taccess
Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
- Total Posts : 534
- Joined: 2015/01/11 19:14:36
- Status: offline
Cakewalk ! The Way Forward ?
I like the updates each month and fixes and new plug ins etc etc by Cakewalk, i appreciate them and no matter what they are its always a nice addition moving forward. Maybe there is another thread already however it has to be the future and time for Cakewalk to introduce a new Application Language for Sonar Platinum that opens Platinum up and allows user/programmers to also shape Sonar Platinum's future. We are dealing with some stiff competition at the moment "Apples immense fortune and its unlimited DAW $ supply" or "Ableton with Cycling 74 which allows there users to make apps that have opened Ableton UP and it is growing daily ", or other DAWs with feature based Directions/Updates which again users from other DAWs take notice of and should be able to have in there DAW if possible , or the fact that most these other DAWs having different platforms to run on also has some impact on the competition. Now i will say this is not a "competition" but the fact that the more Cakewalk customers there are the more money that can be spent on Cakewalk users, be it updates tutorials, customer service etc etc. I am thinking if they do this then most of those ideas at the bakery may come through by users monthly/weekly/daily etc etc and it will be super inviting to potential customers. I am not saying that Cakewalk should become a "full transparent" open source code application but what about semi transparent or introducing a new Current language where users help shape the future of platinum. My idea is a bit like this and i would encourage any users to help me as i am not a specialist with the different coding or languages available however i know they are powerful and unlimited, and we need to work together to help cakewalk see this as the way forward. My thought is this in the simplest explanation, imagine if i could write language and cakewalk introduced a "New" "Current" "Superior" "Application Language" that allowed me to add any idea at the bakery into platinum myself. The Future: Imagine if cakewalk added a New " CAKESON " application. That Cakeson application always has the latest updated Sonar Platinum code and when you start the Cakeson application and entered each step of your idea into that Cakeson application it would make the necessary code for your idea step by step ( being that each users step entered into the application is possible , which would automatically write the code and make available the next step, similar to a choose your own adventure < if you remember those books ). I saw a Docu about a machine "Watson" that answered double jeopardy questions, the way forward was to let Watson learn itself and i cant see why a Cakeson application with this principle of knowing all of platinum's code and teaching itself to learn how to write and join code itself as each Sonar Platinum update is fed into Cakeson by cakewalk Bakers each month cant work also. Yes the machine would be at cakewalk headquarters but would connect via application and internet to the users and allow the users "successful "ideas to be an available option for everyone. This would keep Sonar Platinum code "Private" for Cakewalk but allow users to add any ideas and those ideas cant be hidden from other users either so a win win situation for cakewalks and the users . I can see this as a self growing DAW that would make every competitor envious and everyone would want to be apart of that. Yes this can be done overnight and will cost some money but looking into it by cakewalk will be the ultimate way forward i believe. One last thing the documentary is called : NOVA - Official Website | Smartest Machine on EarthTowards the end of the documentary there is a real time language converting app that also used the same principle of learning itself to be a super powerful travel companion and who wants to travel without it. My point is made. Please watch the documentary if you have some time.
z800 Dual x5690 NvME 256gb 950Pro / Win10 LSI MegaRaid Nvidia 450 GTS 96GB 1366MHZ RME Babyface
|
gswitz
Max Output Level: -18.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5694
- Joined: 2007/06/16 07:17:14
- Location: Richmond Virginia USA
- Status: offline
Re: Cakewalk ! The Way Forward ?
2017/09/30 11:20:39
(permalink)
☄ Helpfulby bapu 2017/10/02 21:12:06
If we allow machines to automate scripting, soon they will automate mixing. Next, question the usefulness of all these humans. Next, fumigate.
It's all downhill. Better to hope for a coffee mug.
StudioCat > I use Windows 10 and Sonar Platinum. I have a touch screen. I make some videos. This one shows how to do a physical loopback on the RME UCX to get many more equalizer nodes.
|
Audioicon
Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
- Total Posts : 349
- Joined: 2016/06/13 23:25:25
- Status: offline
Re: Cakewalk ! The Way Forward ?
