JohnEgan
Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
- Total Posts : 543
- Joined: 2014/10/21 10:03:57
- Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Status: offline
LOCK CONTROLS
Is there a simple way that I've missed to lock/unlock a tracks controls in console or track view to prevent inadvertently moving controls? (other than totally hiding track, and clip lock doesn't lock controls). I would think right clicking on a track should bring up a menu option, to lock/unlock track controls, or a lock/unlock button on the track itself, no?
John Egan Sonar Platinum (2017-10),RME-UFX, PC-CPU - i7-5820, 3.3 GHz, 6 core, ASUS X99-AII, 16GB ram, GTX 960, 500 GB SSD, 2TB HDD x 2, Win7 Pro x64, O8N2 Advanced, Melodyne Studio,.... (2 cats :(, in the yard).
|
chuckebaby
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 13146
- Joined: 2011/01/04 14:55:28
- Status: offline
Re: LOCK CONTROLS
2016/07/10 09:31:11
(permalink)
the only way controls can be "Moved" is if you go to the CV or TV menu and remove them. I don't know maybe im confused on what you are referencing "controls".
Windows 8.1 X64 Sonar Platinum x64 Custom built: Asrock z97 1150 - Intel I7 4790k - 16GB corsair DDR3 1600 - PNY SSD 220GBFocusrite Saffire 18I8 - Mackie Control
|
Boscoe
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 56
- Joined: 2015/06/12 01:15:31
- Status: offline
Re: LOCK CONTROLS
2016/07/10 11:43:08
(permalink)
He's asking about being able to lock a track so no changes can be made to it by accident. By "controls", I'd assume he's talking about faders and dials and buttons and anything you could accidentally click on in the channel strip or prochannel...
------------------------------------------------- Dell XPS 8700 Win 7 64 pro Intel Core i7-4770 3.4GHz 24gb ram Nvidia Geforce GT 635 E-MU 1616m Behringer QX1202USB MIDISport 4x4 Anniversary Edition Kurzweil K2000VP & K2500RS Yamaha DTX 2.0 Drums Roland GI-20 Guitar interface Roland GK3 Midi Pickup attached to surprisingly not awful cheapo Johnson Strat copy
|
pwalpwal
Max Output Level: -43 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3249
- Joined: 2015/01/17 03:52:50
- Status: offline
Re: LOCK CONTROLS
2016/07/10 12:16:13
(permalink)
|
JohnEgan
Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
- Total Posts : 543
- Joined: 2014/10/21 10:03:57
- Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Status: offline
Re: LOCK CONTROLS
2016/07/10 14:16:14
(permalink)
Thanks Boscoe, exactly what I mean.
John Egan Sonar Platinum (2017-10),RME-UFX, PC-CPU - i7-5820, 3.3 GHz, 6 core, ASUS X99-AII, 16GB ram, GTX 960, 500 GB SSD, 2TB HDD x 2, Win7 Pro x64, O8N2 Advanced, Melodyne Studio,.... (2 cats :(, in the yard).
|
Bristol_Jonesey
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 16775
- Joined: 2007/10/08 15:41:17
- Location: Bristol, UK
- Status: offline
Re: LOCK CONTROLS
2016/07/10 14:41:32
(permalink)
I think that's a pretty neat idea
CbB, Platinum, 64 bit throughoutCustom built i7 3930, 32Gb RAM, 2 x 1Tb Internal HDD, 1 x 1TB system SSD (Win 7), 1 x 500Gb system SSD (Win 10), 2 x 1Tb External HDD's, Dual boot Win 7 & Win 10 64 Bit, Saffire Pro 26, ISA One, Adam P11A,
|
chuckebaby
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 13146
- Joined: 2011/01/04 14:55:28
- Status: offline
Re: LOCK CONTROLS
2016/07/10 14:58:02
(permalink)
Windows 8.1 X64 Sonar Platinum x64 Custom built: Asrock z97 1150 - Intel I7 4790k - 16GB corsair DDR3 1600 - PNY SSD 220GBFocusrite Saffire 18I8 - Mackie Control
|
Anderton
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 14070
- Joined: 2003/11/06 14:02:03
- Status: offline
Re: LOCK CONTROLS
2016/07/10 15:50:14
(permalink)
☄ Helpfulby Kev999 2016/09/27 05:16:54
Actually SONAR has what I think is a better way than locking controls. For example with faders, right-click on the fader and choose Value > Set Snap-To = Current. You can still adjust the fader, but double-clicking on the fader returns it to the "locked" setting. What I like about this is as the mix develops and I hit what I think are good levels, I set the faders for Snap-To = Current. That way I can always get back to the "locked" settings, while still being able to experiment if I want to make any tweaks.
|
JohnEgan
Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
- Total Posts : 543
- Joined: 2014/10/21 10:03:57
- Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Status: offline
Re: LOCK CONTROLS
2016/07/10 16:08:25
(permalink)
Thanks Chucke, LOL, guess I'm not that perfect and at times lose track of mouse location, (and have some visual impairments), a lock/unlock option, just sounds like a simple logical option when your actively mixing many tracks.
