Key binding

Author
HotCoollMusicGirl
Max Output Level: -71 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 991
  • Joined: 2004/10/02 20:23:31
  • Status: offline
2008/04/26 15:29:18 (permalink)

Key binding

I'm trying to unbind the D key from the Show/Hide Navigator function. But I'm unable to do it. When I go to the Key Bindings dialog and click D, it says at the bottom that it is assigned to the Show/Hide Navigator function, even though there are no lines that connect the key to the function. I click Unbind anyway, and nothing happens.

I find the function and have both it and the key highlighted, but there is still no line connecting them. So I click Bind. Now there is an asterisk next to the D and there is a line connecting them. So I then click Unbind again and the asterisk and the line disappear. But when I close the dialog D is still bound to Show/Hide Navigator.

I'm able to bind the D key to something else. But I don't want it bound to anything. And it seems that the only way to unbind a key that is bound to something by default is to bind it to something else.

Does anyone know of a way around this?

Sonar really needs more flexible and more extensive customization. What it has now is too limited (in terms of the functions available and how they can be assigned or positioned on menus) and too clunky in terms of how it works.

It's 2008. Sonar's Key Binding system is pure Windows 3.1. So are its toolbars. Sonar deserves better. So do its users.
#1

28 Replies Related Threads

    Susan G
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 12016
    • Joined: 2003/11/05 22:49:26
    • Location: Putnam County, NY
    • Status: offline
    RE: Key binding 2008/04/26 15:38:28 (permalink)
    Hi HCMG-
    I'm able to bind the D key to something else. But I don't want it bound to anything. And it seems that the only way to unbind a key that is bound to something by default is to bind it to something else.

    I'm seeing the same thing, and here's my broken record!

    Post an official FR here: Cakewalk Feature Requests

    Another excellent suggestion, IMO.

    Thanks-

    -Susan

    2.30 gigahertz Intel Core i7-3610QM; 16 GB RAM
    Windows 10 x64; NI Komplete Audio 6.
    SONAR Platinum (Lexington) x64
    #2
    John
    Forum Host
    • Total Posts : 30467
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
    • Status: offline
    RE: Key binding 2008/04/26 15:45:21 (permalink)
    I'm able to bind the D key to something else. But I don't want it bound to anything. And it seems that the only way to unbind a key that is bound to something by default is to bind it to something else.

    I don't know about this. An unbound key is a useless key. Why on earth would you not want it bound? Not that its any of my business.

    Sonar is to some great in the flexibility it has in its key binding. Yet I look at as a flaw in that we users can have any key binding thus it makes it hard to give instructions when no one has the same setup. There is a good argument for keeping the key mapping untouchable.

    It just has to be learned by all. Anybody want to change Scroll Lock? LOL
    post edited by John - 2008/04/26 16:09:26

    Best
    John
    #3
    Vovchik
    Max Output Level: -74 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 847
    • Joined: 2005/01/24 00:47:59
    • Location: Staten Island, NY
    • Status: offline
    RE: Key binding 2008/04/26 15:52:15 (permalink)
    Just bind it, it works.
    Click "Locate Key", press D, (don't pay attention to what the bottom line sais), find your function, click "Bind", "OK".
    Your new binding will overwrite default binding.

    If It Ain't Broken, Don't Fix It
    #4
    Susan G
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 12016
    • Joined: 2003/11/05 22:49:26
    • Location: Putnam County, NY
    • Status: offline
    RE: Key binding 2008/04/26 16:03:13 (permalink)
    Hi Vladimir-

    But HCMG doesn't want "D" bound to anything. She stated:
    "But I don't want it bound to anything."

    I don't see any way to do that, once a key's bound.

    Thanks-

    -Susan

    2.30 gigahertz Intel Core i7-3610QM; 16 GB RAM
    Windows 10 x64; NI Komplete Audio 6.
    SONAR Platinum (Lexington) x64
    #5
    guitartrek
    Max Output Level: -47 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2842
    • Joined: 2006/02/26 12:37:57
    • Status: offline
    RE: Key binding 2008/04/26 16:07:23 (permalink)
    Looks like you can't un-bind keys that are defaulted to a global command. This is from the help screen:

    "If a key or combination is already bound to a global command by default, the name of the key appears in bold text, and the command it is bound to appears at the bottom of the dialog under Global Key Assignment. Binding a key or combination to a command and clicking OK overwrites any default binding for that key or combination."
    #6
    Vovchik
    Max Output Level: -74 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 847
    • Joined: 2005/01/24 00:47:59
    • Location: Staten Island, NY
    • Status: offline
    RE: Key binding 2008/04/26 16:11:02 (permalink)
    Sorry, did not read carefully.

