craigb
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 41704
- Joined: 2009/01/28 23:13:04
- Location: The Pacific Northwestshire
- Status: offline
Learning to play guitar well
About time for a new discussion topic I say! Since I may actually have a guitar again soon after not playing for a few years, I thought pretending I was completely new and starting over might not be a bad thing. In my mind, I have always looked at [insert musical endeavor here] (I'll use "learning to play guitar well") like a multi-legged table. You need to build each leg up a bit at a time or your table is going to be very unstable! Here's what I mean by multi-legged: Leg one - Knowledge of your chosen instrument. You should understand how your instrument makes sound, how to set it up, how to clean and maintain it, what each part does and how to tune it. You should also know what it's musical range is, how the notes and chords are configured, how to alter the basics (e.g., alternate tunings, capo use, baritone vs. standard, how many strings?, string gauges, slides, tremolos, in-series or out pickups, single coils vs. multiple coils, in phase or out, muting, etc.) as well as correct playing techniques for whichever styles you are interested in. Leg two - Music theory. Here is where you learn what music itself is all about. From chords, chord progressions, arpeggios, notes, keys, scales, rests, bends, portamento, vibrato, harmonics, modes, octaves, bars, tab and staff. And on and on and on. Circles of 5ths and 4ths as well as being able to read music (either staff notation or tab). Being able to communicate with other musicians (when needed) or playing something already created without hearing it. Leg three - Ear training. This falls into two camps: Absolute pitch and relative pitch. The abilities to know what a note is when you hear it and to know what chord is being played when you hear it. This could be the easiest leg to describe, but the hardest (for some) to become proficient at! Leg four - Song theory. This area includes song structure, verses, choruses, codas, bridges, intros, outros, time signatures, melody, harmony, soloing, song writing, orchestrating, etc. Naturally, these tend to blend together, but I'm kind of looking at the whole process as different subjects like you would at school. Period 1 - Music Theory, Period 2 - Ear Training, Period 3 - Instrument Work, Period 4 - Song Theory. Rinse and repeat. I've seen lots of people who spend most of their time in one or two areas. So what do you guys think? Sound about right? Something missing? After these (which I consider the basics or the foundation for everything else), you're going to have other areas appear like learning other instruments (or just how to interact with other players using other instruments), understanding amplification & effects, playing live and recording (including getting the best signal, learning a DAW, mixing, mastering, etc.). Randy will be teaching the class on finding hookers and blow while dealing with clingy groupies. CJ will discuss studio setup. Dave covers security concepts. Bapu has asked to teach a morning class apparently (all it says is " Am"). Rain and Jarvse will co-teach a class on how to dress to match your chosen genre. Others are still signing up! Well, except for the "percussion" teachers who haven't figured out how to get the tip to show by clicking on the top of the pen yet...
Time for all of you to head over to Beyond My DAW!
|
eph221
Max Output Level: -28.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4665
- Joined: 2014/12/22 05:06:50
- Status: offline
Re: Learning to play guitar well
2016/09/25 20:35:09
(permalink)
security? Because I know the bouncer handshake? haha Oh wait, you must have meant Dave 003 for security. I'll be doing the masterclasses.
post edited by eph221 - 2016/09/25 20:57:49
|
tlw
Max Output Level: -49.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2567
- Joined: 2008/10/11 22:06:32
- Location: West Midlands, UK
- Status: offline
Re: Learning to play guitar well
2016/09/25 21:06:36
(permalink)
A subject area to add perhaps...
"Taste, the difference between a technician and a musician".
Sonar Platinum 64bit, Windows 8.1 Pro 64bit, I7 3770K Ivybridge, 16GB Ram, Gigabyte Z77-D3H m/board, ATI 7750 graphics+ 1GB RAM, 2xIntel 520 series 220GB SSDs, 1 TB Samsung F3 + 1 TB WD HDDs, Seasonic fanless 460W psu, RME Fireface UFX, Focusrite Octopre. Assorted real synths, guitars, mandolins, diatonic accordions, percussion, fx and other stuff.
|
craigb
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 41704
- Joined: 2009/01/28 23:13:04
- Location: The Pacific Northwestshire
- Status: offline
Re: Learning to play guitar well
2016/09/25 23:15:12
(permalink)
tlw A subject area to add perhaps...
"Taste, the difference between a technician and a musician".
Actually, I almost doubt that part can be taught. They're either an insecure dweeb who can only justify their existence if they can play 64th triplets at 240bpm, or a music lover from birth I would say. LOL.
Time for all of you to head over to Beyond My DAW!
|
craigb
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 41704
- Joined: 2009/01/28 23:13:04
- Location: The Pacific Northwestshire
- Status: offline
Re: Learning to play guitar well
2016/09/25 23:16:01
(permalink)
eph221 security? Because I know the bouncer handshake? haha Oh wait, you must have meant Dave 003 for security. I'll be doing the masterclasses.