John Egan Sonar Platinum (2017-10),RME-UFX, PC-CPU - i7-5820, 3.3 GHz, 6 core, ASUS X99-AII, 16GB ram, GTX 960, 500 GB SSD, 2TB HDD x 2, Win7 Pro x64, O8N2 Advanced, Melodyne Studio,.... (2 cats :(, in the yard).
|
JohnEgan
Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
- Total Posts : 543
- Joined: 2014/10/21 10:03:57
- Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Status: offline
Re: LOCK CONTROLS
2016/07/10 16:14:06
(permalink)
Thanks Craig, I like the snap option, I did miss that, albeit still would be nice to lock entire track with one click also. Will that work when selecting multiple tracks holding "CTRL" key?
post edited by JohnEgan - 2016/07/10 16:35:35
John Egan Sonar Platinum (2017-10),RME-UFX, PC-CPU - i7-5820, 3.3 GHz, 6 core, ASUS X99-AII, 16GB ram, GTX 960, 500 GB SSD, 2TB HDD x 2, Win7 Pro x64, O8N2 Advanced, Melodyne Studio,.... (2 cats :(, in the yard).
|
pwalpwal
Max Output Level: -43 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3249
- Joined: 2015/01/17 03:52:50
- Status: offline
Re: LOCK CONTROLS
2016/07/10 16:44:28
(permalink)
Anderton Actually SONAR has what I think is a better way than locking controls. For example with faders, right-click on the fader and choose Value > Set Snap-To = Current. You can still adjust the fader, but double-clicking on the fader returns it to the "locked" setting. What I like about this is as the mix develops and I hit what I think are good levels, I set the faders for Snap-To = Current. That way I can always get back to the "locked" settings, while still being able to experiment if I want to make any tweaks.
would be great for the whole track!
|
Anderton
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 14070
- Joined: 2003/11/06 14:02:03
- Status: offline
Re: LOCK CONTROLS
2016/07/10 17:14:29
(permalink)
JohnEgan Thanks Craig, I like the snap option, I did miss that, albeit still would be nice to lock entire track with one click also. Will that work when selecting multiple tracks holding "CTRL" key?
No. It works for groups, but unpredictably if you vary any of the controls within the group.
|
Anderton
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 14070
- Joined: 2003/11/06 14:02:03
- Status: offline
Re: LOCK CONTROLS
2016/07/10 17:20:47
(permalink)
pwalpwal
Anderton Actually SONAR has what I think is a better way than locking controls. For example with faders, right-click on the fader and choose Value > Set Snap-To = Current. You can still adjust the fader, but double-clicking on the fader returns it to the "locked" setting. What I like about this is as the mix develops and I hit what I think are good levels, I set the faders for Snap-To = Current. That way I can always get back to the "locked" settings, while still being able to experiment if I want to make any tweaks.
would be great for the whole track!
You can just minimize the track, and adjust the track pane width so nothing appears in the header; but for non-minimized tracks, you can adjust anything you want. Seems simpler than adding another function. The other problem I see with Lock is what if you have automation on the track controls? Which moment along the automation continuum would be where you would lock the controls? Or would you have automation continue on in the background, which would override your lock setting? What if you wanted to mute or solo it? Then you'd have to lock and unlock. Minimizing seems like a much simpler solution because it already exists, and can hide the controls without having to hide the track.
|
JohnEgan
Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
- Total Posts : 543
- Joined: 2014/10/21 10:03:57
- Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Status: offline
Re: LOCK CONTROLS
2016/07/10 17:27:26
(permalink)
Ok groups is good for efficiency, so create a group of say tracks mixed already, and snap to value, to say any one fader and all in group will lock, where they lay?, (i.e., possibly all being at different level values)
John Egan Sonar Platinum (2017-10),RME-UFX, PC-CPU - i7-5820, 3.3 GHz, 6 core, ASUS X99-AII, 16GB ram, GTX 960, 500 GB SSD, 2TB HDD x 2, Win7 Pro x64, O8N2 Advanced, Melodyne Studio,.... (2 cats :(, in the yard).
|
JohnEgan
Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
- Total Posts : 543
- Joined: 2014/10/21 10:03:57
- Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Status: offline
Re: LOCK CONTROLS
2016/07/10 17:36:26
(permalink)
Ok, fair enough I can see their would be various issues/complications with locking all track controls, with automation, mute, solos etc.. , Ill start using snap value thing, or hide track its mostly that pesky volume fader I find I've moved at some point, sometimes pan.