    Seams like you can't bind it to nothing. But maybe you can bind it to something that does not do anything. Like an empty CAL... Just an idea...

    If It Ain't Broken, Don't Fix It
    #7
    Susan G
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 12016
    • Joined: 2003/11/05 22:49:26
    • Location: Putnam County, NY
    • Status: offline
    RE: Key binding 2008/04/26 16:15:44 (permalink)
    Hi John-
    Yet I look at as a flaw in that we users can have any key binding thus it makes it hard to give instructions when no one has the same setup. There is a good argument for keeping the key mapping untouchable.

    I disagree. It's pretty easy to say "The default key [combo] for this is...". You'd trade that for being able to customize your own key bindings? I wouldn't!

    -Susan

    EDIT: Same with the PRV Tools configuration, BTW. Do people *have* to stay with the defaults before they can get help/suggestions here? I certainly hope not!
    post edited by Susan G - 2008/04/26 16:40:00

    2.30 gigahertz Intel Core i7-3610QM; 16 GB RAM
    Windows 10 x64; NI Komplete Audio 6.
    SONAR Platinum (Lexington) x64
    #8
    John
    Forum Host
    • Total Posts : 30467
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
    • Status: offline
    RE: Key binding 2008/04/26 16:26:40 (permalink)
    ORIGINAL: Susan G

    Hi John-
    Yet I look at as a flaw in that we users can have any key binding thus it makes it hard to give instructions when no one has the same setup. There is a good argument for keeping the key mapping untouchable.

    I disagree. It's pretty easy to say "The default key [combo] for this is...". You'd trade that for being able to customize your own key bindings? I wouldn't!

    -Susan

    EDIT: Same with the PRV Tools configuration, BTW. Do people *have* to stay with the defaults before they can get help/suggestions here? I certainly hope not!

    You're probably right. It has just always been in the back of my mind that it could cause confusion. But so far I can't point to any time it has turned out that way. I do leave things in their defaults for this reason. Except for those things that need a keybinding and don't have one.

    Edit; I still don't understand the need to unassign a key.
    post edited by John - 2008/04/26 16:54:35

    Best
    John
    #9
    Susan G
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 12016
    • Joined: 2003/11/05 22:49:26
    • Location: Putnam County, NY
    • Status: offline
    RE: Key binding 2008/04/26 16:53:58 (permalink)
    Hi John-

    Edit; I still don't understand the need to unassign a key.

    You don't have to; that's not what the forum is here for!

    -Susan

    2.30 gigahertz Intel Core i7-3610QM; 16 GB RAM
    Windows 10 x64; NI Komplete Audio 6.
    SONAR Platinum (Lexington) x64
    #10
    UnderTow
    Max Output Level: -37 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3848
    • Joined: 2004/01/06 12:13:49
    • Status: offline
    RE: Key binding 2008/04/26 17:04:29 (permalink)

    ORIGINAL: John
    There is a good argument for keeping the key mapping untouchable.



    Hurray hurray! Now I wish Cakewalk would think like that. When Sonar 6 came out, "delete track" was suddenly bound to right-click-L instead of right-click-D. I asked why this had changed and the answer from someone at Cakewalk was something like "Oh I just used the auto-assign function and it allocated it that way". WHAT????*&^#&*^#& Does Cakewalk want to be taken seriously or just make silly adverts about Protools that they can't make true in their wettest dreams?


    It just has to be learned by all. Anybody want to change Scroll Lock? LOL


    The scroll_lock key rocks. Sonar is the only audio application I know that uses it properly.

    UnderTow sipping on Duvels *hic*
    #11
    John
    Forum Host
    • Total Posts : 30467
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
    • Status: offline
    RE: Key binding 2008/04/26 17:05:08 (permalink)

    ORIGINAL: Susan G

    Hi John-

    Edit; I still don't understand the need to unassign a key.

