Bflat5
Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
- Total Posts : 421
- Joined: 2008/07/05 20:58:44
- Location: Memphis, Tn.
- Status: offline
Live recording
I've recently found myself doing video for local shows. I've never really done this before and what seems like a good way to do it is proving to be a bit of a hassle. A few weeks ago I recorded a show for a friend. It was mainly to try and get a feel for it. I have a Sony field recorder that sounds pretty freaking good. I thought that since it has a line input I could connect directly to tape out on the mixer then mix the live sound from the camera with the mixed recording from the board. I've tested this in my own band room and works very well. Syncing audio separate video and audio sources are a pain though. I figured it may be a challenge getting a sound guy to allow it, even though there would be zero problems or extra work for him. But this guy tried making sound like it is a major deal. "I can do it, but you need to get with me before the show so I can setup sub outs blah blah blah..." I said, no I just need the tape out right there at the top of the board... I guess he either didn't have a clue what that was or simply didn't want to do it. Anyway, here's my question for you guys that record live shows. What do you use? My camera isn't exactly a little handy cam. It's a Canon XHA1 and does a great job. I can connect 2 external mics and control the audio input levels right from the camera, but that still doesn't sound great. The field recorder just picking up the room noise and such does sound a bit better. Would I need to invest in a small mixer and setup mics and mix the sound that way in Sonar from my laptop or what?
|
MandolinPicker
Max Output Level: -76 dBFS
- Total Posts : 720
- Joined: 2003/11/05 18:51:51
- Location: Oxford, AL
- Status: offline
Re: Live recording
2015/09/16 17:20:56
(permalink)
You can use the tape outs, but it may not sound that good. Live sound is typically sound reinforcement, so the mix for the house just beefs up the natural sound of the band. For example, if the guitar player has a loud amp, I may not have much, if anything, of that in the house mix. If the bass is weak, I might have to push it up. Chances are I really don't need to put much of any drums into the house mix (even when they are in a drum cage). So the mix you would get off the house mixer would be full of base, no drums and a little guitar, plus whatever ambient noise enters the mics. Depending on the mixer, there may be a row that is just for a separate mix (sometimes used for mixing the stage monitors, sometimes it can be used for recording). Our Allen and Heath 2800 has this at the bottom, separate from the faders, has a gain and pan knob. It can be sent to a separate out. This would allow you to record from the house board and get a better mix than straight off the tape out. A couple of caveats with this.You and the house sound guy will be doing a dance as each of you try to work the same board. Not impossible, but you need to work together. Second, you will need to mix in headphones. No matter how good the headphones are, some of the house will bleed in. This can mess up what you think you are hearing in the recording. Hope that helps. Good luck!
The Mandolin Picker "Bless your hearts... and all your vital organs" - John Duffy "Got time to breath, got time for music!"- Briscoe Darling, Jr. Windows 8.1, Sonar Platinum (64-bit), AMD FX 6120 Six-Core, 10GB RAM
|
Bristol_Jonesey
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 16775
- Joined: 2007/10/08 15:41:17
- Location: Bristol, UK
- Status: offline
Re: Live recording
2015/09/16 17:25:23
(permalink)
I've some out of the FOH mixers Direct Outs, 16 of them straight into the line ins. But you'd better co-operate closely with the FOH guy and makes sure that if the option exists, the direct outs are set to PRE fader/gain
CbB, Platinum, 64 bit throughoutCustom built i7 3930, 32Gb RAM, 2 x 1Tb Internal HDD, 1 x 1TB system SSD (Win 7), 1 x 500Gb system SSD (Win 10), 2 x 1Tb External HDD's, Dual boot Win 7 & Win 10 64 Bit, Saffire Pro 26, ISA One, Adam P11A,
|
Beepster
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 18001
- Joined: 2012/05/11 19:11:24
- Status: offline
Re: Live recording
2015/09/16 17:31:21
(permalink)
☄ Helpfulby John T 2015/09/16 18:23:35
What MandoPicker said... I have tons of board recordings from medium sized clubs where everything was mic'd BUT the vocals are blaring (because singers don't show up with amps) and everything else except the kick and snare is an afterthought. What the dude was saying is he wanted to create a sub mix especially to output to the camera so you could actually have a decent recording. It's actually pretty cool he was willing to do that. I've paid sound guys just to get the raw board mix onto a CD at the end of a gig... which as I said was mostly vocals.
|
Bflat5
Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
- Total Posts : 421
- Joined: 2008/07/05 20:58:44
- Location: Memphis, Tn.