John Egan Sonar Platinum (2017-10),RME-UFX, PC-CPU - i7-5820, 3.3 GHz, 6 core, ASUS X99-AII, 16GB ram, GTX 960, 500 GB SSD, 2TB HDD x 2, Win7 Pro x64, O8N2 Advanced, Melodyne Studio,.... (2 cats :(, in the yard).
|
bitman
Max Output Level: -34 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4105
- Joined: 2003/11/06 14:11:54
- Location: Keystone Colorado
- Status: offline
Re: LOCK CONTROLS
2016/07/10 17:44:27
(permalink)
Anderton Actually SONAR has what I think is a better way than locking controls. For example with faders, right-click on the fader and choose Value > Set Snap-To = Current. You can still adjust the fader, but double-clicking on the fader returns it to the "locked" setting.
So that's what that's for. I could use that. I also like the idea of locking all controls on a strip as the OP desires.
|
chuckebaby
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 13146
- Joined: 2011/01/04 14:55:28
- Status: offline
Re: LOCK CONTROLS
2016/07/10 17:56:06
(permalink)
you can also choose the track widget manager and hide some widgets. I do this when automating. I have my own custom preset that only show M/S/R buttons. but I agree, it would be a nice feature request. a check box that would lock all parameters of the track.
Windows 8.1 X64 Sonar Platinum x64 Custom built: Asrock z97 1150 - Intel I7 4790k - 16GB corsair DDR3 1600 - PNY SSD 220GBFocusrite Saffire 18I8 - Mackie Control
|
Anderton
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 14070
- Joined: 2003/11/06 14:02:03
- Status: offline
Re: LOCK CONTROLS
2016/07/10 21:22:50
(permalink)
I don't see how you could simultaneously lock a parameter to a value and have it respond to automation. Minimizing (not hiding) still seems simplest...if the fader isn't available, you can't mess with it.
|
chuckebaby
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 13146
- Joined: 2011/01/04 14:55:28
- Status: offline
Re: LOCK CONTROLS
2016/07/10 21:47:11
(permalink)
Anderton I don't see how you could simultaneously lock a parameter to a value and have it respond to automation. Minimizing (not hiding) still seems simplest...if the fader isn't available, you can't mess with it.
if your referring to my post, what I meant was I hide most of the controls. there for they cant be touched. using the Track manager settings. I create a custom widget layout for track view. only Solo, Mute and Record buttons are shown (for my automation screenset) when doing automation, I don't need to see any of the widgets except for solo, mute (just to zone in and listen) FX bin, Volume, all that other stuff is useless to me when automating. so I hide it with my custom preset. if you minimize a track, theres not much you can do edit wise (to see the wave form. that's why I suggest using the track manager to hide it...but you know, if you still need those parameters for recording other tracks they cant be seen so Im out of ideas at this point.
Windows 8.1 X64 Sonar Platinum x64 Custom built: Asrock z97 1150 - Intel I7 4790k - 16GB corsair DDR3 1600 - PNY SSD 220GBFocusrite Saffire 18I8 - Mackie Control
|
Anderton
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 14070
- Joined: 2003/11/06 14:02:03
- Status: offline
Re: LOCK CONTROLS
2016/07/10 22:38:09
(permalink)
chuckebaby
Anderton I don't see how you could simultaneously lock a parameter to a value and have it respond to automation. Minimizing (not hiding) still seems simplest...if the fader isn't available, you can't mess with it.
if your referring to my post, what I meant was I hide most of the controls. No, I was referring to the OP saying he didn't want to hide the track. The widget concept works too, and as you know has applications beyond what the OP wants. But I think the "as far as faders, knob, exc... don't touch them" is probably the prime directive  , and if you do "save current," you can at least get back to where you started if you get toooooo far off course.