Sorry, the reference was for Bitflipper. I keep forgetting how many Daves are here now...
Time for all of you to head over to Beyond My DAW!
|
Randy P
Max Output Level: -44.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3070
- Joined: 2006/11/17 11:02:45
- Location: smokin with the boys upstairs....
- Status: offline
Re: Learning to play guitar well
2016/09/26 09:09:29
(permalink)
☄ Helpfulby bapu 2016/09/26 09:55:37
I'm afraid that my skills in procuring hookers and blow have deteriorated to the point that I can't even remember the basics.
http://www.soundclick.com/riprorenband The music biz is a cruel and shallow money trench,a plastic hallway where thieves & pimps run free and good men die like dogs. There's also a negative side. Hunter S. Thompson
|
Slugbaby
Max Output Level: -33.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4172
- Joined: 2004/10/01 13:57:37
- Location: Toronto, Canada
- Status: offline
Re: Learning to play guitar well
2016/09/26 09:14:07
(permalink)
craigb
tlw A subject area to add perhaps...
"Taste, the difference between a technician and a musician".
Actually, I almost doubt that part can be taught. They're either an insecure dweeb who can only justify their existence if they can play 64th triplets at 240bpm, or a music lover from birth I would say. LOL.
I think that's part of LIFE training, not just musical...
|
bapu
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 86000
- Joined: 2006/11/25 21:23:28
- Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
- Status: offline
Re: Learning to play guitar well
2016/09/26 09:35:23
(permalink)
☄ Helpfulby Mesh 2016/09/26 10:18:32
Randy P I'm afraid that my skills in procuring hookers and blow have deteriorated to the point that I can't even remember the basics.
RTFM
|
eph221
Max Output Level: -28.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4665
- Joined: 2014/12/22 05:06:50
- Status: offline
Re: Learning to play guitar well
2016/09/26 11:06:55
(permalink)
craigb
eph221 security? Because I know the bouncer handshake? haha Oh wait, you must have meant Dave 003 for security. I'll be doing the masterclasses.
Sorry, the reference was for Bitflipper. I keep forgetting how many Daves are here now... 
I understand, I'm a frog and you need a dog.
|
Moshkito
Max Output Level: -37.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3765
- Joined: 2015/01/26 13:29:07
- Status: offline
Re: Learning to play guitar well
2016/09/27 15:38:16
(permalink)
Hi, I've always enjoyed the free form, and the unusual in music. In reading, it's hard to disseminate what somethings are, and where they come from. For example, in reading about CAN, they were older than most rockers, and were also high level students in music in big name schools. And yet, what they were famous for? The complete and total opposite, and only one thing was brought from their "training" ... the discipline to stick with it, and learn from it. THAT, is missing in your notes, sort of. The other two read's, I have mentioned here. Syd Barrett did not even know the chords ... and many went on to copy him! Robert Wyatt has become a "master" of child play (literally), and one can not say he does not know music. He knows more than most. And, just recently, reading about XTC's Andy Partridge (review upcoming), he was not knowledgeable of the chords for a long time, and a lot of his playing, was simply ... and he insists on it to the end ... plain intentional errors sometimes, simply to find where things go, and how. AND, he states that is where the "magic" and "voodoo" is. I will not, however, trash well rehearsed stuff, and played. Seeing King Crimson recently, with 3 drummers, was probably one of the best examples of great music, well rehearsed and beautifully played all the way through, and the drummers, were all complementary of each other and then some, and even added so much to the depth and strength of the music itself. A lot of the stuff you say is about mechanics. Yes, one has to know something or other about it, I suppose, but it does not matter, if one lacks one very important factor ... and the "Future Days" book about the German music scene, makes it clear via the same CAN folks ... the main lesson in those experiments, was ... you ready ... LISTENING to each other, so you know how to adjust and evolve and continue (in their case) on with the piece, instead of falling back into something already done and known. There is a saying that sometimes, to over come your knowledge, you have to unlearn it all, so you can have a fresh start. One of the ways to work with that is ... to spend less time on the rigidity (or computerized!!!!!!!!!!) schooling in music, and teach folks to "talk to each other", with their instrument. Now you got music, instead of something on a piece of paper!
