celopadua
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 40
- Joined: 2/19/2015
- Status: offline
Melodyne Editor vs Waves Tune
Just reviving the old discussion of which one is better in terms of the following:
1) Pitch Correction Quality
2) More Natural Sounding
3) Pitch Shifting capabilities
4) Creating believable harmonies
5) Features
What do you guys think? I like both and use them interchangeably, but I do seem to lean a bit more towards Melodyne as of late, specially after the new release.
|
batsbrew
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 10037
- Joined: 6/7/2007
- Location: SL,UT
- Status: offline
Re: Melodyne Editor vs Waves Tune
May 25, 18 8:47 PM
(permalink)
man, i don't know..
i have waves tune,
but have never used.
i don't use pitch correction
|
rj davis
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
- Total Posts : 141
- Joined: 8/25/2006
- Status: offline
Re: Melodyne Editor vs Waves Tune
May 25, 18 8:54 PM
(permalink)
I use Melodyne Editor almost daily, and it is amazing at each of the tasks you ask about. Haven't used Waves Tune nearly as much, but it seems like a toy in comparison. Will do the basic stuff ok though. If you're going to do a lot of higher end tuning, Editor is worth the $ IMHO.
Ron Windows 10 Sonar Platinum i7-5700K 4.0 GHz StudioCat ProStudio (monster) RME Babyface Pro Mackie MCU Pro Neumann TLM49 Too many guitars...
|
celopadua
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 40
- Joined: 2/19/2015
- Status: offline
Re: Melodyne Editor vs Waves Tune
May 26, 18 0:19 PM
(permalink)
Thanks for the input.
I've used Waves tunes in the past, but am thinking of migrating over to Melodyne. I have the essential version, but should probably upgrade to Editor.
What I've found from my limited comparassions is that with Waves Tune it is easier to get a good sound, but it's impossible to get a great one. And with melodyne, it is difficult to get a more natural sounding result, but possible to perfect it with time and its different tools.
Am I on to something?
|
jerrypettit
Max Output Level: -78 dBFS
- Total Posts : 625
- Joined: 11/6/2003
- Location: Omaha, NE
- Status: offline
Re: Melodyne Editor vs Waves Tune
May 26, 18 1:38 AM
(permalink)
Per something I've read elsewhere, I first use Melodyne and then I put Waves Tune on the track. Seems to be fewer "artifacts" that way.
|
batsbrew
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 10037
- Joined: 6/7/2007
- Location: SL,UT
- Status: offline
Re: Melodyne Editor vs Waves Tune
May 26, 18 2:01 AM
(permalink)
i'm curious...
why do you guys have so much stuff that's out of tune?
|
celopadua
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 40
- Joined: 2/19/2015
- Status: offline
Re: Melodyne Editor vs Waves Tune
May 26, 18 10:51 AM
(permalink)
Well, not all of us were blessed with Freddie Mercury's perfect pitch or David Bowie's serenity under pressure.
|
jerrypettit
Max Output Level: -78 dBFS
- Total Posts : 625
- Joined: 11/6/2003
- Location: Omaha, NE
- Status: offline
Re: Melodyne Editor vs Waves Tune
May 26, 18 6:58 PM
(permalink)
batsbrew
i'm curious...
why do you guys have so much stuff that's out of tune?
I'm 66. The voice is going and the ears are long gone. 
|
jude77
Max Output Level: -68 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1146
- Joined: 8/27/2013
- Location: South Saturn Delta
- Status: offline
Re: Melodyne Editor vs Waves Tune
May 26, 18 11:56 PM
(permalink)
rj davis
I use Melodyne Editor almost daily, and it is amazing at each of the tasks you ask about. Haven't used Waves Tune nearly as much, but it seems like a toy in comparison. Will do the basic stuff ok though. If you're going to do a lot of higher end tuning, Editor is worth the $ IMHO.
Yep. I have them both, and Melodyne is in it's own league.
You haven't lived until you've taken the Rorschach. Windows 10 Home Edition 64-bit /6th Generation Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-6700 Processor (8M Cache, up to 4.0 GHz)/16GB (1x16GB) DDR4 2133MHz SDRAM Memory/ NVIDIA(R) GeForce(R) GT 730 with 2GB DDR3 Graphics Memory/ Dell KB216 Wired Multi-Media Keyboard English Black/ 802.11ac + Bluetooth 4.0/Integrated 7.1 with WAVE MAXXAudio Pro/Wireless 3165 driver
|