    You don't have to; that's not what the forum is here for!

    -Susan

    What????

    Best
    John
    #12
    UnderTow
    Max Output Level: -37 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3848
    • Joined: 2004/01/06 12:13:49
    • Status: offline
    RE: Key binding 2008/04/26 17:05:44 (permalink)

    ORIGINAL: John
    An unbound key is a useless key. Why on earth would you not want it bound? Not that its any of my business.


    I would like to unbind CTRL-UP/DOWN arrow. Or have Cakewalk fix the U (Undo GUI change) function to work properly...

    UnderTow
    #13
    Susan G
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 12016
    • Joined: 2003/11/05 22:49:26
    • Location: Putnam County, NY
    • Status: offline
    RE: Key binding 2008/04/26 17:21:32 (permalink)
    What????

    Hi John-

    I think CW should allow Users to customize their settings. It's not up to us forum members to "understand the need". I hope that's clear!

    -Susan

    2.30 gigahertz Intel Core i7-3610QM; 16 GB RAM
    Windows 10 x64; NI Komplete Audio 6.
    SONAR Platinum (Lexington) x64
    #14
    John
    Forum Host
    • Total Posts : 30467
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
    • Status: offline
    RE: Key binding 2008/04/26 17:43:06 (permalink)
    Well it is if one is asking for support on a feature request. Besides the question why is often informative when answered. Wouldn't not accessing a key be the same as unbinding it? I just don't understand the why of it. Rebinding makes sense but unbinding doesn't.

    Best
    John
    #15
    Susan G
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 12016
    • Joined: 2003/11/05 22:49:26
    • Location: Putnam County, NY
    • Status: offline
    RE: Key binding 2008/04/26 17:47:46 (permalink)
    Hi John-

    There is a good argument for keeping the key mapping untouchable.

    You'd rather the key assignments were writ in stone? Really? Why?

    -Susan

    2.30 gigahertz Intel Core i7-3610QM; 16 GB RAM
    Windows 10 x64; NI Komplete Audio 6.
    SONAR Platinum (Lexington) x64
    #16
    Susan G
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 12016
    • Joined: 2003/11/05 22:49:26
    • Location: Putnam County, NY
    • Status: offline
    RE: Key binding 2008/04/26 17:56:26 (permalink)
    Hi John-

    Wouldn't not accessing a key be the same as unbinding it? I just don't understand the why of it. Rebinding makes sense but unbinding doesn't.

    Well, then it's back to HCMG to explain better, but not up to any of us to dismiss it out-of-hand as "useless", IMO.

    -Susan
    post edited by Susan G - 2008/04/26 18:16:24

    2.30 gigahertz Intel Core i7-3610QM; 16 GB RAM
    Windows 10 x64; NI Komplete Audio 6.
    SONAR Platinum (Lexington) x64
    #17
    Vovchik
    Max Output Level: -74 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 847
    • Joined: 2005/01/24 00:47:59
    • Location: Staten Island, NY
    • Status: offline
    RE: Key binding 2008/04/26 17:57:20 (permalink)
    I understand your perplexity, but...
    The question was not "Does unbinding make any sense?"
    The question was "How to unbind?".

    If It Ain't Broken, Don't Fix It
    #18
    Susan G
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 12016
    • Joined: 2003/11/05 22:49:26
    • Location: Putnam County, NY
    • Status: offline
    RE: Key binding 2008/04/26 17:59:51 (permalink)
    Exactly!

    -Susan

    2.30 gigahertz Intel Core i7-3610QM; 16 GB RAM
    Windows 10 x64; NI Komplete Audio 6.
    SONAR Platinum (Lexington) x64
    #19
    John
    Forum Host
    • Total Posts : 30467
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
    • Status: offline
    RE: Key binding 2008/04/26 18:04:46 (permalink)
    To me it makes no difference. Learning the keyboard short cuts has always been part of learning an app. Sonar is no different in this regard. To me how a developer sets this up is up to them. The ability to map an unused key to a function is what matters. What it is isn't important to me so much as long as it can be done. Leave as many keys unmapped as possible and I am happy. But the default keys could be written in stone for all the difference it makes to the end results. I know some want total control over this. I just don't see a compelling reason to have it. But as far as I know Sonar gives complete remapping capability to the user. It can even remap to another apps key mapping. Even though its there I have thought that it is unnecessary. I do have other DAWs and it is not an issue for me. But then I rely on a CS for a lot of the things others do with keys.