Music is not about notes and chords! My poem is not about the computer or monitor or letters! It's about how I was able to translate it from my insides!
|
eph221
Max Output Level: -28.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4665
- Joined: 2014/12/22 05:06:50
- Status: offline
Re: Learning to play guitar well
2016/09/27 15:54:02
(permalink)
Pedro, Well said! I think curiosity is an important component of it all. If one has a voracious curiosity about things...it's like a carrot in front of the horse(for creativity.) What alot of musicians consider *maturity* unfortunately means to stop thinking intuitively. Obviously, with that definition, we want to stay very immature until we leave this mortal coil; and for that matter put a road block to all forms of rhetoric and thinking penurious of intuition and curiosity. For an interesting read on this problem check out Jung's *psychological types*.
|
Moshkito
Max Output Level: -37.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3765
- Joined: 2015/01/26 13:29:07
- Status: offline
Re: Learning to play guitar well
2016/09/28 11:00:22
(permalink)
eph221 Pedro, Well said! I think curiosity is an important component of it all. If one has a voracious curiosity about things...it's like a carrot in front of the horse(for creativity.) What alot of musicians consider *maturity* unfortunately means to stop thinking intuitively. Obviously, with that definition, we want to stay very immature until we leave this mortal coil; and for that matter put a road block to all forms of rhetoric and thinking penurious of intuition and curiosity. For an interesting read on this problem check out Jung's *psychological types*.
Thx. Gosh knows I could use some help with music teaching and learning. The only problem I have had with two instructors, is that I know so much music (and have it and can show it), and I am more interested in learning how to do some of those things, and most of them ... don't know it ... because all they know is the "theory" and the "scales" and where the fingers go. I could not even imagine, a couple of those folks even enjoying some intentionally missed note in the middle of a chord, as is the case with XTC, and how it does not hurt the piece. And the same for quite a few other experimentation folks. I know I'm a bit of a social rebel, but "learning" is more about you talking to that instrument, than it is really about the notes. It's almost like saying that this chord is happy and the next one is sad, and that is one of the greatest BS's ever invented, specially the major/minor stuff ... there are ways to play a minor key "happy" just like there are ways to play the major key "sad". I just wish I knew these better and an instrument better so I could show it, but really ... BACH has already done that exercise for us!
Music is not about notes and chords! My poem is not about the computer or monitor or letters! It's about how I was able to translate it from my insides!
|
eph221
Max Output Level: -28.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4665
- Joined: 2014/12/22 05:06:50
- Status: offline
Re: Learning to play guitar well
2016/09/28 11:11:33
(permalink)
I'm not disparaging traditional theory. It's all important. What you said about unlearning is really about taking the eagle- eye view of the instrument versus the titmouse.
post edited by eph221 - 2016/09/28 11:33:28
|
Moshkito
Max Output Level: -37.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3765
- Joined: 2015/01/26 13:29:07
- Status: offline
Re: Learning to play guitar well
2016/09/28 11:26:57
(permalink)
Hi, craigb Leg one - Knowledge of your chosen instrument. You should understand how your instrument makes sound, how to set it up, how to clean and maintain it, what each part does and how to tune it. You should also know what it's musical range is, how the notes and chords are configured, how to alter the basics (e.g., alternate tunings, capo use, baritone vs. standard, how many strings?, string gauges, slides, tremolos, in-series or out pickups, single coils vs. multiple coils, in phase or out, muting, etc.) as well as correct playing techniques for whichever styles you are interested in. ...
You do know how many bass guitar teachers have shown me all that, right? NONE. They all wanted me to play bleeping Chuck Berry and I was not interested! craigb Leg two - Music theory. Here is where you learn what music itself is all about. From chords, chord progressions, arpeggios, notes, keys, scales, rests, bends, portamento, vibrato, harmonics, modes, octaves, bars, tab and staff. ...
I would like to disagree here. Sometimes you find a set of fingerings that sound perfect for your ear and represents the cows grazing in the sunset, and then being milked in the morning, and it has nothing to do with the notes, or the chords or the keys ... your inner mind automatically went from here to there, because it was how the "visual" side of your inner story kinda told you to go, and how you "interpreted" your inner movie. Almost every one of those details are AFTER THE FACT, of the creative process, unless you believe that everyone uses a computer to compose now, and will never even play an instrument, in which case, all this is redundant and not even considered. Let's start with Rap! And we haven't even mentioned "effects" and "sound" and how it affects all of those details mentioned. craigb Leg three - Ear training. This falls into two camps: Absolute pitch and relative pitch. The abilities to know what a note is when you hear it and to know what chord is being played when you hear it. ...
