musmin2415
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 35
- Joined: 2012/08/13 10:54:05
- Status: offline
Issues with Latency that I SHOULDN'T be having!
Alright, so even though I've been a professional musician for years and been dabbling in recording for the last 5-7 years, I still consider myself a VERY green newb when it comes to this stuff. Here's my amateur rig specs: Win 7 Pro 64-bit Intel i7 3770K 16 GB RAM AMD Radeon HD 7700 Series Audio Card/Interface: Presonus Firestudio Project MIDI Controller: Roland Fantom Recording Software: Sonar 8 Here's the issue I've been having. A couple of weeks ago I was creating a bedtrack for a video we had produced at my job, and everything was via MIDI. The ONLY tracks I had were an audio track with speaking on it and then one track for my MIDI keyboard. I used a piano soft synth that contained some nice delay and reverb - that was it. What killed me was that as I was recording my MIDI piano track, as the track progressed in time the response time of the keys (latency) increased to where it was almost impossible to play! I had to basically record little bits at a time. I had experimented with the buffer size on the Universal Control, and that helped a LITTLE. But honestly, with my current rig, it should be able to handle a simple task like this WITH NO ISSUES WHATSOEVER. So here's my question. Does anyone have any suggestions on optimal settings (buffer & whatever else might effect recording and playback of MIDI) for my current setup Sonar? Are the buffer settings on the Universal Control the only ones I have to worry about, or are there other settings for the FS Project that I can tweak? What about the settings within Sonar? Anyone have anyone have any suggestions there??? Please help!
|
Beagle
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 50621
- Joined: 2006/03/29 11:03:12
- Location: Fort Worth, TX
- Status: offline
Re:Issues with Latency that I SHOULDN'T be having!
2013/04/12 07:26:49
(permalink)
first thing I'd do is suggest that you disable the Radeon's software and run just basic windows graphics.
|
musmin2415
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 35
- Joined: 2012/08/13 10:54:05
- Status: offline
Re:Issues with Latency that I SHOULDN'T be having!
2013/04/12 10:13:50
(permalink)
Beagle first thing I'd do is suggest that you disable the Radeon's software and run just basic windows graphics. I do video editing with Vegas Pro 12 as well, which is why I have that card. You'd think that with all the horsepower I have with my rig that it wouldn't be an issue. I assume it's fairly easy to disable the card while I'm running Sonar, and then enable it again when I'm done?
|
Sonico
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
- Total Posts : 266
- Joined: 2003/11/25 12:53:58
- Status: offline
Re:Issues with Latency that I SHOULDN'T be having!
2013/04/12 11:04:22
(permalink)
Both of my systems are less powerful than yours and I have the Firestudio Project as well, I always record audio tracks monitoring thru software with no noticeable latency. I don't have to disable my video card, just the internal audio card. You should have no problem with that. Is your FW chip Texas Instruments or VIA?? If not, that could be the cause..
Desktop: Intel Core i7 3.60Ghz, 16 GB Ram Windows 10 64bit Laptop: Intel i5 2.3Ghz, 6GB Ram Windows 10 64bit Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 Presonus Faderport My Music
|
Beagle
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 50621
- Joined: 2006/03/29 11:03:12
- Location: Fort Worth, TX
- Status: offline
Re:Issues with Latency that I SHOULDN'T be having!
2013/04/12 11:06:14
(permalink)
I would think so as well. BUT I'm speaking from experience. I also use Vegas Pro. But my MOTU doesn't go down to low latencies without disabling my video card drivers and just using the basic video. I have an AMD Radeon 4500 Series 512M PCIe 2.0 video card and below 512 buffers I get pops and clicks and stuttering unless I disable the video software. however, I don't normally do this (I've actually only done it once to verify that it was the problem) - I usually just monitor via hardware and keep the latency settings at the high end. I had to disable them in the start up "msconfig" file to verify that was the problem. then I just put it back like it was and just deal with high buffers since this is a multitasking computer - not dedicated to audio.
|
musmin2415
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 35
- Joined: 2012/08/13 10:54:05
- Status: offline
Re:Issues with Latency that I SHOULDN'T be having!
