THambrecht
Max Output Level: -73 dBFS
- Total Posts : 867
- Joined: 2010/12/10 06:42:03
- Location: Germany
- Status: offline
"Holes" in the recording - Why does SONAR not notice?
We had a client computer that recorded vinyl 12 hours per day. (Artist 2017.02 - ASIO: RME Fireface 800). For a few months we had replaced this computer with a laptop DELL Latitude. (Artist, 2017.02) (the same RME Fireface 800) Now we notice "holes" in the recording: That means: Every 1 - 3 minutes, suddenly 500ms to 2000ms are missing. The recording jumps seamless without a pause. It sounds like the band has forgotten to play half a measure. During Recording I listened to the OUTPUT of the RME Fireface - all OK. When I play this recording, then it "jumps" all few minutes. I know this is up to a driver for the firewire connection or its up to the firewire hardware from the DELL laptop. The solution is to replace this computer. Very easy. (I don't want to check with other versions of SONAR) My question is: Why does SONAR not notice !!! that the firewire driver delivers nonsense? I would expect that SONAR stops !! immeditately !! when the driver has issues during recording? Is there any parameter where I can tell SONAR to stop recording when a driver delivers nonsense? I ask - because I need a safety precaution to prevent such issues. We have 7 client computers to record audio - I cann't check all recordings.
We digitize tapes, vinyl, dat, md ... in broadcast and studio quality for publishers, public institutions and individuals.4 x Intel Quad-CPU, 4GHz Sonar Platinum (Windows 10 - 64Bit) and 14 computers for recording tapes, vinyl ... 4 x RME Fireface 800, 2 x Roland Octa Capture and 4 x Roland Quad Capture, Focusrite .... Studer A80, RP99, EMT948 ... (Germany) http://www.hambrecht.de
|
azslow3
Max Output Level: -42.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3297
- Joined: 2012/06/22 19:27:51
- Location: Germany
- Status: offline
Re: "Holes" in the recording - Why does SONAR not notice?
2017/08/02 14:02:26
(permalink)
How you think Sonar should detect the skip? For the problem itself: are you sure that you have switched off ALL powersaving features (in BIOS and Windows) on DELL? For RME output during recording: you probably has "direct monitoring", so you get on the output what you have on the input, bypassing Sonar. Turn that off and enable "Echo" on recorded track, then you should hear what it coming into Sonar.
Sonar 8LE -> Platinum infinity, REAPER, Windows 10 pro GA-EP35-DS3L, E7500, 4GB, GTX 1050 Ti, 2x500GB RME Babyface Pro (M-Audio Audiophile Firewire/410, VS-20), Kawai CN43, TD-11, Roland A500S, Akai MPK Mini, Keystation Pro, etc. www.azslow.com - Control Surface Integration Platform for SONAR, ReaCWP, AOSC and other accessibility tools
|
bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
- Total Posts : 26036
- Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
- Location: Everett, WA USA
- Status: offline
Re: "Holes" in the recording - Why does SONAR not notice?
2017/08/02 16:45:37
(permalink)
Does gap occur during recording, or during playback? IOW, if you examine the audio clip closely, can you identify where the gap is? If so, that would suggest the audio interface is flushing its own internal buffer for some reason. SONAR would only know this had occurred if the data stream was interrupted. SONAR would detect this as a dropout and, if it was more than 250 ms in duration, halt the audio engine. You wouldn't miss such an event. However, if the interface were to keep sending data despite the internal loss, the driver would happily continue to fill its buffers, SONAR would see an uninterrupted stream of data from the driver, and neither the driver nor SONAR would know there'd been any data lost. I wouldn't be looking to replace the computer, I'd be considering replacing the audio interface.
All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. My Stuff
|
THambrecht
Max Output Level: -73 dBFS
- Total Posts : 867
- Joined: 2010/12/10 06:42:03
- Location: Germany
- Status: offline
Re: "Holes" in the recording - Why does SONAR not notice?
