Craig, I think you provided me with a great insight in my decision making process. I have every cakewalk plugin that cakewalk provides for the ProChannel. I have a decent understanding on how to use compressors, EQ’s and limiters. I have been studying them for many years. However, I am not a professional so I still struggle with the Mastering process. Most of the clients I work with do not have the capital to afford what a good mastering house can provide. I really only need something similar to what Ozone provides which seems to be a more straight forward approach to Mastering. I am able to get descent results using the Mastering tools that Cakewalk provides but it could be better. I am big on the workflow aspect to music making. Nothing aggravates me more than losing my momentum by having to spend a lot of time figuring out something when I am creating. Sometimes I limit myself to the capability of my Roland Fantom G when creating a track. I only have the included sounds to work with and the capabilities of the on board sequencer and I am able to create faster. Afterward, I can transfer the track to Sonar and replace some of the sounds using the endless amount of plugins and sounds I have which can take forever. The creating part is faster but transferring everything is a cumbersome process and not ideal. I use this process when I am creating a track for a client.
I say all this to say that you have just convinced me to go with Console 1 because workflow is more important to me. I will spend more time with the mastering tools I currently have on hand.
Thank you for your guidance.