Giving the singer more level

Author
revnice1
Max Output Level: -69 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1082
  • Joined: 2007/09/21 14:43:56
  • Status: offline
2016/01/07 18:51:33 (permalink)

Giving the singer more level

I'm on Sonar 8.5.2 and everything goes through a MOTU Traveler interface. I'm having a problem giving the vocalist more level so she can hear herself. Turning up the headphone volume raises everything at once. Adjusting the mic sensitivity means the vocal level gets too hot, she now has to stand back more (which changes the sound) and reduces the level.
 
I can turn down all the other tracks such that the mic input can be heard better but that's not a very satisfactory answer. There must be a way I can route the output of the vocal channel (somewhere!) such that during recording I can give her more level without affecting anything else?
 
Anyone?
 
Thanks - rev
#1

27 Replies Related Threads

    gokidsmusic
    Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 51
    • Joined: 2010/11/09 16:29:40
    • Location: NC
    • Status: offline
    Re: Giving the singer more level 2016/01/07 19:16:25 (permalink)
    I can't remember if CueMix has sends that are assignable, but, I have used sends routed to an output (headphones) to get an extra bit of signal.  Perhaps increase the singers send level to FX bus, (if available, such as reverb or delay), minimize the effect such as smallest, dryest room or minimal delay with no feed back.  This could add extra level. 
     
    Is there a fader for DAW in the CueMix, you could lower that (in CueMix) then raise the the headphone level and balance to taste. 
     
    Good Luck
    #2
    Cactus Music
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 8424
    • Joined: 2004/02/09 21:34:04
    • Status: offline
    Re: Giving the singer more level 2016/01/08 01:23:59 (permalink)
    You need the right hardware, that's the plain truth. 
    If your interface does not have a input / computer blending control or if it does not have a GUI mixer that acomplishes the same thing your hooped. 
    Most interfaces allow you to mix the singers mike ( input) with the DAW's playback ( computer) 
    Turning the control towards the input makes the singer louder, turning it towards the playback makes the music louder. Simple. 
    I use a small mixer for cue mixes and adding a little reverb in the cans. Small mixers are not expensive... I actually own two. My interface is capable of creating 2 or more cue mixes but I still find the mixer works the best. 
    post edited by Cactus Music - 2016/01/08 01:38:05

    Johnny V  
    Cakelab  
    Focusrite 6i61st - Tascam us1641. 
    3 Desktops and 3 Laptops W7 and W10
     http://www.cactusmusic.ca/
     
     
    #3
    Sanderxpander
    Max Output Level: -36.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3873
    • Joined: 2013/09/30 10:08:24
    • Status: offline
    Re: Giving the singer more level 2016/01/08 04:31:57 (permalink)
    CueMix doesn't have a level control for DAW playback. Instead it relies on the DAW main fader. So yeah, you'll have to turn down the DAW main fader and then turn up the headphones output. This is simply the way things work.

    If you find it easier you could put a send on your master bus, send that bus to a second set of outputs and tell CueMix to use those outputs for the headphones mix. Also put the mic on there. That way at least you won't have to keep raising and lowering your main fader.
    #4
    Bristol_Jonesey
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 16775
    • Joined: 2007/10/08 15:41:17
    • Location: Bristol, UK
    • Status: offline
    Re: Giving the singer more level 2016/01/08 04:49:01 (permalink)
    I insert sends on my individual busses routed to the headphone mix.
     
    It's easy to drop them all by whatever amount is necessary for the vocalist to hear everything and more importantly, what they hear of themselves in the cans

    CbB, Platinum, 64 bit throughout
    Custom built i7 3930, 32Gb RAM, 2 x 1Tb Internal HDD, 1 x 1TB system SSD (Win 7), 1 x 500Gb system SSD (Win 10), 2 x 1Tb External HDD's, Dual boot Win 7 & Win 10 64 Bit, Saffire Pro 26, ISA One, Adam P11A,
    #5
    brconflict
    Max Output Level: -56.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1891
    • Joined: 2012/10/05 21:28:30
    • Status: offline
    Re: Giving the singer more level 2016/01/08 11:39:09 (permalink)
    CueMix doesn't offer plug-in use, and the Echo function in Sonar is VERY iffy. So, what I've resorted to is using a hardware compressor chained off the mic-pre. If you can Aux-Send the mic pre's output to the compressor, then return the output of the compressor back to the Aux Return of the mixer, which, I assume ultimately feeds the headphone amp, the compressor can give you what you need in relation to the mix.
     
