Helpful ReplyLet's talk Microphones under $300 Vocal only

Page: < 12 Showing page 2 of 2
Author
Kev999
Max Output Level: -36 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 3922
  • Joined: 2007/05/01 14:22:54
  • Location: Victoria, Australia
  • Status: offline
Re: Let's talk Microphones under $300 Vocal only 2015/03/10 16:16:02 (permalink)
dwardzala
If you're thinking of getting an SM58, you might be better off with a 57.  I think it has a bit more utility (although you said you would use it for vocals only) but it is essential the same mic...


Assuming that it's not intended for stage use, the 57 seems like a better option. A 58 is really just a 57 with a built-in pop filter.

SonarPlatinum(22.11.0.111)|Mixbus32C(4.3.19)|DigitalPerformer(9.5.1)|Reaper(5.77)
FractalDesign:DefineR5|i7-6850k@4.1GHz|16GB@2666MHz-DDR4|MSI:GamingProCarbonX99a|Matrox:M9148(x2)|UAD2solo(6.5.2)|W7Ult-x64-SP1
Audient:iD22+ASP800|KRK:VXT6|+various-outboard-gear|+guitars&basses, etc.
Having fun at work lately
#31
greekmac7
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 85
  • Joined: 2010/01/16 18:48:15
  • Location: northampton, england
  • Status: offline
Re: Let's talk Microphones under $300 Vocal only 2015/03/15 09:58:42 (permalink)
Hi,
 
I noticed the Blue Baby Bottle mentioned in this thread and I've found one for what seems to be a fair enough price.
I currently have a Rode NT1A. 
Would the Baby Bottle be a good addition for me?
 
Thanks,
 
Ed.

Here is where I put my songs sometimes: https://soundcloud.com/eduard-alexogiannopoulos

:)
#32
MachineClaw
Max Output Level: -68 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1116
  • Joined: 2012/10/08 00:15:28
  • Status: offline
Re: Let's talk Microphones under $300 Vocal only 2015/03/15 13:21:37 (permalink)
greekmac7
Hi,
 
I noticed the Blue Baby Bottle mentioned in this thread and I've found one for what seems to be a fair enough price.
I currently have a Rode NT1A. 
Would the Baby Bottle be a good addition for me?
 
Thanks,
 
Ed.




Well I bought one.  I like it.  I have a deepish vocal quality without signing high notes.  I like the Baby bottle for my vocal range.
 
I had to buy another mic stand that would hold it correctly.  I had a boom mic style stand and it wanted to fall over with the baby bottle.
 
the pop filter isn't that great as it sits to close to the mic - but you can get a 3rd party one and it works fine.
 
if I had the money I would buy a Bottle and start collecting capsules to play with.  great company, great box/packing.
 
all that said I do have a rode NT1A on my list to get/check out as well.  I want some extra tools in the toolbox for differences.
 
what is your vocal style range?  what is a good deal, can  you afford the mic? what mics do you currently own.
#33
cclarry
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 20964
  • Joined: 2012/02/07 09:42:07
  • Status: offline
Re: Let's talk Microphones under $300 Vocal only 2015/03/15 13:56:21 (permalink)
I purchased a Blue Bluebird and love it.  I also got a FREE 
Encore 100 with it...and paid less then $200 for both
on a Black Friday deal....I use my E100 all the time for 
live use...it's great....


#34
greekmac7
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 85
  • Joined: 2010/01/16 18:48:15
  • Location: northampton, england
  • Status: offline
Re: Let's talk Microphones under $300 Vocal only 2015/03/15 13:57:18 (permalink)
I'm looking at an ex-demo Baby Bottle for £140 ($200).
I have quite a low vocal range which I'm hoping will benefit from this kind of mic.
 
My plan is to use it as an alternative to the Rode NT1A that I have for vocals, and also I plan to use it along side my Rode NT1A when recording acoustic guitar in stereo.
 
 

Here is where I put my songs sometimes: https://soundcloud.com/eduard-alexogiannopoulos

:)
#35
cclarry
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 20964
  • Joined: 2012/02/07 09:42:07
  • Status: offline
Re: Let's talk Microphones under $300 Vocal only 2015/03/15 13:58:24 (permalink) ☄ Helpfulby greekmac7 2015/03/15 14:10:53
greekmac7
I'm looking at an ex-demo Baby Bottle for £140 ($200).
I have quite a low vocal range which I'm hoping will benefit from this kind of mic.
 
My plan is to use it as an alternative to the Rode NT1A that I have for vocals, and also I plan to use it along side my Rode NT1A when recording acoustic guitar in stereo.
 
 



That's a good deal if it's in good shape....and a good plan also...


#36
MachineClaw
Max Output Level: -68 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1116
  • Joined: 2012/10/08 00:15:28
  • Status: offline
Re: Let's talk Microphones under $300 Vocal only 2015/03/17 11:13:17 (permalink)
greekmac7
I'm looking at an ex-demo Baby Bottle for £140 ($200).
I have quite a low vocal range which I'm hoping will benefit from this kind of mic.
 