2017/08/02 18:42:26
(permalink)
Probably the DELL builtin firewire is overloaded - throws data out - and SONAR can not notice. I'm just disappointed that there is no exchange between "firewire hardware" and SONAR. The firewire should "cry", that it throws data out - and SONAR should stop recording. I think DELL has built a very bad firewire connection in the budget range and this is the problem. I think Dell has not been building new ones with firewire. There is no gap - not for one bit. Its absolut seamlessly. And its up to two seconds skipped audio (!! seamlessly without gap !!). I also noticed a repeat from 1,2 seconds. I think its up to the DELL laptop E6520, because SONAR very often crashed when closing the project (shut down the connection to the interface). SONAR also crashed sometimes by choosing an other input channel from the fireface. And Sonar crashes every second time by exporting a file. I have replaced the DELL with the old computer. And until now it seems to work without "jumps". In this old computer is a very good firewire card. And thats why it works. (We only wanted to save energy as we took a laptop.)
We digitize tapes, vinyl, dat, md ... in broadcast and studio quality for publishers, public institutions and individuals.4 x Intel Quad-CPU, 4GHz Sonar Platinum (Windows 10 - 64Bit) and 14 computers for recording tapes, vinyl ... 4 x RME Fireface 800, 2 x Roland Octa Capture and 4 x Roland Quad Capture, Focusrite .... Studer A80, RP99, EMT948 ... (Germany) http://www.hambrecht.de
|
bitman
Max Output Level: -34 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4105
- Joined: 2003/11/06 14:11:54
- Location: Keystone Colorado
- Status: offline
Re: "Holes" in the recording - Why does SONAR not notice?
2017/08/02 18:50:02
(permalink)
|
bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
- Total Posts : 26036
- Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
- Location: Everett, WA USA
- Status: offline
Re: "Holes" in the recording - Why does SONAR not notice?
2017/08/02 19:46:12
(permalink)
I can think of a few reasons why not. If the problem was an intermittent connector or cable, there is no way for the FW adapter to know that. How do you distinguish between no data sent versus no data received? Even if there was a way, SONAR and the FW adapter don't talk to one another - that's a private conversation between the adapter and the audio driver, so SONAR isn't in the loop. All SONAR knows is that either there is some data in the input buffer or there isn't.
All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. My Stuff
|
35mm
Max Output Level: -68 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1105
- Joined: 2008/12/09 08:21:44
- Location: Devon, UK
- Status: offline
Re: "Holes" in the recording - Why does SONAR not notice?
2017/08/03 03:09:30
(permalink)
Sonar can't notice a problem if there is a continuous stream of data coming into it - even if some of that data describes silence. So the issue must be outside Sonar. If drop outs are being described as data then they must be happening before or maybe during the A/D conversion stage. If this is the case there may be a fault in the analogue stage on the way into the audio interface. Either way, it's likely to be hardware rather than software, assuming you are monitoring from tape (from the DAW) and you are sure the drop outs are on the way in and not the way out.
Splat, Win 10 64bit and all sorts of musical odds and sods collected over the years, but still missing a lot of my old analogue stuff I sold off years ago.
|
M@
Max Output Level: -86 dBFS
- Total Posts : 221
- Joined: 2015/01/07 17:58:56
- Location: Innsbruck, Austria
- Status: offline
Re: "Holes" in the recording - Why does SONAR not notice?
2017/08/03 06:53:16
(permalink)
If I understood OP correctly there is no silence but it seems as if a section of 2sec. has been "cut out" of the recording and the wave to the right of the cut has been shifted forward to close the gap. (Whoa a ripple-editing hardware device)
The question is which part of the chain starting from A/D has a 2*2second buffer which allows for a whole section of 2seconds to get lost/flushed without any "silence" being sent as "data".
What about monitoring through Sonar (not direct) Do you get a huge (+2second) delay?