    If you use an external mic pre, one that offers both XLR and 1/4" outputs, youu can run the XLR to your DAW or mixer, and the 1/4" output to the compressor.
     
    You can find an Alesis 3630 compressor for next to nothing, which works quite well. I'm using a dbx 560 (dbx 160 in a 500-series module).
     
    Hope this helps!

    Brian
     
    Sonar Platinum, Steinberg Wavelab Pro 9, MOTU 24CoreIO w/ low-slew OP-AMP mods and BLA external clock, True P8, Audient ASP008, API 512c, Chandler Germ500, Summit 2ba-221, GAP Pre-73, Peluso 22251, Peluso 2247LE, Mackie HR824, Polk Audio SRS-SDA 2.3tl w/upgraded Soniccraft crossovers and Goertz cables, powered by Pass-X350. All wiring Star-Quad XLR or Monster Cable. Power by Monster Power Signature AVS2000 voltage stabilizer and Signature Pro Power 5100 PowerCenter on a 20A isolation shielded circuit.
    #6
    Beepster
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 18001
    • Joined: 2012/05/11 19:11:24
    • Status: offline
    Re: Giving the singer more level 2016/01/08 14:23:30 (permalink)
    Seriously listen to Jonesey. If you need an instant mix for a specific headphone setup and don't want to screw around with your levels insert sends on everything (that's needed for tracking) and send them to a bus.
     
    Solo the bus and create your headphone mix using the Sends levels on each track.
     
    If you already are using busses for each set of instruments (Drum Bus, Guitar Bus, Bass Bus, etc) then it's even easier because you can just insert sends on the busses to send to your headphone mix bus (instead of on every track).
     
    Once you are done tracking you just mute (and unsolo) the bus. That way it is not blending in to your general mix. You can set up multiple headphone mixes this way by using multiple sends for each artist without screwing up your general mix or screwing up previous headphone mixes.
     
    Another way is to do a "Save As", mix the song as is in a way that works best for the artist you are recording, export it then import it into a new track in your original project. Solo that track and whatever track(s) the artist is recording into then you can turn just that export track up or down as needed. This however means you can't turn things up or down individually (because it's a whole mix) but it's a simpler scheme if your artist doesn't need things constantly being readjusted (which unfortunately they usually will).
     
    Cheers.
    #7
    revnice1
    Max Output Level: -69 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1082
    • Joined: 2007/09/21 14:43:56
    • Status: offline
    Re: Giving the singer more level 2016/01/08 14:35:48 (permalink)
    Beepster:
    Yes, spot on dude, I was just about to thank Jonesey for the simplest solution.
     
    Thanks Jonesey!
     
    I also like the idea of mixing down the track and having the singer sing against that. I can archive everything else for better performance and give the singer any level they like. My singers don't need a custom mix so anything approximating the final song will do.
     
    Thanks to everyone else for all the other answers!
     
    rev 
     
     
    #8
    Beepster
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 18001
    • Joined: 2012/05/11 19:11:24
    • Status: offline
    Re: Giving the singer more level 2016/01/08 14:46:03 (permalink)
    You could also just do a "Save As" and totally mangle the project in any way you want as you track the vocals (or whatever) then do a dry track export (no effects) of the tracks you recorded and import them into the original project for mixing.
     
    Tons of ways to do this stuff which is what is so awesome about digital recording (one of of the million and one things that is so awesome about it... lol).
     
    Cheers.
    #9
    cryophonik
    Max Output Level: -28 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 4724
    • Joined: 2006/04/03 17:28:17
    • Location: Elk Grove, CA
    • Status: offline
    Re: Giving the singer more level 2016/01/08 14:47:34 (permalink)
    I'm sure that people have different preferences here, but I personally NEVER record the singer into the original song project.  I export the song to WAV and import that WAV into a new project template that is already set up for recording vocals.  My template already has tracks inserted for the guide track, a folder full of ready-to-go tracks for the lead vocals, another for harmonies, etc. all pre-routed to busses, with a reverb already instantiated for the headphone mix, etc.  That gives me a lot more flexibility for controlling the headphone mix and latency is a non-issue.  I also use that project file for comping vocals, pitch-correction, etc. to clean up and finalize the vocals.  Once the raw vocals are done, I bring them back into the original project for final mixing.

    cryophonik   |   soundcloud  |   Facebook

    Q6600 | GA-EP45-UD3P | Windows 7 64 | 8GB
    Access Virus Keyboard TI2 | Kurzweil PC3X | NI Maschine

    #10
    revnice1
    Max Output Level: -69 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1082
    • Joined: 2007/09/21 14:43:56
    • Status: offline
    Re: Giving the singer more level 2016/01/08 14:54:00 (permalink)
    Another good idea but how do you instantiate a reverb? I can only hear mine on playback.
     