I think this is OK for an academic exercise. Not OK, in almost ALL of rock music history, that originally was setup to break the rigidness of the music circles. Even jazz was laughed at for not being serious music way back when, although that might have been more of a color barrier than otherwise, which is very hard to disseminate. But using "ear training" to ENSURE that you are LISTENING and working with that other person, is something that needs to be considered and learned better. The only issue here, is teaching how to adjust and react to it, which is not hard, and will bring all your inner knowledge to the forefront real quick, but it is the difference between good and average player. This is easily TAUGHT in advanced acting classes, for example, and can also be taught for music. I like the studies on both of those, and even bought the CD's ... but his teaching method is a bit odd and scary, since I do not associate "notes" or "chords" with colors ... I associate them with movies and visuals ... and for me, all music is a continuous movie with story and such. The notes are the mechanical side of it. This is really hard to explain to most people, because a music teacher (specially) will immediately say ... you're not fit to do music! It's like Mahler ... wrote a symphony for his wife ... and it didn't phase her ... she still walked out. You gonna say that Mahler was out of tune, or she was? craigb Leg four - Song theory This area includes song structure, verses, choruses, codas, bridges, intros, outros, time signatures, melody, harmony, soloing, song writing, orchestrating, etc. ...
This is after the fact stuff for most people, and specially with the advent of rock 60 or so years ago, when things were done because they felt good and right, not becausse of any of these things. In fact, most of the Beatle stuff was about breaking those traditions and doing something else with it. craigb ... Randy will be teaching the class on finding hookers and blow while dealing with clingy groupies. CJ will discuss studio setup. Dave covers security concepts. Bapu has asked to teach a morning class apparently (all it says is "Am"). Rain and Jarvse will co-teach a class on how to dress to match your chosen genre. Others are still signing up! ...
I'm offended! I would have been the door person with the t-shi(r)t that says ... "I hate musik!" ... and the t-shirt has that contorted face listening to something horrible ... in blue, of course! PS: I like what you did ... it was well meaning and good, although I really thought it just needed a more open idea about music itself. Please spend some time reading the book on Andy Partridge, or the one on that German music (Future Days), and then if you have time, the one on Robert Wyatt (Different Every Time), for some really good eye openers about music and how some folks dealt with it. Hopefully we will not think that Robert was too drunk to know the difference, but his consistency suggests a lot more.
Music is not about notes and chords! My poem is not about the computer or monitor or letters! It's about how I was able to translate it from my insides!
|
eph221
Max Output Level: -28.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4665
- Joined: 2014/12/22 05:06:50
- Status: offline
Re: Learning to play guitar well
2016/09/28 12:50:52
(permalink)
Moshkito Hi,
craigb Leg one - Knowledge of your chosen instrument.
You should understand how your instrument makes sound, how to set it up, how to clean and maintain it, what each part does and how to tune it. You should also know what it's musical range is, how the notes and chords are configured, how to alter the basics (e.g., alternate tunings, capo use, baritone vs. standard, how many strings?, string gauges, slides, tremolos, in-series or out pickups, single coils vs. multiple coils, in phase or out, muting, etc.) as well as correct playing techniques for whichever styles you are interested in. ...
You do know how many bass guitar teachers have shown me all that, right? NONE. They all wanted me to play bleeping Chuck Berry and I was not interested!
craigb Leg two - Music theory.
Here is where you learn what music itself is all about. From chords, chord progressions, arpeggios, notes, keys, scales, rests, bends, portamento, vibrato, harmonics, modes, octaves, bars, tab and staff. ...
I would like to disagree here. Sometimes you find a set of fingerings that sound perfect for your ear and represents the cows grazing in the sunset, and then being milked in the morning, and it has nothing to do with the notes, or the chords or the keys ... your inner mind automatically went from here to there, because it was how the "visual" side of your inner story kinda told you to go, and how you "interpreted" your inner movie. Almost every one of those details are AFTER THE FACT, of the creative process, unless you believe that everyone uses a computer to compose now, and will never even play an instrument, in which case, all this is redundant and not even considered. Let's start with Rap! And we haven't even mentioned "effects" and "sound" and how it affects all of those details mentioned.
craigb Leg three - Ear training. This falls into two camps: Absolute pitch and relative pitch. The abilities to know what a note is when you hear it and to know what chord is being played when you hear it. ...
I think this is OK for an academic exercise. Not OK, in almost ALL of rock music history, that originally was setup to break the rigidness of the music circles. Even jazz was laughed at for not being serious music way back when, although that might have been more of a color barrier than otherwise, which is very hard to disseminate. But using "ear training" to ENSURE that you are LISTENING and working with that other person, is something that needs to be considered and learned better. The only issue here, is teaching how to adjust and react to it, which is not hard, and will bring all your inner knowledge to the forefront real quick, but it is the difference between good and average player. This is easily TAUGHT in advanced acting classes, for example, and can also be taught for music. I like the studies on both of those, and even bought the CD's ... but his teaching method is a bit odd and scary, since I do not associate "notes" or "chords" with colors ... I associate them with movies and visuals ... and for me, all music is a continuous movie with story and such. The notes are the mechanical side of it. This is really hard to explain to most people, because a music teacher (specially) will immediately say ... you're not fit to do music! It's like Mahler ... wrote a symphony for his wife ... and it didn't phase her ... she still walked out. You gonna say that Mahler was out of tune, or she was?
craigb Leg four - Song theory
This area includes song structure, verses, choruses, codas, bridges, intros, outros, time signatures, melody, harmony, soloing, song writing, orchestrating, etc. ...