2017/10/01 02:00:15
(permalink)
taccess I like the updates each month and fixes and new plug ins etc etc by Cakewalk, i appreciate them and no matter what they are its always a nice addition moving forward. Maybe there is another thread already however it has to be the future and time for Cakewalk to introduce a new Application Language for Sonar Platinum that opens Platinum up and allows user/programmers to also shape Sonar Platinum's future. We are dealing with some stiff competition at the moment "Apples immense fortune and its unlimited DAW $ supply" or "Ableton with Cycling 74 which allows there users to make apps that have opened Ableton UP and it is growing daily ", or other DAWs with feature based Directions/Updates which again users from other DAWs take notice of and should be able to have in there DAW if possible , or the fact that most these other DAWs having different platforms to run on also has some impact on the competition. Now i will say this is not a "competition" but the fact that the more Cakewalk customers there are the more money that can be spent on Cakewalk users, be it updates tutorials, customer service etc etc. I am thinking if they do this then most of those ideas at the bakery may come through by users monthly/weekly/daily etc etc and it will be super inviting to potential customers. I am not saying that Cakewalk should become a "full transparent" open source code application but what about semi transparent or introducing a new Current language where users help shape the future of platinum. My idea is a bit like this and i would encourage any users to help me as i am not a specialist with the different coding or languages available however i know they are powerful and unlimited, and we need to work together to help cakewalk see this as the way forward. My thought is this in the simplest explanation, imagine if i could write language and cakewalk introduced a "New" "Current" "Superior" "Application Language" that allowed me to add any idea at the bakery into platinum myself. The Future: Imagine if cakewalk added a New " CAKESON " application. That Cakeson application always has the latest updated Sonar Platinum code and when you start the Cakeson application and entered each step of your idea into that Cakeson application it would make the necessary code for your idea step by step ( being that each users step entered into the application is possible , which would automatically write the code and make available the next step, similar to a choose your own adventure < if you remember those books ). I saw a Docu about a machine "Watson" that answered double jeopardy questions, the way forward was to let Watson learn itself and i cant see why a Cakeson application with this principle of knowing all of platinum's code and teaching itself to learn how to write and join code itself as each Sonar Platinum update is fed into Cakeson by cakewalk Bakers each month cant work also. Yes the machine would be at cakewalk headquarters but would connect via application and internet to the users and allow the users "successful "ideas to be an available option for everyone. This would keep Sonar Platinum code "Private" for Cakewalk but allow users to add any ideas and those ideas cant be hidden from other users either so a win win situation for cakewalks and the users . I can see this as a self growing DAW that would make every competitor envious and everyone would want to be apart of that. Yes this can be done overnight and will cost some money but looking into it by cakewalk will be the ultimate way forward i believe. One last thing the documentary is called :NOVA - Official Website | Smartest Machine on Earth Towards the end of the documentary there is a real time language converting app that also used the same principle of learning itself to be a super powerful travel companion and who wants to travel without it. My point is made. Please watch the documentary if you have some time.
Ahhh... WHAT?!!!
|
Tim Flannagin
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
- Total Posts : 132
- Joined: 2015/01/28 16:50:14
- Location: Baton Rouge, Louisiana
- Status: offline
Re: Cakewalk ! The Way Forward ?
2017/10/01 03:47:21
(permalink)
☄ Helpfulby outland144k 2017/10/01 05:57:23
I may have to start drinking more (or less). I'm not really sure after reading this post.
Dell Precision T5400, 2 Xeon E5420 CPUs, 32 GB ram, 1 X 750 GB HDD, 2 X 1TB HDD, Nvidia GTX750 , M-Audio 1010LT, Roland GR-55, Novation SL MKII 49 , Arturia MiniLab, Arturia Spark Creative Drum Controller, '77 Gibson Les Paul Artistan, Epiphone Les Paul Studio w/ GK-3, Fender Stratocaster, Dean Exotica Acoustic, Cakewalk Sonar Platinum Lifetime, Arturia Synths galore!, Cakewalk Synths galore!, M-Audio BX-5a monitors, a couple of cheap mikes, a dubious quality desk, several shady characters hanging in the studio, etc....
|
Audioicon
Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
- Total Posts : 349
- Joined: 2016/06/13 23:25:25
- Status: offline
Re: Cakewalk ! The Way Forward ?
2017/10/01 05:29:57
(permalink)
Tim Flannagin I may have to start drinking more (or less). I'm not really sure after reading this post.
