Philip
Max Output Level: -34.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4062
- Joined: 2007/03/21 13:09:13
- Status: offline
RE: How good is Garritan Pocket Orchestra?
2007/09/28 13:10:27
(permalink)
I may be wrong but check your Saxe(s) in DimLE GPO; I've got about 10 Sax choices in DimPro, half of which are extremely decent; I'm guessing DimLE/GPO has only a couple GBytes of 'wave-synths'. Also, check CW website samples of DimPro (GPO) Sax, etc. The Saxes are what made me switch, Mark. Why is GPO in DimPro better than GPO in DimLE? GPO is GPO, is it not? Unfortunately, DimLE-GPO appears to be only a sample of GPO. I think it has about 1/2 of GPO; albeit DimPro Orchestras are more G-Byte intensive than GPO. AKA: I use nothing from DimLE, except 'Xmas Bells' if I recall (which may be under Bells) Note: DimPro has Vista issues and may still have 32-bit limitations; but CW seems to imply (in Sonar-7 ads) that DimPro upgrades are Vista do-able  . Once you play a DimPro "Les Paul" guitar or "Grand Piano" (which neither GPO nor DimLE seems to me to have) ... methinks you'll be a believer. Philip
|
mwall
Max Output Level: -65 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1262
- Joined: 2003/12/02 14:15:41
- Location: East of Charlotte, NC
- Status: offline
RE: How good is Garritan Pocket Orchestra?
2007/09/28 13:31:01
(permalink)
Unfortunately, DimLE-GPO appears to be only a sample of GPO. I think it has about 1/2 of GPO; albeit DimPro Orchestras are more G-Byte intensive than GPO. I was about to cry false advertising, but then I looked closer at Cake's description of the GPO that comes with DimLE: "In addition, you get the special edition of the Garritan Pocket Orchestra, expressively programmed for Dimension LE."
|
Philip
Max Output Level: -34.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4062
- Joined: 2007/03/21 13:09:13
- Status: offline
RE: How good is Garritan Pocket Orchestra?
2007/09/28 15:01:59
(permalink)
Its the 30GBytes worth of wave nuances in DimPro Orchestra vs a fraction of that in DimLE and GPO Orchestras. IMHO, the relatively few (10-20) DimPro Guitars and Pianos are so (sur-)realistic that I'm blown away. I'd never buy a real guitar or piano after this; and, I have hundreds of cheezy ROMpler pianos and guitars I eschew henceforth.
|
mwall
Max Output Level: -65 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1262
- Joined: 2003/12/02 14:15:41
- Location: East of Charlotte, NC
- Status: offline
RE: How good is Garritan Pocket Orchestra?
2007/09/28 16:13:35
(permalink)
So, what your saying is, don't get my hopes up with DimLE, and to go for the DimPro upgrade special, right?
|
haydn12
Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
- Total Posts : 322
- Joined: 2007/01/29 17:12:04
- Status: offline
RE: How good is Garritan Pocket Orchestra?
2007/09/28 16:34:51
(permalink)
I haven't checked out the version of GPO in DimLE yet so I'm not sure how much of the original Kontakt programming is carried over. If it's like the Kontakt programming, then just playing through the sounds may be disappointing. The power of GPO is in the controllers. I'm not sure if DimLE has Flex Envelopes which are used heavily in the GPO Kontakt programming. The flex envelopes shape the attack of the sounds and will change from a slow attack at low velocities to fast and heavier attacks at higher velocities. The mod wheel in the Kontakt version controls both volume and timbre. The combination of these controllers give GPO great flexibility in writing without having to stop and change articulations for many of the sounds. I use VSL, EWQLSO, Project SAM, Kirk Hunter and other libraries but still find myself coming back to GPO for woodwinds, strings and the french horns (plus some of the other brass mutes which the other libraries seem to miss). I also use the piano quite a bit in the full GPO as I like it's smooth virtual velocity layers. Jim
|
Philip
Max Output Level: -34.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4062
- Joined: 2007/03/21 13:09:13
- Status: offline
RE: How good is Garritan Pocket Orchestra?