What Firewire driver are you using. (Dell?/Microsoft Win10 version) Maybe try using the older "Legacy Firewire Driver" from Microsoft. I know on my Motherboard it shows much lower spikes on Latency checker than the newer Microsoft driver. It might "communicate" better.
Don't give up without a fight :)
Tracking: Sonar Platinum (X3 Producer, X2 studio, X1 expanded, 8.3) (64bit)System: Win10 Pro (64bit), Asus P8Z77 V Le Plus, I7-3770k, 16GB Ram, SSD System drive, Raid1 Recording & Backup drive, VS-700 Set, TC Konnekt 48Instruments: Roland Juno Stage, Kawai CA5, Washburn X50Pro, Blackstar-One100, Merida,...
|
THambrecht
Max Output Level: -73 dBFS
- Total Posts : 867
- Joined: 2010/12/10 06:42:03
- Location: Germany
- Status: offline
Re: "Holes" in the recording - Why does SONAR not notice?
2017/08/03 12:11:40
(permalink)
There is a checksum of posted and received data trough firewire. So if the connection (for example cable) fails, the checksum is wrong.This would end in connection lost. And the RME 800 doesnt tell SONAR where to position the data - Sonar only records the stream. And it's not up to the RME 800, because it works with an other computer. The question is: who kills up to 2 seconds of data without a gap in the streaming. As we can now say: An Original with 3:17 has after recording 3:15. Therefore SONAR is suspected - who shortens the recording? Who kills the 2 seconds?? It's as if a ghost has cut holes in the recording then joined the ends. (sync & caching is Trigger & Freewheel on all our devices - so only the stream is recorded without a clock) I will make another test, to see if the recording is stretched, if there is a delay .... Now I'm interessted in whats going on.
We digitize tapes, vinyl, dat, md ... in broadcast and studio quality for publishers, public institutions and individuals.4 x Intel Quad-CPU, 4GHz Sonar Platinum (Windows 10 - 64Bit) and 14 computers for recording tapes, vinyl ... 4 x RME Fireface 800, 2 x Roland Octa Capture and 4 x Roland Quad Capture, Focusrite .... Studer A80, RP99, EMT948 ... (Germany) http://www.hambrecht.de
|
M@
Max Output Level: -86 dBFS
- Total Posts : 221
- Joined: 2015/01/07 17:58:56
- Location: Innsbruck, Austria
- Status: offline
Re: "Holes" in the recording - Why does SONAR not notice?
2017/08/03 12:18:23
(permalink)
☼ Best Answerby THambrecht 2017/08/03 12:41:11
Yes, yes! 👍 Let's find out who stole 2seconds of vintage vinyl sound. The Bastards. Whoever it was I guess they knew it's priceless.....
* maybe Sonar noticed that your record player was turning slightly faster than 33 1/3 RPM and tried to compensate?
Tracking: Sonar Platinum (X3 Producer, X2 studio, X1 expanded, 8.3) (64bit)System: Win10 Pro (64bit), Asus P8Z77 V Le Plus, I7-3770k, 16GB Ram, SSD System drive, Raid1 Recording & Backup drive, VS-700 Set, TC Konnekt 48Instruments: Roland Juno Stage, Kawai CA5, Washburn X50Pro, Blackstar-One100, Merida,...
|
THambrecht
Max Output Level: -73 dBFS
- Total Posts : 867
- Joined: 2010/12/10 06:42:03
- Location: Germany
- Status: offline
Re: "Holes" in the recording - Why does SONAR not notice?