There goes your music career.
|
pwalpwal
Max Output Level: -43 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3249
- Joined: 2015/01/17 03:52:50
- Status: offline
Re: Cakewalk ! The Way Forward ?
2017/10/01 13:08:30
(permalink)
it's unlikely cakewalk'll develop and release an ai-enabled sonar any time soon, but i've been wrong before
|
S.L.I.P.
Max Output Level: -72 dBFS
- Total Posts : 949
- Joined: 2004/07/10 18:00:29
- Status: offline
Re: Cakewalk ! The Way Forward ?
2017/10/01 19:02:18
(permalink)
|
mettelus
Max Output Level: -22 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5321
- Joined: 2005/08/05 03:19:25
- Location: Maryland, USA
- Status: offline
Re: Cakewalk ! The Way Forward ?
2017/10/01 22:03:52
(permalink)
☄ Helpfulby clintmartin 2017/10/01 22:18:51
Unfortunately, everyone wants to contribute and there is no good reference to what does what (exactly). CAL scripts is one example of this. There are a LOT that have been made, but finding and choosing them is awkward. Samples, loops, and presets fall into a similar category... trying to find the handful of useful things in a pile of thousands (literally in many cases) often amounts to a waste of time.
ASUS ROG Maximus X Hero (Wi-Fi AC), i7-8700k, 16GB RAM, GTX-1070Ti, Win 10 Pro, Saffire PRO 24 DSP, A-300 PRO, plus numerous gadgets and gizmos that make or manipulate sound in some way.
|
Cactus Music
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 8424
- Joined: 2004/02/09 21:34:04
- Status: offline
Re: Cakewalk ! The Way Forward ?
2017/10/02 16:06:52
(permalink)
mettelus Unfortunately, everyone wants to contribute and there is no good reference to what does what (exactly). CAL scripts is one example of this. There are a LOT that have been made, but finding and choosing them is awkward. Samples, loops, and presets fall into a similar category... trying to find the handful of useful things in a pile of thousands (literally in many cases) often amounts to a waste of time.
+1
|
bapu
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 86000
- Joined: 2006/11/25 21:23:28
- Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
- Status: offline
Re: Cakewalk ! The Way Forward ?
2017/10/02 21:13:20
(permalink)
☄ Helpfulby gswitz 2017/10/08 10:38:40
gswitz Better to hope for a coffee mug.
And we all know that will happen right after cows can fly to the moon in a CW Hovercar.
|
jpetersen
Max Output Level: -61 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1499
- Joined: 2015/07/11 20:22:53
- Status: offline
Re: Cakewalk ! The Way Forward ?
2017/10/02 21:23:10
(permalink)
I'd be happy if the Bakers just took a moment to clarify the CAL API specification.
|
...wicked
Max Output Level: -1.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 7360
- Joined: 2003/12/18 01:00:56
- Location: Seattle
- Status: offline
Re: Cakewalk ! The Way Forward ?
2017/10/02 21:30:43
(permalink)
☄ Helpfulby taccess 2017/10/02 23:48:47
I like that this original msg could've read "We could use a full-featured scripting layer in SONAR." But I appreciate the passion!
=========== The Fog People =========== Intel i7-4790 16GB RAM ASUS Z97 Roland OctaCapture Win10/64 SONAR Platinum 64-bit billions VSTs, some of which work
|
taccess
Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
- Total Posts : 534
- Joined: 2015/01/11 19:14:36
- Status: offline
Re: Cakewalk ! The Way Forward ?
2017/10/03 00:33:16
(permalink)
...wicked I like that this original msg could've read "We could use a full-featured scripting layer in SONAR." But I appreciate the passion!
.....wicked: a full featured scripting Layer in Sonar ! Nice ! Is this an updated version of CAL “ which I would be happy with “ because I would also like to see a real time processing language Layer in Sonar “ say for users to built Sonar specific apps or add features and I guess the main thing here is if Sonar adds a language Layer for users that’s its the latest greatest language so it resonates with current times. I bet there are a bunch of users who would like a certain Language added, and I bet adding a new languages opens windows for users to change Sonar for the better. Sonar adding features that allows users to add features is the way forward, not doing that right now is a big mistake in my eyes.
z800 Dual x5690 NvME 256gb 950Pro / Win10 LSI MegaRaid Nvidia 450 GTS 96GB 1366MHZ RME Babyface
|
whitejs
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 89
- Joined: 2004/10/18 23:00:18
- Location: Columbus, Ohio
- Status: offline
Re: Cakewalk ! The Way Forward ?