    Best
    John
    #20
    Tom F
    Max Output Level: -48 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2749
    • Joined: 2007/07/08 05:56:12
    • Location: Vienna (the one in Europe)
    • Status: offline
    RE: Key binding 2008/04/26 18:33:22 (permalink)
    you will never ever make john say: "ok probably it could be an idea if somone out there wants it like that"
    ...because like god would have given us wings if he wanted us to fly - sonar would have given us unbinding if it wanted us to want umbinding - isnt it like that john ? :-)

    #21
    John
    Forum Host
    • Total Posts : 30467
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
    • Status: offline
    RE: Key binding 2008/04/26 20:20:04 (permalink)

    ORIGINAL: info@tomflair.com

    you will never ever make john say: "ok probably it could be an idea if somone out there wants it like that"
    ...because like god would have given us wings if he wanted us to fly - sonar would have given us unbinding if it wanted us to want umbinding - isnt it like that john ? :-)



    No it isn't! I want to understand why its needed. You know, increase my understanding. Sort of what this forum is all about.

    Best
    John
    #22
    ru
    Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 555
    • Joined: 2007/09/18 14:31:36
    • Status: offline
    RE: Key binding 2008/04/26 21:27:03 (permalink)
    not to speak for hcmgirl, but maybe the key's in the way...gets inadvertently struck while attempting something else. who knows? but adding such a basic function to the customization options doesn't seem like much of a stretch.
    if she wants to share her reason, all the better.
    #23
    HotCoollMusicGirl
    Max Output Level: -71 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 991
    • Joined: 2004/10/02 20:23:31
    • Status: offline
    RE: Key binding 2008/04/27 00:02:34 (permalink)
    Hi all. Gee I go away for a few hours and look at what my cranky little post has blossomed into! :) Thanks for the replies. I prolly should've said why I wanted to totally unbind the D key... not that it should matter. But ru got it totally right:

    ORIGINAL: ru

    not to speak for hcmgirl, but maybe the key's in the way...gets inadvertently struck while attempting something else.


    That's it! I was working in AudioSnap (which is really an amazing feature) and when you right click on a transient you can disable and re-enable it by pressing D. And when working quickly I would often press D either before the right-click menu had come up, or I wasn't actually over the transient -- I'm not really sure what it was, though technically, I suppose, it could be considered a user error. Either way, when that happened, the plain old D was passed to the system and so the Navigation thing would come up, which after a while got annoying. I'd rather have nothing happen at all at those times than something that shifted the display. And so I wanted to turn that off! :) I turn it on inadvertently other times too, like when I mistype the Split or the Envelope tool. And I don't usually have the Navigator open (thought when I DO have it open, I wouldn't want to inadvertently close it.)

    In the bigger scheme of things that *particular* change is not the most important UI change I would make, but the fact that it couldn't be done in the key bindings really DOES get to something that i think is important.

    John raises an interesting point about possible confusion if users deviate from the default settings. And every time I post about the need for full-function customization (and I acknowledge that customization is one of my fetishes) I anticipate that someone will raise that objection. But, I'm sorry, it just doesn't carry any weight, IMV.

    First of all, anyone who does extensive customization will usually not forget that she's doing it and will take that into account when asking for support. (I've posted here several times where I described steps I was taking and had to "translate" what I was actually doing into the default keystrokes.) If I ever had to call CW for support and be walked through some procedure, I'd load the default key bindings -- sort of like what happens when I call Comcast for something and they walk me through 20 steps to get to Windows Control Panel when I've have a short cut (Ctrl-Alt-Shift-C) to that for years. Sometimes you just have to indulge these guys.


    ORIGINAL: John
    Learning the keyboard short cuts has always been part of learning an app. Sonar is no different in this regard. To me how a developer sets this up is up to them. The ability to map an unused key to a function is what matters. What it is isn't important to me so much as long as it can be done. Leave as many keys unmapped as possible and I am happy. But the default keys could be written in stone for all the difference it makes to the end results.