|
kellerpj
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
- Total Posts : 287
- Joined: 2003/12/05 00:25:05
- Status: offline
Re: LOCK CONTROLS
2016/07/10 23:06:09
(permalink)
I just save a Mix Scene with what I want to preserve. Then I can recall whatever I want if I move things around. That doesn't "lock" controls, but will allow me to set things back to a "known" state. Paul
"The thing about quotes from the internet is that it's hard to verify their authenticity." - Abraham Lincoln
|
JohnEgan
Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
- Total Posts : 543
- Joined: 2014/10/21 10:03:57
- Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Status: offline
Re: LOCK CONTROLS
2016/07/10 23:53:56
(permalink)
K so I move fader "right-click on the fader and choose Value > Set Snap-To = Current" move fader, double click and returns to 0.0 level, not to where I Set Snap-To = Current? It does display a revert to when I right click though.
John Egan Sonar Platinum (2017-10),RME-UFX, PC-CPU - i7-5820, 3.3 GHz, 6 core, ASUS X99-AII, 16GB ram, GTX 960, 500 GB SSD, 2TB HDD x 2, Win7 Pro x64, O8N2 Advanced, Melodyne Studio,.... (2 cats :(, in the yard).
|
pwalpwal
Max Output Level: -43 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3249
- Joined: 2015/01/17 03:52:50
- Status: offline
Re: LOCK CONTROLS
2016/07/11 03:13:14
(permalink)
Anderton I don't see how you could simultaneously lock a parameter to a value and have it respond to automation.
Rather than locking to a static value I think "prevent editing" is a better description, like a "read only" mode for the track, so whatever automation is already there still happens but can't be changed
|
LJB
Max Output Level: -60 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1502
- Joined: 2009/07/29 10:31:31
- Location: South Africa
- Status: offline
Re: LOCK CONTROLS
2016/07/11 03:23:21
(permalink)
A Parameter lock would be brilliant. Mixing 80+ tracks at speed can cause all kinds of issues - many of them not that easily fixed. I have accidentally grabbed an entire mix and changed the gain... only to realise it five moves later. Or grabbing all the Low Shelfs by accident.. it happens, esp in big projects under pressure...
Ludwig Bouwer, One Big Room Studios. -------------------- Cakewalk with all the trimmings / Win 10Pro 64 / Intel i7-7700 / Asus Prime Z270k / 16GB DDR4 / RME HDSP9652 / RME UFX / Black Lion Audio ADA8000 / ART MPA & ART Pro Channel / Focusrite Voicemaster Pro / Aphex 107 Check out my work at www.onebigroom.co.za
|
chuckebaby
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 13146
- Joined: 2011/01/04 14:55:28
- Status: offline
Re: LOCK CONTROLS
2016/07/11 06:13:14
(permalink)
Anderton
chuckebaby
Anderton I don't see how you could simultaneously lock a parameter to a value and have it respond to automation. Minimizing (not hiding) still seems simplest...if the fader isn't available, you can't mess with it.
if your referring to my post, what I meant was I hide most of the controls. No, I was referring to the OP saying he didn't want to hide the track. The widget concept works too, and as you know has applications beyond what the OP wants. But I think the "as far as faders, knob, exc... don't touch them" is probably the prime directive , and if you do "save current," you can at least get back to where you started if you get toooooo far off course.
+1 I agree Mr. A accidents do happen but as you said with a good "Save current" there is no possible way I could ever get to the point of "What did I do". I wish the same could be said for when I try to bake dinner for my family. LJB I have accidentally grabbed an entire mix and changed the gain... only to realise it five moves later. yes but may I submit, how many times have you done that ? enough to warrant a new feature ? my theory is cake would be better of using their resources on implementing other features. don't get me wrong, you have a point. but I have too run in to this situation and found a quick way out of it. sometimes leading me to a better sound because of experimentation.
post edited by chuckebaby - 2016/07/11 06:38:35
Windows 8.1 X64 Sonar Platinum x64 Custom built: Asrock z97 1150 - Intel I7 4790k - 16GB corsair DDR3 1600 - PNY SSD 220GBFocusrite Saffire 18I8 - Mackie Control
|
SquireBum
Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
- Total Posts : 347
- Joined: 2013/06/26 13:23:55
- Status: offline
Re: LOCK CONTROLS
2016/07/11 10:06:39
(permalink)
Anderton I don't see how you could simultaneously lock a parameter to a value and have it respond to automation. Minimizing (not hiding) still seems simplest...if the fader isn't available, you can't mess with it.