This is after the fact stuff for most people, and specially with the advent of rock 60 or so years ago, when things were done because they felt good and right, not becausse of any of these things. In fact, most of the Beatle stuff was about breaking those traditions and doing something else with it.
craigb ... Randy will be teaching the class on finding hookers and blow while dealing with clingy groupies. CJ will discuss studio setup. Dave covers security concepts. Bapu has asked to teach a morning class apparently (all it says is "Am"). Rain and Jarvse will co-teach a class on how to dress to match your chosen genre. Others are still signing up! ...
I'm offended! I would have been the door person with the t-shi(r)t that says ... "I hate musik!" ... and the t-shirt has that contorted face listening to something horrible ... in blue, of course! PS: I like what you did ... it was well meaning and good, although I really thought it just needed a more open idea about music itself. Please spend some time reading the book on Andy Partridge, or the one on that German music (Future Days), and then if you have time, the one on Robert Wyatt (Different Every Time), for some really good eye openers about music and how some folks dealt with it. Hopefully we will not think that Robert was too drunk to know the difference, but his consistency suggests a lot more.
I anxiously await Craig's response!
|
Moshkito
Max Output Level: -37.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3765
- Joined: 2015/01/26 13:29:07
- Status: offline
Re: Learning to play guitar well
2016/09/29 10:47:17
(permalink)
eph221 ... I anxiously await Craig's response! ...
I kinda don't. Craig knows that I know that he also listens to some other music's and has a good feel for different things, however, I find it interesting that his write up does not consider a lot of those experimental things, and how they were done. Not a single bit of Tangerine Dream, in their first 4 or 5 albums was done with any of those things considered ... and are we going to say that it was crap? It was done by "sound" and its "flow", and then later sequencers done manually and with tapes, helped develop more of it, into something different, still just as good as before. It was still about the "sound" and its "flow". It's just strange, when you end up reading a Klaus Schulze say that he does not study music, and does not seem to know that chords they are ... because that is not where his interest lies in the music he makes. He simply allows his fingers to move ... !!! Basically, in my estimation, there is a whole segment, or two, of music that is not being taken into consideration, and that does not mean that what Craig wrote is wrong, IT'S NOT, but it is something that would be required if you were going to be a studio musician and be on call to get many studio things done for/by others, or you were to play with an orchestra. However, this has not been the case, or the history of rock music in general.
post edited by Moshkito - 2016/09/29 11:09:39
Music is not about notes and chords! My poem is not about the computer or monitor or letters! It's about how I was able to translate it from my insides!
|
eph221
Max Output Level: -28.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4665
- Joined: 2014/12/22 05:06:50
- Status: offline
Re: Learning to play guitar well
2016/09/29 22:54:50
(permalink)
As I said elsewhere, the cows aren't black. There are principles for understanding aesthetics. It's not all subjective no matter how much our lovey-dovey 3rd grade teachers wanted us to think. Theory simply means that the music is arranged in certain ways (taxonomies) in order for us to understand and discuss things with eachother. Language is what sets us apart from the monkey's, no? So it's arranged in order for us to communicate about aesthetic ideas (theoretically).
post edited by eph221 - 2016/09/30 20:46:27
|
eph221
Max Output Level: -28.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4665
- Joined: 2014/12/22 05:06:50
- Status: offline
Re: Learning to play guitar well
2016/09/30 19:42:37
(permalink)
Different DNA. Different quantum information (I think our *souls* are basically quantum information and they persist past death). :D:D Edit: And hundreds of millions of USD.
post edited by eph221 - 2016/09/30 20:07:21
|
jamesg1213
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 21760
- Joined: 2006/04/18 14:42:48
- Location: SW Scotland
- Status: offline
Re: Learning to play guitar well
2016/10/01 02:55:02
(permalink)
craigb Leg one - Knowledge of your chosen instrument. You should understand how your instrument makes sound, how to set it up, how to clean and maintain it, what each part does and how to tune it. You should also know what it's musical range is, how the notes and chords are configured, how to alter the basics (e.g., alternate tunings, capo use, baritone vs. standard, how many strings?, string gauges, slides, tremolos, in-series or out pickups, single coils vs. multiple coils, in phase or out, muting, etc.) as well as correct playing techniques for whichever styles you are interested in. Leg two - Music theory. Here is where you learn what music itself is all about. From chords, chord progressions, arpeggios, notes, keys, scales, rests, bends, portamento, vibrato, harmonics, modes, octaves, bars, tab and staff. And on and on and on. Circles of 5ths and 4ths as well as being able to read music (either staff notation or tab). Being able to communicate with other musicians (when needed) or playing something already created without hearing it. Leg three - Ear training. This falls into two camps: Absolute pitch and relative pitch. The abilities to know what a note is when you hear it and to know what chord is being played when you hear it. This could be the easiest leg to describe, but the hardest (for some) to become proficient at! Leg four - Song theory. This area includes song structure, verses, choruses, codas, bridges, intros, outros, time signatures, melody, harmony, soloing, song writing, orchestrating, etc.
