Is my Setup causing muddy vocals?

So I have a ATR2500 usb mic form sudio technica and I am currently trying my hardest to get clear vocals!! They come out a bit muddy and oomy eve after eq...how I do I fix it? I kow eq will help but I need a pre solution before a major one any help?

Unfortunately I'm new to this so I don't know how to post a wav file on here!! Asfor all the fancy stuff I'm just using ATR2500 and SONAR X2 to do my covers. I recently decided to start over on my cover because the vocals just were too damn boomy!! I don't need it fixed for me I want to try it on my own I'll never get anywhere if people do it for me ad the girfriend thing...uh...I'm not exactly sure what you mean

Still waiting for my dream girl, I will handle all of your audio needs after that.
 
One is about as easy as the other?

"Play around with distance and performance and you should find something that will work.  Best of luck."
 
Or it could be 
 
EQ
Compression
Limiting
Excitation
Stereo Width
Verb
Delay
Saturation
Overlapping frequencies
Etc. Etc. Etc... 
 
"Best of luck?" Without an example, it is quite literally "impossible" to make an honest recommendation. I could make a BS one? But that doesn't get you anywhere...
 

@The Band19 Ok look your dream girl is not inside of my post if you cannot answer my question then please don't respond!! I hate when people always want to trade something just for HELP especially when it has nothing ot do with my problems. I want to handle my own audio needs 
 
@AT look hun here is a link to the mic I am
using 
I am using SONAR X2 and am far enough from my mic as is!! It could be I'm ot eq'ing properly because earlier most of vocals sounded a little more better...but my chorus sounded way to boomy and muddy and I hated it...I'm just looking for a better answer. I can only work with what I have

i am a girl and thank you but I haven't mixed it completely I mean I am all about working to get something to sound beautiful or at least decent !! I mean you can't just expect to sound good on it's own you have to try!!
But here is some samples of it one with EQ and one without
 
The first one has we...nothing on it...just recorded vocals with sonitus noise gate

 
The second one have been eq'd qith fabfilter pro-q, compressed with sonar x2 track compressor, and breverb 2 cakewalk 64, but the speaking part has a classic chorus and the melody with it has a classic flanger you know to make it swirl 

 
I just don't want my vocals to be muddy and boomy, I don't know maybe my hearing is just dumb

There are more expensive microphones also, that cost a lot more. Those mics are not going to be duplicated by a cheaper microphone either. Only somewhat. Although there may be cheaper mics that sound pretty good, there is a reason recording studios use better mics - they can probably afford it.
 

And you can save the images on that link by right clicking and "copy image" or something like that. Then since it is on the clipboard, open up Paint program - Paste the image (that is still on the clipboard in Windows) and then save it in the Paint program with a name you want to use for the image.
 
That way you do not always have to go to that website to see the charts.
 

How many times have I heard "fix it in the mix?" No amount of mixing skill will turn a sow's ear into a silk purse, despite what you read.  Fixing it in the mix or in post is the most time consuming and least successful way of producing a good product.  Getting it right during recording (or as right as possible) is the first step to good sound.  If you learned in the old studio system the first real experience you got w/ recording was setting up mics, not mixing a paying client's masterpiece on a ssl board that you didn't know which button to push.  Which is why I suggested learning the basics of recording a  sound before learning how to fix a badly recording sound. 
 
If the sound is booming, judicious use of EQ can help, but not cure, the boom.  And since the OP has another open thread about "too much air" in the vocal, I suppose the fault lies within the recording technique themselves, not the stars, dear Brutus. If the same artist, same room and same mic produce such varying results, I'd start w/ the actual recording process. It is a learning process, so start at the source.  Get that decent, and it is soooo much easier to get a decent mix.  Get great sound, and the song mixes itself.  If you can't change the artist, or room or mic, find the technique that produces consistent results.  Then you can apply the same techniques to make the mix better.  Otherwise, you are just spitting into the wind and hoping something sticks.  Again and again.
 
Some practical mix suggestions for vocals in general, and your specific problem are:
 
Start w/ a high pass filter (which, as the name implies, passes the higher frequencies while cutting the lower ones).  For female vocals, you might go up to 200 Hz and higher without damaging the meat of the sound.  Play w/ the slope, if available, which is the curve of the filter. 
 
Muddy or booming usually apply to frequencies a bit higher, up to 400 Hz.  A separate notch filter, or for wide mud, a gentler dip, might help.  Reverb and other time-based effects will muck things up, so add those only after the track sound is good or you'll be fighting the vocals on two fronts.   For subtractive EQ like this, even the most basic EQ should work.  You ain't trying to add anything special, just take away.

hearing the example would certainly give us a starting point....
 
until you get 25 posts, you can't include active links. it's an anti-spammer thing.....
 
However,,, you can always type it out:  www dot yourwebsitelink dot com...and we can easily get there, then someone else can post the active link for you and for the rest of us to click on it.