2013/04/12 13:51:29
(permalink)
Oh, btw, maybe I should've included this before -- but everytime I switch buffer settings via the FS Universal Controller, Sonar throws up a window that says my Audio Engine has stopped. It's no big deal to click the button that re-starts it, but maybe that's also a symptom of what's going on?
|
Goddard
Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
- Total Posts : 338
- Joined: 2012/07/21 11:39:11
- Status: offline
Re:Issues with Latency that I SHOULDN'T be having!
2013/04/12 17:02:24
(permalink)
You might get more responses over in the appropriate Sonar version forum. But I suspect it may have nothing to do with your interface's audio buffer size setting or your graphics card and is more likely a MIDI timing (timestamping) issue or a bug in the softsynth plug-in.
|
musmin2415
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 35
- Joined: 2012/08/13 10:54:05
- Status: offline
Re:Issues with Latency that I SHOULDN'T be having!
2013/04/12 23:55:49
(permalink)
Sonico I don't have to disable my video card, just the internal audio card. You should have no problem with that. Is your FW chip Texas Instruments or VIA?? If not, that could be the cause.. I checked my FW card and it's a IOCREST. I ordered it, but I've never heard of it. How can I find out if it's the problem? Actually order the TI or VIA and see if the problem is solved??
|
musmin2415
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 35
- Joined: 2012/08/13 10:54:05
- Status: offline
Re:Issues with Latency that I SHOULDN'T be having!
2013/04/13 00:00:13
(permalink)
Goddard You might get more responses over in the appropriate Sonar version forum. But I suspect it may have nothing to do with your interface's audio buffer size setting or your graphics card and is more likely a MIDI timing (timestamping) issue or a bug in the softsynth plug-in. I thought x-posting was bad forum etiquette? But I don't mind trying in another forum. Anyway.... I do tend to agree with you that it has nothing to do with the audio buffer setting or the g-card, but I'm really not sure how to address the other issues you mentioned (timestamping & softsynth bug)
|
gbarrett
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
- Total Posts : 258
- Joined: 2003/11/18 22:21:25
- Location: Marco Island, FL
- Status: offline
Re:Issues with Latency that I SHOULDN'T be having!
2013/04/13 00:31:58
(permalink)
Are you using ASIO drivers? Do you have the correct audio device set for the timing master? Just a couple of ideas. I hope it helps.
A real musician knows the difference between the music and the notes.
|
Goddard
Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
- Total Posts : 338
- Joined: 2012/07/21 11:39:11
- Status: offline
Re:Issues with Latency that I SHOULDN'T be having!
2013/04/13 02:32:58
(permalink)
If you can't get help here, try posting another request for assistance in the Sonar forum corresponding to whichever version of Sonar 8 you're using. You might try doing a search first, such as for "MIDI delay" or "MIDI lag" or "MIDI drift". You can also try inspecting what the MIDI data looks like in Sonar's views, e.g. whether it's shown with correct timing, or for anything abnormal. Btw, ASIO doesn't handle MIDI, only audio, so all interfaces use Windows MIDI drivers for streaming MIDI data.
post edited by Goddard - 2013/04/13 02:37:02
|
Beagle
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 50621
- Joined: 2006/03/29 11:03:12
- Location: Fort Worth, TX
- Status: offline
Re:Issues with Latency that I SHOULDN'T be having!
2013/04/13 08:21:05
(permalink)
ASIO doesn't have anything to do with MIDI itself, but ASIO has everything to do with latency of softsynths triggered by MIDI, which is what musmin2415 stated in his original post, so gbarrett's questions/ideas are very relevant. the advice about the video drivers and the ASIO drivers are good things to check. they may not be what your problem is, that's why the forum is such a great place - the community of users have different experiences and different angles of advice. Goddard's advice of asking in the Sonar forum is not poor advice - you might find more answers there to help.
post edited by Beagle - 2013/04/13 15:28:03
|
Goddard
Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
- Total Posts : 338
- Joined: 2012/07/21 11:39:11
- Status: offline
Re:Issues with Latency that I SHOULDN'T be having!
