dissfigured
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
- Total Posts : 147
- Joined: 2010/02/05 23:51:05
- Location: Dallas
- Status: offline
I need a sound card simple as that..
I require 1/4 inch input for guitar Stereo 1/8 output for headphones / speakers Compatible w/ Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit Compatible w/ sonar 8.5 Hoping to get something around $150 or less. I need to run the out on my line 6 spider directly into the PC. Was looking at m-audio delta44 but it lacks the stereo headphone/speaker output. I really only require 1 in and 1 out as I am recording 1 guitar track at a time, and I only wear 1 pair of headphones at a time :) Any tips, links, ebay auctions that will satisfy these requirements? Thanks for helping me. In the past I had an XP machine w/ SB audigy and Cakewalk home studio (prior to sonar)and loved it. Seems vista and win 7 have complicated things a bit so I am sort of re-entering home studio recording, and it is a bit overwhelming all the sudden. It used to be so simple :)
|
brundlefly
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 14250
- Joined: 2007/09/14 14:57:59
- Location: Manitou Spgs, Colorado
- Status: offline
Re:I need a sound card simple as that..
2010/02/06 11:52:18
(permalink)
Stereo 1/8 output for headphones / speakers I'm not up on what's currently out there with these features and the best drivers and low latency performance, so I'll defer to others on that. I just wanted to throw out that since most decent interfaces will have a 1/4" headphone out, you shouldn't limit you requirements to an 1/8" headphone out. You can always use a 1/4"-1/8" adapter or, better yet, get a good set of headphones with a 1/4" plug.
|
dissfigured
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
- Total Posts : 147
- Joined: 2010/02/05 23:51:05
- Location: Dallas
- Status: offline
Re:I need a sound card simple as that..
2010/02/06 11:55:53
(permalink)
Good point. A even have one of those adapters already. Thanks.
|
stratman70
Max Output Level: -45 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3044
- Joined: 2006/09/12 20:34:12
- Location: Earth
- Status: offline
Re:I need a sound card simple as that..
2010/02/06 12:32:15
(permalink)
You cannot just plug headphones into the output of a sound card (except for a sound blaster which has a headphone out jack)which is really going backwards. If you can swing $200 you can get an M Audio Audiophile 2496 (that's what I have) and a Mackie 4 channel VLZ3 mixer. Then you can even plug a mic in, etc. I use the 1202vlz3 ($300) and in\out to my sound card. The little 4 channel has the same quality, just less ins/outs. But plenty for what you want to do You might want to check out the mixer-Perhaps a used AP2496 on ebay or something for less.
|
dissfigured
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
- Total Posts : 147
- Joined: 2010/02/05 23:51:05
- Location: Dallas
- Status: offline
Re:I need a sound card simple as that..
2010/02/06 12:33:30
(permalink)
Looks like most of the sound cards I see have a left input and right input and then left and right outs. I used to just plug my guitar into the "mic in" and that would record to a single stereo track and I would listen to it with my "speaker out" That is what I am hoping to do. For some reason, my windows 7 Machine will not see my audigy card.
|
dissfigured
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
- Total Posts : 147
- Joined: 2010/02/05 23:51:05
- Location: Dallas
- Status: offline
Re:I need a sound card simple as that..
2010/02/06 12:37:05
(permalink)
so nowadays if you were to mic a guitar, you have to plug the guitar to a mixer and then the left and right outs from the mixer go to the left and right ins of the sound card? And suppose you want to listen to music on your PC does each speaker need to plug into a separate output? This seems a bit complex. They still sell computer speakers that have a single stereo jack. Surely modern soundcards are equipped to handle this.
|
dissfigured
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
- Total Posts : 147
- Joined: 2010/02/05 23:51:05
- Location: Dallas
- Status: offline
Re:I need a sound card simple as that..