2017/10/03 03:09:04
(permalink)
☄ Helpfulby taccess 2017/10/03 03:28:39
You vets here have to be careful not to cheaply, glibly fart your way into alienating earnest posts. I've always noticed this about this place, and it can be petty and silly. Man-up and stay out of a thread that you don't have any constructive input for. The rest makes you look shallow, judgemental and low. Now, for sure, the cracks on me will begin. All I can say is look at yourself and ask if you help and contribute, or smack BS to feel better about yourself in this social illusion. Get back to music computing.
|
lfm
Max Output Level: -53 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2216
- Joined: 2005/01/24 05:35:33
- Location: Sweden
- Status: offline
Re: Cakewalk ! The Way Forward ?
2017/10/03 09:31:43
(permalink)
☄ Helpfulby taccess 2017/10/03 11:54:50
BlueCatAudio has Plug'n Script plugin - but have not tried it. But more extensive than CAL for sure. Thinking making midi scripts - realtime. But since this is VST and not DX interface, we cannot insert it into midi plugin bays. Always wondered, and had feature request years ago on this: Sonar support both VST and DX plugins for audio tracks. Why not same for midi tracks? MFX is DirectX technology. We could then run both VST midi plugins, like InsertPizHere stuff, and this Plug'n Script. There used to be a CAL forum, and some really helpful people there heling out to make scripts, even a CAL editor which was cool. Why did it disappear? Cubase has these Logical Editors(one for midi and one for project) - which is like kind of scripting but in a wizard style. Not anywhere close as flexible as scripting language, but idea is good. Dialog driven interface that helps you along a bit to get started - but does not generate a script you can modify at all. I've seen implementations for scripting languages that offer a wizard style interface that works really well for beginners - but it really under the hood generate a full script. So it's free for anybody to extend and use to full flexibility as you learn. This was a programming language for communications program, to login and automate things etc . But as a principle it's terrific idea: a) make wizard to generate a script This style is common in many query situations in software - like my email program has to search for various conditions in mails to filter out what you want. Everybody understand and can use that. b) allow free writing of script as well I had(company sold now) a scripting language for my product, a technical analysis program for stockmarket - that also had this assistant to generate a script for the real beginner. Then you start modifying this as you learn the structure. It's a really cool way to introduce somebody to such a complex task.
|
taccess
Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
- Total Posts : 534
- Joined: 2015/01/11 19:14:36
- Status: offline
Re: Cakewalk ! The Way Forward ?
2017/10/03 12:36:46
(permalink)
Lfm: good idea, it gave me a thought that cakewalk could add a wizard, like a so to speak “starting” point from under the hood type wizard for the cakewalk users to then allow free writing of script from there ! This wizard could have different templates which could either start at different locations under the platinum hood ( and prior to that starting point it is hidden for cakewalk privacy or program protection purposes) or be ( pre ready templates). I am sure with this available cakewalk users would also create and share pre made ready templates or new features which is the main idea of this post to allow users to help grow cakewalk in directions cakewalk are not focusing on or by allowing cakewalk users to program language from those certain “under the hood “ points which cakewalk can determine “semi open source code application” which can only change cakewalk for the [GREATer]
Imagine they do! And some users who are great at coding decide to do some special things, cakewalk will be rolling around in a new buzz that will totaly benifit them and us or like me I will further my language skills, I will find time to add a couple hours here and there in between my music .
There’s only benefits by cakewalk adding this in and continuing the momentum of the monthly updates, they do a fantastic job at and I am extremely grateful for.
z800 Dual x5690 NvME 256gb 950Pro / Win10 LSI MegaRaid Nvidia 450 GTS 96GB 1366MHZ RME Babyface
|
jimfogle
Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
- Total Posts : 463
- Joined: 2007/03/14 10:08:19
- Location: North Carolina USA
- Status: offline
Re: Cakewalk ! The Way Forward ?
2017/10/04 16:50:38
(permalink)
Does CAL scripts function in current Sonar products or is CAL functionality obsolete? If it's available, why not return the CAL forum? Why not put together a knowledge guide and tutorials about the feature?
|
scook
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 24146
- Joined: 2005/07/27 13:43:57
- Location: TX
- Status: offline
Re: Cakewalk ! The Way Forward ?
