pharohoknaughty
Max Output Level: -66 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1226
- Joined: 2004/07/08 17:29:16
- Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Status: offline
RE: LAME Encoder lives up to its Name
2005/11/01 12:14:13
(permalink)
Jesse Loaded the lame processor up and works great. Any thoughts on how to build the tag info into it?
|
Dale Aston
Max Output Level: -66 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1204
- Joined: 2003/11/05 17:41:35
- Location: USA
- Status: offline
RE: LAME Encoder lives up to its Name
2005/11/01 13:19:47
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: Jesse G Instructions: Open SONAR 3, 4, 5 and go to Tools -> Cakewalk Ext. Encoder Config. In the Friendly Name Field write: Lame Mp3 Encoder. In the Extension field write: .mp3 In the Description field write whatever you want. In the Path field write the path where the Lame encoder is located. That is where lame.exe and lame_enc.dll are located. I keep my Lame encoder in my C:\Program Files\Cakewalk\Shared Utilities\Lame Folder or (copy and past the extracted zip file to your Sonar shared utilities folder and then when you have to perform this step, click the browse button to find the location. In the Command Line field write: lame -b 192 -m j %I %O Press Save button. Uncheck Keep Wave File. (In Sonar 5 I went to the "Tools" menu and there is no choise for "Cakewalk Ext. Encoder Config." Where is it?
|
daverich
Max Output Level: -41 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3418
- Joined: 2003/11/06 05:59:00
- Location: south west uk
- Status: offline
RE: LAME Encoder lives up to its Name
2005/11/01 14:10:40
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: pharohoknaughty Jesse Loaded the lame processor up and works great. Any thoughts on how to build the tag info into it? Yup - just use winamp. Kind regards Dave Rich
|
j boy
Max Output Level: -48 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2729
- Joined: 2005/03/24 19:46:28
- Location: Sunny Southern California
- Status: offline
RE: LAME Encoder lives up to its Name
2005/11/03 13:28:24
(permalink)
I use the LAME 3.96.1 encoder and I agree, it's the way to go - sounds great and it's free. I have configured Sonar to export using Jesse G.'s advice, and also have RazorLame to use as a stand-alone front-end. One question - what is the difference between "joint stereo" and "stereo" encoding and why would one be better or more desirable than the other?
|
Jesse G
Max Output Level: -32.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4282
- Joined: 2004/04/14 01:43:43
- Status: offline
RE: LAME Encoder lives up to its Name
2005/11/07 10:09:24
(permalink)
Not sure about the difference using Joint stereo or just stereo, I jsut followed the instructions I read and then passed the information on. I just want others to be able to use the MP3 export options, but now sure of the weighing of the options for use. Peace
post edited by Jesse G - 2005/11/07 10:12:52
Peace,Jesse G. A fisher of men <>< ==============================Cakewalk and I are going places together! Cakewalk By Bandlab, Windows 10 Pro- 64 bit, Gigabyte GA-Z97X-SLI, Intel Core i5-4460 Haswell Processor, Crucial Ballistix 32 GB Ram, PNY GeForce GTX 750, Roland Octa-Capture, Mackie Big Knob, Mackie Universal Controller (MCU), KRK V4's, KRK Rockit 6, Korg TR-61 Workstation, M-Audio Code 49 MIDI keyboard controller.[/
|
dcastle
Max Output Level: -49 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2623
- Joined: 2004/11/15 12:40:02
- Location: Inland Empire
- Status: offline
RE: LAME Encoder lives up to its Name
2005/11/08 14:25:48
(permalink)
A quick google confirmed my understanding! Joint Stereo: The Myths ... and The Realities If gives the encoder an additional compression technique like M/S, which it can use on a frame-by-frame basis to encode the audio in L/R or M/S, whichever is better for the given bitrate. Regards, David
ASUS M3A78 AMD 9950 Quad 2.6G 8GB Shure • Rhode • Audio-Technica • Allen&Heath GL2200-24 MOTU 24i • Presonus Firepod • E-MU 1212m • Zoom H2 SONAR 2XL-8PE • Sound Forge 1-9 • Audacity 0.1-1.3
|
GypsyJazz
Max Output Level: -83 dBFS
- Total Posts : 361
- Joined: 2005/06/30 18:48:49
- Location: http://127.0.0.1
- Status: offline
RE: LAME Encoder lives up to its Name
2005/11/08 16:38:04
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: joseph.barron I finally broke down and paid the 19.95 to unlock the LAME encoder. HAHAHAHAHA! LOL! You paid for LAME? I'm afraid that makes you the lame one man! You need to do a bit more research my friend. Lame is free. Reminds me of a mate of mine who recently paid $29 for Spybot Search and destroy. Some people have more $ than sense.