Craig, I have used Lock Track Controls in another DAW. It works by disabling " user" changes to the track controls that could be made by mouse movements and keyboard shortcuts. Automation continues to modify parameters, since it is the DAW that is modifying the parameters, not the user. Automation in Read mode in any DAW essentially "locks" parameters unless the user is in override mode, since any user changes are overridden by the automation during playback. Hope this helps, -- Ron
Cakewalk by Bandlab, Sonar Platinum x64 2017.10, X3E, X2a, X1d, 8.5 Windows 10 x64 AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.20 GHz 8 GB Ram Nvidia GeForce 9500 GT Echo Gina 3G
|
Anderton
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 14070
- Joined: 2003/11/06 14:02:03
- Status: offline
Re: LOCK CONTROLS
2016/07/11 10:19:17
(permalink)
SquireBum Hope this helps,
Yes, I understand the clarification from you and others that the goal is not really to lock controls, but to lock editing of the controls. For this to happen there needs to be a clear proposal presented to Cakewalk of how they would do this. I think the simplest option would be variation on what already exists, e.g., ctrl+click on the Archive button to lock out editing. Doing this would basically "disconnect" all track controls, including things like bypass the effects bin, from any editing. The Archive button could have a specific color to indicate the locked state. However, I do question how necessary this is in the grand scheme of things, per Chuck's "yes but may I submit,how many times have you done that? enough to warrant a new feature? my theory is cake would be better of using their resources on implementing other features. don't get me wrong, you have a point. but I have too run in to this situation and found a quick way out of it. sometimes leading me to a better sound because of experimentation." I still don't see why not simply minimize the track? In Track view, it's just one click to disable editing, in the sense that you can't access the controls. I can't think of any workflow that's easier than one click. Where this doesn't work is Console View, which would need a dedicated control. So if the majority of the people want this feature for Console View, then it makes sense. But again, there's still the question of which is more important: being able to lock editing, or being able to get back to a known state. The former doesn't allow for experimentation, the latter does and can be done with Mix Recall or recall current.
|
JohnEgan
Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
- Total Posts : 543
- Joined: 2014/10/21 10:03:57
- Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Status: offline
Re: LOCK CONTROLS
2016/07/11 10:37:15
(permalink)
To: "LJB", Somewhat comforting to know I'm not the only one who's experienced moving some parameter, and noticed perhaps only after many undo levels, mix scene and/or project saves have been done. Ideally if one could selectively undo something in undo history, without affecting anything in else after would also be a great feature. (albeit parameter/level changes aren't logged in undo history). Perhaps if moved only once parameter right click, "value" "revert" may show last level change at least. cheers
John Egan Sonar Platinum (2017-10),RME-UFX, PC-CPU - i7-5820, 3.3 GHz, 6 core, ASUS X99-AII, 16GB ram, GTX 960, 500 GB SSD, 2TB HDD x 2, Win7 Pro x64, O8N2 Advanced, Melodyne Studio,.... (2 cats :(, in the yard).
|
57Gregy
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 14404
- Joined: 2004/05/31 17:04:17
- Location: Raleigh, North Carolina
- Status: offline
Re: LOCK CONTROLS
2016/07/11 10:48:45
(permalink)
I was looking in X3 for such a feature. In console, if you right-click the volume in a MIDI track, there is an option to Lock Control. No such option in audio tracks. But Lock Control doesn't seem to do anything; as soon as you move the slider, it moves. Unless I'm misunderstanding what Control is in this case.
|
JohnEgan
Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
- Total Posts : 543
- Joined: 2014/10/21 10:03:57
- Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Status: offline
Re: LOCK CONTROLS
2016/07/11 11:11:09
(permalink)
Thanks Craig, while I hadn't intended this to go this far, and thought there may be simple way to lock track controls I wasn't aware of, obviously there are many ways to adapt to an environment, foremost being be careful, "and don't text while mixing" (and probably shouldn't drink and smoke, excessively at least, LOL) That said, it would be more so in the console view that this may happen, say when scrolling console view, but mouse was over a parameter you hadn't noticed, mix scene is great when intentionally changing mixes around.
John Egan Sonar Platinum (2017-10),RME-UFX, PC-CPU - i7-5820, 3.3 GHz, 6 core, ASUS X99-AII, 16GB ram, GTX 960, 500 GB SSD, 2TB HDD x 2, Win7 Pro x64, O8N2 Advanced, Melodyne Studio,.... (2 cats :(, in the yard).
|