Interface Recommendation for Sonar

Author
Vettetech
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 200
  • Joined: 2006/03/06 11:53:46
  • Location: Newburgh, NY
  • Status: offline
2011/05/19 06:27:11 (permalink)

Interface Recommendation for Sonar

Is there a 16 channel interface out there, under $1000, that will record 16 inputs with 16 outputs to 16 tracks at once? It is just to record a basement band for rehearsels and I understand quality won't be there but it will still be helpful for our purposes.
 
I have started researching the many interfaces online but thought this might help narrow the field.
 
Using a P4 with 4gb memory and plenty of HD. Don't care if it is USB or Firewire. Combinaton XLR and 1/4" inputs would be good.
 
Thanks!
#1

28 Replies Related Threads

    daveny5
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 16934
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 09:54:36
    • Location: North Carolina
    • Status: offline
    Re:Interface Recommendation for Sonar 2011/05/19 09:39:29 (permalink)
    There are a few. Check the Sweetwater website or Musician's Friend. 

    However, I doubt a P4 computer will be able to handle it. 

    Dave
    Computer: Intel i7, ASROCK H170M, 16GB/5TB+, Windows 10 Pro 64-bit, Sonar Platinum, TASCAM US-16x08, Cakewalk UM-3G MIDI I/F
    Instruments: SL-880 Keyboard controller, Korg 05R/W, Korg N1R, KORG Wavestation EX
    Axes: Fender Stratocaster, Line6 Variax 300, Ovation Acoustic, Takamine Nylon Acoustic, Behringer GX212 amp, Shure SM-58 mic, Rode NT1 condenser mic.
    Outboard: Mackie 1402-VLZ mixer, TC Helicon VoiceLive 2, Digitech Vocalist WS EX, PODXTLive, various stompboxes and stuff. 
    Controllers: Korg nanoKONTROL, Wacom Bamboo Touchpad
    #2
    AT
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 10654
    • Joined: 2004/01/09 10:42:46
    • Location: TeXaS
    • Status: offline
    Re:Interface Recommendation for Sonar 2011/05/19 10:15:49 (permalink)
    You really need to give a price range.  On the lower end, check out Beagle's site - he has a lot of recomendations.  the cheapest way to go is either ganging two Echo units together, the Mackie, or using a cheap behringer ADAT 8x8 unit with a FW/USB unit like the stienberg mr816 or Octo-capture.  Those would all be less than $1000.

    At the other end you can get Lynx ($3500) or SSL ($3000) on up to RADAR ($20,000).

    Decide how much you have to spend and then look through the dealer sites.  Most interfaces come w/ 8 in/outs.  The sound quality won't be the difference except at the high end - it is the driver quality so you can record 16 tracks at once w/o glitching.  W/ a dedicated hard drive, you should be able to do it, but I don't know about mixing w/ any effects.

    @

    https://soundcloud.com/a-pleasure-dome
    http://www.bnoir-film.com/  
     
    there came forth little children out of the city, and mocked him, and said unto him, Go up, thou bald head; go up, thou bald head.
    24 And he turned back, and looked on them, and cursed them in the name of the Lord. And there came forth two she bears out of the wood, and tare forty and two children of them.
    #3
    daveny5
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 16934
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 09:54:36
    • Location: North Carolina
    • Status: offline
    Re:Interface Recommendation for Sonar 2011/05/19 11:13:59 (permalink)
    You really need to give a price range.



    The OP said "under $1000". Is that not a price range? 

    Dave
    Computer: Intel i7, ASROCK H170M, 16GB/5TB+, Windows 10 Pro 64-bit, Sonar Platinum, TASCAM US-16x08, Cakewalk UM-3G MIDI I/F
    Instruments: SL-880 Keyboard controller, Korg 05R/W, Korg N1R, KORG Wavestation EX
    Axes: Fender Stratocaster, Line6 Variax 300, Ovation Acoustic, Takamine Nylon Acoustic, Behringer GX212 amp, Shure SM-58 mic, Rode NT1 condenser mic.
    Outboard: Mackie 1402-VLZ mixer, TC Helicon VoiceLive 2, Digitech Vocalist WS EX, PODXTLive, various stompboxes and stuff. 
    Controllers: Korg nanoKONTROL, Wacom Bamboo Touchpad
    #4
    agundrum
    Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 71
    • Joined: 2004/11/20 09:54:19
    • Status: offline
    Re:Interface Recommendation for Sonar 2011/05/19 11:54:41 (permalink)
    What equipment is the basement band using?  PA? mixer? mics?  If a PA are you miking all the instruments into the PA via its mixer?