|
Blizzar180
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3
- Joined: 2006/01/02 14:51:55
- Status: offline
RE: LAME Encoder lives up to its Name
2006/01/02 19:23:18
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: Jesse G The LAME encoder is FREE and even Scott R. Garrigus, or was it Craig Anderton, well one of them wrote an article on how to configure Sonar to use the Lame MP3 encoder. Also, when you upgrade, from an earlier version of Sonar and allow Sonar to copy its settings, the MP3 settings are copied to the next version as well. Follow these directions: If you don't want to unlock(buy) the cakewalk mp3 encoder, you can invoke the Lame mp3 encoder directly from SONAR 3, 4, 5. With this you don't need to first export to wav and then encode to mp3. Remember that the Lame mp3 encoder is high quality, open source and free. Download and install the lame 3.96.1 (STABLE) encoder. ~~~~> HERE <~~~~~ If you want to select your own version of a Lame encoder, download from the ~~~> LAME ENCODER SITE <~~~~ Instructions: Open SONAR 3, 4, 5 and go to Tools -> Cakewalk Ext. Encoder Config. In the Friendly Name Field write: Lame Mp3 Encoder. In the Extension field write: .mp3 In the Description field write whatever you want. In the Path field write the path where the Lame encoder is located. That is where lame.exe and lame_enc.dll are located. I keep my Lame encoder in my C:\Program Files\Cakewalk\Shared Utilities\Lame Folder or (copy and past the extracted zip file to your Sonar shared utilities folder and then when you have to perform this step, click the browse button to find the location. In the Command Line field write: lame -b 192 -m j %I %O Press Save button. Uncheck Keep Wave File. This will export to a 192Kbps, joint stereo mp3 file. If you want 128Kbps, replace 192 with 128 in the Command Line field. The next time you click on File->Export->Audio in SONAR 3, 4, 5 you'll find 'Lame mp3 encoder' as a type of audio. Hope this helps, Peace  i tried that but it doesn't seem to be working. every time i click export it tells me that i have to unlock the cakewalk mp3 encoder. what's wrong?
|
dcastle
Max Output Level: -49 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2623
- Joined: 2004/11/15 12:40:02
- Location: Inland Empire
- Status: offline
RE: LAME Encoder lives up to its Name
2006/01/05 19:43:37
(permalink)
The next time you click on File->Export->Audio in SONAR 3, 4, 5 you'll find 'Lame mp3 encoder' as a type of audio. You have to select 'Lame mp3 encoder' as the type of audio when you export it!
