent this. But this is a program error.
 
The remaining microclip on the right side of the clip belongs still to the splitted and deleted clip snd audiofile - not to the following clip on the second layer. In my test project there is only "one" audiofile.
The more I think about it, the problem is not solved.

We digitize tapes, vinyl, dat, md ... in broadcast and studio quality for publishers, public institutions and individuals.
4 x Intel Quad-CPU, 4GHz Sonar Platinum (Windows 10 - 64Bit) and 14 computers for recording tapes, vinyl ...

4 x RME Fireface 800, 2 x Roland Octa Capture and 4 x Roland Quad Capture, Focusrite .... Studer A80, RP99, EMT948 ...

(Germany)  http://www.hambrecht.de
#22
Klaus
Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 320
  • Joined: 2009/07/14 07:34:02
  • Location: Cologne, Germany
  • Status: offline
Re: Mysterious behavior after splitting audioclips 2016/12/10 17:54:43 (permalink)
I think the microclip is not a result from splitting but from the orginal overlapping recording (as you already mentioned).
Hence it doesn't matter where you split the clip.
 
Try not recording into Take Lanes:
Uncheck "Create New Lanes on Overlap" and check "Store Takes in Separate Tracks".
 
 

SONAR Platinum 
RME HDSPe AIO - Windows 10 64bit - Intel i7 2600K - 16 GB RAM
 
 
 
 
#23
Klaus
Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 320
  • Joined: 2009/07/14 07:34:02
  • Location: Cologne, Germany
  • Status: offline
Re: Mysterious behavior after splitting audioclips 2016/12/10 17:59:38 (permalink)
Hmm, you're right, the remaining clip belongs to the first recording, so it's not an overlap between two recordings.
 
Phew, I'm a bit lost here...sorry.
 
 

SONAR Platinum 
RME HDSPe AIO - Windows 10 64bit - Intel i7 2600K - 16 GB RAM
 
 
 
 
#24
THambrecht
Max Output Level: -73 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 867
  • Joined: 2010/12/10 06:42:03
  • Location: Germany
  • Status: offline
Re: Mysterious behavior after splitting audioclips 2016/12/10 18:04:34 (permalink)
Thank you.
I have never seen this option before. I have unchecked "Create New Lanes on Overlap".
But I'm wondering.
Deleting a clip should delete all take lanes !! This is probably the fault !! Deleting a clip manually or by splitting has to delete all take lanes from the clip !!
 

We digitize tapes, vinyl, dat, md ... in broadcast and studio quality for publishers, public institutions and individuals.
4 x Intel Quad-CPU, 4GHz Sonar Platinum (Windows 10 - 64Bit) and 14 computers for recording tapes, vinyl ...

4 x RME Fireface 800, 2 x Roland Octa Capture and 4 x Roland Quad Capture, Focusrite .... Studer A80, RP99, EMT948 ...

(Germany)  http://www.hambrecht.de
#25
Anderton
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 14070
  • Joined: 2003/11/06 14:02:03
  • Status: offline
Re: Mysterious behavior after splitting audioclips 2016/12/10 18:16:47 (permalink)
Klaus
Try not recording into Take Lanes:
Uncheck "Create New Lanes on Overlap" and check "Store Takes in Separate Tracks".



Please let us know what happens when you try this. If the problem still occurs, then at least we can exclude Take Lanes as being part of the issue.

The first 3 books in "The Musician's Guide to Home Recording" series are available from Hal Leonard and http://www.reverb.com. Listen to my music on http://www.YouTube.com/thecraiganderton, and visit http://www.craiganderton.com. Thanks!
#26
Klaus
Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 320
  • Joined: 2009/07/14 07:34:02
  • Location: Cologne, Germany
  • Status: offline
Re: Mysterious behavior after splitting audioclips 2016/12/10 18:21:45 (permalink)
THambrecht
 
Deleting a clip should delete all take lanes !! This is probably the fault !! Deleting a clip manually or by splitting has to delete all take lanes from the clip !!



I understand what you mean but that would defeat the purpose of Take Lanes, I think.
 

SONAR Platinum 
RME HDSPe AIO - Windows 10 64bit - Intel i7 2600K - 16 GB RAM
 
 
 
 
#27
THambrecht
Max Output Level: -73 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 867
  • Joined: 2010/12/10 06:42:03
  • Location: Germany
  • Status: offline
Re: Mysterious behavior after splitting audioclips 2016/12/10 19:33:20 (permalink)
It is now very clear.
After recording clip 1, and after that recording clip 2, the first clip 1 is automatically splitted at its right end and muted. Why the clips are overlapping is unclear. Stop and record should never result in overlapping clips. That means after "stop" the project jumps back 0,01 seconds.
 
