Helpful ReplyLoyalty to Cakewalk

Page: 1234 > Showing page 1 of 4
Author
GTex62
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 17
  • Joined: 2010/05/25 06:16:06
  • Location: Memphis, TN
  • Status: offline
2013/11/05 12:00:32 (permalink)

Loyalty to Cakewalk

Just wondered how long people have been using Cakewalk?
 
I started with Cakewalk v1.0 on a 5.25" floppy disk in 1987; although the company was called Twelve Tone Systems.  
 
DOS, IBM XT with dual 5.25" floppy drives.  All song names had to be 8 characters or less.  At least the filename of the song.  MT-32, Roland D-50, and record out to a cassette deck.  Magic!
 
Later I wrote a DRM for the JD-990 and Cakewalk sent me a hat and a shirt and put my DRM into a DRM text file.  The advancements have been incredible over the years.  Thanks to Greg and crew!
 
OK, back to work.  

Win 10, i7-64-bit, 32Gb Ram, 12Tb NAS, dual 27" monitors, MOTU 896mk3, MOTU MTP AV, UAD-2 Octo, Roland A-88, Roland A-49, Roland VG-99, Torpedo Studio, Komplete, Spectrasonics, E/W, etc.
 
#1
DeeringAmps
Max Output Level: -49 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2614
  • Joined: 2005/10/03 10:29:25
  • Location: Seattle area
  • Status: offline
Re: Loyalty to Cakewalk 2013/11/05 12:03:57 (permalink)
Cakewalk Pro 3.0 Win 3.1 cust #A0050 in those days.
 
Now FIX LOOP & PUNCH-IN FOR CHRIS SAKE
 
T

Tom Deering
Tascam FW-1884 User Resources Page
Firewire "Legacy" Tutorial, Service Manual, Schematic, and Service Bulletins

Win10x64
StudioCat Pro Studio Coffee Lake 8086k 32gb RAM

RME UFX (Audio)
Tascam FW-1884 (Control) in Win 10x64 Pro
#2
brundlefly
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 14250
  • Joined: 2007/09/14 14:57:59
  • Location: Manitou Spgs, Colorado
  • Status: offline
Re: Loyalty to Cakewalk 2013/11/05 12:21:42 (permalink)
GTex62
I started with Cakewalk v1.0 on a 5.25" floppy disk in 1987; although the company was called Twelve Tone Systems.  
 
DOS, IBM XT with dual 5.25" floppy drives.  All song names had to be 8 characters or less.  At least the filename of the song.  MT-32, Roland D-50, and record out to a cassette deck.  Magic!
 



2.0a in 1988 bundled with an MPU-401 MIDI interface, Roland RD-300s and D-110. 

SONAR Platinum x64, 2x MOTU 2408/PCIe-424  (24-bit, 48kHz)
Win10, I7-6700K @ 4.0GHz, 24GB DDR4, 2TB HDD, 32GB SSD Cache, GeForce GTX 750Ti, 2x 24" 16:10 IPS Monitors
#3
markyzno
Max Output Level: -66 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1216
  • Joined: 2011/02/08 06:40:20
  • Location: UK
  • Status: offline
Re: Loyalty to Cakewalk 2013/11/05 12:56:44 (permalink)
2.0 here as well.

Sonar Platinum 64 bit > Pro tools 10.3.2 >Intel i7 3770K > 16Gb Ram > Gigabyte Z77-D3H Motherboard> NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 2 GB > ATi RADEON HD5700 > 240GB OCZ Agility 3 SSD> Win 10 home 64 bit> Delta 1010 > MOTU Audio Express > MA-15D's > NI Ultimate 9 > NI Kontrol S61 1.1 > NI MAschine Studio 2.3 / KORG MS-20 Mini - Arturia MicroBrute > KORG SQ1 - KORG Kaoss Pad KP3 > iPad and IO Dock 2 running various bits > Bunch of guitars >

Sound Design on IMDB --
 
#4
Gary McCoy
Max Output Level: -86 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 215
  • Joined: 2006/05/08 11:24:36
  • Status: offline
Re: Loyalty to Cakewalk 2013/11/05 13:03:06 (permalink)
I don't remember the year...late 80's.  It was then Twelve Tone Systems, and did not record audio at all.  It was a midi sequencer.  For audio, I used SAW Studio until Cakewalk offered the audio feature.
#5
beltrom
Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 306
  • Joined: 2005/08/18 12:45:20
  • Status: offline
Re: Loyalty to Cakewalk 2013/11/05 13:05:42 (permalink)
GTex62
Just wondered how long people have been using Cakewalk?
 