2017/08/03 12:46:04
(permalink)
@M@ Our turntable is a broadcast turntable EMT948. "Supposedly" the best of the world. Has been used in all european broadcasting stations. It runs more accurately as a switsch watch. Second hand (with system TSD15) 6.500$
We digitize tapes, vinyl, dat, md ... in broadcast and studio quality for publishers, public institutions and individuals.4 x Intel Quad-CPU, 4GHz Sonar Platinum (Windows 10 - 64Bit) and 14 computers for recording tapes, vinyl ... 4 x RME Fireface 800, 2 x Roland Octa Capture and 4 x Roland Quad Capture, Focusrite .... Studer A80, RP99, EMT948 ... (Germany) http://www.hambrecht.de
|
M@
Max Output Level: -86 dBFS
- Total Posts : 221
- Joined: 2015/01/07 17:58:56
- Location: Innsbruck, Austria
- Status: offline
Re: "Holes" in the recording - Why does SONAR not notice?
2017/08/03 13:02:39
(permalink)
Nice!
I can't imagine an overloaded HDD (wrong cache flushing) would create seamless and error free .wav files but that should be easy to check.
Tracking: Sonar Platinum (X3 Producer, X2 studio, X1 expanded, 8.3) (64bit)System: Win10 Pro (64bit), Asus P8Z77 V Le Plus, I7-3770k, 16GB Ram, SSD System drive, Raid1 Recording & Backup drive, VS-700 Set, TC Konnekt 48Instruments: Roland Juno Stage, Kawai CA5, Washburn X50Pro, Blackstar-One100, Merida,...
|
THambrecht
Max Output Level: -73 dBFS
- Total Posts : 867
- Joined: 2010/12/10 06:42:03
- Location: Germany
- Status: offline
Re: "Holes" in the recording - Why does SONAR not notice?
2017/08/03 13:24:52
(permalink)
OK here is the first TEST: SONAR looks into the future: The recording is ready before the end is played. The ghost is SONAR. At the end of the recording, a ghost from the Cakewalk team comes immediately and cuts a hole and joins the ends. Probably everyone laughs at this "joke". (I have turned off direct monitoring. The output of the turntable is synchron with the RME 800) My next test is updating from 2017.02 to the current version.
We digitize tapes, vinyl, dat, md ... in broadcast and studio quality for publishers, public institutions and individuals.4 x Intel Quad-CPU, 4GHz Sonar Platinum (Windows 10 - 64Bit) and 14 computers for recording tapes, vinyl ... 4 x RME Fireface 800, 2 x Roland Octa Capture and 4 x Roland Quad Capture, Focusrite .... Studer A80, RP99, EMT948 ... (Germany) http://www.hambrecht.de
|
Joe_A
Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
- Total Posts : 458
- Joined: 2008/07/06 23:16:14
- Status: offline
Re: "Holes" in the recording - Why does SONAR not notice?
2017/08/03 13:25:59
(permalink)
Ahhhhhh firewire...... although we love it when needed, continuous placing into new set ups is risky so why continue... This is copied from multiple current trade rags, Elegy for a dead technology
"Today FireWire is fading into memory. Thunderbolt took its place at the high end of the market. And at the volume end, USB 2.0 has given way to the much faster USB 3.0, which is now being replaced by USB-C.....etc etc. And Dell budget laptops for audio commercial set ups, why use Dell ?
And why put multiple set ups out in the field when there were no running systems being tested on the bench before putting in production? Make some hardware changed with known good systems, solving the problem, before hundreds of hours are spent in the weeds.
jambrose@cfl.rr.com Sonar Plat. Lifetime. Started in Sonar 4, each through 8.5.3PE. Scarlett 18i202nd gen., Edirol FA-101, M-Audio Firewire 410, AMD Phenom II 1045T six core processor, 8GB DDR3, AMD Radeon HD 6450, dual displays, 1.5 TB SATA HD, USB 2, Firewire 1394A, 1394B, 18/22 mixer, EV Q-66, Yamaha HS50M monitors, few guitars, Fender Cybertwin SE, Fender Cyber foot controller, Boss RC20-XL, misc pedals, etc. Win Home Prem 64 bit.
|
gswitz
Max Output Level: -18.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5694
- Joined: 2007/06/16 07:17:14
- Location: Richmond Virginia USA
- Status: offline
Re: "Holes" in the recording - Why does SONAR not notice?