2010/02/06 12:39:12
(permalink)
AP2496 looks lie the AP2496 uses RCA inputs so I would run a 1/4 cord from the out on the amp to a splitter that has RCA connections on it and run it to the AP2496? I swear I am not ****ed, things have just changed a lot since I did this last.
|
stratman70
Max Output Level: -45 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3044
- Joined: 2006/09/12 20:34:12
- Location: Earth
- Status: offline
Re:I need a sound card simple as that..
2010/02/06 12:48:38
(permalink)
I guess you can do that, but you wouldn't be able to use your headphones like you want to? Hence the little mixer. The reason i mentioned the mackie VLZ3 4 channel ($99) is because the quality is very good as apposed to a piece of crap Behringer 4 channel for $50. You would have all you need.
|
MurMan
Max Output Level: -70 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1040
- Joined: 2008/12/10 19:11:36
- Location: Sunny San Diego
- Status: offline
Re:I need a sound card simple as that..
2010/02/06 13:04:28
(permalink)
In your first post, you said that you want 1/4 inch input for guitar and later your mentioned mic'ing a guitar. Direct connecting a guitar requires a different type of input than a mic. A traditional electric guitar (magnetic pickups) requires a high impedance input, sometimes called a Hi-Z input. If your guitar has active circuitry or if you're running your guitar through an amp or an effects processor, you won't need a Hi-Z input.
Sonar 8PE & VS, Presonus Firestudio, VS-100, AlphaTrack, Nord Stage Compact, Roland Sonic Cell, Axiom 49, dbx 386, Event TR-8's, Kawai 650, ...
|
noldar12
Max Output Level: -69 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1075
- Joined: 2006/07/07 20:30:16
- Status: offline
Re:I need a sound card simple as that..
2010/02/06 13:08:57
(permalink)
Part of what you are looking at traces to the different purposes of a Sound Blaster type card compared to a card designed more specifically for serious audio recording and playback. What works ok for the first case is far from optimal for the second. The M Audio cards are about as inexpensive as it will get for serious use. If you can afford the Audiophile 192, it is a better choice than the 2496, as it has balanced ins and outs. One of the Echo firewire cards also run about $200. Not sure of the cost of the budget Roland/Edirol/Cakewalk USB cards. Given your intended use, a USB card would probably be ok. As far as providing a headphone, in/out, the Echo Gina is a PCI card that has 2 in 6 out 1/4 inch jacks, as well as ADAT i/o, and a headphone out jack, priced at about $279. It is not a bad card, and a definite step up in terms of features from the M Audio cards. One thing to consider when buying music gear is the "buy cheap, buy twice" situation. In the long run it is usually a bit less exensive to get something good initially, rather than buying cheap, and then having to replace the piece a few months or a year later. Anyway, if you check a retail site like Sweetwater, you can find numerous potential options.
post edited by noldar12 - 2010/02/06 13:11:32
|
dissfigured
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
- Total Posts : 147
- Joined: 2010/02/05 23:51:05
- Location: Dallas
- Status: offline
Re:I need a sound card simple as that..
2010/02/06 13:16:58
(permalink)
MurMan In your first post, you said that you want 1/4 inch input for guitar and later your mentioned mic'ing a guitar. Direct connecting a guitar requires a different type of input than a mic. A traditional electric guitar (magnetic pickups) requires a high impedance input, sometimes called a Hi-Z input. If your guitar has active circuitry or if you're running your guitar through an amp or an effects processor, you won't need a Hi-Z input. oops, sorry for confusion. I will likely run from the out on my line 6 amp to a 1/4 inch in on an audio interface for the PC. If I were to mic the amp, I would still be using a mic and the 1/4 inch jack. All my mics have the three prong connector to the mic, and a 14/inch at the other end. I have never had much success actually micing an amp so most likely would do direct in from the amp.
|
MurMan
Max Output Level: -70 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1040
- Joined: 2008/12/10 19:11:36
- Location: Sunny San Diego
- Status: offline
Re:I need a sound card simple as that..