I started with Cakewalk v1.0 on a 5.25" floppy disk in 1987; although the company was called Twelve Tone Systems.  
 
DOS, IBM XT with dual 5.25" floppy drives.  All song names had to be 8 characters or less.  At least the filename of the song.  MT-32, Roland D-50, and record out to a cassette deck.  Magic!
 



Wow V1.0! I bow deeply!
I was right behind with V2.0 on an XT equipped with a Roland MPU-IPC. Also had the Mt32 but used an Alpha Juno for keys. Teac Tascam 244 for getting some guitars and vocals down as well.  Actually still have it all except the XT, it might be hard to find the MPU but it's around here somewhere.
#6
Beagle
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 50621
  • Joined: 2006/03/29 11:03:12
  • Location: Fort Worth, TX
  • Status: offline
Re: Loyalty to Cakewalk 2013/11/05 13:07:03 (permalink)
Sonar 4.
 
But it stopped with X2.  I'm not interested in a product distributed by Tascam.

http://soundcloud.com/beaglesound/sets/featured-songs-1
i7, 16G DDR3, Win10x64, MOTU Ultralite Hybrid MK3
Yamaha MOXF6, Hammond XK3c, other stuff.
#7
bluzdog
Max Output Level: -56 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1928
  • Joined: 2007/10/06 17:15:14
  • Location: Lakewood, Colorado
  • Status: offline
Re: Loyalty to Cakewalk 2013/11/05 13:17:12 (permalink)
Sonar 1
 
Rocky
#8
jsg
Max Output Level: -69 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1079
  • Joined: 2003/11/20 04:54:18
  • Location: San Francisco, California
  • Status: offline
Re: Loyalty to Cakewalk 2013/11/05 13:20:02 (permalink) ☄ Helpfulby 12Kevin 2013/11/06 20:38:32
I started using Cakewalk for DOS around 1991.  I am one of the first composers in the U.S. to score an entire animated TV series (The Adventures of Gumby) using only MIDI instruments.  At that time, I was using a hardware sequencer called the Yamaha QX-3. 
 
I was scoring computer games when I first started using Cakewalk for DOS.   in 1995 I decided to take a break from soundtrack work (scoring over 100 soundtracks) and focus on CD production.  So far, I've created and produced 3 concertos, 8 symphonies, lots of short works--12 albums using Cakewalk/Sonar.
 
When X1 was released I almost bailed on Cakewalk.  It was the most ridiculous software release I'd ever seen, bugs everywhere.   I began looking closely at Cubase and Digital Performer for Windows.  But by X2d, Cakewalk was moving forward and I am now again satisfied that Sonar is the best DAW for my purposes.  X3c is great, as far as DAWs are concerned Sonar has:
 
1.  The best event list around (color coding of types of events is very helpful), DP's event list is tiny and
     cumbersome, both DP and Cubase's event lists don't allow color coding
2.  The most flexible windows management of any DAW (being able to open and lock multiple windows of the
      same type is a great feature other DAWS don't have)
3.  The most logical user interface (subjective, of course)
4.  The best built-in MIDI instrument library management
     a.  The ability to rename MIDI controllers is a great feature, DP and Cubase don't have this
     b.  Creating custom patch lists is easy
5.  Stability in terms of audio recording and editing, MIDI recording and editing and VSTs
 
I'm not sure "loyalty" is the right term.  I use what serves my purposes, for me it's not a question of "loyalty" or "disloyalty", it's a question of what is practical. 
 
