The Maillard Reaction
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 31918
- Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
- Status: offline
How many DAWs can do this?
I had a Wurli keys chord progression and some drumming set up in a project today and I was struggling to come up with some lyrics so I switched off my speakers, added a audio track, set the input, hooked up a 58, brought the 58 to my mixing desk, put on my headphones, and hit record so I could try some scratch tracking. As soon as I started singing I realized the vocal return through my headphones was too quiet. I kept singing while the DAW kept recording as I rerouted the output of the track from the Main Outs to my "master bus", turned up the track volume level, added an insert of Fab Filter Q2, set up a low cut and a tilt shift filter, added an insert of FabFilter Pro-C, and tweaked some compressor settings to make the vocals sound clear and loud. I don't think I have ever added effects in my DAW while recording and monitoring round trip through the DAW before today. It was nice because I wanted to get the vocal melody line recorded while it was in my head, and it was helpful to be able to quickly set it up so I could hear what I was singing. It made me wonder; How many DAWs can do this in 2014?
|
Jim Roseberry
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 9871
- Joined: 2004/03/23 11:34:51
- Location: Ohio
- Status: offline
Re: How many DAWs can do this?
2014/12/09 13:27:08
(permalink)
As long as you have low round-trip latency (and the machine can sustain the the load)... you're golden.
|
The Maillard Reaction
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 31918
- Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
- Status: offline
Re: How many DAWs can do this?
2014/12/09 13:43:19
(permalink)
My machine seems to run pretty darn good. ;-) It was adding the FX in the DAW while the transport was recording that seemed special to me. I never did that before, and I think it is because I used to think I could not add FX in the DAW while the recording was happening.
|
gswitz
Max Output Level: -18.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5694
- Joined: 2007/06/16 07:17:14
- Location: Richmond Virginia USA
- Status: offline
Re: How many DAWs can do this?
2014/12/09 14:38:03
(permalink)
StudioCat > I use Windows 10 and Sonar Platinum. I have a touch screen. I make some videos. This one shows how to do a physical loopback on the RME UCX to get many more equalizer nodes.
|
The Maillard Reaction
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 31918
- Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
- Status: offline
Re: How many DAWs can do this?
2014/12/09 14:48:33
(permalink)
Can you add FX to the FX bin in SONAR X while actively recording? In SONAR 8.5 you can't do it, and you can't change the output routing on the fly either. Maybe you can with X??? One thing I do really like about SONAR is the ability to arm a track and/or initiate a record in the middle of playback. That has been really useful to me.
|
ampfixer
Max Output Level: -20 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5508
- Joined: 2010/12/12 20:11:50
- Location: Ontario
- Status: offline
Re: How many DAWs can do this?
2014/12/09 16:30:59
(permalink)
When I play back a midi drum track, I usually have AD2 and BFD2 set up and flip between them to find the best sound. Same goes for simple plugs like a chorus. I didn't know I wasn't supposed to do it, but it worked. I guess ignorance can be your friend at times.
Regards, John I want to make it clear that I am an Eedjit. I have no direct, or indirect, knowledge of business, the music industry, forum threads or the meaning of life. I know about amps. WIN 10 Pro X64, I7-3770k 16 gigs, ASUS Z77 pro, AMD 7950 3 gig, Steinberg UR44, A-Pro 500, Sonar Platinum, KRK Rokit 6
|
bapu
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 86000
- Joined: 2006/11/25 21:23:28
- Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
- Status: offline
Re: How many DAWs can do this?
2014/12/09 16:33:54
(permalink)
mike_mccue It made me wonder; How many DAWs can do this in 2014?
So far, one. Yours.
|
bapu
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 86000
- Joined: 2006/11/25 21:23:28
- Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
- Status: offline
Re: How many DAWs can do this?
2014/12/09 16:35:52
(permalink)
☄ Helpfulby mike_mccue 2014/12/09 16:48:09
Bapsi
mike_mccue It made me wonder; How many DAWs can do this in 2014?
So far, one. Yours.
They ain't be much of 2014 left. Enjoy it while you cam McQ.
|
bapu
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 86000
- Joined: 2006/11/25 21:23:28
- Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
- Status: offline
Re: How many DAWs can do this?
2014/12/09 16:44:38
(permalink)
McQ It was nice because I wanted to get the vocal melody line recorded while it was in my head, and it was helpful to be able to quickly set it up so I could hear what I was singing.
Yeah, I can see that hitting the stop and start button & Ctll-Z as bookends to all that other activity will just kill the creativity.
|
Jim Roseberry
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 9871
- Joined: 2004/03/23 11:34:51
- Location: Ohio
- Status: offline
Re: How many DAWs can do this?
2014/12/09 16:56:49
(permalink)
mike_mccue Can you add FX to the FX bin in SONAR X while actively recording? In SONAR 8.5 you can't do it, and you can't change the output routing on the fly either. Maybe you can with X??? One thing I do really like about SONAR is the ability to arm a track and/or initiate a record in the middle of playback. That has been really useful to me.
Back in the day, you used to have to stop the transport for a lot of operations. Samplitude was one of the first DAWs (for PC) where many things could be done on-the-fly. Logic Audio (PC) was also good in this regard. The realtime/non-destructive quantize was awesome. For me, that created a whole new level of (realtime) expectation. Nowadays, as Cakewalk users we have a lot more options available on-the-fly.
|
The Maillard Reaction
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 31918
- Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
- Status: offline
Re: How many DAWs can do this?
