smallstonefan
Max Output Level: -48 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2724
- Joined: 2003/11/20 11:41:35
- Location: Papillion, Nebraska
- Status: offline
High pass/low pass - front / back
Hi all, I typically high pass and low pass my tracks using an eq as the first insert. It has occurred to me that character EQs and other effects could create new content that should be removed. Also, if you apply the filtering first, you are not necessarily giving your other effects a full spectrum to work with.
So my question: do you apply your hi/lo pass filters at the front of your chain, the back, or both?
|
Karyn
Ma-Ma
- Total Posts : 9200
- Joined: 2009/01/30 08:03:10
- Location: Lincoln, England.
- Status: offline
Re: High pass/low pass - front / back
2015/02/16 11:47:46
(permalink)
I tend to apply Hi pass first, to stop random low freqs from hitting compressors and stuff. I put low pass (if I use it) last.
Mekashi Futo. Get 10% off all Waves plugins.Current DAW. i7-950, Gigabyte EX58-UD5, 12Gb RAM, 1Tb SSD, 2x2Tb HDD, nVidia GTX 260, Antec 1000W psu, Win7 64bit, Studio 192, Digimax FS, KRK RP8G2, Sonar Platinum
|
FastBikerBoy
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 11326
- Joined: 2008/01/25 16:15:36
- Location: Watton, Norfolk, UK
- Status: offline
Re: High pass/low pass - front / back
2015/02/16 12:04:33
(permalink)
I use hi pass on tracks at the front end but I also usually have one on my master buss. I rarely use lo pass except for bass tracks or kick, snare etc.
When I do it's at the end.
|
batsbrew
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 10037
- Joined: 2007/06/07 16:02:32
- Location: SL,UT
- Status: offline
Re: High pass/low pass - front / back
2015/02/16 12:14:06
(permalink)
NEVER LOW OR HIGH PASS......
unless it's needed.
it ends up being 'unnecessary' math you are doing to the digital wave files.......
AND
if you are not using LINEAR PHASE ACCURATE EQ'S.....
then you may very well be adding phase problems and artifacts to your mix that you do not want.
that said.......
i DO use low pass on any tracks that i did not get right to start with.
and i always end up tweaking mids and highs on almost every track.
but i use a nice EQ (Waves Linear Phase EQ) on sub busses, and will use the SONITUS eq (remember, i'm on Sonar 6PE) to add color to things i want to tweak, but usually only subtractive eq.
|
smallstonefan
Max Output Level: -48 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2724
- Joined: 2003/11/20 11:41:35
- Location: Papillion, Nebraska
- Status: offline
Re: High pass/low pass - front / back
2015/02/16 18:30:38
(permalink)
thanks for your thoughts everyone!
|
sharke
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 13933
- Joined: 2012/08/03 00:13:00
- Location: NYC
- Status: offline
Re: High pass/low pass - front / back
2015/02/16 18:44:54
(permalink)
I think people go a little nuts with the HPF's and end up taking all the warmth out of the sound. Sometimes all that's needed is a low shelf to attenuate the lows, not remove them.
JamesWindows 10, Sonar SPlat (64-bit), Intel i7-4930K, 32GB RAM, RME Babyface, AKAI MPK Mini, Roland A-800 Pro, Focusrite VRM Box, Komplete 10 Ultimate, 2012 American Telecaster!
|
Danny Danzi
Moderator
- Total Posts : 5810
- Joined: 2006/10/05 13:42:39
- Location: DanziLand, NJ
- Status: offline
Re: High pass/low pass - front / back
2015/02/17 02:03:54
(permalink)
sharke
I think people go a little nuts with the HPF's and end up taking all the warmth out of the sound. Sometimes all that's needed is a low shelf to attenuate the lows, not remove them.