2013/04/13 17:43:28
(permalink)
The symptom described by musmin2415 of the latency (response time to MIDI keyboard input) of the MIDI piano softsynth track being recorded progressively increasing with time as the track recording progressed would indicate a timing/sync mismatch somewhere. Without getting into too long of a technical discussion, if audio and MIDI data are being processed using respectively different clocking (timebases) such a progressively increasing drift as described can occur. ASIO and VST on Windows get their timing by using an older and less precise Windows system timing routine harking back to Win98 days, whereas current Windows OS's and and applications can implement more precise timing using system calls to higher resolution timing references, so timing discrepancies (which can progressively increase over time) may occur when ASIO audio drivers and/or VST plug-ins use a different timebase for time stamping or transmitting or playing out their data than is being used by the Windows kernel and drivers and DAW client applications. Sonar has a configuration option parameter setting in TTSSEQ.INI for "IgnoreMIDITimestamps=" (or something like that) which iirc defaults to a value of "0" (zero), so one thing to try is editing this file (using a text editor such as Notepad) and changing the value to "1" (one) and then saving the file and restarting Sonar. Easily reversible if it doesn't help, just edit the file again to change the "1" back to "0", save and restart Sonar. Another possibility might be the delay and reverb fx used for the piano softsynth playing up with (delaying) the processing of MIDI data, dunno, but it might be worth a try disabling those fx to see if that improves MIDI responsiveness. Btw, Beagle, I won't bother responding to what you've since edited from your post, other than to say that if you can truly read my thoughts then you are probably right now checking whether HDMI audio is enabled in your Radeon driver.
|
Beagle
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 50621
- Joined: 2006/03/29 11:03:12
- Location: Fort Worth, TX
- Status: offline
Re:Issues with Latency that I SHOULDN'T be having!
2013/04/14 13:29:34
(permalink)
I edited it because I felt I was being too harsh. If you want a public apology, then I do so publicly apologize. however, if you really want to help the OP why didn't you post this information earlier instead of just discounting other responses? I fail to see how that helps the OP. and no, even tho HDMI was included in my Radeon drivers, it was already disabled during the problems I was having before I disabled all of the Radeon software to get the "workaround." So, there's no need for me to check it because that was disabled as soon as I started having problems. thank you for your thoughts, tho.
|
Goddard
Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
- Total Posts : 338
- Joined: 2012/07/21 11:39:11
- Status: offline
Re:Issues with Latency that I SHOULDN'T be having!
2013/04/14 18:20:35
(permalink)
Beagle, no apology necessary, I'd just happened to see your initial post but by the time I got some time to respond you'd already edited it. I do not believe I had in any way criticized anyone's post as being unhelpful, but was only giving my own view, namely that, from the described symptom, imo it seemed more likely a software issue rather than a hardware problem, which is why I'd suggested posting to the Sonar forum might yield more help. Trust me, when I'm criticizing another post, there will be no mistaking that! I'm not posting here out of any obligation to spoon feed anybody anything. I'm happy to help if and when I can, but anyone needing help should first at least make an effort on their own to RTFM, check the info and FAQs on the Sonar site or their hardware or software vendor's site and use any forum search facilities first, and only then if they still can't find a solution, post a forum request with all necessary info. Btw, as far as I can see, the OP has not even indicated what piano softsynth is being used, only some details of the hardware in use (but not the motherboard?), and nobody has yet bothered to even ask about that. Hmm.
|
Beagle
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 50621
- Joined: 2006/03/29 11:03:12
- Location: Fort Worth, TX
- Status: offline
Re:Issues with Latency that I SHOULDN'T be having!
2013/04/14 21:18:22
(permalink)
Goddard Beagle, no apology necessary, I'd just happened to see your initial post but by the time I got some time to respond you'd already edited it. ok. I'm not posting here out of any obligation to spoon feed anybody anything. I'm happy to help if and when I can, but anyone needing help should first at least make an effort on their own to RTFM, check the info and FAQs on the Sonar site or their hardware or software vendor's site and use any forum search facilities first, and only then if they still can't find a solution, post a forum request with all necessary info. I guess personally I don't mind spoon feeding sometimes - that's just me, I don't expect others to do the same. but you're right they do need to post all necessary info. Btw, as far as I can see, the OP has not even indicated what piano softsynth is being used, only some details of the hardware in use (but not the motherboard?), and nobody has yet bothered to even ask about that. Hmm. you are correct there as well. we could use more info from the OP in order to help. cheers.
|
musmin2415
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 35
- Joined: 2012/08/13 10:54:05
- Status: offline
Re:Issues with Latency that I SHOULDN'T be having!
