Hardware Verses Software Plugins and Routing

Author
Abbie
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 98
  • Joined: 2007/02/11 22:57:40
  • Status: offline
2011/10/02 15:11:29 (permalink)

Hardware Verses Software Plugins and Routing

This may sound like a stupid questions. However, I was looking at a mastering limiter plugin. The company offers both plug-ins and rack mounted hardware. The only hardware I've ever used is on the input (Compressors and Pres). Which is better plug-ins or hardware, and what is the most efficient way to route a path out of a DAW and back when using hardware (Should I create a sub which routes out the entire signal, bring it back on the master?)?
 
Thanks!
#1

3 Replies Related Threads

    AT
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 10654
    • Joined: 2004/01/09 10:42:46
    • Location: TeXaS
    • Status: offline
    Re:Hardware Verses Software Plugins and Routing 2011/10/02 18:48:34 (permalink)
    Hardware?  Is it analog?  Digital hardware does have a slight advantage, too, since it is optimized for one task.  But it is the skill of the user more than the type of equipment used.  I like analog hardware going in or rerecording soft synths, and in mastering.  It adds a little something to pure digital, tho I admit digital is getting better and better with saturation etc.

    AS far as routing, you want to hear the effect while re-recording, which means coming to the external hardware but not necessarily the signal you are listening to.  That gets recorded, which is what, ideally, you should be listening to.  In sonar I tap a sub out, route that to a hardware out, into my external hardware and then back into in 1/2.  That signal is what I listen to.


    https://soundcloud.com/a-pleasure-dome
    http://www.bnoir-film.com/  
     
    there came forth little children out of the city, and mocked him, and said unto him, Go up, thou bald head; go up, thou bald head.
    24 And he turned back, and looked on them, and cursed them in the name of the Lord. And there came forth two she bears out of the wood, and tare forty and two children of them.
    #2
    aleef
    Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 431
    • Joined: 2006/09/14 20:02:26
    • Location: la/ca
    • Status: offline
    Re:Hardware Verses Software Plugins and Routing 2011/10/02 23:23:29 (permalink)
    i would have to give hardware the advantage. as much as i wanted to believe otherwise, (the good stuff is so expensive).. i finally broke the bank and got a professional channel strip/preamp and it has changed my life. i actually bought the unit for my 77 jazz bass, but it sounded fantastic on everything we tried it on.. even the 57 for vocals. as far as routing i do have to re-patch(no big deal) i have some great plugs, but i dont always need them..i think its best to have power and good sound before going ITB. and i know im' gonna catch hell for saying this.." there is no way around it ...you are gonna have to fork out those dollars, for a hardware pro level preamp/channel strip" its crazy software emulates everything but the preamp.. why??

    Intel i7 3820 3.6 GHz
    ASUS Sabertooth X79 16Gb   
    SonarX2PE ProTools 11 
    RME HDSP9632
    #3
    mudgel
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 12010
    • Joined: 2004/08/13 00:56:05
    • Location: Linton Victoria (Near Ballarat)
    • Status: offline
    Re:Hardware Verses Software Plugins and Routing 2011/10/03 00:08:07 (permalink)
    Use SONAR's External Insert Plugin.
     
    It allows you to insert hardware units into the signal chain as if it was a software plugin.
     
    SONAR will compensate for the round trip latency introduced by this process.
     
    As to whether hardware is better than software.
     
    The operator will have a greater impact than either software or hardware.
     
    I use a pair of external preamps for processing mic/line signals coming into the box. I also have a channel strip for use outside the box but to be honest I'm getting such good results purely ITB that sometimes I don't bother going the extra step.
     
    Whatever makes it easy as long as it doesn't compromise the sound quality.

    Mike V. (MUDGEL)

    STUDIO: Win 10 Pro x64, SPlat & CbB x64,
    PC: ASUS Z370-A, INTEL i7 8700k, 32GIG DDR4 2400, OC 4.7Ghz.
    Storage: 7 TB SATA III, 750GiG SSD & Samsung 500 Gig 960 EVO NVMe M.2.
    Monitors: Adam A7X, JBL 10” Sub.
    Audio I/O & DSP Server: DIGIGRID IOS & IOX.
    Screen: Raven MTi + 43" HD 4K TV Monitor.
    Keyboard Controller: Native Instruments Komplete Kontrol S88.
    #4
    Jump to:
    © 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1