2017/10/04 16:55:35
(permalink)
|
azslow3
Max Output Level: -42.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3297
- Joined: 2012/06/22 19:27:51
- Location: Germany
- Status: offline
Re: Cakewalk ! The Way Forward ?
2017/10/04 17:59:42
(permalink)
So far: * there was and is CAL. That is offline only processor but it has features possible in offline only (I mean some functionality is impossible in real-time one track oriented MFX/ MIDI VST frameworks): there was more developers, there is less now. * there was and is MFX. The API is open source, with examples. Not all (I mean not even all essential...) tricks are explained, but for some use cases everything is rather clean. Unlike CAL, that can be used "on the fly". Unlike CAL, some offline, especially multi-track, processing is not possible. There was some developers, there is no one now. Some users have claimed, the problem is in C++... and requested some binding. One user has requested Lua binding. I have written it... so far no one tried it, not even the person who has requested it! * VST and MFX was established as a DAW independent possibility to extend MIDI/Audio processing functionality, available for everyone. How many VSTs from Cakewalk community was developed? I can remember one... * Control Surface API is open source since very long time. It does not allow to control the content of the project (at least not directly), but it allows to control Sonar. There was just several people which have tried to use that, there are still just several people. * Sonar customization was developed long before it become official. * every interfere with (close to) real-time DAW processing (even MIDI, even Surface), made by not experienced programmers, is an easy way to make Sonar unstable, up to crashes and freezes. It is not an easy job to make a bullet prove protection against misbehavior of user scripts in general (in some cases simpler then in other... I have implemented such protection in the Lua MFX). And so there are just several people which really want to develop something, only subset of them which really can. Who was serious, has achieved some results (CAL scripts, MFXes, Control Surfaces, customization). So IMHO: an idea to invest huge effort just to attract a bunch of noobs by the fact they cat mess a bit with Sonar internals is pointless.
Sonar 8LE -> Platinum infinity, REAPER, Windows 10 pro GA-EP35-DS3L, E7500, 4GB, GTX 1050 Ti, 2x500GB RME Babyface Pro (M-Audio Audiophile Firewire/410, VS-20), Kawai CN43, TD-11, Roland A500S, Akai MPK Mini, Keystation Pro, etc. www.azslow.com - Control Surface Integration Platform for SONAR, ReaCWP, AOSC and other accessibility tools
|
lfm
Max Output Level: -53 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2216
- Joined: 2005/01/24 05:35:33
- Location: Sweden
- Status: offline
Re: Cakewalk ! The Way Forward ?
2017/10/04 18:18:36
(permalink)
azslow3 So IMHO: an idea to invest huge effort just to attract a bunch of noobs by the fact they cat mess a bit with Sonar internals is pointless.
May that is the reality of it all. But what would benefit Sonar for sure - make VST midi plugins load in MFX slots - just like DX and VST audio plugins load in audio track plugin slots. You have to use wrappers like Patchwork or Metaplugin today to solve multi synth stuff in a smooth way. There you can load a bunch of synths and VST midi plugins as well and do almost anything you can come up with. Or extend patch points so support midi - then we are home regarding this. And we can make a nice track template to do that stuff. Or Cubase style with midi sends from midi tracks.
Cubase Pro 9 with SA2015 as backup - W7 i7 2.8GHz 16G GeForce GT 730 - RME HDSP 9632 + AI4S
|
azslow3
Max Output Level: -42.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3297
- Joined: 2012/06/22 19:27:51
- Location: Germany
- Status: offline
Re: Cakewalk ! The Way Forward ?
2017/10/04 20:28:25
(permalink)
lfm But what would benefit Sonar for sure - make VST midi plugins load in MFX slots - just like DX and VST audio plugins load in audio track plugin slots.