JG
http://www.jerrygerber.com
 
post edited by jsg - 2013/11/05 14:54:05
#9
Bristol_Jonesey
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 16775
  • Joined: 2007/10/08 15:41:17
  • Location: Bristol, UK
  • Status: offline
Re: Loyalty to Cakewalk 2013/11/05 13:23:40 (permalink)
Relative newbie here
 
I started with Sonar 6PE back in September 2007

CbB, Platinum, 64 bit throughout
Custom built i7 3930, 32Gb RAM, 2 x 1Tb Internal HDD, 1 x 1TB system SSD (Win 7), 1 x 500Gb system SSD (Win 10), 2 x 1Tb External HDD's, Dual boot Win 7 & Win 10 64 Bit, Saffire Pro 26, ISA One, Adam P11A,
#10
Grem
Max Output Level: -19.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5562
  • Joined: 2005/06/28 09:26:32
  • Location: Baton Rouge Area
  • Status: offline
Re: Loyalty to Cakewalk 2013/11/05 13:31:04 (permalink)
1996 - Professional 6 with free upgrade to 7 when it came out. Win95 (what a nightmare!) Ensoniq sound card.

Upgraded to Turtle Beach Pinnacle 20bit sound card about a year later.

Coming from two trk reel to reels, and four trk Vestax cassette recorder, I never looked back.

Grem

Michael
 
Music PC
i7 2600K; 64gb Ram; 3 256gb SSD, System, Samples, Audio; 1TB & 2TB Project Storage; 2TB system BkUp; RME FireFace 400; Win 10 Pro 64; CWbBL 64, 
Home PC
AMD FX 6300; 8gb Ram; 256 SSD sys; 2TB audio/samples; Realtek WASAPI; Win 10 Home 64; CWbBL 64 
Surface Pro 3
Win 10  i7 8gb RAM; CWbBL 64
#11
vintagevibe
Max Output Level: -51 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2446
  • Joined: 2003/12/15 21:45:06
  • Location: Atlanta, Ga
  • Status: offline
Re: Loyalty to Cakewalk 2013/11/05 13:57:16 (permalink)
Vesion 3.0 for Windows 3.1.  2013 is the year I finally moved on to another DAW.
#12
jb101
Max Output Level: -46 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2946
  • Joined: 2011/12/04 05:26:10
  • Status: offline
Re: Loyalty to Cakewalk 2013/11/05 14:04:44 (permalink)
Another newbie here.  Sonar Power Studio 660 (I think) - basically Sonar 6 Studio with a Cakewalk version of the FA-66 firewire interface.
 
Before that it was tape, and various hardware sequencers (e.g. Roland MC-500, MC-50), and Sequencer One(?) on the Amiga.
post edited by jb101 - 2013/11/05 14:17:40

 Sonar Platinum
#13
Lynn
Max Output Level: -14 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 6117
  • Joined: 2003/11/12 18:36:16
  • Location: Kansas City, MO
  • Status: offline
Re: Loyalty to Cakewalk 2013/11/05 14:06:36 (permalink)
I started in 1998 with Pro Audio 6, a Gina card from Echo for audio, and a Soundblaster card for MIDI.

All the best,
Lynn

my songs
www.soundclick.com/lynnwilson

www.youtube.com/lywilson
my videos

Cakewalk by Bandlab| Sonar Platinum @ 64bits| i7 860 | 8 gigs ram | W10 @ 64 bits | RME FF 400
#14
dantarbill
Max Output Level: -57 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1820
  • Joined: 2004/12/15 10:48:18
  • Location: Monrovia, CA
  • Status: offline
Re: Loyalty to Cakewalk 2013/11/05 14:29:07 (permalink)
GTex62
...Cakewalk v1.0 on a 5.25" floppy disk...
 



I'm a bit behind you.  I started with version 1.1d.  The next version (2.0) came on a 3.5" floppy.