    I have an external unit (TC Electronic M2000) but I've only had limited success routing out to hardware effects.
    post edited by revnice1 - 2016/01/08 15:07:15
    #11
    Sanderxpander
    Max Output Level: -36.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3873
    • Joined: 2013/09/30 10:08:24
    • Status: offline
    Re: Giving the singer more level 2016/01/08 15:31:12 (permalink)
    You Traveler has a reverb. It's not the best but it works. I happen to use one from time to time because my friend has one. I think really the "least fuss" solution for you would be to create a send on your master bus to outputs 3/4 (or to a bus with those outputs), set the headphones to 3/4 in the CueMix app and in the CueMix mix for outputs 3/4 add the mic input channel. That way the singer will get exactly the mix you already have, the volume is determined by the send on the master bus and any changes you make will be on the singers ears too.
    #12
    revnice1
    Max Output Level: -69 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1082
    • Joined: 2007/09/21 14:43:56
    • Status: offline
    Re: Giving the singer more level 2016/01/08 15:53:04 (permalink)
    I don't think my Traveler has a reverb. I have the older one, which I think is obsolete now, great unit though.
    #13
    Bristol_Jonesey
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 16775
    • Joined: 2007/10/08 15:41:17
    • Location: Bristol, UK
    • Status: offline
    Re: Giving the singer more level 2016/01/08 16:05:54 (permalink)
    Beepster
    You could also just do a "Save As" and totally mangle the project in any way you want as you track the vocals (or whatever) then do a dry track export (no effects) of the tracks you recorded and import them into the original project for mixing.
     
    Tons of ways to do this stuff which is what is so awesome about digital recording (one of of the million and one things that is so awesome about it... lol).
     
    Cheers.


    Yeah I've done this as well - I had one project on which V-Vocal would not load without crashing the project, no matter what I tried. So I exported the mix sans vocals, imported it into a blank project and tracked the vocals from there. Did all my V-Vocal work, then exported the treated vocal tracks back to the main project.
     
    The only thing to be mindful of was the tempo maps had to be identical

    CbB, Platinum, 64 bit throughout
    Custom built i7 3930, 32Gb RAM, 2 x 1Tb Internal HDD, 1 x 1TB system SSD (Win 7), 1 x 500Gb system SSD (Win 10), 2 x 1Tb External HDD's, Dual boot Win 7 & Win 10 64 Bit, Saffire Pro 26, ISA One, Adam P11A,
    #14
    Beepster
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 18001
    • Joined: 2012/05/11 19:11:24
    • Status: offline
    Re: Giving the singer more level 2016/01/08 16:17:10 (permalink)
    Bristol_Jonesey
    The only thing to be mindful of was the tempo maps had to be identical





    Oh... yeah, totally but the Save As of the original project should retain all that type of data. Then freezing or bouncing or archiving or deleting or whatever needs to be done to make the project lighter on resources can happen for tracking.
     
    It is certainly a dicey affair when using things like V-Vocal/Melodyne/Audiosnap/clip "stretching"/etc in large projects so even if I'm not tracking I tend to make sure I've done a Save As to see how the project is going to behave and act accordingly after that (which includes exporting/importing the results of such procedures back into the original project).
     
    Actually I may do full exports of ALL tracks multiple times and import them into new projects over the course of a project. Like I'll do all my writing, edit/bounce/flatten all my "scratch tracks", import into a new project for final takes... then edit/bounce/flatten that and bring it into another new project for mixing.
     
    Otherwise I'll do a ton of Cloning and Archiving as I work if it's not TOO nutty of a project (or if I'm just doing a few tracks for someone else).
     
    But that semi sorta OT and I'm semi sorta insane.
     
    lol
     
    Cheers.
    #15
    Kev999
    Max Output Level: -36 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3922
    • Joined: 2007/05/01 14:22:54
    • Location: Victoria, Australia
    • Status: offline
    Re: Giving the singer more level 2016/01/08 22:15:09 (permalink)
    revnice1
    ...giving the vocalist more level so she can hear herself. Turning up the headphone volume raises everything at once...
    ...I can turn down all the other tracks...