Yes. But... Following IMHO (at the level of speculations) comes from: * DX and VST use quite different approaches with MIDI. VST "quantize" MIDI at audio buffer borders and work with "raw" MIDI messages. DX has artificial quantization which unavoidable introduce logical bugs (original design problem) and works with "aggregated" MIDI events ( so "Note On + Note Off -> Note + duration"). (DX also use raw messages for live processing since "duration" is obviously not known) * internally Sonar works with MIDI in DX framework and just "export" into VST like domain at the very end. Indirect proves: MFX is DX only, some bugs (Yamaha sustain, playback buffer influence on skipped notes, etc.) can only exists in DX way, Lyrics/Text directly accessible in MFX "as is" So a major change in sonar engine is required, in the part which was not really touched since many many years (developers? licenses?). An attempt to make "aux" like dirty hack can break much more then related Audio functionality, for which Sends exist from the beginning (so corresponding machinery was foreseen). I hope CW will do this one lucky day. I mean rewrite MIDI engine. I guess everything appear "at once" then: MIDI VST, audio like routing flexibility, absolute time MIDI events locks, updated staff and lyrics views, etc. That can also lead to "negative" changes: discarded DX/MFXes (no more TTS-1 ??), broken CAL scripts ...
Sonar 8LE -> Platinum infinity, REAPER, Windows 10 pro GA-EP35-DS3L, E7500, 4GB, GTX 1050 Ti, 2x500GB RME Babyface Pro (M-Audio Audiophile Firewire/410, VS-20), Kawai CN43, TD-11, Roland A500S, Akai MPK Mini, Keystation Pro, etc. www.azslow.com - Control Surface Integration Platform for SONAR, ReaCWP, AOSC and other accessibility tools
|
taccess
Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
- Total Posts : 534
- Joined: 2015/01/11 19:14:36
- Status: offline
Re: Cakewalk ! The Way Forward ?
2017/10/05 08:16:09
(permalink)
azslow3
lfm But what would benefit Sonar for sure - make VST midi plugins load in MFX slots - just like DX and VST audio plugins load in audio track plugin slots.
Yes. But... Following IMHO (at the level of speculations) comes from: * DX and VST use quite different approaches with MIDI. VST "quantize" MIDI at audio buffer borders and work with "raw" MIDI messages. DX has artificial quantization which unavoidable introduce logical bugs (original design problem) and works with "aggregated" MIDI events ( so "Note On + Note Off -> Note + duration"). (DX also use raw messages for live processing since "duration" is obviously not known) * internally Sonar works with MIDI in DX framework and just "export" into VST like domain at the very end. Indirect proves: MFX is DX only, some bugs (Yamaha sustain, playback buffer influence on skipped notes, etc.) can only exists in DX way, Lyrics/Text directly accessible in MFX "as is" So a major change in sonar engine is required, in the part which was not really touched since many many years (developers? licenses?). An attempt to make "aux" like dirty hack can break much more then related Audio functionality, for which Sends exist from the beginning (so corresponding machinery was foreseen). I hope CW will do this one lucky day. I mean rewrite MIDI engine. I guess everything appear "at once" then: MIDI VST, audio like routing flexibility, absolute time MIDI events locks, updated staff and lyrics views, etc. That can also lead to "negative" changes: discarded DX/MFXes (no more TTS-1 ??), broken CAL scripts ...
I hope cakewalk does update the midi engine then, because being able to load a VST into MFX or introducing midi sends/midi patch points and having the “new”midi engine in a state of “repair” to roll with the monthly updates now “freely being able to “add even more is well worth the negatives changes, by FARrrrrrrrr. Also I am sure there has to be another way regarding these or any changes in cakewalk, hitting brick walls is the reason to climb them or break through or simply go around them, that’s what I have to do every day of my whole life so I hope this is what cakewalk does for us users “first” if this is what is needed. There is to much to offer or introduce into Sonar right now and what those things are will not land on there lap magically, there are new languages being written there are programs and apps which may benifit specific companies when combined with existing applications and it vital to be on the look out and be forward thinking in there field this is exactly how Microsoft was made and this is what companies are doing right now to turn there companies into something greater. It is also vital to not let anything stop cakewalk storming forward be it coding updates with negative changes, or licence/s or finances when times are tough push back harder then ever and work harder than ever and those times and feelings are what get etched into the soul of Sonar and its users.
z800 Dual x5690 NvME 256gb 950Pro / Win10 LSI MegaRaid Nvidia 450 GTS 96GB 1366MHZ RME Babyface
|
bapu
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 86000
- Joined: 2006/11/25 21:23:28
- Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
- Status: offline
Re: Cakewalk ! The Way Forward ?
2017/10/05 18:33:42
(permalink)
whitejs The rest makes you look shallow
|