2013/04/14 23:12:59
(permalink)
Goddard I'm not posting here out of any obligation to spoon feed anybody anything. I'm happy to help if and when I can, but anyone needing help should first at least make an effort on their own to RTFM, check the info and FAQs on the Sonar site or their hardware or software vendor's site and use any forum search facilities first, and only then if they still can't find a solution, post a forum request with all necessary info. Btw, as far as I can see, the OP has not even indicated what piano softsynth is being used, only some details of the hardware in use (but not the motherboard?), and nobody has yet bothered to even ask about that. Hmm. Hmmmmm....can't help feeling I'm being somewhat indirectly chastised for not knowing exactly what I'm doing here. Lol! I never asked to be "spoon-fed", but I will say that I really appreciate it when someone gives me a direct answer instead of assuming I didn't "read the f'ing manual". You see, even though I'm a professional musician, I still hardly know ANYTHING about DAW systems and home recording. I'm a husband of one, father of 3 daughters, and am in full-time ministry. So, as much as I love to research (I actually do - and am sort of a nerd that way), sometimes that "free time" (which is usually only at night) is taken up reading bed time stories and dealing with little ones that are scared of the dark. I have read manuals, how-to's, watched YouTube videos, etc., and honestly, even though I've learned a lot, a lot of it is still very foreign to me. And since this is such a basic/general question and I didn't know enough to narrow down my search, when I did search 3 or 4 forums for the answer, I couldn't even figure out where to start because I wasn't sure which posts were relevant and which weren't! So, I thought I'd show my ignorance and post here. I'm a huge fan of the adage, "give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime...." but sometimes a brother just needs a fish to get him through the day so he can eventually get to the pond to throw out his line. I'm sorry I forgot to post MoBo - I just honestly forgot (Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. Z77X-UD5H). And the softsynth I'm using is "TruePianos1". I can reassure you that I'm not just a leech that comes to forums to take up space/time and post for the sake of posting. I love the Proverb - "A wise person is hungry for knowledge, while the fool feeds on trash." I am not a fool. Thank you all again, and I will continue to try what has been suggested (although it'll take some time because I'm only down in my studio a few times a week for about an hour). Gotta go kiss the little ones good night! Take care all.
post edited by musmin2415 - 2013/04/14 23:16:08
|
AT
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 10654
- Joined: 2004/01/09 10:42:46
- Location: TeXaS
- Status: offline
Re:Issues with Latency that I SHOULDN'T be having!
2013/04/15 00:44:00
(permalink)
musmin, I read the manual and still can't figure stuff out. DAWs and such are so darned complex, it is like trying to spell a word w/ a dictionary but having no idea what letter it starts w/. The forum is a helpful place, but many times OPs don't know the first thing about recording, or computers, or music. You can write a long post and when they answer you realize that didn't have that first letter. Or get offended because they do and think a helpful poster is talking down to them. Take nothing personal. One of the hardest things is figuring out how much the OP knows. Although I've got a lot of posts, sometimes I find myself asking a basic question because I can't remember it. later, @
https://soundcloud.com/a-pleasure-dome http://www.bnoir-film.com/ there came forth little children out of the city, and mocked him, and said unto him, Go up, thou bald head; go up, thou bald head. 24 And he turned back, and looked on them, and cursed them in the name of the Lord. And there came forth two she bears out of the wood, and tare forty and two children of them.
|
Goddard
Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
- Total Posts : 338
- Joined: 2012/07/21 11:39:11
- Status: offline
Re:Issues with Latency that I SHOULDN'T be having!
2013/04/15 04:18:46
(permalink)
|
musmin2415
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 35
- Joined: 2012/08/13 10:54:05
- Status: offline
Re:Issues with Latency that I SHOULDN'T be having!