My plan is to use it as an alternative to the Rode NT1A that I have for vocals, and also I plan to use it along side my Rode NT1A when recording acoustic guitar in stereo.
 
 


baby Bottle should work for you, that's a decent price though I dunno if I would want a demo model that has seen dust and hands all over it.
 
if your going to record your guitar in stereo it's always a good idea to record using 2 of the same mics.  if you use the Rode and the Blue to record the guitar L/R your going to end up with different colored sounding guitar.
 
#37
greekmac7
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 85
  • Joined: 2010/01/16 18:48:15
  • Location: northampton, england
  • Status: offline
Re: Let's talk Microphones under $300 Vocal only 2015/03/22 08:13:07 (permalink)
 

baby Bottle should work for you, that's a decent price though I dunno if I would want a demo model that has seen dust and hands all over it.
 
if your going to record your guitar in stereo it's always a good idea to record using 2 of the same mics. if you use the Rode and the Blue to record the guitar L/R your going to end up with different colored sounding guitar.

 
I agree with you on both points.
 
Ex-demo is not ideal. That said, new Baby Bottle's are retailing here in the UK at £270 ($400). I got this one for £125 ($185), so you can understand the appeal.
 
I understand it's better to use two of the same mic for recording guitar in stereo. I have two SM57s, but whenever I have tried recording through these I have found the sound to be harsh. I've used the NT1A and an SM58 , so while the Baby Bottle with the NT1A won't be perfect, it will be an improvement on my current situation.

Here is where I put my songs sometimes: https://soundcloud.com/eduard-alexogiannopoulos

:)
#38
rontarrant
Max Output Level: -78 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 643
  • Joined: 2010/06/21 06:26:09
  • Location: Ottawa, Ontario
  • Status: offline
Re: Let's talk Microphones under $300 Vocal only 2015/03/22 09:20:56 (permalink)
I have two mics, an AT2020 and a cheap Shure that's intended for speaking voice only. If I had the money, I might be tempted to buy more expensive ones, but I doubt I'd hear the difference being 30% deaf in one ear.

-Ron T.
----------------------------------------------------------
MSI GE72 2QF-247US, 12 gb, Focusrite 6i6, AT-2020
----------------------------------------------------------
Windows 10 x64, Sonar Platinum
#39
lawajava
Max Output Level: -55 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2040
  • Joined: 2012/05/31 23:23:55
  • Location: Seattle
  • Status: offline
Re: Let's talk Microphones under $300 Vocal only 2015/03/24 19:43:25 (permalink)
Vastman
I have a large number of mics, all of which have been retired in favor of the CAD Equitek E100S... just exquisite, lowest noise of any mic, built right here in the USA...
 
I'm a singer.  love it.
sound on sound review:  http://www.soundonsound.c.../articles/cade100s.htm
 
Their conclusion:  The E100S is a very different beast from its earlier namesake, but its ability to serve as a reliable all‑rounder makes it a must‑hear mic if you're thinking of a spending spree this Christmas. Its smooth but detailed sound character is quite ribbon‑like in some ways, and provides a perfect antidote for those who find the shrill brilliance of many modern capacitor mics too much in combination with squeaky‑clean digital recording systems. The E100S is a remarkably quiet mic, with a full-bodied and detailed sound and an ability to cope with silly sound levels. There's nothing in my mic collection that sounds quite like this, or is as universally useful as this mic. For that reason, this one is definitely staying here! .

Alternatives

Given the E100's remarkably low self‑noise, its integrated 'stealth' shockmount, and its detailed but smooth sound character, I'd struggle to think of anything that really compares, let alone compares at a similar price.


Vastman - after reading and monitoring this thread I noticed your suggestion above and added it to my candidates including quite a few of the ones mentioned elsewhere in this thread.

There are a considerable number of articles and comparative reviews out there. YouTube has an ample selection of clips allowing you to hear many of these mics either side by side in comparisons or in depth recording samples of any of these mics.

This one kept getting more and more worthy after comparing and listening to it in depth.

There are a good number of YouTube clips providing samples of it alone or in comparison to other choices.

I was able to purchase the CAD Equitek E100S for just over $300. I think it is just what I was looking for.

Here is one of many YouTube clips that covers it. I am posting this one because you can hear the mic on several tracks on one song.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fnq0JrOvfUo

Thanks very much to all for the many worthy suggestions. This one is the winner for my personal taste.

Thanks very much Vastman!
post edited by lawajava - 2015/03/24 19:52:31

Two internal 2TB SSDs laptop stuffed with Larry's deals and awesome tools. Studio One is the cat's meow as a DAW now that I've migrated off of Sonar. Using BandLab Cakewalk just to grab old files when migrating songs.
#40
Page: < 12 Showing page 2 of 2
Jump to:
© 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1