39 years since I picked up a guitar. My chair still only has one leg, and the paint is peeling off that.
Jyemz Thrombold's Patented Brisk Weather Pantaloonettes with Inclementometer
|
sharke
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 13933
- Joined: 2012/08/03 00:13:00
- Location: NYC
- Status: offline
Re: Learning to play guitar well
2016/10/01 02:56:46
(permalink)
I know my theory inside and out, but funnily enough, I never give it a second thought when I'm composing music or playing guitar. I have written some quite long pieces which are quite harmonically complex (i.e. lots of extended chords, voice leading, modulation etc) but I couldn't tell you what any of those chords are and I don't even know what key they're in. I could find out in a flash, by applying what I know about chords and theory. But the point is that I don't feel any need to - I feel my way around music using my musical instincts. I will oftentimes push notes around on the piano roll until they sound like the right ones. Sometimes I happen upon interesting harmonic ideas purely by chance - but I don't think of this as good luck or cheating in any way. I'm using my musical taste to distinguish good accidents from bad accidents. And I guarantee a substantial number of history's great musical was "happened upon" in this way. Similary, I don't think about theory when I'm playing the guitar. But in playing an instrument, if you don't want to learn "formally" then it's still a good idea to get the shapes of chords and scales under your fingers if only to get a sense of pattern and of clusters of notes which work together and produce certain feelings. After a while, you can get by without having to memorize entire scale patterns and fingerings - you develop the skill of translating what you hear in your head to your instrument. For instance, if I'm playing a G note and I hear in my head a note that's a fifth higher, I'm not thinking "Fifth higher than G...a D!" My muscle memory has learned over the years to reach for a note "yay higher" and it knows where that note is. I'm sure pianists do the same thing. They hear the distance between two notes and they know how to translate that distance onto the keyboard. I'm no music teacher and I'd be the last person to give "expert advice" on learning an instrument because I've always done things in my quirky way and I have no idea if that way is good for the majority of people. I will say in general that it's a good idea to get a solid grounding of the basics of chords and scales, but to do so with the understanding that once you've gotten it down pretty well, there's no harm in forgetting about it as you continue your musical journey.
JamesWindows 10, Sonar SPlat (64-bit), Intel i7-4930K, 32GB RAM, RME Babyface, AKAI MPK Mini, Roland A-800 Pro, Focusrite VRM Box, Komplete 10 Ultimate, 2012 American Telecaster!
|
SteveStrummerUK
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 31112
- Joined: 2006/10/28 10:53:48
- Location: Worcester, England.
- Status: offline
Re: Learning to play guitar well
2016/10/01 10:11:01
(permalink)
☄ Helpfulby jamesg1213 2016/10/01 11:26:15
Moshkito
I could not even imagine, a couple of those folks even enjoying some intentionally missed note in the middle of a chord, as is the case with XTC, and how it does not hurt the piece. And the same for quite a few other experimentation folks.
An " intentionally missed note in the middle of a chord" is a complete misnomer. Shirley if it's intentional, it's just a 'different' chord.
|
Moshkito
Max Output Level: -37.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3765
- Joined: 2015/01/26 13:29:07
- Status: offline
Re: Learning to play guitar well
2016/10/05 10:44:05
(permalink)
SteveStrummerUK
Moshkito
I could not even imagine, a couple of those folks even enjoying some intentionally missed note in the middle of a chord, as is the case with XTC, and how it does not hurt the piece. And the same for quite a few other experimentation folks. An "intentionally missed note in the middle of a chord" is a complete misnomer. Shirley if it's intentional, it's just a 'different' chord.