    The Roland Octa-Capture has 8 inputs and you can link another one to make 16 inputs.

    You're problem is going to be the P4 computer if it isn't already.  Disk space doesn't matter.  Processing power and RAM does.  Even with 4GB of RAM, your P4 mobo bus speed will be the bottleneck accessing the memory.  Recording 8 tracks at once will definitely tax the system beyond all consideration.

    If you are seriously considering this I wouldn't consider getting an audio I/F but a new computer and audio I/F.  Nothing less than a Core 2 Duo system is recommended and then it has to be optimized for audio and dedicated to just being a DAW.

    You want this for band rehearsals? Are you running everyone through a PA? If you are then all you really need is a portable recorder like a Zoom H2 or H4n. Even if you are not running it through a PA you can just use a portable recorder setup on a mic stand in the middle of the basement.  On the H2 I would set it to record through the four built-in mics.  You'll get a much better recording than spending a $1,000 on an audio I/F and it failing to do the job because of the P4 computer.

    post edited by agundrum - 2011/05/19 11:56:50

    John
    ------
    SONAR X1 Producer, Adobe CS5 Master Collection, Gigabyte EP45-DS3R MB, Intel Core 2 Quad @ 2.66GHz, 4GB RAM, VisionTek Radeon HD 4850 video, 600W P/S, 4 SATA 7200RPM drives (1.8TB), DVD DL reader/re-writer, E-Mu 1820m Audio, Windows 7 Pro 64-bit, dual 22" displays
    #5
    agundrum
    Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 71
    • Joined: 2004/11/20 09:54:19
    • Status: offline
    Re:Interface Recommendation for Sonar 2011/05/19 12:03:42 (permalink)
    Why are 16 simultaneous inputs needed for recording?  Do you have a horn section or something?  How many people are in this band?

    John
    ------
    SONAR X1 Producer, Adobe CS5 Master Collection, Gigabyte EP45-DS3R MB, Intel Core 2 Quad @ 2.66GHz, 4GB RAM, VisionTek Radeon HD 4850 video, 600W P/S, 4 SATA 7200RPM drives (1.8TB), DVD DL reader/re-writer, E-Mu 1820m Audio, Windows 7 Pro 64-bit, dual 22" displays
    #6
    Muziekschuur at home
    Max Output Level: -62 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1442
    • Joined: 2006/03/01 03:30:22
    • Status: offline
    Re:Interface Recommendation for Sonar 2011/05/19 12:25:11 (permalink)
    laptop,
    Phonic helix 24 universal in a toploaded rack.
    Second disk.
    The Phonic comes with software. But since you are here I assume you have/will use Sonar.
    Helix has an USB & firewire connection wich will transfer 16 tracks to the laptop. those tracks can be recorded on a second USB external disk. And if every bandmember brings their own, copying afterwards is fast and easy.
     
    two 8 channel snakes
    Superlux drumkit (micro's)
    two SM58's and three SM57's.
    Some clipon stands on the cabs.
    Some xlr cabling.
    I assume all this will be around 1500 euro's.

    post edited by Muziekschuur at home - 2011/05/19 12:27:07

    Cakewalk Sonar Platinum Windows 7 32bit & 64bit (dualboot) Gigabyte mobo Intel dual quad 9650 & 4GB Ram RME DIGI9636 & Tascam DM24.  M-audio Rbus & SI-24 Alesis Pro active 5.1 & Radford 90 transmissionline monitors. Roland RD-150 piano Edirol UM-880 & alesis fireport.
    Remote recording Alesis HD-24 & Phonic MRS 1-20.
    P.A. D&R Dayner 29-8-2 & behringer MX8000 (& racks)
    Rackpc Sonar Platinum with win10 AMD X6 1055T, 16GB Ram
     Dell inspiron 17R 6gb ram W10 two SSD's Sonar Plat.
    #7
    Beagle
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 50621
    • Joined: 2006/03/29 11:03:12
    • Location: Fort Worth, TX
    • Status: offline
    Re:Interface Recommendation for Sonar 2011/05/19 12:52:35 (permalink)
    as AT said, I've got recommendations on my website.  it's not an exhaustive list, but it's a starting point and it's a great resource for beginners looking for soundcards.  check the link in my sig.