2007/09/28 18:46:54
(permalink)
Exactly Mark ... DimLE/GPO was a complete disapointment for me; no better than TTS, GS, and GM. My FantomX SRX-06 Complete Orchestra was far superior to DimLE/GPO's limited polyphony until I got DimPro. The 2 DimPro free expansion packs aren't nearly as spectacular as DimPro-GPO; but are worth downloading (only a few G-Bytes) from CW. Seriously; DimPro absolutely redeems the $230 or so I paid for it and is better than 85% of my Fantom ROMplers (including Roland's SRX-06 Complete Orchestra). That is saying alot  ... Just make sure you have ample disk space or another dedicated H. Drive. Which would you prefer; one or 2 quality 'Les Paul' overdrive guitars or grand pianos (in DimPro) that sound better than anything out there ... or 1000 cheezy guitar and piano synths that waste your time and make you feel like another 2nd-rate MIDI-synth? DimPro is (IMHO) the very best for complete orchestra quality for 85-90% of my rock and orchestra needs. DimPro's few pianos and guitars are so chimy and realistic I would never consider buying a 'real' sax, guitar, or piano ... nor some other Roland ROMpler ... nor some other synthesizer ... nor Virius synthesizer, etc.
post edited by Philip - 2007/09/28 19:09:20
|
mwall
Max Output Level: -65 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1262
- Joined: 2003/12/02 14:15:41
- Location: East of Charlotte, NC
- Status: offline
RE: How good is Garritan Pocket Orchestra?
2007/09/28 19:06:59
(permalink)
And in what department do you work at Cakewalk? Just kidding. Thanks for the information and opinion. Another question: Does the GPO you speak of come with DimPro, or is that a separate expansion pack you have to purchase.
|
Philip
Max Output Level: -34.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4062
- Joined: 2007/03/21 13:09:13
- Status: offline
RE: How good is Garritan Pocket Orchestra?
2007/09/28 19:25:33
(permalink)
I'm just a noob; so be aware of it being just 2-cents worth of advice. Yes, the GPO I use comes with DimPro. Also remember, you adjust (peradventure) many parameters of the quality of each DimPro instance. I have 4 DimPro's running on each song. I've only had to freeze tracks (to conserve CPUs) in one complex symphony ... to prevent drop-outs. (And, no; my pieces are not out there yet; hopefully we'll critique each other more somewhat in that day)
|
dredd i knight
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
- Total Posts : 132
- Joined: 2006/04/04 21:29:31
- Location: London UK
- Status: offline
RE: How good is Garritan Pocket Orchestra?
2007/09/28 23:22:07
(permalink)
the strings that come with dim pro are better than much of garritan pocket in my opinion. and some of the expansion pack stuff, woodwinds oboes are good too. i dont know how le sounds but to my mind dim pro is way better than the tts1! there is no comparison.
|
tls11823
Max Output Level: -86 dBFS
- Total Posts : 227
- Joined: 2003/11/06 16:40:41
- Location: Harrisburg, PA, USA
- Status: offline
RE: How good is Garritan Pocket Orchestra?
2007/09/29 01:57:01
(permalink)
As somebody who just ordered Dim Pro today, I have to say thanks to you guys for helping me get excited about my purchase. I was looking forward to it before, but am really looking forward to it now.
|
Philip
Max Output Level: -34.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4062
- Joined: 2007/03/21 13:09:13
- Status: offline
RE: How good is Garritan Pocket Orchestra?
2007/09/29 19:10:08
(permalink)
Congrats Tls, I know S7 synths supposedly 'rock and all' with funky Rapture, funky DropZone, and funky Z3ta ... 3 more cheezy synths that I'm sure I'll trash and forget by year-end. The real problem with cheezy midi's is they don't emulate guitar or piano enough to be leads, nor stringed instruments. How can I expect to compose a lasting song with GM quality instruments and weird synths. Man is designed to enjoy stringed instruments, horns, and vocals. DimPro gets 2/3 correct DimPro Strings, Guitar, and Piano patches will remain in my songs as leads as precious few leads. Now, if only my vocals could be redeemed, thus!  
|
efin
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 100
- Joined: 2006/08/01 11:01:47
- Status: offline
RE: How good is Garritan Pocket Orchestra?
2007/09/29 21:35:02
(permalink)
When you try out either GPO, make sure you really work with your reverb plugin before you make judgments. That's what sets the mood for whatever kind of instrument you want it to sound like. You can make a violin sound like a fiddle or a classical virtuoso just with reverb alone.
|
tls11823
Max Output Level: -86 dBFS
- Total Posts : 227
- Joined: 2003/11/06 16:40:41
- Location: Harrisburg, PA, USA
- Status: offline
RE: How good is Garritan Pocket Orchestra?
