Gain Staging: Input trim Vs Fader... Before Master

Author
moffdnb
Max Output Level: -64 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1332
  • Joined: 2004/04/27 16:42:30
  • Status: offline
2012/01/08 16:36:15 (permalink)

Gain Staging: Input trim Vs Fader... Before Master

Hi all,

I'm hoping this won't be a debate but just hoping for some experts to explain simply what difference it makes between lower the trim input of a track or lowering the fader of the track.  I realise that this may have an impact if you have certain VSTs in a track but just from a mix perspective and aiming to keep the Master peaking at around -6db.

So as a test, I have 20 tracks and need to pull them back to keep the master in good shape.  No VSTs.  So I drop them by -10db in the trim pot and reset, then drop fader by -10db and for the life in my I cannot here any difference at all.

So if the point of trim is mainly to control VST input, then can I just use the Input of the VST plugin itself and not really bother with Sonar's Trim?

This Gain staging thing seems so controversial.  After reading up on it I'm more confused.  I can understand this in Analog but not in the Math of DAWs

Any1 like the chime in and share their view?
#1

12 Replies Related Threads

    BenMMusTech
    Max Output Level: -49 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2606
    • Joined: 2011/05/23 16:59:57
    • Location: Warragul, Victoria-Australia
    • Status: offline
    Re:Gain Staging: Input trim Vs Fader... Before Master 2012/01/08 16:55:18 (permalink)
    Ok someone can correct me on this but I believe that the trim is the input stage where as the fader is the output stage. So if this is the case the you want to turn down the input not the output. Someone might be able to explain this better.

    I regualry pull the trim down by anywhere up to -12 to -15 db it all depends how many tracks I have.

    I have a link here: http://www.prosoundweb.com/article/setting_sound_system_and_mixing_console_gain_staging/P3/ explaing by how much you should turn down the trim depending on how many tracks/faders you have in operation.

    I hope that helps.

    Benjamin Phillips-Bachelor of Creative Technology (Sound and Audio Production), (Hons) Sonic Arts, MMusTech (Master of Music Technology), M.Phil (Fine Art)
    http://1331.space/
    https://thedigitalartist.bandcamp.com/
    http://soundcloud.com/aaudiomystiks
    #2
    The Maillard Reaction
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 31918
    • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
    • Status: offline
    . 2012/01/08 17:01:19 (permalink)
    .
    post edited by Caa2 - 2017/04/08 19:27:47


    #3
    AT
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 10654
    • Joined: 2004/01/09 10:42:46
    • Location: TeXaS
    • Status: offline
    Re:Gain Staging: Input trim Vs Fader... Before Master 2012/01/08 17:24:30 (permalink)
    IN the old analog days you'd typically set the trim so you could leave the fader at 0.  You had finer fader control over the volume doing it that way, important before automation and recall.

    Ánd as noted, if you have an "outboard" or VST signal the trim can help keep that signal clean or saturated coming out and before the fader volume.

    @

    https://soundcloud.com/a-pleasure-dome
    http://www.bnoir-film.com/  
     
    there came forth little children out of the city, and mocked him, and said unto him, Go up, thou bald head; go up, thou bald head.
    24 And he turned back, and looked on them, and cursed them in the name of the Lord. And there came forth two she bears out of the wood, and tare forty and two children of them.
    #4
    moffdnb
    Max Output Level: -64 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1332
    • Joined: 2004/04/27 16:42:30
    • Status: offline
    Re:Gain Staging: Input trim Vs Fader... Before Master 2012/01/08 18:27:04 (permalink)
    OK so in that case..

    How in the name of all that is good do you know what input level and for what VST because I simply cannot tell a difference once I'm staying out of the RED.  Serious!!  Any general approach or do you only really know when you get to the end of a full mix?



    (Well maybe I can tell moreso on AMP/distortion plugs, but verbs, delays, comps hmmm  duno)
    #5
    ltb
    Max Output Level: -48 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2707
    • Joined: 2005/06/19 13:34:08
    • Status: offline
    Re:Gain Staging: Input trim Vs Fader... Before Master 2012/01/08 18:44:06 (permalink)
    moffdnb




    So if the point of trim is mainly to control VST input, then can I just use the Input of the VST plugin itself and not really bother with Sonar's Trim?


    Exactly, or vice versa.
    #6
    drewfx1
    Max Output Level: -9.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 6585
    • Joined: 2008/08/04 16:19:11
    • Status: offline
    Re:Gain Staging: Input trim Vs Fader... Before Master 2012/01/08 19:05:22 (permalink)
    moffdnb


    OK so in that case..

    How in the name of all that is good do you know what input level and for what VST because I simply cannot tell a difference once I'm staying out of the RED.  Serious!!  Any general approach or do you only really know when you get to the end of a full mix?



    (Well maybe I can tell moreso on AMP/distortion plugs, but verbs, delays, comps hmmm  duno)

    OK, a couple of points:

    1. Not all VST's vary in any way with input level. The word "linear" is used to describe this behavior. If you send the VST a signal at +100dB or -100dB and compensate by an identical amount after the VST it will sound 100% identical.

    2. For other VST plugins, the plugin will behave differently depending on the level of the signal sent to it. All compressors/limiters/dynamics-processors fall into this category, along with tube and tape emulators and saturators and distortion plugs, and also some (but not all) VST's that emulate classic analog gear. However, some of these may behave perfectly linearly up to a level at which they start to sound different. Some of these plugs have their own built-in input and output level controls, so you don't really have to worry about the trim.

    The best advice I can give you to tell which kind is which and how they sound is to reduce your fader and boost the trim so that you're sending the VST a signal well above 0dBFS. If you don't hear any difference between this and the trim set much lower and the fader higher, then that VST probably doesn't care level so you don't have to worry about what level you send it.