    I have to strongly disagree. What the default keys are, and exactly how they work -- e.g., does a key not only turn a function on, but does it toggle it off as well -- makes a huge difference to the end result, if you include in the end result the process and experience of getting there -- which I personally think is a most valid way of looking it. If it made no difference there'd be hardly any basis for choosing one application over another, because as much as we want to wave the Cakewalk flag the fact is there's virtually no *end result* that you can accomplish in Sonar that you can't also accomplish in Cubase or Reaper or Pro Tools. Or on magnetic tape. (I'm sure I'll be called on that, but I'm taking some poetic license because I know my larger point is valid, and also because I just renewed my poetic license and want to get my money's worth.)

    << Learning the keyboard short cuts has always been part of learning an app. Sonar is no different in this regard. To me how a developer sets this up is up to them. >>

    Sonar is actually not too great in this regard. There's a lot of inconsistency across the application, especially when you look not only at keystrokes (keybindings) but accessibility to common (or conceptually similar) functions across different views and how user expectations are established -- and then not met. That makes "learning an app" needlessly difficult, because you can learn it and still be led into stupid mistakes... in effect, forced typos.

    I realize that UnderTow was taking the opposite position than I am, when she/he said this....

    ORIGINAL: UnderTow

    I asked why this had changed and the answer from someone at Cakewalk was something like "Oh I just used the auto-assign function and it allocated it that way". WHAT????*&^#&*^#&


    ...but I find that extreeeemely easy to believe. And if that's really how it works at CW Central Command then it explains a whole lot. But rather than that supporting the case for "keeping the key mapping untouchable" and having them "written in stone" it argues just the opposite: Ship with whatever defaults you want -- acknowledging that some bindings will make no sense whatsoever -- and then let the users decide how they want to set up their environment.

    Doesn’t anyone else find it kind of strange (and telling) that here at the half-life of Sonar 7 you can keybind "Help-Tip of the Day" and "Help-Usage Logger" and "Help-What's New" and "Help-Other Useless Junk Under The Help Menu" but you can't bind Clip Envelopes -- Clip Envelopes!!! -- and that the default menu layout actually hides Clip Envelopes two levels down?

    Or that that the extremely useful Copy Entire Clips as Linked Clips function also can't be directly key binded, and that by default it requires a right click to bring up a context menu and then a left click to bring up a dialog box and then a click to toggle the function and then a click on OK to close the dialog... and then you have to repeat the entire process if you want it to work differently next time? Some of those clicks can be bypassed by using keystrokes.... but the ENTIRE forage-for-functionality maze should by bypassable by letting me bind a key of my choosing that would toggle the function on AND off without any fuss. I happen to have the Drag and Drop Options dialog bound to Ctrl-Shift-D and it still takes 3 steps when it should take only 1. I should be able to create a button for that function, which would alternate being dim and light, and be positionable on any toolbar I want, so I can tell at a glance what the status is, rather than making me drag a clip before realizing I'm in the wrong mode, or making me check the mode before I start dragging. I'm working on music; I'm not gonna remember the last mode of a frequently toggled function.

    None of this is sophisticated stuff. It's basic modern interface design.

    All of this effects the "end result" because it shapes the path to the end result. Software should be transparent and elegant and consistent so that it CAN be learned and not actually lead users into user errors caused by inconsistency or hidden-from-view function-states.

    ALL functionality FULLY configurable.

    As you probably know I can go on and on (and on) but I've already broken a string banging out this riff so I'll stop here.

    Hope you are all having a lovely weekend! :)

    Sonar on!
    post edited by HotCoollMusicGirl - 2008/04/27 00:39:11
    #24
    John
    Forum Host
    • Total Posts : 30467
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
    • Status: offline
    RE: Key binding 2008/04/27 00:52:53 (permalink)
    I have to strongly disagree. What the default keys are, and exactly how they work -- e.g., does a key not only turn a function on, but does it toggle it off as well -- makes a huge difference to the end result, if you include in the end result the process and experience of getting there -- which I personally think is a most valid way of looking it. If it made no difference there'd be hardly any basis for choosing one application over another, because as much as we want to wave the Cakewalk flag the fact is there's virtually no *end result* that you can accomplish in Sonar that you can't also accomplish in Cubase or Reaper or Pro Tools. Or on magnetic tape. (I'm sure I'll be called on that, but I'm taking some poetic license because I know my larger point is valid, and also because I just renewed my poetic license and want to get my money's worth.)