Dan Tarbill
#15
Danny Danzi
Moderator
  • Total Posts : 5810
  • Joined: 2006/10/05 13:42:39
  • Location: DanziLand, NJ
  • Status: offline
Re: Loyalty to Cakewalk 2013/11/05 14:42:54 (permalink)
Man, some real old timers here. Cake v 4.0 here....3.5 floppy. I still have them here. I thought for sure I started at 3.0, but can't seem to find the floppies. Whenever it was, Cake was in Best Buy. I saw it, it looked cool and I tried it. Quite a change from 1 inch and 2 inch tape...which is what I was using at the time. Whew, what a ride it's been. Though there are loads of things that annoy me about computer recording, most of that stems from things I'd never be able to do with my tape machines. There are more things that DO NOT annoy me though...so even though I have both of my tape machines still, I don't miss them for a second.
 
-Danny

My Site
Fractal Audio Endorsed Artist & Beta Tester
#16
spacey
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 8769
  • Joined: 2004/05/03 18:53:44
  • Status: offline
Re: Loyalty to Cakewalk 2013/11/05 14:46:57 (permalink)
I started with Cake back in...a long time ago and still
trying to learn how to record...and nothing about it is credited to loyalty.
It's been about "hope".
Now I'm hoping X3c and my computer will last long enough before everything
changes again to let me record a few tunes...that will pobably suck.
Well...at least my computer skills are getting better. Maybe I should be like FBB and
record that. ;)
#17
pagec
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 79
  • Joined: 2009/09/02 11:22:50
  • Status: offline
Re: Loyalty to Cakewalk 2013/11/05 14:54:16 (permalink)
A' Cakewalk' slot machine on Canvey Island (UK) caravan park amusements hall in 1964. Beat that.....still analogue !!!!
#18
musicroom
Max Output Level: -51 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2421
  • Joined: 2004/04/26 22:31:02
  • Status: offline
Re: Loyalty to Cakewalk 2013/11/05 14:56:37 (permalink)
Sonar 3 after the abandonment of logic pc. How could they do that to me? I'm over it really, mostly.  :) Actually really enjoy Sonar. It's always performed above and beyond for my needs.

 
Dave
Songs
___________________________________
Desktop: Platinum / RME Multiface II / Purrfect Audio DAW  I7-3770 / 16 GB RAM / Win 10 Pro / Remote Laptop i7 6500U / 12GB RAM /  RME Babyface



 
 
#19
mgh
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 8594
  • Joined: 2007/05/10 05:15:56
  • Location: betwixt and between
  • Status: offline
Re: Loyalty to Cakewalk 2013/11/05 15:07:18 (permalink)
pagec
A' Cakewalk' slot machine on Canvey Island (UK) caravan park amusements hall in 1964. Beat that.....still analogue !!!!


wow - people went to Canvey for amusement?!
(btw i'm near Southend)

Memorare debut album 'Philistine' available now http://blackwoodproductio...philistine-digipack-cd
#20
backwoods
Max Output Level: -49.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2571
  • Joined: 2011/03/23 17:24:50
  • Location: South Pacific
  • Status: offline
Re: Loyalty to Cakewalk 2013/11/05 15:07:48 (permalink)
I'm a relative newcomer also.
 
First used LE that came bundled with UA-101. Then bought P5. Then upgraded to the Producer Suite- Sonar 7, P5v2, Rapture, Dim Pro.

 
#21
RogerH
Max Output Level: -78 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 608
  • Joined: 2007/09/10 17:50:07
  • Location: Norway
  • Status: offline
Re: Loyalty to Cakewalk 2013/11/05 15:09:08 (permalink)
Another newbie : Sonar 6

A song from my band: Terramater 
My soundcloud page
Sonar Platinum
Windows 7 Professional (SP1) 64Bit
Intel Core i7 Quad Processor i7-2600K 3,4GHz
MSI P67A-C45 (MOBO)
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600MHz 8GB CL9 (2x4GB)
Seagate Barracuda® 7200.12 1TB
Seagate Barracuda® XT 2TB
[font="arial, sans-se
#22
pdarg
Max Output Level: -52.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2265
  • Joined: 2004/03/26 17:52:53
  • Status: offline
Re: Loyalty to Cakewalk 2013/11/05 15:09:32 (permalink)
A user since '94 - version 2 - on 3.5 disks.
#23
Skyline_UK
Max Output Level: -54 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2133
  • Joined: 2004/04/15 17:55:09
  • Location: Midlands, UK
  • Status: offline
Re: Loyalty to Cakewalk 2013/11/05 15:18:53 (permalink)
Relative newbie - Sonar 2.