2007/09/30 13:20:37
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: Philip How can I expect to compose a lasting song with GM quality instruments and weird synths. On one hand I agree with you. A few weeks ago I was poking around in the instrument samples on the Cakewalk site, since I was planning on buying Dimension at some point. Then I listened to the Rapture stuff and was kind of captivated by some of the sounds there. They reminded me of Pink Floyd and things like that, which made up quite a bit of the music of my youth. I actually ended up buying Rapture first, and have had fun playing with it. It's also nice for deconstructing some of those old sounds and updating them. But I have a lot of playing ahead of me before I can declare any kind of victory. Most of my songs are more along the "realistic" lines, but I think there's some room for the off-the-wall stuff, too. My problem now is that I've been running Home Studio for a long time, and just upgraded to Sonar 6 in July (just missed the August cutoff - bummer). So I'm still getting used to those new toys. Then I went out and bought Rapture, and now am upgrading to Sonar 7 and Dim Pro at the same time. I'm going to be so busy learning and playing to create any music for a long time. (Oh yeah, and trying to squeeze home and work lives, too.) But it's tremendous fun, even if I'm only creating one- or two-minute snippets at a time and moving on to some other cool toy. ORIGINAL: Philip Man is designed to enjoy stringed instruments, horns, and vocals. DimPro gets 2/3 correct That's good to hear, and I'm really looking forward to playing around with it. I've been limping along for years with mainly the sounds of my Yamaha S03. Some of them are actually half-decent, but most won't ever be mistaken for the real instruments. Sound fonts have been helpful in bridging the gap in a limited way, but the things that I'm seeing in Dimension really have me worked up. ORIGINAL: Philip Now, if only my vocals could be redeemed, thus! You and me both, brother, you and me both. I keep trying to convince my wife to record some stuff, because she has a nice voice. But she hates to hear herself on recordings, so I'm counting on future generations of things like V-Vocal and the virtual singers to redeem me.
|
Philip
Max Output Level: -34.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4062
- Joined: 2007/03/21 13:09:13
- Status: offline
RE: How good is Garritan Pocket Orchestra?
2007/09/30 17:41:21
(permalink)
To be honest with God, myself, and others: Once I hum a few melodies worth pouring my heart (and/or lyrics) the rest is involves Piano-Chord-Theory I'm no virtuoso, piano-roll sequencing alone redeems everything for me; and requires 'honest instruments' to balance chord-notes, harmonize, and symphonize. Else I oft-choke the original melody with cheezy-half-baked-artificial-sounding stuff. I love S-7 and suppose to need it more as Vista becomes viable one day; though HS6XL was perfect; Rapture makes *cool* sounds like 'Pink-Floyd' ... my wife and children seem to love melody and soft-rock better. I use "S-7 funky-synths" strictly as preludes to capture interest before the melody and song 'clears in' ... hopefully with quality-orchestra chords and notes. OFF TOPIC: For Vocals probably my own below average voice will oft be the best vocal lead(s) ... where vocal leads are indicated (IMHO), at least in the beginning. There's a lot of ways to redeem a bad vocal to be an average or better. I just bought Max Baxter's "The Rock and Roll Singer's Survival Manual" which is touted as a 'bible' for many. It helped me slightly. But, I've learned to achieve 'high-notes' by breaking posture-rules and singing upward (toward Heaven if you will) ... hands out-stretched and/or lifted up (high). Hyper-dramatic 'praise-mode' works wonders for vocals; Max Baxter speaks more of breathing and dieting than inspiring and glorifiying.
|
digimidi
Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
- Total Posts : 496
- Joined: 2003/11/15 19:21:08
- Location: Eastern part of the country
- Status: offline
RE: How good is Garritan Pocket Orchestra?
2007/10/06 13:42:01
(permalink)
Wow! I guess I would have to say, from all of the posts, that maybe, perhaps, the Garritan Pocket Orchestra may not be all that it's cracked up to be. Consequently, I wonder what would be the most inexpensive alternative. Garritan PERSONAL Orchestra or maybe some other software developer. I was just hoping to use it as a TTS-1 substiture, only with higher realism and quality.