2014/12/09 17:00:40
(permalink)
I guess I'll go ahead and list SONAR X as a "maybe"? Maybe someone will try to add a FX to the FX bin while recording on the same track and report back.
|
bapu
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 86000
- Joined: 2006/11/25 21:23:28
- Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
- Status: offline
Re: How many DAWs can do this?
2014/12/09 17:07:59
(permalink)
mike_mccue Maybe someone will try to add a FX to the FX bin while recording on the same track and report back.
That's a negative.
|
bapu
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 86000
- Joined: 2006/11/25 21:23:28
- Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
- Status: offline
Re: How many DAWs can do this?
2014/12/09 17:08:38
(permalink)
Could do it while playing.
|
bapu
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 86000
- Joined: 2006/11/25 21:23:28
- Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
- Status: offline
Re: How many DAWs can do this?
2014/12/09 17:09:55
(permalink)
Here's a thought McQ. Some FXs introduce latencey. Would you want to add that while in the midst of recording?
|
bapu
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 86000
- Joined: 2006/11/25 21:23:28
- Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
- Status: offline
Re: How many DAWs can do this?
2014/12/09 17:14:04
(permalink)
So now you have to stop and think "is this plug going to get me out of sync?" before adding it to your track while recording. That's a buzz kill, no?
|
The Maillard Reaction
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 31918
- Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
- Status: offline
Re: How many DAWs can do this?
2014/12/09 17:41:24
(permalink)
bapu So now you have to stop and think "is this plug going to get me out of sync?" before adding it to your track while recording. That's a buzz kill, no?
Major buzz kill. The thing is I was already singing, I reached down and added the effects, before I thought that I couldn't. That was pretty cool. Setting up parameters is something I can do in my sleep, so it just sort of worked out fine. I grabbed the idea and I had in my head and got it recorded, and if I added any latency on that one track it was worth it. I was surprised it worked. edit spelling
post edited by mike_mccue - 2014/12/09 17:49:33
|
bapu
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 86000
- Joined: 2006/11/25 21:23:28
- Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
- Status: offline
Re: How many DAWs can do this?
2014/12/09 17:45:38
(permalink)
mike_mccue
bapu So now you have to stop and think "is this plug going to get me out of sync?" before adding it to your track while recording. That's a buzz kill, no?
Major buzz kill. The thing is I was already singing, I reached down and added the effects, before I knew thought that I couldn't. That was pretty cool. Setting up parameters is something I can do in my sleep, so it just sort of worked out fine. I grabbed the idea and I had in my head and got it recorded, and if I added any latency on that one track it was worth it. I was surprised it worked.
I meant noticeable latency. When in play mode in X3e some plugs when added will get the track out of sync. Buzz Kill.
|
The Maillard Reaction
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 31918
- Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
- Status: offline
Re: How many DAWs can do this?
2014/12/09 17:58:24
(permalink)
Yeah, when I add a plugin to SONAR 8.5 when I am playing back I get this thing that sounds like a "gap". What I did today, while recording, didn't make any sort of interruption that I could hear.
|
Fog
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 12302
- Joined: 2008/02/27 21:53:35
- Location: UK
- Status: offline
Re: How many DAWs can do this?
2014/12/09 18:01:38
(permalink)
mike asking a question to get a load of "sonar head nodders" is a bit weak.. I use a few things beside sonar, I can point out weak area's in all 4 things. you are a tad biased, or haven't used rival products ?
|
Anderton
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 14070
- Joined: 2003/11/06 14:02:03
- Status: offline
Re: How many DAWs can do this?
2014/12/09 20:29:20
(permalink)
Fog mike asking a question to get a load of "sonar head nodders" is a bit weak.. I use a few things beside sonar, I can point out weak area's in all 4 things. you are a tad biased, or haven't used rival products ?
I think Mike was saying he thought SONAR doesn't do this. But it does. Not a feature I'd use, though.
|
gswitz
Max Output Level: -18.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5694
- Joined: 2007/06/16 07:17:14
- Location: Richmond Virginia USA
- Status: offline
Re: How many DAWs can do this?
2014/12/09 22:20:10
(permalink)
I definitely add FX and mix in RME TotalMix while capturing recordings using RME DigiCheck. Heck I massively mix the band turning things on and off all night. It's purpose built for it and works great imho. So, when I'm just capturing a performance where I'm sending to monitors and mains, this is a great tool and enables me to add and subtract FX all night long without a hiccup. In Sonar, when maybe I'm playing along to pre-recorded tracks or practicing a guitar part 500 times, hitting stop is not an issue for me. I obviously had never noticed that I can't add FX while recording in Sonar. Usually when I'm recording in Sonar my hands are full of guitar. So, I can imagine starting some loop to practice for an hour and when I take a break letting the loop keep playing and me reaching over and dragging some FX from the browser into the PC or adding new PC Modules. Not having to hit stop would be a nice feature. And you could mildly increase the timing of the output maybe without impacting the incoming recording... right? and maybe crossfade the new and old signals together so the user doesn't suffer more than necessary? Now, if you add a heavy convolution reverb, you get what you deserve. X4? Isn't that supposed to come out this week?
StudioCat > I use Windows 10 and Sonar Platinum. I have a touch screen. I make some videos. This one shows how to do a physical loopback on the RME UCX to get many more equalizer nodes.
|