jimkleban
Max Output Level: -64 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1319
- Joined: 2008/11/09 09:42:45
- Status: offline
Looking for Multi I/O - Audio Interface for SONAR X1
So, I have an ECHO GINA 3G now and I think I finally outgrew its usefullness. When I was tracking in stereo or mono (one instrument at a time), this is a great little box. But, now, I want to track an instrument with multiple inputs (multiple mics and DI). I see that the LAYLA 3G has the specs to do what I need and I like the idea of the BOB (saving getting behind the PC to re cable connections). However, the LAYLA 3G is quite old and in this technology, unless it is VINTAGE, I feel that something bigger, better and less expensive has been released that will meet my needs. I would like to have both XLR and 1/4 inputs. I need more than 2 XLR inputs which I think the LAYLA is limited to. I have some external PREs that I patch using XLRs, I don't use a mixing desk and pretty much mix ITB and need this interface to transfer audio to and from the real world. Any suggestions would be appreciated. My budget isn't limitless but if there is some real value in spending bigger bucks, I am open to suggestions. I only need 24bit by 44.1Khz audio (for now) and don't need to record 16 tracks at a time but maybe 5-8 (with ambient mics). Thanks in advance, Jim
The Lamb Laid Down on MIDI www.lldom.com Studio Cat Custom i7 with Thunderbolt (wonderful system built and configured by our own Jim R) Apollo Duo (via TB) UAD Quad UAD Duo WIN 8.1 x64 with 32 GB Ram 4 SSD for programs and sample libraries Splat (latest version)
|
MarioD
Max Output Level: -72 dBFS
- Total Posts : 901
- Joined: 2006/04/15 15:59:50
- Status: offline
Re:Looking for Multi I/O - Audio Interface for SONAR X1
2011/07/31 09:44:38
(permalink)
I asked a very similar question a few months ago and many on the forums suggested Roland’s Octa-Capture. I bought one and I couldn’t be happier with my purchase. Eight ins and outs, S/PDIF and midi ins and outs, super mic preamps and super low latency. Check this one out.
|
Middleman
Max Output Level: -31.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4397
- Joined: 2003/12/04 00:58:50
- Location: Orange County, CA
- Status: offline
Re:Looking for Multi I/O - Audio Interface for SONAR X1
2011/07/31 12:26:00
(permalink)
|
jimkleban
Max Output Level: -64 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1319
- Joined: 2008/11/09 09:42:45
- Status: offline
Re:Looking for Multi I/O - Audio Interface for SONAR X1
2011/07/31 12:34:15
(permalink)
Middleman, My budget is unlimited but I obviously don't want to spend more than I need to. It all depends upon value. Jim
The Lamb Laid Down on MIDI www.lldom.com Studio Cat Custom i7 with Thunderbolt (wonderful system built and configured by our own Jim R) Apollo Duo (via TB) UAD Quad UAD Duo WIN 8.1 x64 with 32 GB Ram 4 SSD for programs and sample libraries Splat (latest version)
|
Middleman
Max Output Level: -31.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4397
- Joined: 2003/12/04 00:58:50
- Location: Orange County, CA
- Status: offline
Re:Looking for Multi I/O - Audio Interface for SONAR X1
2011/07/31 12:51:47
(permalink)
If you have the money and you want higher quality conversion I would direct you to the Lynx Aurora or the Black Lion converters. Cost will be in the $1800 to $2500 range.
|
Sidroe
Max Output Level: -55.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1954
- Joined: 2010/11/10 18:59:43
- Location: Macon,Georgia
- Status: offline
Re:Looking for Multi I/O - Audio Interface for SONAR X1
2011/07/31 12:59:15
(permalink)
I know you said you only needed 4-8 ins and output I have used a MOTU 24io for several years and it has worked like a champ. 24 tracks in,24 out, and the PCIe card allows you to expand to 96 tracks by just adding interfaces. Converters are not state of the art but the sound is great. Only beware, the ins and outs are TRS plugs. The only sync is word clock. It is a rock solid unit though.
|
Sidroe
Max Output Level: -55.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1954
- Joined: 2010/11/10 18:59:43
- Location: Macon,Georgia
- Status: offline
Re:Looking for Multi I/O - Audio Interface for SONAR X1
2011/07/31 13:01:30
(permalink)
Sorry, forgot to say, the inputs will take a regular 1/4 inch guitar plug. The high and low impedance is adjusted in the software for the card.