2013/04/15 11:44:30
(permalink)
Taking some advice from another thread, I ran 2 programs to check latency & firewire chipset compatability. Here's the results of ohciTool.exe: OS: Microsoft Windows 7 64-bit Service Pack 1 [6.1.7601] CPU(s): Processor: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770K CPU @ 3.50GHz Physical: 1 Cores: 4 Logical: 8 L1 Cache: 32 KB ( L2 Cache: 256 KB (4) L3 Cache: 8192 KB (1) Installed RAM: 16345 MB Microsoft 1394ohci.sys [6.1.7601.17514] Microsoft ohci1394.sys [6.1.7600.16385] ???? Microsoft 1394bus.sys [6.1.7600.16385] ???? Looking for OHCI 1394 Host Controllers... 1: Vendor : (104C) Texas Instruments Chipset: (823F) XIO2213 Revision: 01 Status : Active Details: Subsysten VendorId: 3412 Subsystem DeviceId: 7856 Max # isoch Rx contexts: 4 Max # isoch Tx contexts: 8 Max 1394 Speed Capability: S800 Support: Compatible, no known issues. 2: Vendor : (1106) VIA Technologies Chipset: (3044) VT6307/VT6308 Revision: C0 Status : Active Details: Subsysten VendorId: 1458 Subsystem DeviceId: 1000 Max # isoch Rx contexts: 4 Max # isoch Tx contexts: 8 Max 1394 Speed Capability: S400 Support: Compatible, no known issues. The next test was for DPC latency ( http://www.thesycon.de/dpclat/dpclat.exe), and the graph came back showing that mine was consistently in the 'yellow' at around 1100us (& peaked around 1189us). I'm assuming this is high. Should this tell me anything I don't know besides now I can rule out chipset incompatbility? Goddard: I'll check on the miditimestamp values, and begin sifting through the other thread. I believe one of those I already came across, and it'll come as no surprise to anyone that I was confused. But I'll dig deeper. AT: I'm very thankful that someone can resonate with me at least a little, because it's EXACTLY like you said -- trying to look up a word in a dictionary and not knowing what letter it starts with. Believe it or not, I dig putting in the hard work (no matter how long it takes) when I can narrow down what I'm actually looking for.
|
Beagle
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 50621
- Joined: 2006/03/29 11:03:12
- Location: Fort Worth, TX
- Status: offline
Re:Issues with Latency that I SHOULDN'T be having!
2013/04/15 11:49:01
(permalink)
1100us is pretty high for audio work and will cause you to have to have your buffers set higher than you would need on a better DPC latency system. you may have background (memory resident) programs running which could cause this, or, as I said above, it could be a problem with your graphics card software/drivers. what I did was disable my radeon software in msconfig, then ran the DPC latency checker again and everything was down in the 50us average. there could be other issues with other programs or drivers causing that high DPC latency as well. using the TI chipset is good. BTW - I'm also in church ministry. I'm not paid staff, though, just a volunteer. check out my website and music links in my signature when you get a chance...
post edited by Beagle - 2013/04/15 12:01:27
|
Goddard
Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
- Total Posts : 338
- Joined: 2012/07/21 11:39:11
- Status: offline
Re:Issues with Latency that I SHOULDN'T be having!
2013/04/15 12:30:42
(permalink)
musmin2415, as Beagle said, you want to use the "T.I. XIO2213" Firewire (which I assume is your IOCREST FW card) for connecting your Presonus Firestudio Project interface, not the "VIA 6307/08" (which is the onboard FW controller on your motherboard). See this info: http://support.presonus.c...st-for-Firewire-cards- Avoid using the onboard VIA FW (if possible, disable it in your BIOS setup). It is a PCI FW chip using a "bridged PCI" connection (because your Gigabyte Z77 motherboard only supports PCI Express and "bridged" PCI, not "native" PCI) which can cause performance issues. The T.I. XIO2213 chip on your IOCREST PCI Express FW card is better in that respect, and is listed as compatible with your Presonus interface. If your IOCREST card only has FW800 ports, you'll need a 9-pin to 6-pin FW cable for connecting your Presonus interface, but I'd guess it probably has a 6-pin FW400 port you can use (if you aren't doing so already?). Regarding your DPC issue, try running Latencymon: http://www.resplendence.com/latencymon which offers more detailed info than Thesycon's DPC checker (I'm confident you'll read the info on that site including the FAQ for guidance on how to use it). Have faith, help is at hand!
|
musmin2415
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 35
- Joined: 2012/08/13 10:54:05
- Status: offline
Re:Issues with Latency that I SHOULDN'T be having!