post edited by dcastle - 2006/01/05 19:46:34
ASUS M3A78 AMD 9950 Quad 2.6G 8GB Shure • Rhode • Audio-Technica • Allen&Heath GL2200-24 MOTU 24i • Presonus Firepod • E-MU 1212m • Zoom H2 SONAR 2XL-8PE • Sound Forge 1-9 • Audacity 0.1-1.3
|
groove
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
- Total Posts : 270
- Joined: 2003/12/19 05:09:48
- Location: Poughkeepsie, NY
- Status: offline
RE: LAME Encoder lives up to its Name
2006/01/05 21:55:20
(permalink)
To clear up the issues with licensing and LAME - I found this via the cwenc faq( http://cwenc.sourceforge.net/faq.html ): "Q: What about MP3 licensing? I have read that you need to have a license from Fraunhofer/Thomson if you use an MP3 encoder? A: Strictly speaking this is correct. According to the licensing conditions put forward by Thomson (who owns the MP3 patents), anyone who develops software with MP3 encoding or decoding must purchase a license for each copy of the software sold. But for free software they have unofficialy accepted that no such fee is required." -- Thus, it's OKAY to use the free LAME encoder, and you're not going to get pegged by Thomson for it. Cakewalk's implementation of the LAME encoder is a pay-for product probably mostly because 1) Sonar isn't free and 2) Thomson could change their license down the road. File that under "cross that bridge when it happens" as far as I'm concerned. The big problem I have with Cakewalk's LAME encoder version is that they're obscurring the settings that you get if you download it and set it up as an external encoder. The people who use that one get better results, it seems, and I think it's worth a try. Definitely use Variable Bit Rate, as it will help compensate for quality problems, especially at lower bit rates. Also - I hope you're not sending the encoder a stream that peaks at 0db or 100% - mp3 will introduce some artifacts if there's no headroom. Better to compress/limit the program content a bit for the podcast and encode it when the max level is somewhere around -3db give or take. You may also want to make sure you don't have any dc offset, extreme low frequencies, etc, as these can rob some fidelity. Better still would be to do external ogg's but I guess that's out for podcasting. Ogg-Vorbis is well known to be better than mp3 at basically any bitrate, but it's more audible with lower bitrates, obviously. pete
|
PF Twanger
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
- Total Posts : 143
- Joined: 2004/09/21 15:22:51
- Location: Franklin, TN
- Status: offline
RE: LAME Encoder lives up to its Name
2006/01/10 14:47:10
(permalink)
This is worth bumping. Thanks to Jesse G's instructions above--not to mention the hyperlink to the software--I was able to get the Lame encoder up and running. Thanks, Jesse!
Intel Core2 Quad Processor Q8300, 8GB DDR2 RAM, 750GB HDD, ATI Radeon HD4350 (512MB dedicated RAM), Win 7 x64, SONAR X1 (build 184), VS100, Red Kool Aid
|
techtim
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6
- Joined: 2006/01/18 04:48:30
- Status: offline
RE: LAME Encoder lives up to its Name
2006/01/18 20:01:43
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: pharohoknaughty Jesse Loaded the lame processor up and works great. Any thoughts on how to build the tag info into it? Tags can be set up as in the example below: lame %I -b 192 -m j -h -c --tt "%T" --ta "%A" --ty 2006 --tc "%C" %O In this case we are setting the MP3 Title to the Project title, the MP3 Artist tag to the Project Author info, the MP3 Year tag to 2006 and the MP3 Comment tag to the Project Copyright info. We are also converting at 192kbps, using Joint stereo and setting the algorithms, via the -h switch, to -q 2 (the default is -q 5). Incorrect use of the latter switch may explain why some users are not getting as good a result as they would expect at similar bit rates. Cheers Tim
|
jamesgxyz
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 68
- Joined: 2005/04/20 15:24:57
- Status: offline
RE: LAME Encoder lives up to its Name
2006/01/19 15:45:46
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: techtim We are also converting at 192kbps, using Joint stereo and setting the algorithms, via the -h switch, to -q 2 (the default is -q 5). Incorrect use of the latter switch may explain why some users are not getting as good a result as they would expect at similar bit rates. any reason for not using one of the recommended settings? tj
|
dcastle
Max Output Level: -49 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2623
- Joined: 2004/11/15 12:40:02
- Location: Inland Empire
- Status: offline
RE: LAME Encoder lives up to its Name
2006/01/19 18:24:41
(permalink)
any reason for not using one of the recommended settings? Nope! We just get comfortable with what we know works. But, I'll probably start a religious war here when I say, I like the "--preset fast standard" better than my current complicated command line and it encoded faster to a smaller file. Win/win!