2017/08/03 13:35:05
(permalink)
If you are recording with RME DigiCheck and you are messing with record enable buttons in sonar, you can lose what was in the buffer. You risk the data in the buffer, so bigger buffers means more obvious skips. This is basically RME driver issue. Don't fiddle with the driver while you are recording and you will not have the issue. Both Sonar and DigiCheck can be tricked this way. When you are multi tracking, all tracks are impacted identically.
post edited by gswitz - 2017/08/03 14:01:31
StudioCat > I use Windows 10 and Sonar Platinum. I have a touch screen. I make some videos. This one shows how to do a physical loopback on the RME UCX to get many more equalizer nodes.
|
THambrecht
Max Output Level: -73 dBFS
- Total Posts : 867
- Joined: 2010/12/10 06:42:03
- Location: Germany
- Status: offline
Re: "Holes" in the recording - Why does SONAR not notice?
2017/08/03 13:36:18
(permalink)
@ Joe_AYou are right. I end the tests. We had for years a working computer that records withe the RME 800 with no problems. We only wanted to save energy, so we took a laptop. It is difficult to find a laptop with Firewire, so we took the DELL. Therefore the DELL has to go - and we will continue to use the computer. Bye bye DELL, you get another job with an USB interface. But the question remains: Why does SONAR not notice that there is a piece missing?
We digitize tapes, vinyl, dat, md ... in broadcast and studio quality for publishers, public institutions and individuals.4 x Intel Quad-CPU, 4GHz Sonar Platinum (Windows 10 - 64Bit) and 14 computers for recording tapes, vinyl ... 4 x RME Fireface 800, 2 x Roland Octa Capture and 4 x Roland Quad Capture, Focusrite .... Studer A80, RP99, EMT948 ... (Germany) http://www.hambrecht.de
|
THambrecht
Max Output Level: -73 dBFS
- Total Posts : 867
- Joined: 2010/12/10 06:42:03
- Location: Germany
- Status: offline
Re: "Holes" in the recording - Why does SONAR not notice?
2017/08/03 13:50:55
(permalink)
@gswitz We don't use DigiCheck and we don't fiddle with the drivers. We noticed that "all" recordings from the last weeks are unusable. Because all recordings have holes. This does not explain why 2 seconds are missing and the record is 2 seconds shorter as the input recording. Sonar records a stream of 3:17 and has a clip with only 3:15. I would understand, if there were 2 seconds of silence or crackle, when the buffer of the firewire delivers nothing or nonsense. But a recorded stream of 3:17 must end in a clip with 3:17. Because the RME 800 tells no time code, so the recording of the stream must go on. Even when the firewire delivers nonsense.
We digitize tapes, vinyl, dat, md ... in broadcast and studio quality for publishers, public institutions and individuals.4 x Intel Quad-CPU, 4GHz Sonar Platinum (Windows 10 - 64Bit) and 14 computers for recording tapes, vinyl ... 4 x RME Fireface 800, 2 x Roland Octa Capture and 4 x Roland Quad Capture, Focusrite .... Studer A80, RP99, EMT948 ... (Germany) http://www.hambrecht.de
|
Joe_A
Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
- Total Posts : 458
- Joined: 2008/07/06 23:16:14
- Status: offline
Re: "Holes" in the recording - Why does SONAR not notice?
2017/08/03 13:51:07
(permalink)
IMHO the answer is in one of the circumstances already mentioned above, but which one? Or one very similar. Targeting that as a different problem and intentionally spending time there is a project for someone.
