Major BUG, Update...

Author
tazman
Max Output Level: -51 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2435
  • Joined: 2003/11/13 13:01:40
  • Status: offline
2005/08/14 11:37:47 (permalink)

Major BUG, Update...

For those who have followed the PANNING LAW bug ( http://forum.cakewalk.com/tm.asp?m=560199&mpage=1&key=򈱇 ), here is an update...

With -3db center laws:

1. I found that once a punch in has been done with Sound on Sound, the clip is "broken", If you chose to undo and re punch in with overwrite to avoid the volume bug, even in overwrite mode the punched in part is 3db louder.

2. If you record any track. Select it and right mouse click. Then select bounce to clip. The new wave form will now be "3db" smaller (except for the punched in part). I would think that the wave form should have been correclty drawn from the beginning.


Ron - have you guys been able to duplicate this? So far I have had a few people who have and I don't think it's a setup issue, I am pretty positive it's a bug in SONAR, and a pretty major one since you can have tracks that change levels on you without knowing it and if you have large projects you could have a mess in your hands (I am in the middle of tracking a band with many punch ins and tracks and now I have to go through every track which used punch-ins and make sure they are not all screwed up, 10 songs, a lot of my non-paid time wasted).


Regards,

post edited by tazman - 2005/08/14 13:37:54
#1

11 Replies Related Threads

    jm24
    Max Output Level: -54 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2127
    • Joined: 2003/11/12 10:41:12
    • Status: offline
    RE: Major Flaw, Update... Semi-OT 2005/08/14 11:54:47 (permalink)

    Sunday

    In general, I do not use "punch-in."

    I mute the portion(s) of the clip I do not want to use, and record the new bits to a "blank" track.

    This way I can compare/comp as required. And if I need to change the muted parts, I can.


    I do not doubt others use this function with joy and satisfaction.

    But, I find it to require too much attention to detail when wanting to get stuff recorded.



    J
    #2
    Guest
    Max Output Level: -25.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 4951
    • Joined: 2009/08/03 10:50:51
    • Status: online
    RE: Major Flaw, Update... 2005/08/14 11:58:34 (permalink)
    did you report this problem to customer support? hope so, because they don't track
    bugs in the forum (or don't make a policy of it that is).
    jeff
    #3
    tazman
    Max Output Level: -51 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2435
    • Joined: 2003/11/13 13:01:40
    • Status: offline
    RE: Major Flaw, Update... 2005/08/14 12:07:13 (permalink)
    I have sent them emails and talked to them over the phone on Friday.

    This issue can be rather painful if you have lots of songs for clients already recorded and are about to start mixing. Especially because visual inspection in this case won't work since the clips do not show their true level.
    #4
    Tom Riggs
    Max Output Level: -57.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1752
    • Joined: 2003/11/08 22:47:26
    • Location: Displaced Kansan living in Philippines
    • Status: offline
    RE: Major Flaw, Update... 2005/08/14 12:10:21 (permalink)
    Verified that this behaves exactly as Taz described on the -3db setting. I don't use the punch in function myself much but I know he does since he is recording bands and I just record myself. I also tried recording with the pan law set to 0 and then punching in. It recorded ok but when I switched to -3db pan law and bounce the track it is off by 3 db on the new track. I set it back to 0 on the pan law and bounce to another track and it is fine.

    i7-3770k OC at 4.5Ghz, asus p8z77-m, 16g g.skill aries 1600 c9 ram, Noctua d-14 cooler, RME HDSPe Raydat, Motu FastLane, Nvidea GTX 980 ti 6G, windows 7 and 8.1 pro x64. Sonar Platinum and x3e currently installed

    My Music 
    My YouTube
     
    #5
    Tom Riggs
    Max Output Level: -57.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1752
    • Joined: 2003/11/08 22:47:26
    • Location: Displaced Kansan living in Philippines
    • Status: offline
    RE: Major Flaw, Update... 2005/08/14 12:53:38 (permalink)
    Follow up. I also tried it with a stereo track and it works perfectly no matter how the pan law is set. So it appears to only be on mono tracks that the pan law is incorrectly applied to the track. The work around that I see would be to temporarily change the panning law to 0 and bounce the clip to clip or track either. I tried this and it will correctly bounce when set to 0. hope this helps Taz.