2010/02/06 13:30:41
(permalink)
Good. Just wanted to make sure that you knew that. In one of your posts, you said "This seems a bit complex." Welcome to digital recording.
Sonar 8PE & VS, Presonus Firestudio, VS-100, AlphaTrack, Nord Stage Compact, Roland Sonic Cell, Axiom 49, dbx 386, Event TR-8's, Kawai 650, ...
|
RnRmaChine
Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
- Total Posts : 420
- Joined: 2004/08/22 03:17:41
- Location: Pocono Mountians in PA
- Status: offline
Re:I need a sound card simple as that..
2010/02/06 14:02:55
(permalink)
Hey Diss, You mentioned "... All my mics have the three prong connector to the mic, and a 1/4 inch at the other end. I have never had much success actually micing an amp..." That would be the best reason why you never had much success. Using mics of that nature tend to suck for anything. Your Line 6 should sound really nice direct recording anyway so stick with that. Until you end up with gear that sounds better when micd. There are MANY cheaper audio cards out there. I would agree with anyone that told you try and get something decent as opposed to the cheapest, that "buy cheap, buy twice" thing is so true. I would also agree with the audio card with a mixer deal. It really is the smart way to go. Then in the future you can get rid of those 1/4 inch mics. They are USUALLY junk to put it blunty. You should start with a SM-57 or SM-58 style mic for your first recording mic(s) and use XLR cables to go from the mic to the mixer.... BUT all that is in the future since your budget is so small. It's just that, thinking for the future in this world is important. Get a decent audio card, M-Audio, Echo, Lexicon, Alesis, Mackie, MOTU, EMU just to name a few. Just don't get USB models unless you read up that the drivers are very good. USB tends to be poor in latency especially when pushed hard. I had the M-Audio USB Fast Trak and didn't like it at all. The Latency was horrible. I would stick to PCI, M-audio makes good ones.. then get a mixer. Like stratman suggested. It really would be the smarter move. The setup he told you would be a good one to start with. The main thing with the mixer, is that it gives you options for inputs. Line & mic preamps as well as the ability to add things (such as Comp, EQ or rarely FX, again thinking of the future) prior to going into the analog to digital convertors. How many options lso depends on what mixer you get of course. Good Luck dude. Rob
post edited by RnRmaChine - 2010/02/06 14:05:55
Sonar Platinum Windows 7 Pro 64bit Dual Processors - Intel Xeon X5670 - 6 cores/cpu = 12core w/Hyperthreading = 24core 24GB 10600 DDR3 1333 RAM 1110w PSU Geforce GTS 450 128GB SanDisk SSD OS/C:drive WD Blue HDrives Sample, Audio, Storage.
|
hugojacquet
Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
- Total Posts : 305
- Joined: 2004/08/21 16:50:55
- Status: offline
Re:I need a sound card simple as that..
2010/02/06 14:11:53
(permalink)
stratman70 You cannot just plug headphones into the output of a sound card (except for a sound blaster which has a headphone out jack)which is really going backwards. If you can swing $200 you can get an M Audio Audiophile 2496 (that's what I have) and a Mackie 4 channel VLZ3 mixer. Then you can even plug a mic in, etc. I use the 1202vlz3 ($300) and in\out to my sound card. The little 4 channel has the same quality, just less ins/outs. But plenty for what you want to do You might want to check out the mixer-Perhaps a used AP2496 on ebay or something for less. Not TRUE AT ALL. Plenty of USB and Firewire interfaces have an adequate headphone output. Most also have line inputs, mic input (XLR) and most also have phantom power for codenser mic's. And most of these also have a jack input optimised for guitar/ bass guitar. Already thought about a line6 interface? Better processing then your spider (nicer sounds), very low latency monitoring (in parallell with sonar through gearbox or podfarm) wet AND dry recording at the same time (apply podfarm plugin afterwoods on dry track) etc...The plugin is free now with the toneport studio interfaces...Check it out...
|
dissfigured
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
- Total Posts : 147
- Joined: 2010/02/05 23:51:05
- Location: Dallas
- Status: offline
Re:I need a sound card simple as that..
