Fxpansion's Bloom (vs. RP Delay vs. Timeless vs. Sigmund)

Author
SmokeyJ628
Max Output Level: -74 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 809
  • Joined: 2004/12/08 13:17:59
  • Status: offline
2014/10/03 12:01:28 (permalink)

Fxpansion's Bloom (vs. RP Delay vs. Timeless vs. Sigmund)

I see that Bloom is on sale for the weekend at half off (<--I assume I can still at least say that here).
 
What are the thoughts on Bloom?
 
Is there some sort of way to make your way through all the different delays?  What separates them, really? 
 
It's tricky to figure out.  In particular, I'm trying to figure out a choice between Sigmund and Bloom. 
 
Any thoughts?
#1

4 Replies Related Threads

    dmbaer
    Max Output Level: -49.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2585
    • Joined: 2008/08/04 20:10:22
    • Location: Concord CA
    • Status: offline
    Re: Fxpansion's Bloom (vs. RP Delay vs. Timeless vs. Sigmund) 2014/10/03 18:23:25 (permalink)
    I wrote about Sigmund here:
     
    http://soundbytesmag.net/d16sigmunddelay/
     
    I do not have Bloom, but I've looked at the documentation and I do prefer its UI to that of Sigmund.  But if I recall, there are only two delay channels in Bloom where Sigmund has four.  There are periodic sales on Sigmund in which you can pick it up for a price in the low 50s (USD).  That's a little more than the current sale price on Bloom, but not by much.
    #2
    bitflipper
    01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
    • Total Posts : 26036
    • Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
    • Location: Everett, WA USA
    • Status: offline
    Re: Fxpansion's Bloom (vs. RP Delay vs. Timeless vs. Sigmund) 2014/10/03 18:59:13 (permalink)
    The primary feature that differentiates delays is what effects you can apply to the delayed signal.
     
    The delayed echo is typically not an exact replica of the incoming signal. You'll have the ability to add one or more effects to it, and that's what distinguishes one delay plugin from another on a technical level. Those effects may include the following:
     
    Filter: nearly all delays give you a low-pass filter. The next step up from garden-variety delays is multiple filter types.
    Pitch modulation: delays that attempt to emulate classic tape delays can modulate the pitch of the delayed signal. Some give you a lot of control, some just have a button labeled "TAPE".
    Distortion: some delays let you dirty up the delayed signal, again mainly to emulate vintage tape machines. Some give you lots of controls, some just have a knob labeled "distortion".
    Tempo sync: many delay plugins let you synchronize the delay to the project tempo, such as quarter- and eighth-notes. The next step up in sophistication is more unusual synchronization factors such as a dotted eighth or a one-third note, and non-sequential patterns.
    Panning: many plugins let you send the left delay to the right channel and vice versa for your basic "ping-pong" effect. The next step up is the inclusion of options for setting the pan position of each echo independently.
    Chorus: adding chorus to the delayed signal gives an effect similar to tape flutter, and can help intensify one of the effects we use delays for, which is creating width on a track.
     
    There are delays that offer all of the above and then some. Which leads to the next differentiator: the user interface. All those options can make for a confusing experience, to the point where you can end up relying on pure serendipity to stumble onto a pleasant setting.
     
    RP-Delay, for example, is one plugin that has oodles of features but seems particularly difficult to dial in when you have a specific echo effect in mind. Timeless has so many options you have to make a serious investment in learning it before it starts earning its keep. My point is that having gobs of features isn't the only factor, because they don't do you any good if you can't figure out how to use them.
     
    The easiest-to-use delay I know of is the venerable Sonitus Delay. With it, I can dial in an imagined effect in seconds. It does lack some features that have become widespread since the Sonitus came into existence back in 2003, and it has a couple troublesome bugs. But I still like it a great deal.
     
    Another one that manages to keep sophisticated features simple is Ricochet from Audio Damage. It's cheap ($49). 
     


    All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. 

    My Stuff
    #3
    SmokeyJ628
    Max Output Level: -74 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 809
    • Joined: 2004/12/08 13:17:59
    • Status: offline
    Re: Fxpansion's Bloom (vs. RP Delay vs. Timeless vs. Sigmund) 2014/10/03 20:08:11 (permalink)
    Thanks for the thoughts.
     
    I have RP Delay, but I have to agree that it's not easy to get an idea from my head onto the plugin.
     
    I'll be demo-ing Bloom and comparing with Sigmund this weekend.  I might even fire up Sonitus again.
     
    Other thoughts are welcome!
    #4
    clintmartin
    Max Output Level: -36.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3893
    • Joined: 2009/10/11 12:16:43
    • Location: Fort Smith, AR
    • Status: offline
    Re: Fxpansion's Bloom (vs. RP Delay vs. Timeless vs. Sigmund) 2014/10/04 00:18:37 (permalink)
    I keep finding myself using this one... http://www.hornetplugins.com/plugins/hornet-deelay/ It's simple and sounds good for $11.

    Cakewalk, Harrison Mixbus 4, Waveform 9, ADK intel i7 2600 3.40 ghz, 8gb Ram, Win 7, Presonus Audiobox 44VSL. 
    http://www.youtube.com/c/clintmartinmusic
    https://itunes.apple.com/...lint-martin/1010966023
    https://open.spotify.com/artist/4x4TBz32i56bTJkgu7b4tN
     
     
     
    #5
    Jump to:
    © 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1