|
jimkleban
Max Output Level: -64 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1319
- Joined: 2008/11/09 09:42:45
- Status: offline
Re:Looking for Multi I/O - Audio Interface for SONAR X1
2011/07/31 13:02:16
(permalink)
Middleman, What makes the converters more HQ on the Lynz models versus the Octa Capture? Just curious. Thanks, Jim
The Lamb Laid Down on MIDI www.lldom.com Studio Cat Custom i7 with Thunderbolt (wonderful system built and configured by our own Jim R) Apollo Duo (via TB) UAD Quad UAD Duo WIN 8.1 x64 with 32 GB Ram 4 SSD for programs and sample libraries Splat (latest version)
|
Lanceindastudio
Max Output Level: -29 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4604
- Joined: 2004/01/22 02:28:30
- Status: offline
Re:Looking for Multi I/O - Audio Interface for SONAR X1
2011/07/31 13:05:10
(permalink)
The Layla is a great piece of gear. The only thing I would worry about is if you are going to update toa new computer in which it does not have PCI slots for the Layla. The sound and technology of the Layla is still very very good, as well as low latency performance. Lance
Asus P8Z77-V LE PLUS Motherboard i7 3770k CPU 32 gigs RAM Presonus AudioBox iTwo Windows 10 64 bit, SONAR PLATINUM 64 bit Lots of plugins and softsynths and one shot samples, loops Gauge ECM-87, MCA SP-1, Alesis AM51 Presonus Eureka Mackie HR824's and matching subwoofer
|
Middleman
Max Output Level: -31.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4397
- Joined: 2003/12/04 00:58:50
- Location: Orange County, CA
- Status: offline
Re:Looking for Multi I/O - Audio Interface for SONAR X1
2011/07/31 13:35:36
(permalink)
jkleban Middleman, What makes the converters more HQ on the Lynz models versus the Octa Capture? Just curious. Thanks, Jim The audio circuit on the input and output side.
|
jimkleban
Max Output Level: -64 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1319
- Joined: 2008/11/09 09:42:45
- Status: offline
Re:Looking for Multi I/O - Audio Interface for SONAR X1
2011/07/31 14:22:03
(permalink)
MM... I know that theorically that would make them better but I was wondering what are the real deal specs? Is the BETTER an opinion or is there some logic that makes them better (components, design, etc)? Thanks, Jim
The Lamb Laid Down on MIDI www.lldom.com Studio Cat Custom i7 with Thunderbolt (wonderful system built and configured by our own Jim R) Apollo Duo (via TB) UAD Quad UAD Duo WIN 8.1 x64 with 32 GB Ram 4 SSD for programs and sample libraries Splat (latest version)
|
Middleman
Max Output Level: -31.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4397
- Joined: 2003/12/04 00:58:50
- Location: Orange County, CA
- Status: offline
Re:Looking for Multi I/O - Audio Interface for SONAR X1
2011/07/31 16:48:24
(permalink)
If you have unlimited budget, I offered up some of the best sounding examples of converters available. The only way you will be convinced is if you hear them side by side and I have participated in many converter shoot outs to come to my own conclusions. The" better" is my opinion from having heard many different low end versus high products. In some cases the actual converters may be the same but that is irrelevant to the audio quality and results. Design, yes, the design is better because there is more circuitry to capture the sound accurately and reproduce it accurately. The actual converters in a lot of devices are similar, it's the audio filters and transient response which is captured that separates the great from the average. This happens in the audio capture stage prior to digital conversion and also in rebuilding the image on the output side coming out of the digital realm. This is why the Roland won't come remotely close to the higher end products. Perhaps you should rephrase the question as to what is the best trade off in converters i.e. good price, good results. I would probably say the RME, Motu but, if you are going for competitive quality, then Lynx or Black Lion. There are others too but they run in the $3000 range and up. By the way, the Black Lion converters can be heard on the Paper Airplane album with Alison Krauss and Union Station. They may be the apex of digital conversion available today.