2010/02/06 14:13:58
(permalink)
RnRmaChine Hey Diss, You mentioned "... All my mics have the three prong connector to the mic, and a 1/4 inch at the other end. I have never had much success actually micing an amp..." That would be the best reason why you never had much success. Using mics of that nature tend to suck for anything. Your Line 6 should sound really nice direct recording anyway so stick with that. Until you end up with gear that sounds better when micd. There are MANY cheaper audio cards out there. I would agree with anyone that told you try and get something decent as opposed to the cheapest, that "buy cheap, buy twice" thing is so true. I would also agree with the audio card with a mixer deal. It really is the smart way to go. Then in the future you can get rid of those 1/4 inch mics. They are USUALLY junk to put it blunty. You should start with a SM-57 or SM-58 style mic for your first recording mic(s) and use XLR cables to go from the mic to the mixer.... BUT all that is in the future since your budget is so small. It's just that, thinking for the future in this world is important. Get a decent audio card, M-Audio, Echo, Lexicon, Alesis, Mackie, MOTU, EMU just to name a few. Just don't get USB models unless you read up that the drivers are very good. USB tends to be poor in latency especially when pushed hard. I had the M-Audio USB Fast Trak and didn't like it at all. The Latency was horrible. I would stick to PCI, M-audio makes good ones.. then get a mixer. Like stratman suggested. It really would be the smarter move. The setup he told you would be a good one to start with. The main thing with the mixer, is that it gives you options for inputs. Line & mic preamps as well as the ability to add things (such as Comp, EQ or rarely FX, again thinking of the future) prior to going into the analog to digital convertors. How many options lso depends on what mixer you get of course. Good Luck dude. Rob I am actually using a Shure sm-57 it is just that the cable on the other end is the 1/4 inch jack rather than (XLR I think it is called?)
|
hugojacquet
Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
- Total Posts : 305
- Joined: 2004/08/21 16:50:55
- Status: offline
Re:I need a sound card simple as that..
2010/02/06 14:20:16
(permalink)
I tested the m-audio usb fasttrack too. Horrible latency indeed. Tested Edirol UA 25 and that was so much better. But only at the lowest buffer settings... Line6 UX1, UX2, UX8 do NOT suffer from the latency problem on "WET" guitar signals since what you haer is treated separately from what you record in sonar. You CAN however record the wet signal into sonar and even alongside the dry signal. From the UX2 and above you have fantom power on the mic inputs... NO NEED FOR A MIXER IN A PROJECT STUDIO.... Unless you use hardware synths...and have to mix (that is what a mixer is for) the output of several of them with what is goin' in and out your soundcard, like the synths playing the backing while you are tracking the guitar... But if you just record yourself in different takes and only use softsynths the best bet is a good low latency interface OR a modelling interface like the Toneports :-).
|
mgh
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 8594
- Joined: 2007/05/10 05:15:56
- Location: betwixt and between
- Status: offline
Re:I need a sound card simple as that..
2010/02/06 14:30:38
(permalink)
2 options on a budget; cheap soundcard like the audiophile 2496 plus a mixer, i always recommend the soundcraft compact 4 cos it is designed for the home pc-based studio and has a Hi-Z input for guitars, plus 2 headphone outs which is always handy; or a usb/firewire based audio interface, most of which have headphone socket, and they run from $100 up. manufacturers include m-audio, emu, edirol/cakewalk, mackie, tapco, line 6 at the budget end up to presonus, motu, rme at the middle/higher end. the former option will give lower latency and more connectivity/expandability but the latter is neater, portable and in the case of line 6, comes with useful software. the choise is yours!
|
mistified funk
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 66
- Joined: 2009/10/10 18:30:46
- Status: offline
Re:I need a sound card simple as that..