    http://soundcloud.com/beaglesound/sets/featured-songs-1
    i7, 16G DDR3, Win10x64, MOTU Ultralite Hybrid MK3
    Yamaha MOXF6, Hammond XK3c, other stuff.
    #8
    Vettetech
    Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 200
    • Joined: 2006/03/06 11:53:46
    • Location: Newburgh, NY
    • Status: offline
    Re:Interface Recommendation for Sonar 2011/05/19 13:44:54 (permalink)
    Thanks to all for the info. The P4 was a BC (Beofre Coffee) fubar. It's an Intel Core Duo. I don't even know why I put that. But if that is not enough I will buy another CPU.

    We have 3 guitars (2 electric, one acoustic), Bass, and I wanted to a couple mics on the drums, and we have 3 vocals. SO eight owuld not quite be enough but we could easily add the vocals afterward if necessary to save cpu, tracks, and hardware costs.

    I've used CW at home for about 15 years now and in this case am using X1. But I haven't done much in trying to record a live performance. I still use what is today an antiquated Event One GINA 24 and for me at home still does the job.

    I just checked out the Phonic Helix as recommended. Based on a quick review that is exactly what we need. If the system gets bogged as I said, I will upgrade the CPU.

    Thanks much, and I am open to other suggestions as well.

    Joe..

    #9
    Starise
    Max Output Level: -0.3 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 7563
    • Joined: 2007/04/07 17:23:02
    • Status: offline
    Re:Interface Recommendation for Sonar 2011/05/19 14:32:23 (permalink)
     I like Presonus.

    Intel 5820K O.C. 4.4ghz, ASRock Extreme 4 LGA 2011-v3, 16 gig DDR4, ,
    3 x Samsung SATA III 500gb SSD, 2X 1 Samsung 1tb 7200rpm outboard, Win 10 64bit, 
    Laptop HP Omen i7 16gb 2/sdd with Focusrite interface.
     CbB, Studio One 4 Pro, Mixcraft 8, Ableton Live 10 
     
     www.soundcloud.com/starise
     
     
     
    Twitter @Rodein
     
    #10
    JSkeen
    Max Output Level: -78 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 612
    • Joined: 2007/02/01 17:13:49
    • Location: USA
    • Status: offline
    Re:Interface Recommendation for Sonar 2011/05/19 15:04:47 (permalink)
    I work at a club that has a http://tascam.com/product/us-2000/, It has worked very well for me. We have music 7 nights a week and record full shows very often. For 400 dollars its nice. But you will need a mixer with direct outs to get into the channels above 8.
    #11
    BlixYZ
    Max Output Level: -74 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 805
    • Joined: 2010/12/31 16:45:54
    • Location: Barrington, NJ
    • Status: offline
    Re:Interface Recommendation for Sonar 2011/05/19 15:13:25 (permalink)
    recording 16 tracks of audio at one time is not very taxing, even for a P4.
    if there are no plugins running, it will use less then 10% of available cpu.

    i know uu said u have a intel duo, im just sayin.

    i think the tascam, behringer or phonic are your best bets.

    although someone said mackie....
    what mackie can do that for under a grand?
    #12
    agundrum
    Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 71
    • Joined: 2004/11/20 09:54:19
    • Status: offline
    Re:Interface Recommendation for Sonar 2011/05/19 17:00:21 (permalink)
    What audio interface are you using now?  Depending on what you want to do after recording the live band can help determine if you really need to go all out with a new computer audio interface.

    I'm thinking for recording a basement band you could get away with a 16-ch USB mixer like one of these from Sweetwater or something from Musician's Friend.  You have to remember that mixers have stereo channels that can be used as mono inputs.  In reality a 12-ch mixer is commonly 8 mono channels or 4 mono and 4 stereo.  So a 12-ch mixer would not work being 8 mono inputs.  A 16-ch mixer is commonly 12 mono channels or 8 mono channel and 4 stereo.  This Behringer XENYX X2442USB USB Mixer with Effects for about $380 looks like it would have all the channels you would need plus a few extra.

    If you are not looking to mix each individual instrument after the fact then something like this can work.  You set the mix on the board, press record on whatever device you're recording with (USB to computer or maybe to a portable digital recorder) and then review and adjust as necessary.