post edited by Middleman - 2011/07/31 16:51:58
|
AT
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 10654
- Joined: 2004/01/09 10:42:46
- Location: TeXaS
- Status: offline
Re:Looking for Multi I/O - Audio Interface for SONAR X1
2011/07/31 18:34:32
(permalink)
Jim, the difference is real but small. Many pros use the Lynx for major releases - Goldfrappe is the first that comes to mind. There are more expensive converters, but you are really paying out the wazoo for those. Nothing wrong with the lower cost converters these days - the Octa capture, the stienberg/yama 8x8, TC Konnekt, RME. They will all do the job and I bet there are plenty of pro engineers that would be hard pressed to pick it out and your average garden variety listener wouldn't hear any difference, much less pick out the better. Everybody uses the same converter chips - there are only a couple of companies to choose from. it is the electronics and clock around the chips that make the difference. Just like preamp debates, the differences are small but important. Two really nice things about going ahead and getting high-end stuff is 1). you won't be tempted to upgrade your mid-level gear and 2) there is confidence associated with the better stuff, in that you'll say "it must be me, not the equipment." You dont' worry yourself sick trying to get the last 5% of performance out of you cheaper stuff since the better equipment thrives there. If I was in your position I'd get the lynx and not have to worry about it. The 8x8 unit is $2000 and they have a new usb card you can slide in for a couple hundred more. Or ADAT Card. Or FW (which I've heard is kina balky, tho the newer USB is supposed to work well). Or AES pcie slot for your computer. It is a very flexible, upgradable system. Note, you'll have to get external preamps, which ain't cost effective but allows you to get what ever quality you want. The newest RME piece is supposed to have great specs and RME is known for their drivers. A solid bet, tho I'd check the reviews for it. It would be about the same. A step up is the Prism Orpheus at $4500. Mastering grade quality conversion, FW and 4 great preamps. Any of those can take you to pro levels. Of course, a pro could get excellent results using one of the sub -$1000 units, too. Like everything, it is a trade off. But more money = less work to get there.
https://soundcloud.com/a-pleasure-dome http://www.bnoir-film.com/ there came forth little children out of the city, and mocked him, and said unto him, Go up, thou bald head; go up, thou bald head. 24 And he turned back, and looked on them, and cursed them in the name of the Lord. And there came forth two she bears out of the wood, and tare forty and two children of them.
|
DroopyPawn
Max Output Level: -77 dBFS
- Total Posts : 665
- Joined: 2004/04/19 23:55:04
- Location: Fox, OK
- Status: offline
Re:Looking for Multi I/O - Audio Interface for SONAR X1
2011/07/31 18:58:12
(permalink)
|
Middleman
Max Output Level: -31.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4397
- Joined: 2003/12/04 00:58:50
- Location: Orange County, CA
- Status: offline
Re:Looking for Multi I/O - Audio Interface for SONAR X1
2011/07/31 19:00:24
(permalink)
AT 2) there is confidence associated with the better stuff, in that you'll say "it must be me, not the equipment." I used this analogy when I was buying golf clubs and indeed, it was the player not the gear that was the problem.