I think you've done well in resolving the Customer problem getting back with known good systems. And as we all do, learn and move forward....
jambrose@cfl.rr.com Sonar Plat. Lifetime. Started in Sonar 4, each through 8.5.3PE. Scarlett 18i202nd gen., Edirol FA-101, M-Audio Firewire 410, AMD Phenom II 1045T six core processor, 8GB DDR3, AMD Radeon HD 6450, dual displays, 1.5 TB SATA HD, USB 2, Firewire 1394A, 1394B, 18/22 mixer, EV Q-66, Yamaha HS50M monitors, few guitars, Fender Cybertwin SE, Fender Cyber foot controller, Boss RC20-XL, misc pedals, etc. Win Home Prem 64 bit.
|
THambrecht
Max Output Level: -73 dBFS
- Total Posts : 867
- Joined: 2010/12/10 06:42:03
- Location: Germany
- Status: offline
Re: "Holes" in the recording - Why does SONAR not notice?
2017/08/03 13:57:41
(permalink)
Thank you all. This problem can not be solved. Otherwise I - or the Cakewalk team - or DELL - would have to do a lot of work for testing.
We digitize tapes, vinyl, dat, md ... in broadcast and studio quality for publishers, public institutions and individuals.4 x Intel Quad-CPU, 4GHz Sonar Platinum (Windows 10 - 64Bit) and 14 computers for recording tapes, vinyl ... 4 x RME Fireface 800, 2 x Roland Octa Capture and 4 x Roland Quad Capture, Focusrite .... Studer A80, RP99, EMT948 ... (Germany) http://www.hambrecht.de
|
gswitz
Max Output Level: -18.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5694
- Joined: 2007/06/16 07:17:14
- Location: Richmond Virginia USA
- Status: offline
Re: "Holes" in the recording - Why does SONAR not notice?
2017/08/03 14:08:33
(permalink)
This would be appropriate in the RME forum too.
Personally, I think your problem isn't with Sonar. I think something is messing with your driver on that computer while you record. Human or code, idk.
For example, could concurrently watching Netflix cause this intermittently? Maybe.
StudioCat > I use Windows 10 and Sonar Platinum. I have a touch screen. I make some videos. This one shows how to do a physical loopback on the RME UCX to get many more equalizer nodes.
|
tlw
Max Output Level: -49.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2567
- Joined: 2008/10/11 22:06:32
- Location: West Midlands, UK
- Status: offline
Re: "Holes" in the recording - Why does SONAR not notice?
2017/08/03 14:16:48
(permalink)
Sorry if I'm asking the obvious...
Have you monitored the recordings through Sonar? If so, are their periods of silence while Sonar is recording that then get closed up post-recording?
Have you tried recording into e.g. Audacity or another wave editor? If so, does the same problem arise?
Edited to add - I use my UFX via a Thunderbolt to firewire adaptor on Mac and it performs excellently, but have never succeeded in getting it to work properly in WIndows using firewire, so for Windows I've always used the USB connections. Firewire in Windows is a very tempremental thing indeed.
Sonar Platinum 64bit, Windows 8.1 Pro 64bit, I7 3770K Ivybridge, 16GB Ram, Gigabyte Z77-D3H m/board, ATI 7750 graphics+ 1GB RAM, 2xIntel 520 series 220GB SSDs, 1 TB Samsung F3 + 1 TB WD HDDs, Seasonic fanless 460W psu, RME Fireface UFX, Focusrite Octopre. Assorted real synths, guitars, mandolins, diatonic accordions, percussion, fx and other stuff.
|
gswitz
Max Output Level: -18.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5694
- Joined: 2007/06/16 07:17:14
- Location: Richmond Virginia USA
- Status: offline
Re: "Holes" in the recording - Why does SONAR not notice?
2017/08/03 14:18:54
(permalink)
Just for more information, when I record videos of me using sonar where I'm recording the web cam, DigiCheck, and sonar all at once, I get this exact behavior and have to mix together different outputs to match up to the real time video.
To replicate, start recording in DigiCheck, open sonar and begin recording. You will notice the issue on the DigiCheck files.
This happens using USB. I think the problem is outside of how the interface is attached to the computer.