2013/04/15 12:52:09
(permalink)
Beagle you may have background (memory resident) programs running which could cause this, or, as I said above, it could be a problem with your graphics card software/drivers. what I did was disable my radeon software in msconfig, then ran the DPC latency checker again and everything was down in the 50us average. there could be other issues with other programs or drivers causing that high DPC latency as well. Yeah, let me go ahead and do that & give it a shot. I really can't see any other software being the issue because my rig is pretty much dedicated solely to audio/video projects. So, I keep my PC fairly 'clean'. Beagle BTW - I'm also in church ministry. I'm not paid staff, though, just a volunteer. check out my website and music links in my signature when you get a chance... Will do man! Thanks!!
|
musmin2415
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 35
- Joined: 2012/08/13 10:54:05
- Status: offline
Re:Issues with Latency that I SHOULDN'T be having!
2013/04/15 12:56:22
(permalink)
Goddard musmin2415, as Beagle said, you want to use the "T.I. XIO2213" Firewire (which I assume is your IOCREST FW card) for connecting your Presonus Firestudio Project interface, not the "VIA 6307/08" (which is the onboard FW controller on your motherboard). See this info: http://support.presonus.com/entries/21766827-Is-there-a-Firewire-Compatibility-List-for-Firewire-cards- Avoid using the onboard VIA FW (if possible, disable it in your BIOS setup). It is a PCI FW chip using a "bridged PCI" connection (because your Gigabyte Z77 motherboard only supports PCI Express and "bridged" PCI, not "native" PCI) which can cause performance issues. The T.I. XIO2213 chip on your IOCREST PCI Express FW card is better in that respect, and is listed as compatible with your Presonus interface. If your IOCREST card only has FW800 ports, you'll need a 9-pin to 6-pin FW cable for connecting your Presonus interface, but I'd guess it probably has a 6-pin FW400 port you can use (if you aren't doing so already?). Regarding your DPC issue, try running Latencymon: http://www.resplendence.com/latencymon which offers more detailed info than Thesycon's DPC checker (I'm confident you'll read the info on that site including the FAQ for guidance on how to use it). Have faith, help is at hand! Now THIS makes sense to me - I'm actually starting to understand! :-) I'll check everything out and get back to yall. Thanks so much for your patience, man.
|
musmin2415
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 35
- Joined: 2012/08/13 10:54:05
- Status: offline
Re:Issues with Latency that I SHOULDN'T be having!
2013/04/18 00:13:16
(permalink)
Just thought I'd give an update on what's going on & what I've tried so far: Still having some issues. But I found that I can't run "Speccy" (a freeware program that analyzes what's going on with your system - internal temps, how hard your CPU is working, etc.) because it runs up my latency readings. Also, I went into my device manager and disabled my "IEEE 1394 host controllers", which leaves just me TI Chipset. I have not disabled my AMD card yet. I'm also looking at my msconfig and trying to figure out what services I need and which ones I don't. What's really jacking with me is that all these 'Creative Labs' and 'Cyberlink' services are running which I'm wondering if they're really even necessary since they all have to do with either audio or video. Here's a quick list of what I'm going to look up and see if I need: - AMD External Events Utililty - Creative Audio Service - Cyberlink RichVideo Service I'm still planning on investigating the timestamp issue, but I'm not really convinced that that's the issue. Because when I'm recording, the problem doesn't seem to be like if I'm playing at 119bpm & and another internal clock is running at 120bpm so we slowly over time start getting off. It's more like after about a minute of recording that my midi is "bottle-necking" and a huge delay happens with the key response. I'm probably misunderstanding the time-stamping issue that was mentioned above, so I'll still check into it. Now I'm currently running LatencyMon and reading all the info at its website so I can figure out what I'm actually looking at. Latency is still peaking pretty high (and all I have open is Chrome), and plus my 'hard pagefault resolution count' is completely pegged-out. But like I said, I'm currently researching the FAQs and figuring out what this whole analysis is telling me. EDIT: Looks like (just from an initial glance) that HDAudioBus.sys is causing some ISR issues, and msmpeng.exe is causing some Hard pagefaults. That's it for now!
post edited by musmin2415 - 2013/04/18 00:25:26
|
kristoffer
Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
- Total Posts : 406
- Joined: 2010/08/18 15:25:37
- Location: Bergen, Norway
- Status: offline
Re:Issues with Latency that I SHOULDN'T be having!
