revnice1
Max Output Level: -69 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1082
- Joined: 2007/09/21 14:43:56
- Status: offline
Hookup Help
My singers always ask me if they can hear more of their voice when singing, so I bought the Mackie Mix 5. There's one manual for 3 models and hookups are not shown for the Mix 5. In this diagram, which shows the Mix 8, there are two players and a singer hooked up, the whole thing is balanced in the mixer and sent to the computer. https://ibb.co/dST74c Which is not what I'm trying to get. I want the singer to hear more of himself. If the music and the mic go into the mixer, you can control how much of each you hear - but the outputs will bring that mix back to the computer and I'll end up with a vocal track that also contains the music. If I leave the mic in the MOTU interface and send just the music to the mixer, how does the singer hear both sources on one set of headphones. Do I have the right device for this? Thanks - rev
|
tecknot
Max Output Level: -75 dBFS
- Total Posts : 766
- Joined: 2004/10/31 17:09:29
- Status: offline
Re: Hookup Help
2018/03/22 23:29:34
(permalink)
From what little I can glean from the Mackie website for the Mix5, you are very limited with what you can do as far as sending out a separate mix to your singer. It appears that you cannot create a separate mix at all and there seems to be only one single output as far as a mix is concerned (both Main outs and headphones sharing the same mix). The only workaround I can see is if you were to use a stereo DI splitter for the mic (or stereo preamp) and pan the balance to a preferred volume to one side. Then take the output of the DI with the lower volume into the Mix5's mic input (you can compensate for the lower volume with the mixer's gain pot) and the louder output (with an appropriate RCA adapters for the) into the Tape input for the headphones. This is something I would have done back in the day with limited resources. This isn't ideal, but it might be good enough to satisfy your singer. Sorry but that's the best I can think of. Kind regards, tecknot
|
chuckebaby
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 13146
- Joined: 2011/01/04 14:55:28
- Status: offline
Re: Hookup Help
2018/03/22 23:55:05
(permalink)
Didn't you ask the same exact question 5 weeks ago ? http://forum.cakewalk.com/Best-way-to-connect-submixer-m3730091.aspx#3730228 You need to create a submix using the outputs on your MOTU (a stereo mix to 2 channels on the Mixer and a VOX mix to one channel). what If the music and the mic go into the mixer, you can control how much of each you hear - but the outputs will bring that mix back to the computer and I'll end up with a vocal track that also contains the music. Im not sure why on earth you would bring the mixers outputs back to the MOTU for recording. The microphone for VOX should be the only thing you are concerned with and that should be the mic going directly into the MOTU for direct recording. At no point would I use the Mic Pres on that little mixer for recording. your MOTU's pre amps are 1000 times better. The mixer should essentially be just a device for a sub mix and not put in the recording path at all.
Windows 8.1 X64 Sonar Platinum x64 Custom built: Asrock z97 1150 - Intel I7 4790k - 16GB corsair DDR3 1600 - PNY SSD 220GBFocusrite Saffire 18I8 - Mackie Control
|
revnice1
Max Output Level: -69 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1082
- Joined: 2007/09/21 14:43:56
- Status: offline
Re: Hookup Help
2018/03/23 00:04:48
(permalink)
>Didn't you ask the same exact question 5 weeks ago ? Yes I did, but I didn't get anywhere and I put it aside (for 5 weeks). Now that I'm sitting down to the task again, I'm not getting anywhere again. I can't get past the fact that the main outs carry all the sounds that went in. The vocal track would include the music the singer is listening to. Sure, you can put in different sources and control the the mix between them all, but you can't get JUST the vocal out. I think I just bought another doorstop.
|
revnice1
Max Output Level: -69 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1082
- Joined: 2007/09/21 14:43:56
- Status: offline
Re: Hookup Help
2018/03/23 00:08:01
(permalink)
>I'm not sure why on earth you would bring the mixers outputs back to the MOTU for recording. I don't want to and I'm not trying to, the Makie sounds like ****. I leave the mic in the MOTU and send music to the mixer but how does the singer hear both sources?
|
msmcleod
Max Output Level: -72 dBFS
- Total Posts : 920
- Joined: 2004/01/27 07:15:30
- Location: Scotland
- Status: offline
Re: Hookup Help
2018/03/23 00:16:27
(permalink)
I'm assuming your MOTU has more than just a stereo out here, but the way to do it is: MOTU Output 1 & 2 (Main outputs) -> your monitors MOTU Output 3 & 4 -> your Mix5 mixer (with your singer's headphones plugged into it) Create a separate bus within Sonar, and set it's output to MOTU Outputs 3 & 4. You can then send anything you want to that bus, whilst adjusting the level of each instrument (i.e. louder vocals) without affecting the main mix. If you've not got separate outs on the MOTU, then that's what you need. M.