    i7-3770k OC at 4.5Ghz, asus p8z77-m, 16g g.skill aries 1600 c9 ram, Noctua d-14 cooler, RME HDSPe Raydat, Motu FastLane, Nvidea GTX 980 ti 6G, windows 7 and 8.1 pro x64. Sonar Platinum and x3e currently installed

    My Music 
    My YouTube
     
    #6
    Guest
    Max Output Level: -25.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 4951
    • Joined: 2009/08/03 10:50:51
    • Status: online
    RE: Major Flaw, Update... 2005/08/14 13:43:57 (permalink)
    with a stereo track and it works perfectly no matter how the pan law is set

    the pan law only affects mono tracks ... in stereo, the pan just attenuates the L/R
    levels.

    i'm glad you reported it to them 'cause sometimes people don't and they get
    frustrated when there's no activity on their problem.

    i guess the only work around is to use process->audio->+-/3db to correct
    the punch in?

    jeff
    #7
    tazman
    Max Output Level: -51 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2435
    • Joined: 2003/11/13 13:01:40
    • Status: offline
    RE: Major Flaw, Update... 2005/08/14 13:47:44 (permalink)
    Yea, that is the workaround. Only problem is that with large projects, you have to bounce, rename the tracks, archive/hide the original tracks, etc. Very time consuming and easy to make a mistake...

    I just really hope they come out with a patch to fix this cause I think it's major!!!

    Also, if you guys could report this as well, we may have a chance at Cakewalk releasing a patch for this...
    post edited by tazman - 2005/08/14 14:06:58
    #8
    RTGraham
    Max Output Level: -57 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1824
    • Joined: 2004/03/29 20:17:13
    • Location: New York
    • Status: offline
    RE: Major Flaw, Update... 2005/08/14 20:05:59 (permalink)
    I read your original thread, as well as this one, and I'm not certain that what you're seeing is a bug. I can't check it at my DAW right now, but looking at the screen captures and reading the descriptions, it looks like it may just be proper application of the various pan laws. Keep in mind that certain pan laws can affect the apparent, perceived, or rendered center level, and the screen captures show mono waveforms in tracks, but with track interleave set to stereo. I believe I saw a post elsewhere on this forum that indicated that there were updates to SONAR 4's handling of interleave, to accomodate certain routing needs in the FX bin. It's possible that by having the track interleave set to stereo, you're feeding "dual-mono" signals instead of a true "center" signal, which could be affected by pan law.

    Try setting your mono tracks' interleave to mono (one speaker in the track header, instead of two), and see if you still get the same problem.

    If that's not it, then perhaps there is indeed something fishy going on; but first make sure it isn't just interleave / pan law interaction.

    ~~~~~~~~~~
    Russell T. Graham
    Keys, Vocals, Songwriting, Production
    russell DOT graham AT rtgproductions DOT com
    www DOT myspace DOT com SLASH russelltgraham
    #9
    tazman
    Max Output Level: -51 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2435
    • Joined: 2003/11/13 13:01:40
    • Status: offline
    RE: Major Flaw, Update... 2005/08/14 20:22:58 (permalink)
    I am testing with mono tracks. In general I expect that if I record something on a track and then go back with the same identical settings on that track and do a punch-in, that the the original track and the punched-in part sound (level wise) identical.

    #10
    RTGraham
    Max Output Level: -57 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1824
    • Joined: 2004/03/29 20:17:13
    • Location: New York
    • Status: offline
    RE: Major Flaw, Update... 2005/08/14 22:21:30 (permalink)
    I understand that; but in the screenshots I looked at in the other thread, the tracks were set to stereo interleave, even though their content was mono.

    When you say that you are testing "with mono tracks," do you mean that the content is mono, the interleave setting is mono, or both?
    #11
    tazman
    Max Output Level: -51 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2435
    • Joined: 2003/11/13 13:01:40
    • Status: offline
    RE: Major Flaw, Update... 2005/08/14 22:23:36 (permalink)
    The screen shots were not mine. I use mono signals (guitar) to a track set to mono. I have tried with tracks set to stereo as a test, with the same result.

    Thanks,
    #12
    Jump to:
    © 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1