My stuff
 
Intel Sandy Bridge i7 2600 @ 3.4GHz, 4 cores, 8 threads, 16GB RAM.
OS & Programs drive: 240GB SSD
Data drives: 1 x 1TB drive RAID mirrored, plus extra 1TB data drive 
Windows 10 Home 64 bit
Cakewalk by BandLab 64 bit, Studio One 3, 
Band In A Box 2016, Ozone 8
+ too many other plugins
BandLab page
#24
Danny Danzi
Moderator
  • Total Posts : 5810
  • Joined: 2006/10/05 13:42:39
  • Location: DanziLand, NJ
  • Status: offline
Re: Loyalty to Cakewalk 2013/11/05 15:20:29 (permalink) ☄ Helpfulby Del 2013/11/06 08:53:43
spacey
Now I'm hoping X3c and my computer will last long enough before everything
changes again to let me record a few tunes...that will pobably suck.
Well...at least my computer skills are getting better. Maybe I should be like FBB and
record that. ;)



A bit off topic here, but since you mentioned this, I just had to chime in here. My apologies ahead of time for the topic drift.
 
Just do what I do Spacey....put a good version of Sonar on your machine, and if you decide you want the newer stuff, put it on a little pc that doesn't matter too much.
 
I have this little get together with all the engineers in my area once per month at a bar for drinks and food. It's really cool as we get to share secrets, bond, bust on each other, and of course, talk shop in ways we can't talk to anyone else. I opened up the floor with "do you all think we are losers for buying into hype and being current?"
 
This opened up one of the best discussions we ever had in all the years we've been doing this. Everyone at this table (there were 10 of us this night) agreed that we're losers and deter our own progress just because we have this passion and excitement to buy the latest and greatest stuff all the time. Here are the things that were said:
 
It's like our options have options that have options that have options. By the time you get all that stuff organized and working for YOU in YOUR work-flow, the tables turn....you're searching for drivers, your go to plugs no longer work right, you're experiencing crashes, you can't load old projects in this new software, the software has abandoned things that worked for 15 years, the program is over-kill, you're forced to re-learn an entire DAW....wow, what a time waster "just to be current". Are we fricken' nuts?
 
This isn't just in regards to Sonar. We got the latest MAC users with PT and Logic crying, Cubase dudes, Presonus...the list goes on and on. So at the end of the conversation, we were all in agreement. None of us will purchase anything more unless it sincerely blows our doors off. We will not purchase new DAW software and put it on our real recording machines. If we do, it goes on a box we don't care about. This way we can learn about the new system if we choose to....and we can experience the new stuff in a stress free environment. If we find issues that annoy us...you lose on that release unless you feel like trying to resolve them or wait for patches.
 
If you don't find issues, you decide whether or not to install on your good machine. Me personally? I have 8.5 and X1 on my good boxes with X2 and X3 on my secondary recording boxes. I've never really been an X2 fan, but seem to like most of X3. It seems to be working really well on my secondary recording box at the moment and may graduate to the good box this weekend. The whole plugin debacle scares me with X3, but it seems to have been taken care of (at least for me) with the C patch. A and b caused a few issues there for me...but I expected this due to VST3 and the other growing pains we may have experienced.
 
But if I can be honest....from a business owner standpoint, it really hasn't paid for me to be current in anything other than upgrading to Windows 7 which is of course old and dated already. Though I had no problems with XP, 7 obliterates it. With computer audio, when you get something working right, I really and sincerely feel it's best to leave a well-oiled machine alone. For those that like to tweak and work on this stuff spending countless hours troubleshooting, may God bless you. For those of us who have to make a living from this, it can become one of the worst time consuming and frustrating endeavors known to man....all because we get so excited, we gotta buy. It's almost better to not have the money to buy this stuff in certain situations. I got a client that has so many plugins, his uterus fell out. LOL! He uses just about none of them....talk about a spending fetish. Get a good pc...put on a good version of a DAW you know works, add your plugs, make music. Current in my opinion, is way over-rated.
 