    You are disagreeing with a misunderstanding of what I meant by end result. In this case I meant the key press itself. The context was key mapping. I simply thought it really didn't matter what the key is in most cases. I was going back over time and thinking about how it has evolved. From a hod podge of what ever key would do then the mnemonic style and to what it is today. Sort of back to a hod podge approach. (In fairness its probably due to Sonar being so deep)

    As to your point about D being used for two things dependent on where the mouse is is a very good one and one that I hadn't thought about. That though is due to poor GUI design. It should have been better thought out. Thus your idea has merit for you. It may be better to address this as a disgin issue over all. If it is an issue here there may be many other areas that have the same problem. As Susan said there is a lot of inconsistency in what keys do what. A total revamp of the entire key mapping may prove a better solution. Not that your idea shouldn't be incorporated in the new bindings.

    I guess what I don't want is to redo every key binding that Sonar comes with in order to fix this problem. I think CW should do it right and fix it. They need to go through the program and reassign the keys that are in conflict or present a problem such as the one you have pointed out. At the same time allowing us to go and do it anyway we want also.

    This may be a bigger problem then it first appeared to be. Again HCMG you've hit on something that needs to be fixed.

    Just an aside. Susan you know I always support member's feature requests. I do wish to know just what it is am likely going to support though. If I don't understand it I can be of little help.
    post edited by John - 2008/04/27 01:16:09

    Best
    John
    #25
    Susan G
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 12016
    • Joined: 2003/11/05 22:49:26
    • Location: Putnam County, NY
    • Status: offline
    RE: Key binding 2008/04/27 05:52:41 (permalink)
    Hi HCMG-
    Doesn’t anyone else find it kind of strange (and telling) that here at the half-life of Sonar 7 you can keybind "Help-Tip of the Day" and "Help-Usage Logger" and "Help-What's New" and "Help-Other Useless Junk Under The Help Menu"

    LOL - definitely! I wonder how many of us have a key bound to "Help-What's New"?

    Another User and I discussed this at length a while ago (his name was Geoff, IIRC). We agreed that *every* command and setting should be bindable. The Keybindings dialog obviously wouldn't work for that in its current incarnation, and Geoff introduced me to AutoHotKey, a macro tool. That was great, but a lot of work, and we shouldn't have to go there.

    I have an app here somewhere that lets me bind keys to any command/setting. I wish I could think which it is. That's the way it should be. At the very least, we should be able to unbind keys!

    Thanks-

    -Susan

    2.30 gigahertz Intel Core i7-3610QM; 16 GB RAM
    Windows 10 x64; NI Komplete Audio 6.
    SONAR Platinum (Lexington) x64
    #26
    Haddox
    Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 321
    • Joined: 2007/12/31 17:23:10
    • Status: offline
    RE: Key binding 2008/04/27 08:59:11 (permalink)
    Someone's always bound to get keyed up

    It's just gettin' better an better

    Some of my 2nz 
    www.haddoxthomas.com
     

    #27
    UnderTow
    Max Output Level: -37 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3848
    • Joined: 2004/01/06 12:13:49
    • Status: offline
    RE: Key binding 2008/04/28 10:06:39 (permalink)

    ORIGINAL: HotCoollMusicGirl


    I realize that UnderTow was taking the opposite position than I am, when she/he said this....


    Not exactly. I want the default key bindings to be constant through different versions of the software AND I want full customization. The one doesn't exclude the other. I'm also for more consistency throughout the application just as you are.
    Your "Copy Entire Clips as Linked Clips" example is spot on. Sonar has a very mediocre GUI at the moment.

    I brought up the auto assign thing because I find this a very unprofessional approach to managing a professional DAW application and very revealing of Cakewalk's approach and attitude. As long as Cakewalk don't start to think like pros, Sonar will never be fully recognised by pros.

    UnderTow

    #28
    ru
    Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 555
    • Joined: 2007/09/18 14:31:36
    • Status: offline
    RE: Key binding 2008/04/28 10:17:19 (permalink)
    i'd be happy if they'd think like creative/musical/intuitive people.
    #29
    Jump to:
    © 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1