|
revnice1
Max Output Level: -69 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1082
- Joined: 2007/09/21 14:43:56
- Status: offline
Re: Hookup Help
2018/03/23 00:20:21
(permalink)
M: That sounds hopeful! I do have a ton of spare INs and OUTs on the MOTU. I'll give it a shot and post back. Thanks - rev
|
msmcleod
Max Output Level: -72 dBFS
- Total Posts : 920
- Joined: 2004/01/27 07:15:30
- Location: Scotland
- Status: offline
Re: Hookup Help
2018/03/23 00:22:36
(permalink)
If you've got more outputs, you could send the vocals on an additional MOTU output, and connect that to the Mix5 as well - that way your singer can adjust the levels themselves directly on the Mix5. M.
|
revnice1
Max Output Level: -69 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1082
- Joined: 2007/09/21 14:43:56
- Status: offline
Re: Hookup Help
2018/03/23 00:25:07
(permalink)
So in the above config, I wouldn't need to create a bus in Sonar?
|
gswitz
Max Output Level: -18.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5694
- Joined: 2007/06/16 07:17:14
- Location: Richmond Virginia USA
- Status: offline
Re: Hookup Help
2018/03/23 00:35:11
(permalink)
Hey there. Interesting idea, giving the singer control over their own relative to the mix. :-) You can send the stereo pair of outputs from your Motu to the mixer. Send the vocals direct out to another input on the mixer. The singer can listen to headphones plugged into the mixer and raise and lower faders to get the mix she likes best. I don't see why this wouldn't work just fine. I'm tempted to say more, but I'm going to stop here.
StudioCat > I use Windows 10 and Sonar Platinum. I have a touch screen. I make some videos. This one shows how to do a physical loopback on the RME UCX to get many more equalizer nodes.
|
revnice1
Max Output Level: -69 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1082
- Joined: 2007/09/21 14:43:56
- Status: offline
Re: Hookup Help
2018/03/23 01:30:23
(permalink)
>You can send the stereo pair of outputs from your Motu to the mixer. >Send the vocals direct out to another input on the mixer. Right, but it won't work because the main outs from the MOTU carry all sound, that means you'll hear the vocal with the music output. I know because I just tried that. Lowering the main, lowers the vocal as well, even when there's a separate vocal input from the MOTU. There has to be a bus in Sonar that allows you to send all but the vocal. Then it should work. I haven't done it yet but I think msm (above) nailed it with the bus idea, that gives me two separate sources so I can affect one without affecting the other.
|
gswitz
Max Output Level: -18.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5694
- Joined: 2007/06/16 07:17:14
- Location: Richmond Virginia USA
- Status: offline
Re: Hookup Help
2018/03/23 02:00:37
(permalink)
@Chuck >> No disrespect. You nailed it in your post.
StudioCat > I use Windows 10 and Sonar Platinum. I have a touch screen. I make some videos. This one shows how to do a physical loopback on the RME UCX to get many more equalizer nodes.
|
gswitz
Max Output Level: -18.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5694
- Joined: 2007/06/16 07:17:14
- Location: Richmond Virginia USA
- Status: offline
Re: Hookup Help
2018/03/23 02:02:41
(permalink)
revnice1 Right, but it won't work because the main outs from the MOTU carry all sound, that means you'll hear the vocal with the music output.
I often have an instrument bus and a vocal bus that come together for the mains. Rather than sending the mains to the mixer, send the instrument and vocal buses. You can still monitor them together out of the headphone out on the Motu.
StudioCat > I use Windows 10 and Sonar Platinum. I have a touch screen. I make some videos. This one shows how to do a physical loopback on the RME UCX to get many more equalizer nodes.
|
bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
- Total Posts : 26036
- Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
- Location: Everett, WA USA
- Status: offline
Re: Hookup Help
2018/03/23 03:12:43
(permalink)
I've got one of these things, a now-discontinued product but I found one on eBay. It has two inputs, one for your mic and one for the cue mix. The output contains only the mic signal. It has enough gain to blast the mic signal as loud as you want it.
All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. My Stuff
|
revnice1
Max Output Level: -69 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1082
- Joined: 2007/09/21 14:43:56
- Status: offline
Re: Hookup Help
2018/03/23 03:38:43
(permalink)
I set things up the way msm suggested above, namely: MOTU Output 1 & 2 (Main outputs) -> your monitors MOTU Output 3 & 4 -> your Mix5 mixer (with your singer's headphones plugged into it) I can now change the relative levels on the Mix 5 - but only on playback! I can't find a way to monitor the Input. Echo On works but there's a very distracting delay.
|
revnice1
Max Output Level: -69 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1082
- Joined: 2007/09/21 14:43:56
- Status: offline
Re: Hookup Help
2018/03/23 16:47:03
(permalink)
I wrote to Mackie last night and they responded this morning. Support told me that what I'm trying to do is not possible with the Mix 5 (as it stands) because it doesn't have an Aux Send. The Mix 8 does, that's the one I should have bought. I was pressed for time in Guitar Center when I bought it but the sales guy assured me it would work and I thought so too. The promise of stardom and the alluring smile of the Mix 5 was too much. 'Hang the expense,' I said, as I took the $18 plunge. I wish I'd spent $20 now!