I started out with nothing and I still have most of it left... http://daveowenmusic.com/http://fabulous52s.com/https://soundcloud.com/daveowenmusic Sonar Platinum Edition/Cakewalk by BandLab: Dell 8700 XPS i7 16GB RAM, Cyberpower laptop w/8GB RAM/i7/2GB NVidia card/Tascam US1641/Focusrite 18i6/Melodyne Studio 4/Waves Plugs (a lot)/Garritan/EWQL Symphony Silver & Fab 4 and a bunch of other stuff. Studio One 3/Magix Samplitude Pro X3 Suite/Mixcraft 8 Pro/Reaper/Acid Pro 8
|
Philip
Max Output Level: -34.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4062
- Joined: 2007/03/21 13:09:13
- Status: offline
RE: How good is Garritan Pocket Orchestra?
2007/10/06 15:47:03
(permalink)
Digi: IMHO, DimPro (you might be able to finangle an upgrade deal for ($1-200) (and your Quad Core) ... is all you need to trash TTS-1 forever if using XP-32. If I recall, TTS-1 doesn't support ACT nor automation! Ouch! GPO DimPro for XP-32 is a reasonable standard for the norm here. In your Vista config. it may NOT be; call CW tech-support specifically to be sure! If you thoroughly tested DimLE in Vista (eg. playing 5 instruments simultaneously without freezing tracks) and your not crashing, DimPro may be ideal. Or seriously consider dual boot with XP-32 and DimPro ... till Vista really works.  (You may need a local geek to help you dual boot to XP) 'Hope this helps.
|
hellogoodbye
Max Output Level: -64 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1343
- Joined: 2004/03/22 05:46:36
- Status: offline
RE: How good is Garritan Pocket Orchestra?
2007/10/07 11:13:13
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: Philip ... is all you need to trash TTS-1 forever The nice thing about the TTS-1 is that you only need on instance of it to play several instruments (up to 16). Dim LE only let's you play one instrument, so if you want an orchestra you will have to load Dim LE for each and every instrument. I don't like that... Is this the same with Dim Pro...?
post edited by hellogoodbye - 2007/10/07 11:23:39
Sonar 8.5 PE, Edirol FA-66, Behringer C-1. All instruments in my songs are VSTi's. Check out Soundclick
|
dbmusic
Max Output Level: -68 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1150
- Joined: 2005/07/04 12:52:46
- Location: Illinois
- Status: offline
RE: How good is Garritan Pocket Orchestra?
2007/10/07 11:17:40
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: digimidi Wow! I guess I would have to say, from all of the posts, that maybe, perhaps, the Garritan Pocket Orchestra may not be all that it's cracked up to be. Consequently, I wonder what would be the most inexpensive alternative. Garritan PERSONAL Orchestra or maybe some other software developer. I was just hoping to use it as a TTS-1 substiture, only with higher realism and quality. GPO opts for realism by design. If you expect to get a great sound by just pressing a key on your controller, then you'll be disappointed. Proper use of the Mod wheel to mimic the actual friction and tension of the bow moving across the strings is crucial. The pressure of the bow against the strings is never static. It is constantly changing. GPO is an instrument you must learn to "play". Put a violin in the hands of a novice and it sounds like crap. Put it in the hands of an accomplished violinist and it springs to life. The poor looping issue many find in GPO is actually an emulation of the change of bow direction. If you learn to play the GPO using the Mod wheel to mimic the actual back and forth movement and tension of the bow, in other words as you would play an actual violin, I think many of you naysayers will be pleasantly surprised.
|
kayehl
Max Output Level: -74 dBFS
- Total Posts : 846
- Joined: 2007/02/13 14:37:41
- Status: offline
RE: How good is Garritan Pocket Orchestra?
2007/10/07 11:39:50
(permalink)
Garritan Pocket Orchestra is an orchestral sample library with 85 different articulations of string, woodwind, brass and percussion instruments and they are programmed to respond expressively to data from a midi keyboard. The sounds can be mixed, panned, and reverb added to simulate different sized ensembles performing in different acoustic environments. I think Cakewalk TTS has a lot of good capabilities. It has 128 sampled 16 bit preset instruments, plus there are about 30 synthesis parameters that can be used to create new sounds with the underlying samples, and these parameters can also be recorded in real time using midi continuous controller data. Plus 10 different drum kits. Both these instruments have some really great capabilities that can be uncovered if you're willing to spend some time working with them, but they can't always match some of the sounds from a 24-32 bit sampler like dimension pro that comes with a huge library of ready made multisampled sounds.
post edited by kayehl - 2007/10/08 04:56:48
|
Philip
Max Output Level: -34.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4062
- Joined: 2007/03/21 13:09:13
- Status: offline
RE: How good is Garritan Pocket Orchestra?