^This times 1000! If you get the recording correct, you shouldn't even need to do much of this if any as bats mentioned also. The key is to really concentrate on getting your prints right and knowing what a good print is supposed to sound like. Nothing in the new technology world will help you get a good recording other than your ears and experience. Once you accomplish that on a trustworthy monitor system that doesn't give you any false representation, all the rest of this stuff is easy and doesn't need to be over thought or over processed. :) -Danny
My Site Fractal Audio Endorsed Artist & Beta Tester
|
smallstonefan
Max Output Level: -48 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2724
- Joined: 2003/11/20 11:41:35
- Location: Papillion, Nebraska
- Status: offline
Re: High pass/low pass - front / back
2015/03/09 11:36:51
(permalink)
I'm going to be finalizing some mixes for a band next week and I'm looking forward to trying the shelves instead of high pass filters. thanks again guys!
|
Bristol_Jonesey
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 16775
- Joined: 2007/10/08 15:41:17
- Location: Bristol, UK
- Status: offline
Re: High pass/low pass - front / back
2015/03/09 17:29:50
(permalink)
Danny Danzi
sharke
I think people go a little nuts with the HPF's and end up taking all the warmth out of the sound. Sometimes all that's needed is a low shelf to attenuate the lows, not remove them.
^This times 1000! If you get the recording correct, you shouldn't even need to do much of this if any as bats mentioned also. The key is to really concentrate on getting your prints right and knowing what a good print is supposed to sound like. Nothing in the new technology world will help you get a good recording other than your ears and experience. Once you accomplish that on a trustworthy monitor system that doesn't give you any false representation, all the rest of this stuff is easy and doesn't need to be over thought or over processed. :)
-Danny
I think this is very true when you're dealing with recordings made by yourself. I find it more appropriate to get the HPF out on many of the patches you get with soft synths. That's where an awful lot of mud can build up and robs the entire mix of headroom.
CbB, Platinum, 64 bit throughoutCustom built i7 3930, 32Gb RAM, 2 x 1Tb Internal HDD, 1 x 1TB system SSD (Win 7), 1 x 500Gb system SSD (Win 10), 2 x 1Tb External HDD's, Dual boot Win 7 & Win 10 64 Bit, Saffire Pro 26, ISA One, Adam P11A,
|
Jeff Evans
Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5139
- Joined: 2009/04/13 18:20:16
- Location: Ballarat, Australia
- Status: offline
Re: High pass/low pass - front / back
2015/03/09 17:41:07
(permalink)
And Bristol would know too being the owner of the Yamaha physical modelling synth capable of doing great analog sounds. I have been working with the Novation Supernova II lately and it too is seriously fat in the bottom end.
I also own a Roland JD800 and the bottom end of that is just earth shattering. I have got that connected to a Samson mixer which has a nice HPF on every channel. It cuts off at 75Hz. After switching that in the bottom end of the JD is just about right. (normal that is)
Not that this is of any use but the Kawai K5000 additive synth has just the most beautiful bottom end. No matter how many overdubs you do the bottom end just never builds up. Ever.
With synth hardware and some VST's too the HPF can be very helpful. But overall I agree with Danny in that one can also overuse it as well. One of the great things about a VU meter too is that if there is excessive low end or sub stuff you won't want the VU will swing wildly and let you know. (VU's go down to DC) I find it can be very handy for setting the HPF cutoff frequency. You can start down very low eg 20Hz and just slowly move it up. At some point all the low end wild swinging of the needle just goes away. It is also surprising how low that cutoff can be as well before that happens.
Specs i5-2500K 3.5 Ghz - 8 Gb RAM - Win 7 64 bit - ATI Radeon HD6900 Series - RME PCI HDSP9632 - Steinberg Midex 8 Midi interface - Faderport 8- Studio One V4 - iMac 2.5Ghz Core i5 - Sierra 10.12.6 - Focusrite Clarett thunderbolt interface Poor minds talk about people, average minds talk about events, great minds talk about ideas -Eleanor Roosevelt
|
smallstonefan
Max Output Level: -48 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2724
- Joined: 2003/11/20 11:41:35
- Location: Papillion, Nebraska
- Status: offline
Re: High pass/low pass - front / back
2015/03/09 17:45:18
(permalink)
Jeff,
Thanks for the tip about the VU meter! I also have a JD-800 and know exactly what you're talking about regarding the bottom end. :)
|