2013/04/18 15:44:40
(permalink)
Do you mean HDaudBus.sys? If yes, have you disabled your internal audiocard, which can be done your Gigabyte motherboard BIOS. How are the DPC reading? I see you have about 1100us (which is high) but is is stable at that level or do you have high/low peaks?
SonarPlatinum/X3e ProducerHW: ~Pod HD pro~Pod X3~JTV-69 US~Tascam FW1884~BEYERDYNAMIC DT770 PRO~Røde NTK~MaschineMikro~ADAM ARTist5 W10 - i7 920 - Intel DX58SO2 - Nvidia NVS450 Quad - 12GB OCZ Gold 1600Mhz RAM - Noctua NH-D14 - Corsair TX950w PSU - Corsair MX200 500GB OS/Programs - OCZ Agility 3 SSD (Audio) - WD Black 1TB
|
Cactus Music
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 8424
- Joined: 2004/02/09 21:34:04
- Status: offline
Re:Issues with Latency that I SHOULDN'T be having!
2013/04/18 16:03:41
(permalink)
Disable the Creative stuff, very well documented problem child. When you use a proper audio interface you should always disable all other audio devices. Some don't but most will interfere with your good audio system. And Creative is well known to be one of the culprits. Also it is normal to try shutting down the internet on your DAW. Most of the background processes won't make a difference to the DPCLAT readings. In the msconfig utility you can toggle "hide all Micro soft " and that makes it easier to see the 3rd party stuff. Look for things like Adobe, Creative, and any updaters for software. A note about True Pianos. I was hearing a delay when I exported it in a mix. I had to freeze the track to get it to sound in time. It's the first time I noticed this and I havn't used true pianos a lot in the past. But I think it's a heavy user.
|
musmin2415
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 35
- Joined: 2012/08/13 10:54:05
- Status: offline
Re:Issues with Latency that I SHOULDN'T be having!
2013/04/23 10:47:24
(permalink)
kristoffer Do you mean HDaudBus.sys? If yes, have you disabled your internal audiocard, which can be done your Gigabyte motherboard BIOS. Yes that's what I meant - sorry. And now that I think about it, I did turn off some of my internal audio card functions just through Windows and chose my Presonus FS as default, but all the processes won't be disable completely until I do it through the BIOS. Correct? kristoffer How are the DPC reading? I see you have about 1100us (which is high) but is is stable at that level or do you have high/low peaks? Well, since I stopped running "Speccy" and made some other changes that I mentioned above, the readings have been better. (I can't tell you what right now, because I haven't been able to get down to my studio for about a week now.) But I still want to make sure I'm making the changes mentioned in this thread in order to optimize my midi performance --- disabling all unnecessary process/software, checking all the internal audio settings, etc.
|
musmin2415
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 35
- Joined: 2012/08/13 10:54:05
- Status: offline
Re:Issues with Latency that I SHOULDN'T be having!
2013/04/23 10:56:12
(permalink)
Cactus Music Disable the Creative stuff, very well documented problem child. When you use a proper audio interface you should always disable all other audio devices. Some don't but most will interfere with your good audio system. And Creative is well known to be one of the culprits. Thank you! Now that you mention it and as I was digging deeper into other threads, I did notice that Creative tends to have its nose in everything. Cactus Music Also it is normal to try shutting down the internet on your DAW. Most of the background processes won't make a difference to the DPCLAT readings. In the msconfig utility you can toggle "hide all Micro soft " and that makes it easier to see the 3rd party stuff. Look for things like Adobe, Creative, and any updaters for software. Yep, I'm not sure why I didn't think of that before. Especially since I'm wireless, I'm sure that can't help the situation. And I'll take your suggestion in msconfig as well. Thanks so much! I'll try to get back with an update as soon as I can get back down to the studio again.
|
Cactus Music
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 8424
- Joined: 2004/02/09 21:34:04
- Status: offline
Re:Issues with Latency that I SHOULDN'T be having!
2013/04/23 11:44:02
(permalink)
|