- Status: offline
Re: Live recording
2015/09/16 17:51:50
(permalink)
Good stuff to know, thanks. Lets say I can't work with the sound guy for whatever reason. What would be my best options then?
|
stickman393
Max Output Level: -60 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1528
- Joined: 2003/11/07 18:35:26
- Status: offline
Re: Live recording
2015/09/16 18:30:19
(permalink)
My Dad used to get excellent results with a Zoom H2 mounted 7 feet up on a pole in the center of the venue - not always feasible for rock concerts. he said the sound was better than that captured by his expensive stereo pair AKGs... so he switched. This is probably not a viable solution for you...
|
Bflat5
Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
- Total Posts : 421
- Joined: 2008/07/05 20:58:44
- Location: Memphis, Tn.
- Status: offline
Re: Live recording
2015/09/16 19:13:41
(permalink)
stickman393 My Dad used to get excellent results with a Zoom H2 mounted 7 feet up on a pole in the center of the venue - not always feasible for rock concerts. he said the sound was better than that captured by his expensive stereo pair AKGs... so he switched. This is probably not a viable solution for you...
That's pretty much what I ended up doing. Instead of a Zoom I have a Sony.
|
Cactus Music
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 8424
- Joined: 2004/02/09 21:34:04
- Status: offline
Re: Live recording
2015/09/16 21:14:51
(permalink)
I bought the Tascam DR 50 because I like to record live shows. What I like the most is it has the XLR inputs as well as the built in mikes and you can record 4 tracks. You sort of need at least that for live shows. As said the output of a FOH mixer will be vocal hot. And it's a crap shoot to "guess" at a sub mix without being isolated from the room. So ultimatly you capture as many seperate tracks as possible if you need a great mix. Some sound people don't want you to have the board mix because you go home with proof they might not have done a very good job. I get almost all I need if I set the recorder up at the FOH mix possition up hi on a mike stand, and then steal a board mix. I'm doing the sound so I cheat a little and try and push the backline and drums in the mix. It's nice if there is spare AUX channels and then I can say, put the vocals in the left and the Bass and Kick to the right. The ambient mikes will be stereo and the little recorder sould pick up what you are hearing. Having the direct board mixed in with the ambient tightens up the sound and buy nudging the tracks time a hair you can get good results. Depends on how far back you where. For the best results a multi track recording cannot be beat. But to do this you need a mixer with direct outs on all channels and an audio interface that has enough inputs. One other option I've used was to ignore the PA system and add your own mikes to the stage. You can do a lot with 8 good mikes.
|
bluzdog
Max Output Level: -56 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1928
- Joined: 2007/10/06 17:15:14
- Location: Lakewood, Colorado
- Status: offline
Re: Live recording
2015/09/16 23:20:19
(permalink)
Bflat5 Good stuff to know, thanks. Lets say I can't work with the sound guy for whatever reason. What would be my best options then?
Find a way to make nice and befriend him. Rocky
|
Cactus Music
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 8424
- Joined: 2004/02/09 21:34:04
- Status: offline
Re: Live recording
2015/09/16 23:52:59
(permalink)
As I said if you find it hard to work with the FOH person then just place mikes on the stage and record each one to Sonar. I have a Tascam us1641 ( now the 16x08) and they are only $300. This gives you 8 XLR inputs and 6 more via a small mixer and the line inputs. I once double miked the stage and stole the vocals and a horn section from using the back or the Monitor power amps. Most have parallel connections you can patch to. A lot of Bass rigs have an extra DI output. The possibilities are many if you creative and know where to look on stage for patching points. The band will be on your side even if the FOH person is aloof.