|
jimkleban
Max Output Level: -64 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1319
- Joined: 2008/11/09 09:42:45
- Status: offline
Re:Looking for Multi I/O - Audio Interface for SONAR X1
2011/07/31 19:12:29
(permalink)
I appreciate the feedback and information here. I have already started my research and am going to take a bit of time on this one. One thing I do know that happens is that when you upgrade audio quality somewhere in your chain, it winds up exposing another deficiency in your chain. I think they call they GEAR LUST. So, I am going to sample my Hammond T organ with 3 mic's on the leslie (2 on the top ROTOR in stereo and 1 on the bottom rotor in mono) and then also sample the organ notes DI'ed. I have made a few sample libraries in the past but all of them only required DI's, so it was relatively easy compared to sampling with MICs. I have a real good PRE AMP for the LOW END (UA 6176) that has a built in 1176 COMP and want something decent for the stereo pair mic's that I plan on using on not only the hammond but some acoustic guitars (6 and 12 string models). I am hoping that the PRE's in the AUDIO CARD will sound great so I don't need dedicated PRE AMPs for those as well. I think I will be OK because there isn't a lot of SPL in the upper ranges or acoustic instruments, but we shall see. Keep the options coming and whomever recommends the eventual winner for me can get the Hammond sample set for FREE when they are completed. Thanks, Jim
The Lamb Laid Down on MIDI www.lldom.com Studio Cat Custom i7 with Thunderbolt (wonderful system built and configured by our own Jim R) Apollo Duo (via TB) UAD Quad UAD Duo WIN 8.1 x64 with 32 GB Ram 4 SSD for programs and sample libraries Splat (latest version)
|
jimkleban
Max Output Level: -64 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1319
- Joined: 2008/11/09 09:42:45
- Status: offline
Re:Looking for Multi I/O - Audio Interface for SONAR X1
2011/07/31 20:06:25
(permalink)
Middleman.. I wasn't doubting your recommendation when I asked: What makes the converters more HQ on the Lynz models versus the Octa Capture? Just looking for more information. I do know that I like the idea of having at least 8 XLR pre-amps and the audio circuits in one unit if there is anything out there that can do this. I liked the AURORA 8 but it looks like I have to purchase a PCIe card for the I/Os.. sort of like a TAIL coming out the back of the PC. I used to have the SCOPE stuff and that was a real PITA... but, if the lynx is that much better than the competition, I guess it's the price of admission... I am really confused here on what to get. What are the big players names in the audio game: RME ROLAND Sonicore Lynx M-Audio Echo any others that I could investigate? Thanks, Jim
The Lamb Laid Down on MIDI www.lldom.com Studio Cat Custom i7 with Thunderbolt (wonderful system built and configured by our own Jim R) Apollo Duo (via TB) UAD Quad UAD Duo WIN 8.1 x64 with 32 GB Ram 4 SSD for programs and sample libraries Splat (latest version)
|
Jesse G
Max Output Level: -32.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4282
- Joined: 2004/04/14 01:43:43
- Status: offline
Re:Looking for Multi I/O - Audio Interface for SONAR X1
2011/07/31 20:39:14
(permalink)
Peace,Jesse G. A fisher of men <>< ==============================Cakewalk and I are going places together! Cakewalk By Bandlab, Windows 10 Pro- 64 bit, Gigabyte GA-Z97X-SLI, Intel Core i5-4460 Haswell Processor, Crucial Ballistix 32 GB Ram, PNY GeForce GTX 750, Roland Octa-Capture, Mackie Big Knob, Mackie Universal Controller (MCU), KRK V4's, KRK Rockit 6, Korg TR-61 Workstation, M-Audio Code 49 MIDI keyboard controller.[/
|
jimkleban
Max Output Level: -64 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1319
- Joined: 2008/11/09 09:42:45
- Status: offline
Re:Looking for Multi I/O - Audio Interface for SONAR X1
2011/07/31 20:43:36
(permalink)
Jesse, I have to admit that the convenience of the Octa-Capture is interesting. Old Craig though has been known to be biased toward CAKEWALK over the years (now a Roland stable occupant). But I will read his review with an open mind. I guess the issue is going to be QUALITY for me since it seems that the more expensive units may be "you get what you pay for" on the audio side. Thanks, Jim