     
    If you use a pre-master bus for the backing track, i.e. all instruments and everything excluding vocals, you can easily turn this down for recording vocals and turn it back up afterwards. This might actually be the quickest solution.

    SonarPlatinum(22.11.0.111)|Mixbus32C(4.3.19)|DigitalPerformer(9.5.1)|Reaper(5.77)
    FractalDesign:DefineR5|i7-6850k@4.1GHz|16GB@2666MHz-DDR4|MSI:GamingProCarbonX99a|Matrox:M9148(x2)|UAD2solo(6.5.2)|W7Ult-x64-SP1
    Audient:iD22+ASP800|KRK:VXT6|+various-outboard-gear|+guitars&basses, etc.
    Having fun at work lately
    #16
    GaryMedia
    Max Output Level: -86 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 217
    • Joined: 2003/11/05 23:04:20
    • Location: Cary, NC
    • Status: offline
    Re: Giving the singer more level 2016/01/08 22:53:36 (permalink)
    Here's a short story about what worked well for me:
     
    I had a room full of vocalists, and despite having a pair of OZ Audio HM-6's it still was a chore to try to provide useful headphone mixes for everyone without breaking the vibe of the session.   
     
    I finally invested in inexpensive Behringer MA400 headphone/mic/cue mixers (monitor headphone amplifier) and made brackets for each MA400 to attach to a microphone stand.  Now, each vocalist can get a generalized mix sent to their MA400 that allows them to set the cue mix level in their headphones while also allowing them to independently set the amount of direct feed from their individual microphone into their headphone.  The MA400 uses a 12V, 150mA wall wart.
     
    The microphone connects directly into the MA400, and is internally jumpered to an output XLR that goes to the preamp that's connected through the A/D interface to SONAR. The phantom power (as needed) comes from the A/D preamp through the internally jumpered connection to the microphone. The MA400 has an internal mic preamp that taps the jumpered XLR connection and feeds the singers headphone. This also means that there's no/miniscule interaction between the MA400 and the expensive/desirable A/D preamp that feeds SONAR. A second unbalanced stereo TRS input to the MA400 is for the cue mix that the singer uses. 
     
    There are other products that do the same thing, but since I needed seven of them, I needed to keep capital costs down. A bit of caution is necessary. I did have a situation in which a singer over-boosted their direct microphone knob and therefore sang too softly.  I now advise singers. to first set the cue mix level and then work up from zero on their direct microphone knob. They like having the immediate real-time control.
     
    HTH

    CbB Win10 | Mac Pro 12-core 3.33GHz/48GB | TCL 55" 4K UHD | 480GB SSD | 6TB HDD RAID-5 array| 1.5TB SSD RAID-0 array | Midas M32 | 2x Audient ASP800 |  UAD-2 Duo PCIe | Adam A7X.
    http://www.tedlandstudio.com/articles
    #17
    Sanderxpander
    Max Output Level: -36.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3873
    • Joined: 2013/09/30 10:08:24
    • Status: offline
    Re: Giving the singer more level 2016/01/09 06:04:19 (permalink)
    revnice1
    I don't think my Traveler has a reverb. I have the older one, which I think is obsolete now, great unit though.


    Oh sorry I work with a Mk3 from time to time. In that case your only options are patching in an external hardware reverb or monitoring everything through Sonar. In the last case you will need to get your latency down to an acceptable level, so it really depends on your system. For a hardware patch you could use CueMix to direct the incoming mic signal to another output, throw that through a reverb and patch it back in to the original headphone mix.
    #18
    MacFurse
    Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 324
    • Joined: 2013/11/10 07:25:54
    • Location: Newcastle - Australia
    • Status: offline
    Re: Giving the singer more level 2016/01/09 08:00:41 (permalink)
    cryophonik
    I'm sure that people have different preferences here, but I personally NEVER record the singer into the original song project.  I export the song to WAV and import that WAV into a new project template that is already set up for recording vocals.  My template already has tracks inserted for the guide track, a folder full of ready-to-go tracks for the lead vocals, another for harmonies, etc. all pre-routed to busses, with a reverb already instantiated for the headphone mix, etc.  That gives me a lot more flexibility for controlling the headphone mix and latency is a non-issue.  I also use that project file for comping vocals, pitch-correction, etc. to clean up and finalize the vocals.  Once the raw vocals are done, I bring them back into the original project for final mixing.


    +1  what I do too except I do all comping and correction here too before bring back to the  main project. just easier.