|
Beepster
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 18001
- Joined: 2012/05/11 19:11:24
- Status: offline
Re: Live recording
2015/09/17 12:03:00
(permalink)
There is even the old school trick of taping two mics together for the vocalist so you can get you're own feed of their performance instead of tapping the board which you'll have no control over. If you watch those ancient live Black Sabbath in Paris vids (that they released an album for) you can see Ozzy has two mics taped together. Not ideal for sure but you get your own feed you can watch and set from you're own board. It also means a shorter cable run if you set yourself up slightly off stage or even onstage instead of relying on bar cabling and the quality of the output the mixing guy tosses you. PS: To anyone trying that... put a piece of felt or rubber or something in between the two mics at any point where the have physical contact with each other and tape them TIGHT together with each other. You don't want ANY grinding or vibration transfer going on because that will be picked up and recorded (and go through the PA). aaaand maybe consider making it so your recording mic is taped a little further down the PA mic so if the singer is a "mic swallower" the PA mic takes the hit. Not your recording mic.
post edited by Beepster - 2015/09/17 12:18:04
|
Bflat5
Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
- Total Posts : 421
- Joined: 2008/07/05 20:58:44
- Location: Memphis, Tn.
- Status: offline
Re: Live recording
2015/09/17 14:52:19
(permalink)
It shouldn't be too hard to get extra mics on a stage if they want the show recorded. The audio end of it a breeze compared to getting good video. The show I recorded, I kid you not, these 2 morons stood in front of the camera pointing out of a window directly behind me. Again, this isn't a small handy cam and these guys knew I was there and what I was doing. I think that kind of douchery will be the biggest problem with this thing.
|
Beepster
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 18001
- Joined: 2012/05/11 19:11:24
- Status: offline
Re: Live recording
2015/09/17 15:03:04
(permalink)
Bflat5 It shouldn't be too hard to get extra mics on a stage if they want the show recorded. The audio end of it a breeze compared to getting good video. The show I recorded, I kid you not, these 2 morons stood in front of the camera pointing out of a window directly behind me. Again, this isn't a small handy cam and these guys knew I was there and what I was doing. I think that kind of douchery will be the biggest problem with this thing.
And that right there is the WORST part of live video/audio recording. Drunken, clownph8ck douchenozzles who can in an instant destroy an otherwise epic documentation of artistry. You almost need bouncers to specifically keep the drunks away from the gear. A good respectful crowd though adds a lot to such recordings. Delicate balance.
|
Bflat5
Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
- Total Posts : 421
- Joined: 2008/07/05 20:58:44
- Location: Memphis, Tn.
- Status: offline
Re: Live recording
2015/09/17 18:26:11
(permalink)
Beepster
Bflat5 It shouldn't be too hard to get extra mics on a stage if they want the show recorded. The audio end of it a breeze compared to getting good video. The show I recorded, I kid you not, these 2 morons stood in front of the camera pointing out of a window directly behind me. Again, this isn't a small handy cam and these guys knew I was there and what I was doing. I think that kind of douchery will be the biggest problem with this thing.
And that right there is the WORST part of live video/audio recording. Drunken, clownph8ck douchenozzles who can in an instant destroy an otherwise epic documentation of artistry. You almost need bouncers to specifically keep the drunks away from the gear. A good respectful crowd though adds a lot to such recordings. Delicate balance.
Or how about the ones that want to apologize for it, but don't realize they're still screwing up by screaming how sorry they are for walking in front of the camera?