2007/10/08 12:49:25
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: Philip ... is all you need to trash TTS-1 forever The nice thing about the TTS-1 is that you only need on instance of it to play several instruments (up to 16). Dim LE only let's you play one instrument, so if you want an orchestra you will have to load Dim LE for each and every instrument. I don't like that... Is this the same with Dim Pro...? Hellogoodbye, Maybe I was a bit rash about TTS  A month ago I used TTS-1 for your reason (with 16 MIDI tracks in a track folder  ); now I'm trying to limit my orchestral palette by using 4+ instances of DimPro and GS, GM, GM2, and other soundfonts from my FantomX (below) (DimLE didn't have good piano, sax, nor guitar patches (IMHO)) But I'm wrong about TTS being "trashed forever". I may peradventure use it for consolidating funky GM midi patches (gunshot, rain, seashore, etc.)
post edited by Philip - 2007/10/08 13:01:43
|
Susan G
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 12016
- Joined: 2003/11/05 22:49:26
- Location: Putnam County, NY
- Status: offline
RE: How good is Garritan Pocket Orchestra?
2007/10/12 03:31:00
(permalink)
Hi Danny- GPO opts for realism by design. If you expect to get a great sound by just pressing a key on your controller, then you'll be disappointed. Proper use of the Mod wheel to mimic the actual friction and tension of the bow moving across the strings is crucial. That's very interesting! I have whatever GPO limited version that comes with Dim Pro, and I definitely want more realistic strings, but the Mod wheel doesn't seem to do anything. What should the Mod wheel be assigned to for more realistic bowings? Thanks- -Susan
2.30 gigahertz Intel Core i7-3610QM; 16 GB RAMWindows 10 x64; NI Komplete Audio 6.SONAR Platinum (Lexington) x64
|
b rock
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 8717
- Joined: 2003/12/07 20:31:48
- Location: Anytown (South of Miami), U.S.A.
- Status: offline
RE: How good is Garritan Pocket Orchestra?
2007/10/12 08:22:11
(permalink)
GPO limited version that comes with Dim Pro ... What should the Mod wheel be assigned to for more realistic bowings? There isn't much control over articulation written into this version, Susan. Not at the GUI level (MIDI Matrix), nor within the core .sfz files. From a quick glance, I see the occasional sustain pedal or CC20 encoded. More can be done, but you'll have to roll up your sleeves and dive into some .sfz format editing. Combining Elements with crossfades and such (front panel tweaking) is another option.
|
dbmusic
Max Output Level: -68 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1150
- Joined: 2005/07/04 12:52:46
- Location: Illinois
- Status: offline
RE: How good is Garritan Pocket Orchestra?
2007/10/12 10:21:16
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: Susan G Hi Danny- GPO opts for realism by design. If you expect to get a great sound by just pressing a key on your controller, then you'll be disappointed. Proper use of the Mod wheel to mimic the actual friction and tension of the bow moving across the strings is crucial. That's very interesting! I have whatever GPO limited version that comes with Dim Pro, and I definitely want more realistic strings, but the Mod wheel doesn't seem to do anything. What should the Mod wheel be assigned to for more realistic bowings? Thanks- -Susan Hey Susan, I don't have experience with the limited version of GPO, but their website has some good documentation on how to get the most expression and feel out of "playing" the software: GPO Controls GPO definitely takes more time and effort. You have to really "think violin" and use the controls to provide expression...as opposed to just play a keyboard. As many of the examples on their website show, the results can be quite stunning.
|
jsaras
Max Output Level: -49 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2642
- Joined: 2003/12/07 10:40:00
- Location: Pasadena, CA-The Center of the Universe!
- Status: offline
RE: How good is Garritan Pocket Orchestra?