    Platinum. i7 4771 3.5ghz. ECU H87 mobo with 3 monitor support. 16gb Ripjaws 1600mhz. Focusrite 18i20. 2 x 250gb Samsung EVO SSD's OP/Programs. 2x1TB Seagate Baracuda sata3 data drives. 200gb sata2 bootable drive for online and downloading only. Seagate 2tb USB 3.0 backup drive.  2x27in monitors. Rode K2 valve mic. Sontronics STC-1 pair. Studio Projects B1 condenser. SM58B. SM57B. Presonus Eureka Preamp.
    #19
    Cactus Music
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 8424
    • Joined: 2004/02/09 21:34:04
    • Status: offline
    Re: Giving the singer more level 2016/01/09 12:05:49 (permalink)
    Once you have a hardware set up for cue mix,, it is always there and there's no need to waste time mucking about with your project. It's dependable and fast. And does not have to cost very much at all.
    And by hardware, I will also include if you purchase the correct interface as many are capable of multiple cue mixes with reverb. 

    Johnny V  
    Cakelab  
    Focusrite 6i61st - Tascam us1641. 
    3 Desktops and 3 Laptops W7 and W10
     http://www.cactusmusic.ca/
     
     
    #20
    bitman
    Max Output Level: -34 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 4105
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 14:11:54
    • Location: Keystone Colorado
    • Status: offline
    Re: Giving the singer more level 2016/01/09 13:50:35 (permalink)
    Yeah little behringer mixers with verb at the various play stations is a treat.
    Distribution to more than one mixer requires some sort of distribution but if you are the least bit commercial, this setup is vital for the performers experience and also your sanity.
     
    I used some surplus distribution amps and snake cable off ebay to do it when i was taking money.
    I also used high iso phones in the tracking room too.
    #21
    konradh
    Max Output Level: -42 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3325
    • Joined: 2006/01/16 16:07:06
    • Status: offline
    Re: Giving the singer more level 2016/01/09 15:07:17 (permalink)
    You could always make it a routine to route everything but vocals to a single bus so you could just pull the bus level down.
     
    I always have buses for drums, bass, guitars, keyboards, orch, so I can just pull several buses down quickly.  If everything except for vocals went to a single bus, it would be even quicker.

    Konrad
    Current album and more: http://www.themightykonrad.com/

    Sonar X1d Producer. V-Studio 700. PC: Intel i7 CPU 3.07GHz, 12 GB RAM. Win 7 64-bit. RealGuitar, RealStrat, RealLPC, Ivory II, Vienna Symphonic, Hollywood Strings, Electr6ity, Acoustic Legends, FabFour, Scarbee Rick/J-Bass/P-Bass, Kontakt 5. NI Session Guitar. Boldersounds, Noisefirm. EZ Drummer 2. EZ Mix. Melodyne Assist. Guitar Rig 4. Tyros 2, JV-1080, Kurzweil PC2R, TC Helicon VoiceWorks+. Rode NT2a, EV RE20. Presonus Eureka.  Rokit 6s. 
    #22
    revnice1
    Max Output Level: -69 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1082
    • Joined: 2007/09/21 14:43:56
    • Status: offline
    Re: Giving the singer more level 2016/01/09 16:13:51 (permalink)
    konradh:
    That's very much like working with a mixed track, you can turn the whole track down at once. I'm into the idea of doing vocals in a different file because I won't have 5 or 6 plugs in the Synth Rack.
    rev
    #23
    jpetersen
    Max Output Level: -61 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1499
    • Joined: 2015/07/11 20:22:53
    • Status: offline
    Re: Giving the singer more level 2016/01/09 16:28:28 (permalink)
    @GaryMedia: I have the MA400 and the Artcessories MyMonitor. Both take 12v and I find both distort before there is enough headphone level for the vocalist to overcome what's coming in directly through bone conduction, etc.
     
    @bitman: I use those Behringer Xenyx mixers with built-in FX. I tap off the audio directly after the mic preamp and send that out to RCA sockets I have mounted on the back.
     
    I need to first set the trim knob (gain) to get optimum output.
     
    The output from the interface returns to one of the line level channels on the Behringer mixer.
    The artist can now set their own overall headphone level, their own reverb (essential to encourage shy singers to belt it out) and their own backing track level.
     