2010/02/06 14:38:49
(permalink)
I think you should look into a Digital Interface. You can get a Two input one for a decent price, they generally come with separate outputs for headphones and speakers. Don't buy a cheap anything, cheap things suck, sometimes expensive things suck too, so look deep into whatever you are going to buy. Presonus Fire box comes to mind as a good one. Make sure it has pre amped inputs, and that the inputs are interchangeable from XLR to 1/4", meaning you could plug either one into the same input. FYI, when you see a left input and a right input together, that is two separate MONO inputs, you can pair them buy plugging something into both of them to record a stereo track. When recording guitar or vocals, or anything through a mic, best setup is to plug into the left input, select that input in your program, and record it MONO you will know if it's mono because you will have one waveform instead of two identical waveforms on the same track (one being left and the other being right) Does your mic or you mic cable have three prong on one end and 1/4" on the other, doesn't make sense to be a mic, assuming it's your cable, go out and get an XLR to XLR. And as for your 1/4' to 1/8' converter, make sure it's a stereo one, i made that mistake early on and was wondering why i had to do something funky with it to get it to work right
|
dissfigured
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
- Total Posts : 147
- Joined: 2010/02/05 23:51:05
- Location: Dallas
- Status: offline
Re:I need a sound card simple as that..
2010/02/06 15:42:55
(permalink)
so do I lose something in translation when using a cable like this? This is how I have tried to mic my amp in the past using a cable like the one pictured below in combination with a Shure SM57. It has always sounded muttled and that is why I end up going direct in. If I were to use a cable like this in combination w/ my amp (line 6 spider IV 75 watt) should I expect better results? Direct in is okay, but sounds so 1 dimensional. Like a CD vs a vynal record there is some ambiance missing. By the way thanks for all the input guys. I am learning a lot. I appreciate it.
|
HumbleNoise
Max Output Level: -46 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2946
- Joined: 2004/01/04 12:53:50
- Status: offline
Re:I need a sound card simple as that..
2010/02/06 16:40:36
(permalink)
Please take this for what it's worth because I've been away from the latest technology for quite some time but I started with an MAudio 2496 (which I have to this day, after 5 or 6 years at least) and the cheapest Behringer mixer. The Behringer had ZERO features and was a nightmare to configure for recording as it didn't have a true alt bus. (I think it had a tape out with level control or something that just didn't work.) An alt bus let's you send different channels to that bus, usually by pressing a button of some sort, which then sends the signal to your sound card's input for recording. You can adjust that alt bus's level going into the sound card and it's pretty sweet. So I took back the Behringer and got the next step up, I think it was an Alesis of some sort but after having it for a couple days I discovered it didn't have any inserts to add a compressor or effects. So I took that back and tried to find something that had BOTH an alt bus AND inserts. I ended up with a Yamaha MG12/4 and it has served my simple needs very well. I am certainly not a Yamaha fan boy and don't intend to push the brand at all but if you decide to go with a sound card/mixer combination look for those two things - an alt bus and inserts, it will make things SO much easier. One reason I bring this up is because the Mackie 402-VLZ3 has neither but the next step up, the 802 VLZ3 does, neither have faders which are kinda nice till you get to the 1402. I don't know about Sound Craft although that brand was always at the top of my list because I had heard such good things about it. If I were to do it all over again tomorrow I have no idea which way I'd go. Mixerless is a very common setup but having a mixing console right there with real faders and buttons to push is pretty handy but I really don't know enough about some of the good alternatives to really comment. Hope that helps.
post edited by HumbleNoise - 2010/02/06 17:51:13
Humbly Yours Larry Sonar X2 x64 MAudio 2496 Yamaha MG 12/4 Roland XV-88 Intel MB with Q6600 and 4 GB Ram NVidia 9800 GTX Windows 7 x64 Home Premium
|
SvenArne
Max Output Level: -48 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2719
- Joined: 2007/01/31 12:51:29
- Location: Trondheim, Norway
- Status: offline
Re:I need a sound card simple as that..