Not according to Andy Partridge. The sound itself of the combination of notes, or the dis-combination of notes, seems to open up his imagination and off he goes into the movie, and that tends to dictate his next set of notes, or lyrics. He does not clarify if the sound of the combination of notes is what creates songs for him or a few words together or separated ... he says that both of them, since he has bits and pieces all over that sometimes end up somewhere else. But I can relate to "seeing" things in music ... and it is how I define it. Sadly, there are things that I do not "see" in a lot of music ... I was listening to pieces of "Boris Godunov", and those voices did nothing for me, and the music was marginal for my mind. But put on Verdi or Puccini, and I am gone in a second or two. XTC is one of those odd ball things for me, and some of it clicks and some doesn't ... but you're like a big box of paints and such ... are lyrics that are really nice and right to a nifty comment and idea. I'm thinking about body painting now! Go figure!
Music is not about notes and chords! My poem is not about the computer or monitor or letters! It's about how I was able to translate it from my insides!
|
batsbrew
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 10037
- Joined: 2007/06/07 16:02:32
- Location: SL,UT
- Status: offline
Re: Learning to play guitar well
2016/10/05 14:48:30
(permalink)
gotta know how to make 'guitar face'
|
batsbrew
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 10037
- Joined: 2007/06/07 16:02:32
- Location: SL,UT
- Status: offline
Re: Learning to play guitar well
2016/10/05 14:50:22
(permalink)
|
57Gregy
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 14404
- Joined: 2004/05/31 17:04:17
- Location: Raleigh, North Carolina
- Status: offline
Re: Learning to play guitar well
2016/10/05 15:06:51
(permalink)
I'm an okay guitarist. My friend Barry is an okay guitarist. We were noodling around on acoustics one night last year when my friend Nate of the band Noctomb came over. They're one of those death-metal, low-tuned guitars, grunting/croaking vocals bands that seem to be popular among the kids these days. He asked to play my guitar and the things he did on it flummoxed both me and Barry. I can't describe it, because I don't know what he did even though I was just 5 feet away. A bonus was the first time he ever played a 12-string acoustic. He looked like a child the first time he tasted candy. It was cool.
|
eph221
Max Output Level: -28.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4665
- Joined: 2014/12/22 05:06:50
- Status: offline
Re: Learning to play guitar well
2016/10/05 15:30:42
(permalink)
Guitarists can think in any number of ways about the fretboard. At any given time, there are at least 3 places to play the same note! Some guitarists don't even think in terms of theory and simply have an ear tied to different places on the guitar and see sounds in terms of different motions (e.g. move horizontally then go down two strings). It's always tough with young students because, using the latter approach one can get up and running (and sounding decent) without much effort. But to really get that edge, guitarists ultimately have to learn theory, and that can mean unlearning all the kinesthetic stuff that they had just spent the majority of their life doing! Aaron Sherer has/had a pretty good system to get young students interested in classical guitar. The problem being that it takes alot longer to get sounding decent. Without the parents pushing them in that direction, students can lose interest real quick. The fact remains, one can sound pretty decent on the guitar without much effort. It's an easy instrument to sound *ok* on. To truly master it takes a lifetime. It's one of the most difficult in that respect.
|
JohanSebatianGremlin
Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
- Total Posts : 402
- Joined: 2016/03/17 22:27:15
- Status: offline
Re: Learning to play guitar well
2016/10/05 22:55:34
(permalink)
I get where you're coming from. But I've always approached it differently. Where your perception has four legs, mine only has two. For me it has alway broken down into knowledge of your instrument and music theory and that's all. How your instrument is built and how its tuned and how you get various sounds out of it? Instrument stuff. How chords are built and how songs are built and how to listen to a song once and know the chord progression instantly even if you don't know the key? That's all music theory to me. Perhaps that because all of that and more was covered in detail in my high school music theory class. Granted I probably had a pretty other-worldly high school music theory class, but all of that was taught in detail as music theory. Chord structure? Music theory. Song structure? Music theory. Arranging techniques? Music theory. Ear training? Music theory. Writing for 5-part harmony i.e. string arranging? Music theory. It was all music theory and it was all intertwined and connected for me. Its all the same machine for me and in order to understand one of them, you had to understand all the others. But enough about that. You're coming back to guitar and approaching it as though you were never there. Talk about that. How will that work exactly? How are you planning to pull it off? What do you expect the result will be?
|
Moshkito
Max Output Level: -37.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3765
- Joined: 2015/01/26 13:29:07
- Status: offline
Re: Learning to play guitar well
2016/10/06 10:28:42
(permalink)
JohanSebatianGremlin ... Granted I probably had a pretty other-worldly high school music theory class, but all of that was taught in detail as music theory. Chord structure? Music theory. Song structure? Music theory. Arranging techniques? Music theory. Ear training? Music theory. Writing for 5-part harmony i.e. string arranging? Music theory. ...