ASUS M3A78 AMD 9950 Quad 2.6G 8GB Shure • Rhode • Audio-Technica • Allen&Heath GL2200-24 MOTU 24i • Presonus Firepod • E-MU 1212m • Zoom H2 SONAR 2XL-8PE • Sound Forge 1-9 • Audacity 0.1-1.3
|
techtim
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6
- Joined: 2006/01/18 04:48:30
- Status: offline
RE: LAME Encoder lives up to its Name
2006/08/27 09:17:29
(permalink)
Principally as these recommendations are centred around using variable bit rates, which is no good if the MP3 is going to be streamed from a web site. Although default for constant bit rate is -q 5 the LAME help file recommends the -h (-q 2) setting. ORIGINAL: jamesgxyz ORIGINAL: techtim We are also converting at 192kbps, using Joint stereo and setting the algorithms, via the -h switch, to -q 2 (the default is -q 5). Incorrect use of the latter switch may explain why some users are not getting as good a result as they would expect at similar bit rates. any reason for not using one of the recommended settings? tj
|
John T
Max Output Level: -7.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6783
- Joined: 2006/06/12 10:24:39
- Status: offline
RE: LAME Encoder lives up to its Name
2006/08/27 10:32:50
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: Blizzar180 ORIGINAL: Jesse G The LAME encoder is FREE and even Scott R. Garrigus, or was it Craig Anderton, well one of them wrote an article on how to configure Sonar to use the Lame MP3 encoder. Also, when you upgrade, from an earlier version of Sonar and allow Sonar to copy its settings, the MP3 settings are copied to the next version as well. Follow these directions: If you don't want to unlock(buy) the cakewalk mp3 encoder, you can invoke the Lame mp3 encoder directly from SONAR 3, 4, 5. With this you don't need to first export to wav and then encode to mp3. Remember that the Lame mp3 encoder is high quality, open source and free. Download and install the lame 3.96.1 (STABLE) encoder. ~~~~> HERE <~~~~~ If you want to select your own version of a Lame encoder, download from the ~~~> LAME ENCODER SITE <~~~~ Instructions: Open SONAR 3, 4, 5 and go to Tools -> Cakewalk Ext. Encoder Config. In the Friendly Name Field write: Lame Mp3 Encoder. In the Extension field write: .mp3 In the Description field write whatever you want. In the Path field write the path where the Lame encoder is located. That is where lame.exe and lame_enc.dll are located. I keep my Lame encoder in my C:\Program Files\Cakewalk\Shared Utilities\Lame Folder or (copy and past the extracted zip file to your Sonar shared utilities folder and then when you have to perform this step, click the browse button to find the location. In the Command Line field write: lame -b 192 -m j %I %O Press Save button. Uncheck Keep Wave File. This will export to a 192Kbps, joint stereo mp3 file. If you want 128Kbps, replace 192 with 128 in the Command Line field. The next time you click on File->Export->Audio in SONAR 3, 4, 5 you'll find 'Lame mp3 encoder' as a type of audio. Hope this helps, Peace  i tried that but it doesn't seem to be working. every time i click export it tells me that i have to unlock the cakewalk mp3 encoder. what's wrong? You might have made the mistake I just made: clicking close after doing all the setup without clicking the SAVE button at the top right first. Got it up and running, and I can't tell it apart from the Sound Forge encoder on a render of the same track at the same bit rate. Which is nice, as it saves me a step when making an mp3 to email.
|
oY
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 73
- Joined: 2005/06/20 02:33:44
- Status: offline
RE: LAME Encoder lives up to its Name
2006/08/27 10:47:04
(permalink)
i stuck to using lame after hearing how the sound forge encodes (thomsom) tend to sound less 'airy'. i only encode at least at 192 too.