2010/02/06 16:58:51
(permalink)
For what I gather are your needs (plus that you already know and love(?) Line6 amp models), I would strongly recommend the Line6 TonePort UX2 usb interface. That way you can leave your Spider at the rehersal room and still enjoy the tones played straight Into your computer with a simple guitar cable. PLUS, with the right setup you'll be able to change the sound after you've recorded it! For DI guitar recording (with the GearBox/PodFarm software), latency is a non-issue. The box sits nicely on your desk and is as plug-and-play as they come! It doesn't have midi, but you can always get a usb keyboard for input or a cheap usb 1in1out midi interface later! If you're only gonna use guitars and one dynamic microphone at a time the UX1 is alright but the UX2 has phantom power on its two mic preamps so you'll be able to use condenser microphones. All that and it's cheap! I have one at my desk (for plugin dongle purposes) though I've moved up because I needed more inputs for drumkit recording. But the interface always worked nicely with no hiccups ever as I can remember. Sven Edit: Forgot to credit Hugojaquet for getting there first
post edited by SvenArne - 2010/02/06 17:08:03
|
hugojacquet
Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
- Total Posts : 305
- Joined: 2004/08/21 16:50:55
- Status: offline
Re:I need a sound card simple as that..
2010/02/06 16:59:22
(permalink)
I don't get it. You favor recording the line out signal of a spider amp (through a mixer!) over the far superior modelling of a Toneport or Podxt / X3? Agreed that if the poster had a very good amp (like with tubes....) and a good mic it could be a good idea to record the signal (through amp->mic) eventually through a mixer. Although most interfaces DO have a mic input these days.. But the line output of a spider....makes me laugh. At the school I teach we have a couple of Spiders, they are loud, but the sound is..euhh...scratchy The podxt and toneport sounds are so much better, no comparision really....really. I have a Line6Flextone myself for convenience.....Toneport modelling eats it alive....a good tube amp is better though and WILL sound better miced well in good conditions. Buying a mixer to be able to connect a spider to a soundcard which has still to be purchased...great, really great advice.... IF and IF you will record the sound of your spider "as is" frome line out....Latency is really not a problem since your guitar is already "treated", so you can as well buy any cheap usb audio interface...line in and you are done with, and NOT buy a mixer. Latency is only a possible problem if you plan to play with real time processing inserted in the track you are recording....But since you "will' record the line out of your spider you do not need "real time" treatment.
|
alexoosthoek
Max Output Level: -23 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5238
- Joined: 2008/11/12 11:20:51
- Location: A'gus
- Status: offline
Re:I need a sound card simple as that..
2010/02/06 17:18:08
(permalink)
dissfigured I require 1/4 inch input for guitar Stereo 1/8 output for headphones / speakers Compatible w/ Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit Compatible w/ sonar 8.5 Hoping to get something around $150 or less. I need to run the out on my line 6 spider directly into the PC. Was looking at m-audio delta44 but it lacks the stereo headphone/speaker output. I really only require 1 in and 1 out as I am recording 1 guitar track at a time, and I only wear 1 pair of headphones at a time :) Any tips, links, ebay auctions that will satisfy these requirements? Thanks for helping me. In the past I had an XP machine w/ SB audigy and Cakewalk home studio (prior to sonar)and loved it. Seems vista and win 7 have complicated things a bit so I am sort of re-entering home studio recording, and it is a bit overwhelming all the sudden. It used to be so simple :) THIS
|
mgh
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 8594
- Joined: 2007/05/10 05:15:56
- Location: betwixt and between
- Status: offline
Re:I need a sound card simple as that..