|
stxx
Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
- Total Posts : 406
- Joined: 2010/01/31 17:32:02
- Status: offline
Re: Live recording
2015/09/18 08:47:41
(permalink)
☄ Helpfulby Bflat5 2015/09/21 00:51:49
These days most boards have have usb recording including multitracks AND includes the stereo mixbus out. Just ask the sound guy in advance if he wouldn't mind capturing the tracks for you. Bring your external HD and load it up after the gig. For me, I like to take the multitracks and mix them and then line it up to the digital video which really is NOT hard. Here are a few examples. These tracks were captured from the Behringer X32 and video from a Zoom Q3 HD. https://youtu.be/fT_RwCjD-RA https://youtu.be/Z0ZjH9vi5EA https://youtu.be/g-DmceTyaH8 The fact is , as stated numerous times above, MOST stereo board mixes are useless due to the stage levels. I think mixing multitrack is WAY better but more work but the results are worthwhile for you and the client. NOTE!! Make sure you or the soundman include an overhead on the drums, even if they don;t put through the system Also, I didn't go crazy on any of these mixes and often you can do a set and forget to get a basic mix that works for everything and then focus on a few songs that the client might want to give extra attention to. Lastly, I mixed the audio in Sonar Platinum and did the video in Vegas 12. Not sure how well Sonar would have handled the whole sh-bang
post edited by stxx - 2015/09/18 09:03:04
Sonar Platinum, RME UFX, UAD 2, Waves, Soundtoys, Fronteir Alphatrack, X-Touch as Contl Srfc, , Console 1, Sweetwater Creation Station Quad Core Win 8.1, Mackie 824, KRK RP5, AKG 240 MKII, Samson C-Control, Sennheiser, Blue, AKG, RODE, UA, Grace, Focusrite, Audient, Midas, ART Song Portfolio: https://soundcloud.com/allen-lind/sets/oth-short
|
Bflat5
Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
- Total Posts : 421
- Joined: 2008/07/05 20:58:44
- Location: Memphis, Tn.
- Status: offline
Re: Live recording
2015/09/20 22:06:28
(permalink)
I didn't even think about USB outs. Could you connect the board to a laptop via USB and capture each track with Sonar? I'm a Vegas user as well, but haven't upgraded since 10. Is 12 worth the upgrade?
|
Cactus Music
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 8424
- Joined: 2004/02/09 21:34:04
- Status: offline
Re: Live recording
2015/09/21 00:35:37
(permalink)
☄ Helpfulby Bflat5 2015/09/21 00:51:43
The multi track USB option is rare unless they are using a high end digital mixer or a Behringer X32. USB recording on low end mixers of the type found in night clubs will be only a 2 track which is the same board mix as you get from the RCA type record outs only it's digital.
|
Rob[at]Sound-Rehab
Max Output Level: -47 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2819
- Joined: 2011/02/03 04:31:35
- Location: Sound-Rehab, Austria
- Status: offline
Re: Live recording
2015/09/21 02:02:39
(permalink)
There's a fairly good chance to have FOH using a X32 or likewise. These things sell like crazy ... if you are lucky and this guy got one, however, USB access to all channels is still not plug and play because you need to set up drivers, have a PC that can take up to 32 tracks for the entire show ... and just the channels may not be enough, because you don't have the room coming via the mixer, so you would have to set up a stereo pair of pretty decent microphones, probably right where the mix desk is (because that's where the FOH mixer's ears are) unless it's in a corner somewhere ... I don't think there is good chance for a proper recording unless you get to know venue, band and FOH before the show. If you can't do anything in advance, I'd go there with the stereo pair of pretty decent microphones and place them in the best sounding location which is save from audience interference and just record the stereo signal (mind you there will be a difference between empty club at soundcheck and later when the club is full)... and be nice to FOH so that he creates a great sound for the band and not just gets his job done ...