The Lamb Laid Down on MIDI www.lldom.com Studio Cat Custom i7 with Thunderbolt (wonderful system built and configured by our own Jim R) Apollo Duo (via TB) UAD Quad UAD Duo WIN 8.1 x64 with 32 GB Ram 4 SSD for programs and sample libraries Splat (latest version)
|
Jesse G
Max Output Level: -32.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4282
- Joined: 2004/04/14 01:43:43
- Status: offline
Re:Looking for Multi I/O - Audio Interface for SONAR X1
2011/07/31 21:00:58
(permalink)
jkleban, I too had the same opinion about Craig's loyalty to Cakewalk and the Roland family. Especially after the release of X1 and nothing explaining the lack of product quality was mentioned at a time when the entire Sonar community was in an uproar. But when I tested the Octa- Capture, he restored my faith in quality reviews by releasing his review of the OC and I discovered that it was a quality piece for the price being offered. Again, I love using it. Peace
Peace,Jesse G. A fisher of men <>< ==============================Cakewalk and I are going places together! Cakewalk By Bandlab, Windows 10 Pro- 64 bit, Gigabyte GA-Z97X-SLI, Intel Core i5-4460 Haswell Processor, Crucial Ballistix 32 GB Ram, PNY GeForce GTX 750, Roland Octa-Capture, Mackie Big Knob, Mackie Universal Controller (MCU), KRK V4's, KRK Rockit 6, Korg TR-61 Workstation, M-Audio Code 49 MIDI keyboard controller.[/
|
Middleman
Max Output Level: -31.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4397
- Joined: 2003/12/04 00:58:50
- Location: Orange County, CA
- Status: offline
Re:Looking for Multi I/O - Audio Interface for SONAR X1
2011/07/31 21:24:11
(permalink)
jkleban, you should doubt my reccomendation.....everyone's for that matter. When it comes to gear, trust but verify. With the Lynx Aurora, yes, you are going to need to get an interface card. There is one on ebay now for $260. I went the cheap route to get to eight channels which was to buy used, two of the Lynx Two A cards, each has 4 in-out. I got into 8 channels of Lynx for $1200 this way. These are older designs but still top end conversion that a lot of mastering houses use. The Aurora is the company's current model both 8 and 16 channels. The challenge with all convertors, even the top ones, is that they produce a sound which is far removed from the analog sound that so many people desire. That was the idea behind the Black Lion line, to create a more analog sounding device. I really would like to step up to those someday. The Lynx are used quite regularly today in rock, hip hop, electronica music, metal. A lot of the Protools crowd are starting to use them in commercial music.
|
jimkleban
Max Output Level: -64 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1319
- Joined: 2008/11/09 09:42:45
- Status: offline
Re:Looking for Multi I/O - Audio Interface for SONAR X1
2011/07/31 21:29:52
(permalink)
Middleman, Thanks and I understand. I see that you have some AT mics... have you checked out the 4047 yet? Pretty good mic for under $1K. jim
The Lamb Laid Down on MIDI www.lldom.com Studio Cat Custom i7 with Thunderbolt (wonderful system built and configured by our own Jim R) Apollo Duo (via TB) UAD Quad UAD Duo WIN 8.1 x64 with 32 GB Ram 4 SSD for programs and sample libraries Splat (latest version)
|
Middleman
Max Output Level: -31.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4397
- Joined: 2003/12/04 00:58:50
- Location: Orange County, CA
- Status: offline
Re:Looking for Multi I/O - Audio Interface for SONAR X1
2011/07/31 21:47:51
(permalink)
I have checked out the AT 4047, had it for a day and it is great mic for a tenor male or female vocal. Unfortunately it didn't work so great on my vocal which is baritone and I went another route which was the Neumann TLM49. Finding a good personal mic is such a pain i.e. buying then selling them off if they don't work. The keepers for me have been the Neumann which has a great top end but a little light on the low end for which a Pultec plugin goes on vocal tracks to thicken them up. The SM7 is just a great mic for rock or louder voices, a little grainy on the top end but it's a great all around sound (also a great guitar mic). The Oktavas sound amazing using 3:1 spaced pair on acoustic guitar and the 4033/4050 are really great for mid-side recording. The 57, well everyone should have at least one for guitars and snare. Sorry to get off on mics but I just came through a heavy experimental stage on numerous microphones and mic techniques and thought I would share. Good luck with finding some convertors.