    I've used a Behringer 12-channel mixer that I've hooked a Zoom H2 to and have had some excellent live recordings.

    If you are absolutely married to recording each individual instrument to its own track to do mixing in the box then something like the PreSonus digital mixer would work as well as 2 Roland Octa-Capture audio I/Fs (16-channels total).

    John

    John
    ------
    SONAR X1 Producer, Adobe CS5 Master Collection, Gigabyte EP45-DS3R MB, Intel Core 2 Quad @ 2.66GHz, 4GB RAM, VisionTek Radeon HD 4850 video, 600W P/S, 4 SATA 7200RPM drives (1.8TB), DVD DL reader/re-writer, E-Mu 1820m Audio, Windows 7 Pro 64-bit, dual 22" displays
    #13
    agundrum
    Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 71
    • Joined: 2004/11/20 09:54:19
    • Status: offline
    Re:Interface Recommendation for Sonar 2011/05/19 17:08:12 (permalink)
    Hmm, the Phonix Helix 24 sounds nice...  18 independent channels out to the computer.

    John
    ------
    SONAR X1 Producer, Adobe CS5 Master Collection, Gigabyte EP45-DS3R MB, Intel Core 2 Quad @ 2.66GHz, 4GB RAM, VisionTek Radeon HD 4850 video, 600W P/S, 4 SATA 7200RPM drives (1.8TB), DVD DL reader/re-writer, E-Mu 1820m Audio, Windows 7 Pro 64-bit, dual 22" displays
    #14
    Beagle
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 50621
    • Joined: 2006/03/29 11:03:12
    • Location: Fort Worth, TX
    • Status: offline
    Re:Interface Recommendation for Sonar 2011/05/19 17:46:01 (permalink)
    John - those behringer usb mixers only give the mains to the DAW.  they use the UCA202/222 as a soundcard.  those are 2 in / 2 out only.

    http://soundcloud.com/beaglesound/sets/featured-songs-1
    i7, 16G DDR3, Win10x64, MOTU Ultralite Hybrid MK3
    Yamaha MOXF6, Hammond XK3c, other stuff.
    #15
    Jean
    Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 61
    • Joined: 2004/10/05 07:49:08
    • Status: offline
    Re:Interface Recommendation for Sonar 2011/05/19 19:02:55 (permalink)
    The Presonus Studiolive?
    #16
    JSkeen
    Max Output Level: -78 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 612
    • Joined: 2007/02/01 17:13:49
    • Location: USA
    • Status: offline
    Re:Interface Recommendation for Sonar 2011/05/20 03:38:17 (permalink)
    for 1,000 you can get two focusrite pro 40s, or for 1,100 you can get two motu 8pre. If you can get by with 8 mic pre amps and use the line level inputs for synths and such I would recommend the tascam us 2000. 
    #17
    mudgel
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 12010
    • Joined: 2004/08/13 00:56:05
    • Location: Linton Victoria (Near Ballarat)
    • Status: offline
    Re:Interface Recommendation for Sonar 2011/05/20 03:48:36 (permalink)
    Have a look at the new StudioLive 1602. Mixer and audio interfacce in one.

    I use the big brother the 24.4.2 and it's an awesome machine.

    Mike V. (MUDGEL)

    STUDIO: Win 10 Pro x64, SPlat & CbB x64,
    PC: ASUS Z370-A, INTEL i7 8700k, 32GIG DDR4 2400, OC 4.7Ghz.
    Storage: 7 TB SATA III, 750GiG SSD & Samsung 500 Gig 960 EVO NVMe M.2.
    Monitors: Adam A7X, JBL 10” Sub.
    Audio I/O & DSP Server: DIGIGRID IOS & IOX.
    Screen: Raven MTi + 43" HD 4K TV Monitor.
    Keyboard Controller: Native Instruments Komplete Kontrol S88.
    #18
    carlosagm79
    Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 301
    • Joined: 2011/02/07 00:35:29
    • Status: offline
    Re:Interface Recommendation for Sonar 2011/05/20 04:00:48 (permalink)
    TASCAM US-1641 its a more than a great choice...
    You can also use a DIGI 001(or 002,003) like I have ,with Behringer ADA 8000
    IO can record 16 analogs track and 2 digital, plus MIDI


    http://tascam.com/product/us-1641/

    #19
    Vettetech
    Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 200
    • Joined: 2006/03/06 11:53:46
    • Location: Newburgh, NY
    • Status: offline
    Re:Interface Recommendation for Sonar 2011/05/20 08:48:17 (permalink)
    I really appreciate all the info and suggestions.