GOOD TUNES LAST FOREVER +++ Visit the Rehab +++ DAW: Platinum/X3e, win10 64 bit, i7-3930K (6x3.2GHz), Asus Sabertooth X79, 32 GB DDR3 1600MHz, ATI HD 5450, 120 GB SSD OCZ Agility3, 2x 1TB WD HDD SATA 600 Audio-Interface: 2x MOTU 1248 AVB, Focusrite OctoPre, (Roland Octa-Capture) Control-Surface: VS-700C VSTi: WAVES, NI K10u, FabFilter, IK, ... (too many really)
|
stxx
Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
- Total Posts : 406
- Joined: 2010/01/31 17:32:02
- Status: offline
Re: Live recording
2015/09/21 08:47:33
(permalink)
Whoever said USB out is rare is wrong. Almost every sound company now has a Behringer X 32 admitting mom and many people have smaller mixers that provide USP out now so I think the chances of finding somebody with USB out is probably about 60%. otherwise I agree just get some good front of the house Mike's and also the stereo from the board and between Those tracks you should be able to get a pretty decent live recording. The idea is you need to keep it simple or it will become a nightmare
post edited by stxx - 2015/09/21 08:58:05
Sonar Platinum, RME UFX, UAD 2, Waves, Soundtoys, Fronteir Alphatrack, X-Touch as Contl Srfc, , Console 1, Sweetwater Creation Station Quad Core Win 8.1, Mackie 824, KRK RP5, AKG 240 MKII, Samson C-Control, Sennheiser, Blue, AKG, RODE, UA, Grace, Focusrite, Audient, Midas, ART Song Portfolio: https://soundcloud.com/allen-lind/sets/oth-short
|
Noel Borthwick [Cakewalk]
Cakewalk Staff
- Total Posts : 6475
- Joined: 2003/11/03 17:22:50
- Location: Boston, MA, USA
- Status: offline
Re: Live recording
2015/09/21 08:48:20
(permalink)
Nice tips in this thread. I occasionally record live and its a challenge since there are lots of constraints. e.g I record a choir doing arrangements of some of my wife's music in a local church. While there they have decent reinforcement gear (I got them a pair of Line 6 L3T's - great for easy setup) there is very limited capability to record since I can't set up any intrusive wiring or mics being a church. So I normally just end up placing a couple of field recorders and cameras and hope for the best! Here is a YouTube video of a song from the most recent event. The recording is not great but it serves the purpose :) A zoom and Edirol R-09 on either side and a Gopro and Sony camera recording video. I did the entire mix in SONAR and video export (Vegas) in about 2 hours yesterday so its pretty rough. Definitely some phase issues but I didn't have time to fine tune. In SONAR I just fly in the audio tracks and typically use Ozone and prochannel for some tweaks. In this case I cut the bass on the choir mic's since I was getting plenty from the recorder closer to the band. Did some expansion and spatialization in Ozone and finally used the new Max style dial on the master. In Vegas I ended up adding in a small amount of camera audio from the one closed to the choir since it had a bit more definition of the highs.
post edited by Noel Borthwick [Cakewalk] - 2015/09/21 08:58:55
|
Rob[at]Sound-Rehab
Max Output Level: -47 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2819
- Joined: 2011/02/03 04:31:35
- Location: Sound-Rehab, Austria
- Status: offline
Re: Live recording
2015/09/21 09:35:59
(permalink)
Noel Borthwick [Cakewalk] ... placing a couple of field recorders and cameras and hope for the best...
That's a cool way of being non-intrusive. On a side note, phase correction IMHO is terribly important and makes a huge difference. "Channel Tools" makes it really simple and the Sonar video about drum production explains it in detail but it would be great if we could simply read the length of a mouse selection on a clip in terms of samples rather than having to split as explained in the video ... BTW, beware "Channel Tools" has a problem: on stereo channels with the link button engaged it does not change the sample rate for both sides ... so when adjusting you might not notice that you only changed one side of the stereo image (and in this way introduce something that sounds like panning but is actually a few samples time shift) ... on a drum kit recording you might notice that if your snare starts moving out of the center on your rooms mics (given that you placed mics for proper stereo image in the first place) ... Another tip for making phase correction easier: instead of looking for a transients in the recorded material, have the drummer play single snare and kick hits and record them for determining differences in sound wave travel times (that would also work for live environment i.e. record a bit of the sound check to easy later phase correction)
GOOD TUNES LAST FOREVER +++ Visit the Rehab +++ DAW: Platinum/X3e, win10 64 bit, i7-3930K (6x3.2GHz), Asus Sabertooth X79, 32 GB DDR3 1600MHz, ATI HD 5450, 120 GB SSD OCZ Agility3, 2x 1TB WD HDD SATA 600 Audio-Interface: 2x MOTU 1248 AVB, Focusrite OctoPre, (Roland Octa-Capture) Control-Surface: VS-700C VSTi: WAVES, NI K10u, FabFilter, IK, ... (too many really)
|