|
jimkleban
Max Output Level: -64 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1319
- Joined: 2008/11/09 09:42:45
- Status: offline
Re:Looking for Multi I/O - Audio Interface for SONAR X1
2011/07/31 22:13:13
(permalink)
Good mic Middleman (that neumann). I was looking like something that sounded like a 67 (which are insanely expensive to buy and almost as much to maintain. I wasn't looking for clone but something that had high SPL (for Bass guitar, Kick or the bottom Rotor of a Leslie. But like you said, choosing your Mic stable is a personal thing. I like the old vintage sound (the added distortion) on my tracks. The UAD2 stuff helps but we know there are some things that can't be fixed in the mix. Jim
The Lamb Laid Down on MIDI www.lldom.com Studio Cat Custom i7 with Thunderbolt (wonderful system built and configured by our own Jim R) Apollo Duo (via TB) UAD Quad UAD Duo WIN 8.1 x64 with 32 GB Ram 4 SSD for programs and sample libraries Splat (latest version)
|
Middleman
Max Output Level: -31.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4397
- Joined: 2003/12/04 00:58:50
- Location: Orange County, CA
- Status: offline
Re:Looking for Multi I/O - Audio Interface for SONAR X1
2011/07/31 22:41:53
(permalink)
|
scottfa
Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
- Total Posts : 453
- Joined: 2005/04/23 06:25:47
- Status: offline
Re:Looking for Multi I/O - Audio Interface for SONAR X1
2011/08/01 08:12:49
(permalink)
Since you have the Gina 3G you could get an ADAT mic pre and have 8 more inputs. Actually, Echo makes a very nice one - Audiofire Pre 8. I use the Layla 3G with a Mackie 800R. It is not the pres that are holding me back :) I was/am very interested in the RME Babyface. While only 4 inputs I would check it out. Lots of great features like headphone amps etc., it has ADAT as well. Since it is USB 2.0, you could do field recordings. RME drivers are considered some of the best, and their USB interfaces are getting rave reviews. If I had to start over, I would probably get a Babyface and an Echo PRE8. By the way, echo support is superb.
Intel I7 2600K (OCed to 4.0) Gigabyte Ga-Z68X-UD3H-B3 16G Corsair 1600 Memory 4 sticks 1 SSD, 1WD 650 SATA and 1 Samsung 1G SATA Steinberg MR816X Mackie R800 Adat to the Steinberg Windows 10 64 bit Sonar Platinum Lifetime UAD-2 Solo
|
jimkleban
Max Output Level: -64 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1319
- Joined: 2008/11/09 09:42:45
- Status: offline
Re:Looking for Multi I/O - Audio Interface for SONAR X1
2011/08/01 10:41:52
(permalink)
Scott, Does the Audiofire Pre 8 need firewire? Jim
The Lamb Laid Down on MIDI www.lldom.com Studio Cat Custom i7 with Thunderbolt (wonderful system built and configured by our own Jim R) Apollo Duo (via TB) UAD Quad UAD Duo WIN 8.1 x64 with 32 GB Ram 4 SSD for programs and sample libraries Splat (latest version)
|
karma1959
Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
- Total Posts : 515
- Joined: 2008/10/31 10:56:29
- Location: Brooklyn, NY
- Status: offline
Re:Looking for Multi I/O - Audio Interface for SONAR X1
2011/08/01 11:24:22
(permalink)
I recently upgraded my interface to the RME UFX and would recommend it. Tons of I/O, USB and Firewire connectivity, very good drivers, Mic Pres and converters. It's not the most inexpensive interface on the market, but is a step up from many of the prosumer interfaces in my opinion.
|
scottfa
Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
- Total Posts : 453
- Joined: 2005/04/23 06:25:47
- Status: offline
Re:Looking for Multi I/O - Audio Interface for SONAR X1
2011/08/01 13:09:22
(permalink)
Hi: I asked Echo that several months ago and I seem to remember that you needed to hook it up once via Firewire to set up some things, but not after that. Seems like you could just keep it using Firewire, but having one interface for two units works pretty well under ADAT. jkleban Scott, Does the Audiofire Pre 8 need firewire? Jim
Intel I7 2600K (OCed to 4.0) Gigabyte Ga-Z68X-UD3H-B3 16G Corsair 1600 Memory 4 sticks 1 SSD, 1WD 650 SATA and 1 Samsung 1G SATA Steinberg MR816X Mackie R800 Adat to the Steinberg Windows 10 64 bit Sonar Platinum Lifetime UAD-2 Solo
|
jimkleban
Max Output Level: -64 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1319
- Joined: 2008/11/09 09:42:45
- Status: offline
Re:Looking for Multi I/O - Audio Interface for SONAR X1
2011/08/01 17:48:21
(permalink)
Great news Scott... There sure are a lot of options out there that all seem can do the job for me. Lotsa homework to do yet. Thanks, Jim
The Lamb Laid Down on MIDI www.lldom.com Studio Cat Custom i7 with Thunderbolt (wonderful system built and configured by our own Jim R) Apollo Duo (via TB) UAD Quad UAD Duo WIN 8.1 x64 with 32 GB Ram 4 SSD for programs and sample libraries Splat (latest version)
|