So it remains a nearly unvisible and muted microclip from the last record - at this point the new record begins.
The picture shows 0,01 seconds:
You can not see it in this picture, but with marker "gn" ends the first record and the second record begins.
The overlapping clip 1 is then cut into a main clip and a muted microclip.
So I do not need to wonder when normalizing an audioclip and applying effects to an audioclip comes to corrupted audiodata. Because the main clip references in addition to an unvisible microclip that is muted. Operations to this main clip overwhelm Sonar and it comes to corrupt audiodata.
 
So the cause is found but the problem is not solved.
 
I know in my case how I now prevent this. The silly question remains - how to find this microclips and prevent thereby corrupt audiodata?
 

 
 

We digitize tapes, vinyl, dat, md ... in broadcast and studio quality for publishers, public institutions and individuals.
4 x Intel Quad-CPU, 4GHz Sonar Platinum (Windows 10 - 64Bit) and 14 computers for recording tapes, vinyl ...

4 x RME Fireface 800, 2 x Roland Octa Capture and 4 x Roland Quad Capture, Focusrite .... Studer A80, RP99, EMT948 ...

(Germany)  http://www.hambrecht.de
#28
Anderton
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 14070
  • Joined: 2003/11/06 14:02:03
  • Status: offline
Re: Mysterious behavior after splitting audioclips 2016/12/10 21:36:45 (permalink) ☄ Helpfulby Klaus 2016/12/11 13:56:39
Thank you for the detailed information! Because of that I knew where to look, and I can confirm - when you stop and then start and comping is selected, sometimes the Now time backs up slightly when you stop, or recording continues a bit afterward (I'm not sure which, but the result is the same). I also noticed that sometimes, it leaves a very small gap.
 
Fortunately there are four solutions, depending on how you want the clips to end up.
 
  • If you want a clip to go in a new take lane every time you start and stop, and have no overlap, choose Overwrite and check Create New Lanes on Overlap.
  • If you want clips to go in the same take lane every time you start and stop, and have no overlap, choose Overwrite and uncheck Create New Lanes on Overlap.
  • If you want a clip to go in a new take lane every time you start and stop, and you want a slight overlap but don't want the overlapping part to be split, choose Sound on Sound and check Create New Lanes on Overlap.
  • If you want clips to alternate between two take lanes every time you start and stop, and want a slight overlap but don't want the overlapping part to be split, choose Sound on Sound and uncheck Create New Lanes on Overlap.
 
One of these should cover what you need. I know who worked on the comping, and since the behavior you describe is now quantified and reproducible, I'll pass this information along. (I wonder if the slight overlap is on purpose to guarantee that a new take lane will be created when comping...I don't know, but the comping person will know.)
 
I hope you find this "canned response" helpful  
 
Thank you for your diligence in finding a way to reproduce!

The first 3 books in "The Musician's Guide to Home Recording" series are available from Hal Leonard and http://www.reverb.com. Listen to my music on http://www.YouTube.com/thecraiganderton, and visit http://www.craiganderton.com. Thanks!
#29
Keith Albright [Cakewalk]
Max Output Level: -68 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1117
  • Joined: 2006/07/10 15:44:42
  • Location: Boston, MA
  • Status: offline
Re: Mysterious behavior after splitting audioclips 2016/12/16 08:29:37 (permalink)
THambrecht
Since a few months, I watch a mysterious behavior after splitting audioclips.
I mark the whole clip and split it at a certain point.
In preferences I set: Selection after single split: "left portion".
So the left portion should be complete deleted - but every twentieth time a tiny bit of the audioclip remains at the left side. This tiny bit is so short (0,01 seconds), that is almost unvisible. 
I have been working for about 20 years with Sonar, earn my daily money with it,but I have only experienced that behavior since a few months.
This has effect to the clip when editing the visible main piece. Because Sonar holds the whole audiodata, even after "apply trimming" to the main piece, and references to the unvisible tiny bit. I also watch sometimes corrupt audiodata when normalising or applying an effect to an audioclip. I'm not surprised if problems occur by this behavior.
 

 
Thanks for the report, we'll look into it and work to resolve it in a future update.
 
Keith

Keith
#30
Page: 12 > Showing page 1 of 2
Jump to:
© 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1