    I love the Studiolive 1602 but it's almost twice what we wanted to spend. I might upgrade my home studio though and am thinking about something such as that to replace several other pieces of equipment.

    From the specs and reviews (sometimes I think they intentionally make it difficult for the average person to understand the specs) it was not clear to me with the Behringer how many outputs and if I can record directly to multiple tracks at the same time. As mentioned, the desire is 16 in and 16 out.

    The Tascam is only 4 simultaneous outputs so we would be limited there.

    It is also not clear to me if in all cases you can stack two units. For USB or Firewire is it standard practice and a given that if you have one 8x8 you can stack a second one for 16x16 with doing nothing special?

    I also like the Phonic Helix although some of the reviews I found online were not very flattering. But some of the reviews were also a little dated (about 2 years old). Are these updated models that addressed any prior issues would anyone know?
     
    Thanks again to everyone for the info and suggestions. I'm still reviewing.
    #20
    Vettetech
    Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 200
    • Joined: 2006/03/06 11:53:46
    • Location: Newburgh, NY
    • Status: offline
    Re:Interface Recommendation for Sonar 2011/05/20 09:33:30 (permalink)
    Is anyone familiar with the Mackie Blackbird 16x16 Firewire Recording Interface? For $500 it looks like it would do exactly what I would like.

    States that it is compatible with Sonar. I am not sure though if that means I can split any number of outputs to any number of tracks.

    Thanks
    #21
    Starise
    Max Output Level: -0.3 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 7563
    • Joined: 2007/04/07 17:23:02
    • Status: offline
    Re:Interface Recommendation for Sonar 2011/05/20 10:30:35 (permalink)
      You could get two of these these  MF has used ones for sale too. You can still get warranty on them from presonus.

     The  jet pll dice technology developed by TC electronic does make a noted difference in sound IMO(has to do with more accurate digital clocking).

     You would be nudgeing the limit of your budget, however you would have 16 really nice inputs.

      The presonus gear is finicky with firewire. You should check their website to see if you have the recommended FW chipset/card. If you don't its not a big deal to order a FW card with the necessary TI chipset.

      I use a firetube studio and it is a great interface. I think you said you had a core 2 duo instead of a p4? Should handle the load. Agundrum had some very good suggestions on how to eliminate the unecessary stuff in a computer and make it a smoother better recording machine.

     The presonus firestudio is the recording brains of the 16.4.2 without the mixing section or effects.

     


    Intel 5820K O.C. 4.4ghz, ASRock Extreme 4 LGA 2011-v3, 16 gig DDR4, ,
    3 x Samsung SATA III 500gb SSD, 2X 1 Samsung 1tb 7200rpm outboard, Win 10 64bit, 
    Laptop HP Omen i7 16gb 2/sdd with Focusrite interface.
     CbB, Studio One 4 Pro, Mixcraft 8, Ableton Live 10 
     
     www.soundcloud.com/starise
     
     
     
    Twitter @Rodein
     
    #22
    SteveGriffiths
    Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 200
    • Joined: 2004/10/10 10:59:36
    • Status: offline
    Re:Interface Recommendation for Sonar 2011/05/20 12:56:25 (permalink)
    Starise


      You could get two of these these  MF has used ones for sale too. You can still get warranty on them from presonus.

    The  jet pll dice technology developed by TC electronic does make a noted difference in sound IMO(has to do with more accurate digital clocking).

    You would be nudgeing the limit of your budget, however you would have 16 really nice inputs.

    The presonus gear is finicky with firewire. You should check their website to see if you have the recommended FW chipset/card. If you don't its not a big deal to order a FW card with the necessary TI chipset.

    I use a firetube studio and it is a great interface. I think you said you had a core 2 duo instead of a p4? Should handle the load. Agundrum had some very good suggestions on how to eliminate the unecessary stuff in a computer and make it a smoother better recording machine.

    The presonus firestudio is the recording brains of the 16.4.2 without the mixing section or effects.


    I like the Presonus gear too - I use a StudioLive 16.  That is  out of your budget, but they are releasing the 16.0.2 which is much closer (I think $1400 initially), and does a whole lot more.


    http://www.presonus.com/products/Detail.aspx?ProductId=62


    Just a thought - if your budget allowed anything for "other" gear - this has it .


