Just say NO!

Author
Dave King
Max Output Level: -46.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2862
  • Joined: 2005/11/13 14:19:48
  • Location: Connecticut, USA
  • Status: offline
2013/11/07 20:53:00 (permalink)

Dave King
www.davekingmusic.com

SONAR X2 Producer 64-Bit 
StudioCat PC
Windows 7 Home Premium, Service Pack 1 
Intel Corel i5 3450 CPU @3.10 GHz 
RAM 8 GB
M-Audio Delta 44

M-Audio MidiSport 2x2
 
#1

4 Replies Related Threads

    craigb
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 41704
    • Joined: 2009/01/28 23:13:04
    • Location: The Pacific Northwestshire
    • Status: offline
    Re: Just say NO! 2013/11/07 22:37:28 (permalink)
    Good for him.

     
    Time for all of you to head over to Beyond My DAW!
    #2
    The Maillard Reaction
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 31918
    • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
    • Status: offline
    Re: Just say NO! 2013/11/08 07:27:19 (permalink)
    It's easy to say no. It's even easier to just ignore the request.
     
    If you do happen to say yes and you get your music placed in a broadcast property without a placement fee you can still look forward to earning royalties from the actual broadcast of the show. There is a instrument called a cue list that accompanies television and theater content which credits the asset holders and each presentation earns royalties.
     
    If you can get your music in a commercial that is shown frequently you can find a way to call that a good thing even if you gave the producers free use of the placement.
     
    The reason many productions don't have a budget for music is that they don't need very much of a budget to get the job done. The producers know that someone will "produce" some back ground filler and allow free placement in the hope of establishing a royalty stream while others will sell remarkably similar content for nominal "royalty free" fees.
     
    best regards,
    mike
     
     
    post edited by mike_mccue - 2013/11/08 11:50:00


    #3
    craigb
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 41704
    • Joined: 2009/01/28 23:13:04
    • Location: The Pacific Northwestshire
    • Status: offline
    Re: Just say NO! 2013/11/08 10:55:40 (permalink)
    mike_mccue
    It's easy to say no. It's even easier to just ignore the request.
     
    If you do happen to say yes and you get your music placed in a broadcast property without a placement fee you can still look forward to earning royalties from the actual broadcast of the show. There is a instrument called a cue list that accompanies television and theater content which credits the asset holders and each presentation earns royalties.
     
    If you can get your music in a commercial that is shown frequently you can find a way to call that a good thing even if you gave the producers free use of the placement.
     
    The reason many productions don't have a budget for free is that they don't need very much of a budget to get the job done. The producers know that someone will "produce" some back ground filler and allow free placement in the hope of establishing a royalty stream while others will sell remarkably similar content for nominal "royalty free" fees.
     
    best regards,
    mike



    Maybe, but none of that seems to be the case here.

     
    Time for all of you to head over to Beyond My DAW!
    #4
    The Maillard Reaction
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 31918
    • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
    • Status: offline
    Re: Just say NO! 2013/11/08 12:03:57 (permalink)
    The best part about cue sheets and royalties is that it isn't paid by the producers it is paid by the broadcasters.
     
    For example; Betty.co.uk produces a handful of low grade reality shows. Once the content is sent to the broadcasters it is compulsory on the part of the broadcasters to demand a cue sheet and to account for the royalty payments for music that has been mechanically synced to picture. 
     
    Some broadcasters look upon claims of royalty free sync'ed music with su****ion as it is simply easier to C.O.A. by paying the prescribed fees for all the music they use than to wonder when a claim will be made that they broadcast music that wasn't authorized.
     
    A lot of the inexpensive backing track libraries business is built upon the idea that you can have copies of a large library at your studio for a very low fee and the payoff comes when you place some of their content in a broadcast and the royalty stream opens up.
     
    Just because Whitey doesn't mention this doesn't mean he doesn't know how to cash royalty checks when they show up at his mail box. :-)
     
     
     
    These are the same sorts of profit focused producers who try to get labor, like me, to work as cheaply as possible. My favorite line is "we have a big block of work so you should give us a discount" which to me is another way of saying "we want you to lose even more money than if we just asked you to give us a special deal for one day".
     
    One difference between the caterer or labor and a musician like Whitey is that the caterer doesn't get royalties... and if it's TV they don't get a credit either.
     
    It is easy to say no and even easier to ignore the request.
     
    best regards,
    mike
     
     
    post edited by mike_mccue - 2013/11/08 12:06:17


    #5
    Jump to:
    © 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1