|
UnderTow
Max Output Level: -37 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3848
- Joined: 2004/01/06 12:13:49
- Status: offline
RE: LAME Encoder lives up to its Name
2006/08/27 10:49:28
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: Jesse G In the Command Line field write: lame -b 192 -m j %I %O This will give a quality level that most people can not distinguish from CD. But if that isn't enough and you don't mind the files being bigger, use the following line: lame --alt-preset insane %I %O UnderTow
|
DFusion
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
- Total Posts : 270
- Joined: 2006/05/09 15:37:09
- Status: offline
RE: LAME Encoder lives up to its Name
2006/08/27 13:49:40
(permalink)
Thanks for the tip Jesse G  I was frustrated over the muddy and lifeless sound i got out of the standard mp3 encoder in sonar. The song i am working on sounded so nice and crispy when i played it in sonar and saved it as a wav, but when i created a mp3 out of it the sound was muddy and lifeless even at 320kbs. With this external encoding i use the recommended setting that you wrote, and the sound is beautifull (Just like i hear it in sonar).
|
emfrank72
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
- Total Posts : 110
- Joined: 2006/01/20 00:19:22
- Status: offline
RE: LAME Encoder lives up to its Name
2007/04/25 17:32:11
(permalink)
I had this setup in 5 and working. I installed Sonar 6 on a new computer and spent a while searching for Jesse's instructions on setting lame up which worked great before but in 6 I don't see anywhere to set it up. Just wondering if there is an update on how to do this in 6. Thanks
Sonar 7.0 PE, Asus P5B-E, Core2Duo E6400, 2 gigs of RAM, RME HDSP9652, Mackie D8B, MCU, 2 X MCU-XT, UA 6176, Presonus Digimax 96KHR824s, HR624s, Fantom-S, 2 X UAD-1, Waves Platinum, SSL collection, and V-series, NI GR2,
|
DCMonkey
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 7
- Joined: 2007/04/20 04:11:31
- Status: offline
RE: LAME Encoder lives up to its Name
2007/04/26 14:25:44
(permalink)
There's an EncoderConfig.exe in C:\Program Files\Cakewalk\Shared Utilities There are also some premade setups for encoders including LAME on the install DVD. I haven't got a chance yet to see what the exact steps are to set it all up.
|
bigweb
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
- Total Posts : 188
- Joined: 2007/03/23 16:48:01
- Status: offline
RE: LAME Encoder lives up to its Name
2007/04/26 14:59:20
(permalink)
Why do people get so confused with this MP3 encoder thing? LAME is free. SONAR does not come bundled with LAME . The MP3 encoder sold by Cakewalk uses the Fraunhofer IIS algorithm. The reason you have to pay for the MP3 encoder that Cakewalk bundle with SONAR is because of a royalty charged by Fraunhofer. To quote Wikipedia: "The MP3 compression algorithm was invented and patented by Fraunhofer IIS. Its license revenues generated about €100,000,000 in revenue to the society in 2005."
post edited by bigweb - 2007/04/26 15:09:02
|
bigweb
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
- Total Posts : 188
- Joined: 2007/03/23 16:48:01
- Status: offline
RE: LAME Encoder lives up to its Name
2007/04/26 15:20:00
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: emfrank72 I had this setup in 5 and working. I installed Sonar 6 on a new computer and spent a while searching for Jesse's instructions on setting lame up which worked great before but in 6 I don't see anywhere to set it up. Just wondering if there is an update on how to do this in 6. It's in the "Tools" menu. Cakewalk External Encoder Config
|
xackley
Max Output Level: -45.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2973
- Joined: 2004/01/30 09:39:49
- Location: USA
- Status: offline
RE: LAME Encoder lives up to its Name
2007/04/26 16:24:26
(permalink)
Once again, Sonar 4, Sonar 5, and Sonar 6 uses LAME. ORIGINAL: bigweb Why do people get so confused with this MP3 encoder thing? LAME is free. SONAR does not come bundled with LAME . The MP3 encoder sold by Cakewalk uses the Fraunhofer IIS algorithm. The reason you have to pay for the MP3 encoder that Cakewalk bundle with SONAR is because of a royalty charged by Fraunhofer. To quote Wikipedia: "The MP3 compression algorithm was invented and patented by Fraunhofer IIS. Its license revenues generated about €100,000,000 in revenue to the society in 2005."