In many ways, this all helps. I do not doubt that. However, when one studies the experimental and the improvised music, specially on guitar, there are many that do not exactly go by a chord structure, any more than they do music theory, or song structure. As was the case in most of the German music out of the late 60's and 70's, and very much also done in France and even Italy (of all places the most classically influenced!), there were many folks whose experimentation's defied description, and to this day, many of the German folks, from the so (badly!) called "krautrock" were intentionally not using anything that was Anglo-American, or Westernized music, specially what was called schlager or what we consider pop music ... I can even think of Jon McLaughlin, and I am positive that he knows his music, but he has a very good ear, and he bounces out of it really fast and can easily join Hindu musicians and improvise with them. At this point, I am not sure that it is about anything that we think about. And it makes me think that too much of this "theory" thing is stuff that we learn ... when we don't know anything, and hope that the theory transitions into your own music ... and it CAN'T! ... it's all stuff that has been done before and heard before, and you are merely replicating it. To "create", it has to be new. It has to come from a place that ... we were not there before, let's say ... and in many ways, my only concern is that we're limiting what an instrument can do ... which is ... just play the notes n the score! Guess what rock music and almost all the music in the 20th century was about? Pretty much what you could NOT place in the score ... that made so much of rock, jazz and many other things so important and valuable, and we still listen to it. Heck ... even opera could use a Roger Daltrey for a scream or two, no? At least the point would be "true" for you and I, instead of sounding so ... weak for our ears!
Music is not about notes and chords! My poem is not about the computer or monitor or letters! It's about how I was able to translate it from my insides!
|
JohanSebatianGremlin
Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
- Total Posts : 402
- Joined: 2016/03/17 22:27:15
- Status: offline
Re: Learning to play guitar well
2016/10/06 10:52:22
(permalink)
Anytime one produces more than one pitch simultaneously (or even not so much simultaneously), one is using some sort of chord structure whether one knows about it or not. Having knowledge of theory does not in and of itself prevent one from experimenting. Just because you understand theory and chord structure etc, there is nothing that prevents you from getting the sounds you like out of your instrument just by playing it without paying the least amount of attention to what chords you're actually playing or what tonality you're playing in. In other words, you can still play using just your fingers and your ears if you want. I experiment all the time without giving any thought to what I'm actually playing. In short, just because you know the rules, doesn't mean you have to follow them.
|
eph221
Max Output Level: -28.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4665
- Joined: 2014/12/22 05:06:50
- Status: offline
Re: Learning to play guitar well
2016/10/06 13:40:43
(permalink)
Moshkito
JohanSebatianGremlin ... Granted I probably had a pretty other-worldly high school music theory class, but all of that was taught in detail as music theory. Chord structure? Music theory. Song structure? Music theory. Arranging techniques? Music theory. Ear training? Music theory. Writing for 5-part harmony i.e. string arranging? Music theory. ...
In many ways, this all helps. I do not doubt that. However, when one studies the experimental and the improvised music, specially on guitar, there are many that do not exactly go by a chord structure, any more than they do music theory, or song structure. As was the case in most of the German music out of the late 60's and 70's, and very much also done in France and even Italy (of all places the most classically influenced!), there were many folks whose experimentation's defied description, and to this day, many of the German folks, from the so (badly!) called "krautrock" were intentionally not using anything that was Anglo-American, or Westernized music, specially what was called schlager or what we consider pop music ... I can even think of Jon McLaughlin, and I am positive that he knows his music, but he has a very good ear, and he bounces out of it really fast and can easily join Hindu musicians and improvise with them. At this point, I am not sure that it is about anything that we think about. And it makes me think that too much of this "theory" thing is stuff that we learn ... when we don't know anything, and hope that the theory transitions into your own music ... and it CAN'T! ... it's all stuff that has been done before and heard before, and you are merely replicating it. To "create", it has to be new. It has to come from a place that ... we were not there before, let's say ... and in many ways, my only concern is that we're limiting what an instrument can do ... which is ... just play the notes n the score! Guess what rock music and almost all the music in the 20th century was about? Pretty much what you could NOT place in the score ... that made so much of rock, jazz and many other things so important and valuable, and we still listen to it. Heck ... even opera could use a Roger Daltrey for a scream or two, no? At least the point would be "true" for you and I, instead of sounding so ... weak for our ears!
I think you're just taking this position to be obnoxious. Of course, those who know music theory can get alot further on any instrument. Just because someone get's a spot in guitar player mag doesn't mean they're good. And frankly, learning music history makes one aware when he or she or it is COPYING someone,and can give the *originator* credit. Variations are like using the predecessor's thoughts like a cantus firmus. Sadly, there hasn't been much new in the guitar world (improvised or not; most new pieces are a type of improvisation) in an other worldly long time. There's nothing gnu under the sun, it's all variations like Siddharta said; different manifestations of the same thing or essence.
post edited by eph221 - 2016/10/06 14:11:38
|