    Cheers..Grif



    #23
    Vettetech
    Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 200
    • Joined: 2006/03/06 11:53:46
    • Location: Newburgh, NY
    • Status: offline
    Re:Interface Recommendation for Sonar 2011/05/20 15:23:14 (permalink)
    I bought the Presonus FireStudio Project (10x10) for home and I'm going to try that out. I also bought powered speakers to hang off it. This will replace a whole lot of stuff that I have had a long time including power amp, monitors, midi interface, mixer, digital audio interface. I can get rid of a whole rack and save about 1/4 of the space I have in my office\studio.  

    I think the 1602 would be perfect for rehearsals. I need to get the guys to kick in some extra for that but I think it is what we need. We can use the mixer as well so we can save and recall different setups.

    Thanks again to all...
    #24
    AT
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 10654
    • Joined: 2004/01/09 10:42:46
    • Location: TeXaS
    • Status: offline
    Re:Interface Recommendation for Sonar 2011/05/20 17:11:09 (permalink)
    The project and pod are good units.  I used a Pod for years.  Solid unit.

    have fun.

    @

    https://soundcloud.com/a-pleasure-dome
    http://www.bnoir-film.com/  
     
    there came forth little children out of the city, and mocked him, and said unto him, Go up, thou bald head; go up, thou bald head.
    24 And he turned back, and looked on them, and cursed them in the name of the Lord. And there came forth two she bears out of the wood, and tare forty and two children of them.
    #25
    Starise
    Max Output Level: -0.3 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 7563
    • Joined: 2007/04/07 17:23:02
    • Status: offline
    Re:Interface Recommendation for Sonar 2011/05/23 12:56:26 (permalink)
      One other thing to note if you are reading this and thinking about buying a new recording interface. If the opposite is true for you or if you won't need to simultaneously record tracks,there is no need to pay for lots of channels.

      A two or four channel interface can work well.  If I am recording from a keyboard sound module in audio. I can change the recording input channel on each recorded track to "none" in Sonar X1 and select the same channel to record another sound from the same module. As long as you don't forget to un select the recorded channel and then select the other channel.

     

    Intel 5820K O.C. 4.4ghz, ASRock Extreme 4 LGA 2011-v3, 16 gig DDR4, ,
    3 x Samsung SATA III 500gb SSD, 2X 1 Samsung 1tb 7200rpm outboard, Win 10 64bit, 
    Laptop HP Omen i7 16gb 2/sdd with Focusrite interface.
     CbB, Studio One 4 Pro, Mixcraft 8, Ableton Live 10 
     
     www.soundcloud.com/starise
     
     
     
    Twitter @Rodein
     
    #26
    toastjam
    Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 59
    • Joined: 2004/04/13 15:24:23
    • Status: offline
    Re:Interface Recommendation for Sonar 2011/05/23 13:18:15 (permalink)
    For recording our live gigs as well as garage practices I use two Zoom R16s linked together. They are cheap, indestructible, no moving parts and can even run off batteries if needed.  After the gig plug them in via USB and they basically show up as jump drives. Import everything into Sonar and done.  About 6 yrs ago I spent about $2000 on a Mackie MDR for remote recording..now it's just a door block in the studio. These little jump drive recording boxes do everything I need.
    #27
    BretB
    Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 508
    • Joined: 2010/01/17 18:24:00
    • Location: Oklahoma
    • Status: offline
    Re:Interface Recommendation for Sonar 2011/05/23 14:40:20 (permalink)
    Little over the budget but I am loving my A&E ZED-R16.  We use it for practice, live, 16 channel recording, Sonar ACT control.  Single firewire connect to the PC.  Just my $2k worth.

    Sonar Platinum - A&H ZED R16 - KRK VXT4's - Yamaha DTXpress IV & Gretsch Catalina Maple kits
     
    "Music is what feelings sound like"
    https://soundcloud.com/bret575b
    #28
    JSkeen
    Max Output Level: -78 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 612
    • Joined: 2007/02/01 17:13:49
    • Location: USA
    • Status: offline
    Re:Interface Recommendation for Sonar 2011/05/23 23:36:59 (permalink)
    The A&E ZED-R16 is great, my buddy got one and I fell in love with it. If i had 2,000 for a new interface/board that is the route I would go without question.
    #29
    Jump to:
    © 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1