    I would love to use my Mackie 1202 VLZ4. It has super quiet preamps, sockets at the back ready-fitted for tapping the preamp signal after gain and before EQ and levels, but unfortunately it has no built-in FX and that is what it's all about.
    #24
    GregGraves
    Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 282
    • Joined: 2014/11/14 11:32:14
    • Location: florida usa
    • Status: offline
    Re: Giving the singer more level 2016/01/15 05:10:32 (permalink)
    You need a proper mixing board with inputs that can be routed to BOTH the mains and to subgroup outs.
     
    1. The output from the DA converter carrying the mix output from Sonar should be routed to a stereo input on the board, and route that fader to Mains Out ... Mains Out goes to the monitors and the headphone(s).  There is NO vocal in this mix.
    2. The vocalist(s) mic(s) should be routed to Mains Out --AND-- routed to the Subgroup-Output which feeds the AD converter "in" which records the track(s) in Sonar.  Input Echo should be OFF.
    3. Record vocals dry.  Don't RECORD reverb, EQ or compression. The reverb or whatever in the headphones to assist tonal accuracy of the singer should NOT be routed to Sonar, and should not come somehow from a Sonar plugin.  Use outboard gear or effects built into the board -- those effects are routed ONLY to the headphones.  You can always cut a boarder shorter, but you can't cut it longer.
    4. Adjust the mic(s) for PROPER gain for recording.   Then leave alone. 
    5. Use the fader carrying the mix output from Sonar (number 1 above) to bring the mix up or down in the headphones to make the singer happy. 
    6. None of Sonar's faders need be adjusted.  You don't need to export anything.  You don't need an alternative mix.  You do need some beer because the vocalist is completely tone deaf and oblivious to the glaringly apparent fact that they cannot sing, and that you'd do the world a favor by going ahead with your plan involving a shallow grave out behind the vacant store next door to the studio.

    I am "Five Foot Wall" on Spotify, Deezer, etc.  Platinum, Windows 7 64bit, AMD FX-6100 hex-core @3.8ghz, 8 gig ram (never use more than 5 gigs), Delta 44, UM-2
    [Note: join date reflects inability to migrate old account to new forum]
     
     
    https://greggraves.bandcamp.com/track/whatcha-gonna-do
    https://greggraves.bandcamp.com/track/true-believer-man
     
    #25
    revnice1
    Max Output Level: -69 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1082
    • Joined: 2007/09/21 14:43:56
    • Status: offline
    Re: Giving the singer more level 2016/01/19 17:09:52 (permalink)
    I just got the answer from MOTU tech support. It's much simpler than most of the answers above and you DO NOT NEED any additional hardware!
     
    In this example, my Sonar outputs are Analog 1/2 and I have only a mixed track to sing to in the project, and empty vocal tracks waiting to be filled.
     
    1) Open CueMix and under the Phones menu, choose Analog 1/2
    2) Choose Analog 1/2 from the dropdown menu found just above the CueMix master fader
    3) Make sure the CueMix master fader and the CueMix vocal input fader are unmuted and turned up
     
    That's it! You can now control the vocal level with a combination of moving the vocal input fader in CueMix or turning down the mixed track in Sonar. You can also patch in an external effects processor to allow singers to hear reverb as they sing that doesn't get recorded.
     
    Thanks to all for all the amazing tips! I can see that additional hardware would make the reverb easier to patch in because that feature in Sonar seems to work depending on the phase of the moon. My singers don't care though, and this will definitely work for me. 
     
    Thanks - rev
    #26
    Palmerston
    Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1
    • Joined: 2016/11/23 13:42:58
    • Status: offline
    Re: Giving the singer more level 2016/11/23 16:50:08 (permalink)
    Hi, I am using Sonar Artiste with a Focusrite Saphire 2i2. I am having problems with the output levels, both headphone and main volume to my powered speakers. Is there a way of raising these levels within the programme please?  
    #27
    Bristol_Jonesey
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 16775
    • Joined: 2007/10/08 15:41:17
    • Location: Bristol, UK
    • Status: offline
    Re: Giving the singer more level 2016/11/23 16:58:29 (permalink)
    Hi and welcome to the forum.
     
    Please start your own thread and list you entire system spec including interface, driver etc and how you've got things set up in Artiste

    CbB, Platinum, 64 bit throughout
    Custom built i7 3930, 32Gb RAM, 2 x 1Tb Internal HDD, 1 x 1TB system SSD (Win 7), 1 x 500Gb system SSD (Win 10), 2 x 1Tb External HDD's, Dual boot Win 7 & Win 10 64 Bit, Saffire Pro 26, ISA One, Adam P11A,
    #28
    Jump to:
    © 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1