2010/02/06 17:28:39
(permalink)
hey hugo i agree with some of what you say, some less so. it's tough to answer the OP when he clearly doesn't even know what an XLR or 1/4" jack is called, in my post above i gave some advice which assumed different ways of recording, from DI-ing to mic'ing. I'd argue that a small mixer is pretty useful in any home studio, it lets you keep several things connected permanently, and provides expansion. but you could just use an external interface, of course. The OP needs to do a bit of research and understand terminology to narrow down his options i think. And be able to ignore some of the dodgy advice being given on here!
|
hugojacquet
Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
- Total Posts : 305
- Joined: 2004/08/21 16:50:55
- Status: offline
Re:I need a sound card simple as that..
2010/02/08 04:34:04
(permalink)
mgh hey hugo i agree with some of what you say, some less so. it's tough to answer the OP when he clearly doesn't even know what an XLR or 1/4" jack is called, in my post above i gave some advice which assumed different ways of recording, from DI-ing to mic'ing. I'd argue that a small mixer is pretty useful in any home studio, it lets you keep several things connected permanently, and provides expansion. but you could just use an external interface, of course. The OP needs to do a bit of research and understand terminology to narrow down his options i think. And be able to ignore some of the dodgy advice being given on here! Hey, I hear you. And I do agree whit most what you have said too. And I do agree a small mixer can come handy in a project studio. But I do not think the OP needs one per se. He has indeed some reading and learning to do. But hey, even a small mixing desk and NO NEW soundcard would work too in his case. He just has to use the line- ins and not the mic in of his soundcard. A mixing desk could in that case be used as the "better" preamp compared to the one in his soundcard. All this is possible, but I for me the Spider "s*cks" big time and it is of no use to try to record THAT signal as clean as possible. Unless he does it at minimal cost. the a jack to mini- jack adapter and into the line - in of his soundcard is already good enough. If he follows some of the advice here he will end up micing his spider with a 100$+ microphone into a 100$+ mixer and that into a 100$+ soundcard. Well he could always ditch the microphone and go lin- in. He will spend 200$ minimum anyway. And in that case I would go for decent modelling. Or buy a good amp to start with AND a decent microphone and a decent interface+ eventually a mixing desk. Although I think the preamps on most interfaces are better then on cheap mixing desks anyway... So in the end I would go for a decent interface with line ins AND decent mic ins with phantom power like an edirol/ cakewalk UA 25 not to favor line6, but hey the toneport is cheaper, has the same in's and out's and comes with with modelling anyway as a "bonus"...And no I don't work for line6, but use their stuff. To resume: in the case you have NO GOOD AMP and NO GOOD audio interface and have little money and struggle to record your guitar: buy a toneport. If you plan to invest more, like for starters buying a real good amp for example, you CAN choose an other solution from the above that will capture your signal with fidelity. But... indeed that will cost (a lot) more.
|
hugojacquet
Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
- Total Posts : 305
- Joined: 2004/08/21 16:50:55
- Status: offline
Re:I need a sound card simple as that..
2010/02/08 04:36:50
(permalink)
SvenArne For what I gather are your needs (plus that you already know and love(?) Line6 amp models), I would strongly recommend the Line6 TonePort UX2 usb interface. That way you can leave your Spider at the rehersal room and still enjoy the tones played straight Into your computer with a simple guitar cable. PLUS, with the right setup you'll be able to change the sound after you've recorded it! For DI guitar recording (with the GearBox/PodFarm software), latency is a non-issue. The box sits nicely on your desk and is as plug-and-play as they come! It doesn't have midi, but you can always get a usb keyboard for input or a cheap usb 1in1out midi interface later! If you're only gonna use guitars and one dynamic microphone at a time the UX1 is alright but the UX2 has phantom power on its two mic preamps so you'll be able to use condenser microphones. All that and it's cheap! I have one at my desk (for plugin dongle purposes) though I've moved up because I needed more inputs for drumkit recording. But the interface always worked nicely with no hiccups ever as I can remember. Sven Edit: Forgot to credit Hugojaquet for getting there first Hehe, I see we are on the same track here :-). For more inputs have bought a UX8
|
Blades
Max Output Level: -43 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3246
- Joined: 2003/11/06 08:22:52
- Location: Georgia
- Status: offline
Re:I need a sound card simple as that..