|
tecknot
Max Output Level: -75 dBFS
- Total Posts : 766
- Joined: 2004/10/31 17:09:29
- Status: offline
Re: Hookup Help
2018/03/23 17:26:11
(permalink)
Hey, revnice1, actually I wouldn't bother with the Mixer at all in your case. (I originally thought you were using the mixer for all inputs and sending it's mains to the MOTU and SONAR.) However, it is a little tricky to create a particular 'sub-mix' for the vocals out of SONAR to your MOTU and out the phones to the singer. It's more of a mental mapping within SONAR that actual physical routing, but is totally doable as described by others previously as is just using the MOTU mixer software without SONAR's involvement. However, again without the need for a mixer, what bitflipper suggested is just like I was suggesting but in reverse of the routing I described (since I thought you were using the Mix5 as your main mixer). It's more simple and direct. It is doable. Kind regards, tecknot
|
revnice1
Max Output Level: -69 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1082
- Joined: 2007/09/21 14:43:56
- Status: offline
Re: Hookup Help
2018/03/23 18:50:02
(permalink)
Before all this began, I contacted MOTU and they said sure, no problem and sent me instructions on how to configure the CueMix software. It's possible I didn't understand it but I remember following it word for word and I still didn't get what I was looking for. I also remember being nervous about ruining the entire config. Have you ever pressed the wrong button on the TV remote and spent the next half hour trying to get the picture back? :) I once screwed up a Kontakt installation which affected ALL my projects. I had to open each one in Safe Mode and get rid of Kontakt before adding a corrected one. In some cases, I couldn't remember which drum kit was originally loaded, or the settings, it was a disaster. So I was very wary when playing with routing and busses, etc. Then I thought a physical thing with knobs on it would be much more intuitive or at least you can see where the signal is going. Two horrible little devices later (admittedly the wrong devices) and I'm going back to MOTU and the CueMix software - only this time I think I'll have someone help me live on the phone. Once I get it right, I can make detailed notes. rev
|
msmcleod
Max Output Level: -72 dBFS
- Total Posts : 920
- Joined: 2004/01/27 07:15:30
- Location: Scotland
- Status: offline
Re: Hookup Help
2018/03/23 19:11:59
(permalink)
revnice1 I set things up the way msm suggested above, namely: MOTU Output 1 & 2 (Main outputs) -> your monitors MOTU Output 3 & 4 -> your Mix5 mixer (with your singer's headphones plugged into it) I can now change the relative levels on the Mix 5 - but only on playback! I can't find a way to monitor the Input. Echo On works but there's a very distracting delay.
I can think of 2 possible remedies for this: 1. Reduce your latency by either: (i) Freezing all your tracks; or (ii) Bounce everything down to a stereo guide track that your vocalist can sing along to, and temporarily mute or archive the other tracks. 2. Enable input monitoring on the MOTU - CuteMix should alow you to do this. If you're going down this method, I wouldn't bother trying to send your vocals to any extra SONAR bus - just get CuteMix to route the vocals to both your DAW and one of the MOTU outputs (which you can connect to your mixer). M.
|
revnice1
Max Output Level: -69 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1082
- Joined: 2007/09/21 14:43:56
- Status: offline
Re: Hookup Help
2018/03/23 21:02:04
(permalink)
> (i) Freezing all your tracks; or I don't understand that one, I've never frozen a track or plug in 12 years. >(ii) Bounce everything down to a stereo guide I often bounce down and put the result in a new project because I anticipate at least 10 tracks of vocals and with all the other tracks and plugs, it's often too much for my box. It doesn't reduce latency but it does make the project a lot easier for my machine. (Asus P6T, Intel 3.33 i975 quad core, 12 RAM) I could try increasing the latency offset but I think I'm already at the max 5000 >just get CuteMix to route the vocals to both your DAW and one of the MOTU outputs ... That sounds good! That would act like the Aux Send I don't have. My problem now is the singer is due any minute!
|
chuckebaby
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 13146
- Joined: 2011/01/04 14:55:28
- Status: offline
Re: Hookup Help
2018/03/23 21:31:23
(permalink)
gswitz @Chuck >> No disrespect. You nailed it in your post.
Ahhhh don't worry man ....No disrespect taken . The way you described it was exactly the same way I did as well. We are both on the same wave length
Windows 8.1 X64 Sonar Platinum x64 Custom built: Asrock z97 1150 - Intel I7 4790k - 16GB corsair DDR3 1600 - PNY SSD 220GBFocusrite Saffire 18I8 - Mackie Control
|