StudioCat > I use Windows 10 and Sonar Platinum. I have a touch screen. I make some videos. This one shows how to do a physical loopback on the RME UCX to get many more equalizer nodes.
|
THambrecht
Max Output Level: -73 dBFS
- Total Posts : 867
- Joined: 2010/12/10 06:42:03
- Location: Germany
- Status: offline
Re: "Holes" in the recording - Why does SONAR not notice?
2017/08/03 18:34:46
(permalink)
@tlw I have not monitored through SONAR. @gswitz All computers for recording tape or vinyl have no internet. Therefor no Netflix. This are computers just for recording. Nobody works on this computers. Work is done on our 4 large DAWs. (Recorded Data is moved over local Network) I say: A laptop that crashes by closing projects in SONAR has in any case a problem. If you want good results use professional devices - and not a DELL with a bulitin firewire card. The RME 800 is 9 years old. At that time 2008 we recorded 1100 vinyl for the German National Library with Windows XP, Sonar 6, and Pentium 2 with 800MHz and this RME 800. NO HOLES. And now it does not work with Windows 10, DELL, DUAL Processor and 2,5 GHz. This is a shame. I would assume that the DELL should have a better firewire card as the very old computer for 9 years. This is no progress. Now there is back the old working computer Dual Core 3,4GHz. The old computer has a very good firewire interface card and all works perfect. I don't have the time to check why the DELL has such issues. And I don't can check hours of recorded material to find "holes". We are under pressure through our customers.
We digitize tapes, vinyl, dat, md ... in broadcast and studio quality for publishers, public institutions and individuals.4 x Intel Quad-CPU, 4GHz Sonar Platinum (Windows 10 - 64Bit) and 14 computers for recording tapes, vinyl ... 4 x RME Fireface 800, 2 x Roland Octa Capture and 4 x Roland Quad Capture, Focusrite .... Studer A80, RP99, EMT948 ... (Germany) http://www.hambrecht.de
|
M@
Max Output Level: -86 dBFS
- Total Posts : 221
- Joined: 2015/01/07 17:58:56
- Location: Innsbruck, Austria
- Status: offline
Re: "Holes" in the recording - Why does SONAR not notice?
2017/08/04 07:25:43
(permalink)
You have a solution! Good. Continue getting the work done.
You can send the Dell to me.....
Tracking: Sonar Platinum (X3 Producer, X2 studio, X1 expanded, 8.3) (64bit)System: Win10 Pro (64bit), Asus P8Z77 V Le Plus, I7-3770k, 16GB Ram, SSD System drive, Raid1 Recording & Backup drive, VS-700 Set, TC Konnekt 48Instruments: Roland Juno Stage, Kawai CA5, Washburn X50Pro, Blackstar-One100, Merida,...
|
THambrecht
Max Output Level: -73 dBFS
- Total Posts : 867
- Joined: 2010/12/10 06:42:03
- Location: Germany
- Status: offline
Re: "Holes" in the recording - Why does SONAR not notice?
2017/08/04 10:41:51
(permalink)
I believe, that the firewirecard makes sometimes a pause (cable, hardware, overload, driver ...?) and in this pause SONAR stops intern to record the stream - then continues recording as soon the firewire delivers new data. Actually there should be a silent passage in the recording. There is no other way to explain why input stream 3:17 is shortened to a length of 3:15 with a hole or "cut" in the stream. My problem is however to exclude this in future. Therefore a "cancellation" in the recording or a warning would be helpful, when data is not received for a short moment.
We digitize tapes, vinyl, dat, md ... in broadcast and studio quality for publishers, public institutions and individuals.4 x Intel Quad-CPU, 4GHz Sonar Platinum (Windows 10 - 64Bit) and 14 computers for recording tapes, vinyl ... 4 x RME Fireface 800, 2 x Roland Octa Capture and 4 x Roland Quad Capture, Focusrite .... Studer A80, RP99, EMT948 ... (Germany) http://www.hambrecht.de
|