-Danny

My Site
Fractal Audio Endorsed Artist & Beta Tester
#25
karma1959
Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 515
  • Joined: 2008/10/31 10:56:29
  • Location: Brooklyn, NY
  • Status: offline
Re: Loyalty to Cakewalk 2013/11/05 15:22:21 (permalink)
Don't remember the version - but it was Pro Audio v something around 1999
 

Sonar Platinum x64 on Win10 64, Dell T7400 w/ 8 Xeon cores, 8 Gbyte RAM, 3 hard drives, RME Fireface UFX, UAD-1, Mackie Control, Adam A7X
#26
...wicked
Max Output Level: -1.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 7360
  • Joined: 2003/12/18 01:00:56
  • Location: Seattle
  • Status: offline
Re: Loyalty to Cakewalk 2013/11/05 15:27:27 (permalink)
Cake 4.0 here. My college roommate used it and I was so happy there was a good PC sequencer. I remember when Pro Audio 5 came out and it blew my mind. 

===========
The Fog People
===========

Intel i7-4790 
16GB RAM
ASUS Z97 
Roland OctaCapture
Win10/64   

SONAR Platinum 64-bit    
billions VSTs, some of which work    
#27
mgh
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 8594
  • Joined: 2007/05/10 05:15:56
  • Location: betwixt and between
  • Status: offline
Re: Loyalty to Cakewalk 2013/11/05 15:38:08 (permalink)
Danny Danzi
spacey
Now I'm hoping X3c and my computer will last long enough before everything
changes again to let me record a few tunes...that will pobably suck.
Well...at least my computer skills are getting better. Maybe I should be like FBB and
record that. ;)



A bit off topic here, but since you mentioned this, I just had to chime in here. My apologies ahead of time for the topic drift.
 
Just do what I do Spacey....put a good version of Sonar on your machine, and if you decide you want the newer stuff, put it on a little pc that doesn't matter too much.
 
I have this little get together with all the engineers in my area once per month at a bar for drinks and food. It's really cool as we get to share secrets, bond, bust on each other, and of course, talk shop in ways we can't talk to anyone else. I opened up the floor with "do you all think we are losers for buying into hype and being current?"
 
This opened up one of the best discussions we ever had in all the years we've been doing this. Everyone at this table (there were 10 of us this night) agreed that we're losers and deter our own progress just because we have this passion and excitement to buy the latest and greatest stuff all the time. Here are the things that were said:
 
It's like our options have options that have options that have options. By the time you get all that stuff organized and working for YOU in YOUR work-flow, the tables turn....you're searching for drivers, your go to plugs no longer work right, you're experiencing crashes, you can't load old projects in this new software, the software has abandoned things that worked for 15 years, the program is over-kill, you're forced to re-learn an entire DAW....wow, what a time waster "just to be current". Are we fricken' nuts?
 
This isn't just in regards to Sonar. We got the latest MAC users with PT and Logic crying, Cubase dudes, Presonus...the list goes on and on. So at the end of the conversation, we were all in agreement. None of us will purchase anything more unless it sincerely blows our doors off. We will not purchase new DAW software and put it on our real recording machines. If we do, it goes on a box we don't care about. This way we can learn about the new system if we choose to....and we can experience the new stuff in a stress free environment. If we find issues that annoy us...you lose on that release unless you feel like trying to resolve them or wait for patches.
 
If you don't find issues, you decide whether or not to install on your good machine. Me personally? I have 8.5 and X1 on my good boxes with X2 and X3 on my secondary recording boxes. I've never really been an X2 fan, but seem to like most of X3. It seems to be working really well on my secondary recording box at the moment and may graduate to the good box this weekend. The whole plugin debacle scares me with X3, but it seems to have been taken care of (at least for me) with the C patch. A and b caused a few issues there for me...but I expected this due to VST3 and the other growing pains we may have experienced.
 