2010/02/08 08:17:13
(permalink)
I third (or 4th or whatever it is by now) the UX2 suggestion. For $200 you get everything you have asked for and more. Using the 1/4" cable with a Shure SM58 is going to give you an impedance mismatch in much the same way as plugging a regular electric guitar into a Lo-Z input. The muttled sound you are getting is because of this. Because the Spider is what it is, and the VST version of the stuff in PODFarm (part of the UX2 package) should surpass it by a pretty good margin, you probably still won't want/need to mic the amp, but you can certainly use that mic for other things, as it's a good mic and when properly connected, it will be night and day difference. Since no one else has linked it (I didn't see one anyway), here's some info and demos of the UX2: http://line6.com/podstudioux2/ Here's where you can buy it: http://www.zzounds.com/item--LINPSUX2 - if you'd be kind enough to go to my website and use one of the zzounds links from there, I'd be appreciative. I have a UX2 along with an Echo Audio Layla 3G, which has been a great workhorse over the last several year. The Gina3G was recommended above (same card with less I/O) and I can also support THAT as a good option, though it seems that the Toneport line would be more to your requirements and price. Hope this helps. If you get the UX2, I'm pretty sure that you won't be disappointed.
|
dissfigured
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
- Total Posts : 147
- Joined: 2010/02/05 23:51:05
- Location: Dallas
- Status: offline
Re:I need a sound card simple as that..
2010/02/08 09:23:14
(permalink)
So rather than saying I want to do it all for $200, lets help me do this over time and in the right order. Looks like I need an interface w/ XLR input but confused because you say if I get that POD, I wont want yo mic the amp. I thought the point of the XLR input was to improve the quality of the mic'd amp? please clarify. and then a sound card that is going to interface with the outputs from that interface. Some questions: Looking at the POD interface that you linked to, would I run the amp into that or plug guitar straight in? Would it be better to get a sound card 1st then the Interface later? It seems a lot of folks are recommending the m-audio cards and a few of them are in my price range. Anyone live near Dallas and have a lower end (pricewise) setup they could demonstrate. I want to learn but it is hard to figure out what sounds good by just reading about it.
|
mgh
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 8594
- Joined: 2007/05/10 05:15:56
- Location: betwixt and between
- Status: offline
Re:I need a sound card simple as that..
2010/02/08 09:26:47
(permalink)
interface/soundcard same thing. with the ux2 you could mic your amp OR go DI (plug the guitar direct) and use the pod farm plug-in.
|
HumbleNoise
Max Output Level: -46 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2946
- Joined: 2004/01/04 12:53:50
- Status: offline
Re:I need a sound card simple as that..
2010/02/08 10:33:56
(permalink)
The reason I'm commenting here is because I'd like to learn the same thing and I THINK I understand where the current advice is headed regarding the Line 6 UX2 Usb interface. First of all check the web page for all the info on the UX2. Link Here And as you can see in the pic it's got 2 XLR inputs, so you can mike ANYTHING, voice, amp whatever you choose, two guitar inputs that you can plug your guitar directly into and a usb connection that ties it all into your computer. If you plug your guitar directly into the UX2 you can then use all the Line 6 sounds that come in the Pod Farm to model your guitar sounds however you'd like. The consensus is that the sounds from the Pod Farm will sound WAY better than miking your amp. It seems like a really smart way to go for what you're (and I am) looking for. Here's how it might set up for you. Hope that helps.
post edited by HumbleNoise - 2010/02/08 10:45:09
Humbly Yours Larry Sonar X2 x64 MAudio 2496 Yamaha MG 12/4 Roland XV-88 Intel MB with Q6600 and 4 GB Ram NVidia 9800 GTX Windows 7 x64 Home Premium
|