2007/10/12 10:27:32
(permalink)
I just purchased GPO for Reason. Although several of the patches have mod wheel dynamics (with the 'down' position of the wheel as 'loud'...thank goodness ...the original had the reverse behavior, which sucked IMO) much of the library was reprogrammed for round-robin sample alternation (great for increasing the realism of the solo patches) as well as a bank of 'velocity' banks that work for existing sequences. The bottom line, the programming of the GPO material in DimPro is different than the original instrument plugin, and that's not necessarily a bad thing.
|
feedback50
Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
- Total Posts : 564
- Joined: 2004/05/31 12:08:15
- Location: Oregon, USA
- Status: offline
RE: How good is Garritan Pocket Orchestra?
2007/10/12 10:32:47
(permalink)
I have been using Garritan GPO for a few years now as incidental parts behind pop/rock tunes. I am not saying it is the best library out there, but it will serve you well if you put the time into it. (I sometimes spend half a day just getting the voicings right for a single tune.) Trust me on this, you won't get convincing orchestrations until you get into the controller data, detuning, and layering of section and solo instruments with slight variations in phrasing and dynamics. Ambience is important too. (I don't know if the LE verision supports these controllers or voicings.) Also spend some time doing some simple orchestartions and use realistic voicings that a composer/arranger would use. You can't just play a chord like you would on piano and hope to hear anything convincing. If you like, the Garritan site has a free on-line version of the Rimsky-Korsakov text on orchestration (with audio examples) which may be a good place to start. It's a bit like guitar patches: if you don't think like a guitar player when you construct your chords and strum patterns, it will always sound fake. The same applies to orchestral patches.
|
Susan G
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 12016
- Joined: 2003/11/05 22:49:26
- Location: Putnam County, NY
- Status: offline
RE: How good is Garritan Pocket Orchestra?
2007/10/13 00:10:32
(permalink)
Thanks to all for your replies! I've played violin and cello just enough to know not to "play" them as I would a keyboard, and to not be in love with most of the string samples I've heard/own. I've listened to a few of the GPO demos, and I think it would definitely give me better results than what I'm getting now. Just being able to get more realistic articulations/bowings would help a lot. I actually have Rimsky-Korsakov's Principles of Orchestration around here somewhere... I might go ahead and spring for GPO rather than spend much time with the Dim Pro subset, since it sounds like the parameters are handled differently and I don't want to learn one way only to have to learn another. Just thinking out loud, as you can tell, but thanks again for the input! I gather GPO is the best orchestral library near this price range (always a consideration)? $200 at zzounds, but I haven't shopped around. Oh, and what do you think of the woodwinds & brass? I read one very good review of the flutes somewhere today. -Susan
2.30 gigahertz Intel Core i7-3610QM; 16 GB RAMWindows 10 x64; NI Komplete Audio 6.SONAR Platinum (Lexington) x64
|
feedback50
Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
- Total Posts : 564
- Joined: 2004/05/31 12:08:15
- Location: Oregon, USA
- Status: offline
RE: How good is Garritan Pocket Orchestra?
2007/10/13 10:59:23
(permalink)
Hi Susan, I have just begun to introduce more reeds (and french horn) into my arrangements. Mostly I do brief string sequences to beef up a bridge of a song that has already just about peaked dynamically. It gives a nice boost that is often followed by a break (for contrast) and a gradual rebuilding of intensity out to the end. I have not used the reeds solo yet, but more to reinforce or soften a string line. The little I have used them, they seem to be adequate, following predictable curves of stridency and darkness at the ends of their range. If you do get full blown GPO, look into the on-line tutorials available there on achieving realism in your sequences. It can be a bit labor intensive, and not everything turns out stellar, but I'm generally happy with the results.
|
haydn12
Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
- Total Posts : 322
- Joined: 2007/01/29 17:12:04
- Status: offline
RE: How good is Garritan Pocket Orchestra?
2007/10/13 18:17:06
(permalink)
I still think that GPO is a great package to start off with. It gives you quite a few string articulations including both 1st and 2nd violin sections. The woodwinds are quite good and very playable. The weakest part of the library is the brass. I like to mix Project SAM Solo Sessions brass with GPO. I also use the VSL Special Edition library for the 1st chair part of each section. I prefer GPO strings of the VSL strings. VSL SE strings don't have much vibrato plus they are missing mutes unless you get the extended library. GPO brass does have mutes which is very helpful as many library seem to skip over these. Jim
|