But if I can be honest....from a business owner standpoint, it really hasn't paid for me to be current in anything other than upgrading to Windows 7 which is of course old and dated already. Though I had no problems with XP, 7 obliterates it. With computer audio, when you get something working right, I really and sincerely feel it's best to leave a well-oiled machine alone. For those that like to tweak and work on this stuff spending countless hours troubleshooting, may God bless you. For those of us who have to make a living from this, it can become one of the worst time consuming and frustrating endeavors known to man....all because we get so excited, we gotta buy. It's almost better to not have the money to buy this stuff in certain situations. I got a client that has so many plugins, his uterus fell out. LOL! He uses just about none of them....talk about a spending fetish. Get a good pc...put on a good version of a DAW you know works, add your plugs, make music. Current in my opinion, is way over-rated.
 
-Danny


great post Danni. I am certainly in no danger of being a pro like you and unfortunately have one box not several, but I upgraded to x2 from 8.5, and the only reason was to not fall behind on the upgrade curve...8.5 was almost the perfect DAW for me as someone who has used Reaper and Cubase...then the X-series was launched to compete with Live and Studio One...I'm lucky in that X2 has been stable for me and I have grown to like the new workflow...but yeah, it's like they know that anyone in this field has uncontrolable GAS!

Memorare debut album 'Philistine' available now http://blackwoodproductio...philistine-digipack-cd
#28
jsg
Max Output Level: -69 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1079
  • Joined: 2003/11/20 04:54:18
  • Location: San Francisco, California
  • Status: offline
Re: Loyalty to Cakewalk 2013/11/05 15:41:11 (permalink)
Danny Danzi
spacey
Now I'm hoping X3c and my computer will last long enough before everything
changes again to let me record a few tunes...that will pobably suck.
Well...at least my computer skills are getting better. Maybe I should be like FBB and
record that. ;)



A bit off topic here, but since you mentioned this, I just had to chime in here. My apologies ahead of time for the topic drift.
 
Just do what I do Spacey....put a good version of Sonar on your machine, and if you decide you want the newer stuff, put it on a little pc that doesn't matter too much.
 
I have this little get together with all the engineers in my area once per month at a bar for drinks and food. It's really cool as we get to share secrets, bond, bust on each other, and of course, talk shop in ways we can't talk to anyone else. I opened up the floor with "do you all think we are losers for buying into hype and being current?"
 
This opened up one of the best discussions we ever had in all the years we've been doing this. Everyone at this table (there were 10 of us this night) agreed that we're losers and deter our own progress just because we have this passion and excitement to buy the latest and greatest stuff all the time. Here are the things that were said:
 
It's like our options have options that have options that have options. By the time you get all that stuff organized and working for YOU in YOUR work-flow, the tables turn....you're searching for drivers, your go to plugs no longer work right, you're experiencing crashes, you can't load old projects in this new software, the software has abandoned things that worked for 15 years, the program is over-kill, you're forced to re-learn an entire DAW....wow, what a time waster "just to be current". Are we fricken' nuts?
 
This isn't just in regards to Sonar. We got the latest MAC users with PT and Logic crying, Cubase dudes, Presonus...the list goes on and on. So at the end of the conversation, we were all in agreement. None of us will purchase anything more unless it sincerely blows our doors off. We will not purchase new DAW software and put it on our real recording machines. If we do, it goes on a box we don't care about. This way we can learn about the new system if we choose to....and we can experience the new stuff in a stress free environment. If we find issues that annoy us...you lose on that release unless you feel like trying to resolve them or wait for patches.
 
If you don't find issues, you decide whether or not to install on your good machine. Me personally? I have 8.5 and X1 on my good boxes with X2 and X3 on my secondary recording boxes. I've never really been an X2 fan, but seem to like most of X3. It seems to be working really well on my secondary recording box at the moment and may graduate to the good box this weekend. The whole plugin debacle scares me with X3, but it seems to have been taken care of (at least for me) with the C patch. A and b caused a few issues there for me...but I expected this due to VST3 and the other growing pains we may have experienced.
 