|
Ognis
Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5129
- Joined: 2006/08/03 21:52:42
- Location: Memphis, Tennessee
- Status: offline
RE: LAME Encoder lives up to its Name
2007/04/26 16:30:34
(permalink)
I use FL Studio to do my mp3's, esp since I always back up my orignal wavs (if you dont, well.....) No idea what FLS uses, but the mp3's have always sounded great to me. To be honest, you could just whore out the demo, because the FLS demo lets you import export forever, you just cant save a "project". Try it out, you may end up working with its piano roll, and realize how easy life can really be
|
emfrank72
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
- Total Posts : 110
- Joined: 2006/01/20 00:19:22
- Status: offline
RE: LAME Encoder lives up to its Name
2007/04/27 16:29:31
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: bigweb ORIGINAL: emfrank72 I had this setup in 5 and working. I installed Sonar 6 on a new computer and spent a while searching for Jesse's instructions on setting lame up which worked great before but in 6 I don't see anywhere to set it up. Just wondering if there is an update on how to do this in 6. It's in the "Tools" menu. Cakewalk External Encoder Config It's in the "Tools" menu. Cakewalk External Encoder Config It used to be under the tools menu in Sonar 5. But unless I'm blind, it is not there in 6. But I did find the encoder utility under cakewalk\shared utilities. Thanks
Sonar 7.0 PE, Asus P5B-E, Core2Duo E6400, 2 gigs of RAM, RME HDSP9652, Mackie D8B, MCU, 2 X MCU-XT, UA 6176, Presonus Digimax 96KHR824s, HR624s, Fantom-S, 2 X UAD-1, Waves Platinum, SSL collection, and V-series, NI GR2,
|
Brando
Max Output Level: -47.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2776
- Joined: 2003/11/06 11:47:20
- Location: Canada
- Status: offline
RE: LAME Encoder lives up to its Name
2007/04/27 16:38:37
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: j boy I use the LAME 3.96.1 encoder and I agree, it's the way to go - sounds great and it's free. I have configured Sonar to export using Jesse G.'s advice, and also have RazorLame to use as a stand-alone front-end. One question - what is the difference between "joint stereo" and "stereo" encoding and why would one be better or more desirable than the other? "Joint stereo" is...like....way....more.....mellow......man..  Or - "Joint Stereo" is what I'm doing when I'm not watching "Beer TV"
Brando Cakewalk, Studio One Pro, Reaper Presonus Audiobox 1818VSL ASUS Prime Z370-A LGA1151, 32GB DDR4, Intel 8700K i7, 500 GB SSD, 3 x 1TB HDD, Windows 10 Pro 64
|
dewdman42
Max Output Level: -74 dBFS
- Total Posts : 839
- Joined: 2004/09/20 16:37:27
- Status: offline
RE: LAME Encoder lives up to its Name
2007/04/27 16:52:51
(permalink)
If you care about the best quality available go with -ms (stereo), and I also recommend the -k option to remove the lowpass filter.
|
John
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 30467
- Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
- Status: offline
RE: LAME Encoder lives up to its Name
2007/04/27 17:28:38
(permalink)
I also thought that Cakewalk was using the Fraunhofer encoder for those that either paid or had Pro Audio 9. This is wrong it is in fact the Lame encoder. I just checked it. Even though you may have paid for it or not you are using the Lame version if you do your encoding via Sonar. The issue never came up with me because I have been using SF 8 to do this. In a way this is a bit disappointing but not really because as I remember the Fraunhofer encoder took for ever to do its encoding. Best John
post edited by John - 2007/04/27 17:31:03
|