    But if you hear distortion (or some other change in the sound), then play with reducing the trim (and compensating with the fader) until you like the sound and maybe take some notes.

     In order, then, to discover the limit of deepest tones, it is necessary not only to produce very violent agitations in the air but to give these the form of simple pendular vibrations. - Hermann von Helmholtz, predicting the role of the electric bassist in 1877.
    #7
    BenMMusTech
    Max Output Level: -49 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2606
    • Joined: 2011/05/23 16:59:57
    • Location: Warragul, Victoria-Australia
    • Status: offline
    Re:Gain Staging: Input trim Vs Fader... Before Master 2012/01/08 19:12:54 (permalink)
    Ok OP, you are confusing yourself.  Ok look at it this way each device has to be set up in terms of gain structure, so first you get a good signal in your VST, then you use the trim to set the overall level and to make sure the whole mix is sitting around the same level, this makes mixing the track easier.

    Ok say your VST instrument is now peaking at -3db, this is not enough headroom and when you go to mix it within your track the volume of the VST may not match the rest of the instrments/recorded tracks so this means there will be a mismatch in signal level.

    My levels in general for starting a mix is -18db RMS average level, so get the volume and the sound you want from the VST and this may mean running the track a little hot, some synths need this.

    Then readjust the trim so it corresponds with the above -18db RMS.

    Any more questions, just ask.

    Ben 

    Benjamin Phillips-Bachelor of Creative Technology (Sound and Audio Production), (Hons) Sonic Arts, MMusTech (Master of Music Technology), M.Phil (Fine Art)
    http://1331.space/
    https://thedigitalartist.bandcamp.com/
    http://soundcloud.com/aaudiomystiks
    #8
    moffdnb
    Max Output Level: -64 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1332
    • Joined: 2004/04/27 16:42:30
    • Status: offline
    Re:Gain Staging: Input trim Vs Fader... Before Master 2012/01/08 19:35:22 (permalink)
    Thanks folks.

    I particularly like this suggestion:

    "The best advice I can give you to tell which kind is which and how they sound is to reduce your fader and boost the trim so that you're sending the VST a signal well above 0dBFS. If you don't hear any difference between this and the trim set much lower and the fader higher, then that VST probably doesn't care level so you don't have to worry about what level you send it. "

    Very practical.  I will look into this  ;>  Thanks!
    #9
    Lanceindastudio
    Max Output Level: -29 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 4604
    • Joined: 2004/01/22 02:28:30
    • Status: offline
    Re:Gain Staging: Input trim Vs Fader... Before Master 2012/01/08 23:33:06 (permalink)
    There is an over complication going on here-

    Lance

    Asus P8Z77-V LE PLUS Motherboard   
    i7 3770k CPU
    32 gigs RAM
    Presonus AudioBox iTwo
    Windows 10 64 bit, SONAR PLATINUM 64 bit
    Lots of plugins and softsynths and one shot samples, loops
    Gauge ECM-87, MCA SP-1, Alesis AM51
    Presonus Eureka
    Mackie HR824's and matching subwoofer
    #10
    BenMMusTech
    Max Output Level: -49 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2606
    • Joined: 2011/05/23 16:59:57
    • Location: Warragul, Victoria-Australia
    • Status: offline
    Re:Gain Staging: Input trim Vs Fader... Before Master 2012/01/09 00:34:44 (permalink)
    Lanceindastudio


    There is an over complication going on here-

    Lance

    Actually Lance there is not, this is basic audio engineering 101.  If you can't get gain staging correct then you won't be able to get the best out of your mix.  It is something that I still get wrong sometimes.
     
    Ben

    Benjamin Phillips-Bachelor of Creative Technology (Sound and Audio Production), (Hons) Sonic Arts, MMusTech (Master of Music Technology), M.Phil (Fine Art)
    http://1331.space/
    https://thedigitalartist.bandcamp.com/
    http://soundcloud.com/aaudiomystiks
    #11
    joel77
    Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 489
    • Joined: 2004/01/14 11:47:08
    • Status: offline
    Re:Gain Staging: Input trim Vs Fader... Before Master 2012/01/10 12:24:26 (permalink)
    Great explanation, Drew! Thanks.

    Joel, Studio 52

    Joel  Glaser
    Studio 52     

    God Bless America
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Sonar x64, Win 7 Pro, Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R, 
    Intel i7-930 2.86GHz dual quad core, 12GB Corsair DDL3,
    Asus ATI Radion HD 4350, WD 500 GB SATA, 
    Dual WD 1TB SATA HDs, ME RayDAT, Alesis HD24XR - A/D-D/A
     
    https://www.facebook.com/...dio-52/811309178917929
    www.thebrothersglaser.com
    #12
    Jim Roseberry
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 9871
    • Joined: 2004/03/23 11:34:51
    • Location: Ohio
    • Status: offline
    Re:Gain Staging: Input trim Vs Fader... Before Master 2012/01/10 13:00:08 (permalink)
    If you can't get gain staging correct then you won't be able to get the best out of your mix. It is something that I still get wrong sometimes.

     
    In the analog world... things were more cut/dried.
    Having Floating point summing allows you to "go into the red" with no penalty.
    So... it's not always obvious to a someone new.
     
    To put it simple, Trim is there "if you need it" (some plugins don't have an input gain control).
    You don't have to use it... simply because it's there.
    If you have no means of controlling the level going into a plugin (and it's necessary to do so), then Trim is what you'd use.
    Otherwise, leave it alone.  Control the end volume with the fader.

    Best Regards,

    Jim Roseberry
    jim@studiocat.com
    www.studiocat.com
    #13
    Jump to:
    © 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1