But if I can be honest....from a business owner standpoint, it really hasn't paid for me to be current in anything other than upgrading to Windows 7 which is of course old and dated already. Though I had no problems with XP, 7 obliterates it. With computer audio, when you get something working right, I really and sincerely feel it's best to leave a well-oiled machine alone. For those that like to tweak and work on this stuff spending countless hours troubleshooting, may God bless you. For those of us who have to make a living from this, it can become one of the worst time consuming and frustrating endeavors known to man....all because we get so excited, we gotta buy. It's almost better to not have the money to buy this stuff in certain situations. I got a client that has so many plugins, his uterus fell out. LOL! He uses just about none of them....talk about a spending fetish. Get a good pc...put on a good version of a DAW you know works, add your plugs, make music. Current in my opinion, is way over-rated.
 
-Danny




Consumeritis. Materialism. Genuine progress in the computer sciences.  Capitalism.  Insecurity about one's place in the cosmos.
 
All of the above factors contribute to this anxiety about "upgrading".  What about music?  What about real art?  What about the fine arts?  What about "if it's not broken, don't fix it?"  What about learning your craft separate from computer technology?
 
30 years ago, no one would dream of getting involved with music seriously/professionally unless they were certain they had genuine talent.   Music schools would not accept you if you didn't demonstrate talent as a performer or composer.  Now, schools like the Academy of Art in San Francisco will accept anyone who can pay the obscene costs of tuition and they'll con you into thinking you'll get a job in a field that is vastly over-saturated, even though all you have is a studio, like everyone else, without the level of skill required to actually do great work that distinguishes you from the pervasive mediocrity of the marketplace.  Computers and software give us the illusion we have more skills than we actually do. A few years ago, a young person studying at the Academy of Art came to me for consultation on the Vienna Symphonic Library. He told me that his friend, who was about to graduate the Academy of Art, is $250,000 in debt for his "education".  Of course the school doesn't care, they'll get their money regardless of the hardship and impact on this young man, who now owes the government the money.  Imagine starting out life going into a field that is already difficult to make a decent living in and owing that much money in your early 20s.  Insane.
 
I used Sonar 7 for over 5 years.  Now, I'll use X3 for another 5 years.   Though software and hardware are undoubtedly advancing in many ways, it's the marketing and PR departments that keep up the propaganda, illusions and false promises about "no limits" that keep insecure people buying things they don't need.  Check out the advertising of gear that's 20 years old; you'll find the same claims of "no limits on your creativity", just like today.  Actually, real artists thrive on limits.  Limitation is what spurs on creativity, limits are what ignites the imagination and allows us to develop skills.  Without limits, we're lost.  Perhaps one day, when the profit-motive has long been abandoned and people do things not for money but for the the joy of doing them and out of service to others, technology will not overwhelm us and not distract us from the core values that make us human.  Not in my lifetime, but hopefully one day. We're all caught up in delusions of all kinds about the ultimate purpose of our lives and our relationship to the material world.  It's no one's fault.  It's just where we're at in the 21st century. 
 
JG
http://www.jerrygerber.com
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
post edited by jsg - 2013/11/05 16:56:43
#29
rickbail
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 124
  • Joined: 2003/11/18 09:33:55
  • Status: offline
Re: Loyalty to Cakewalk 2013/11/05 15:47:36 (permalink)
Version 1.1 DOS floppy, don't remember the year, I was an embryo, just kidding. I don't even remember where I bought it. I do remember the DOS screen look though, ooooh tough on the eyes back then. LOL 
 

Rick   
 Sonar Platinum 
Dell Intel Core i7-4790 3.6 processor 12GB  SDRAM   1TB Hard Drive  NVIDIA GeForce GT 720
 Focusrite 6I6 audio interface
#30
Page: 1234 > Showing page 1 of 4
Jump to:
© 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1