Dj,
Just curious about your experience with Audition. Would want to hear your voice on this, and anyone else with first hand knowledge.
Not preaching to you or the choir, but the Adobe acquisition of Cool Edit Pro was the beginning of the terminal decline. Cool Edit Pro that was way ahead of its time and rocketing to new heights. I remember walking around in a daze for a week when Pro came out. Multi track digital audio recording now possible with some good effects. There was even the state of the art parametric eq on each channel. Didn't get any better than this for the $275 or whatever it was going for.
Adobe bought them out, first rebranded it, increased the size over twice with nothing added.
Audition 1.5 is aging, but about as good as it got. New features with time stretch and the like. Stable program.
Audition 2 was a major disaster with failed midi implementation, bugs out the yin yang which they said were too bureaucratic mired to fix.
Maybe Audition 3 was the best, maybe. They did a lot of fixes and took the midi crisis out.
During that time, Adobe went genitals to the wall working on SoundBooth as a major scaled down replacement for Audition in their suites, causing outrage with the die hard Cool Edit fans.
I let it go after the legacy download for ver 3 that Adobe kindly offered.
Never used or "upgraded" to the CS series. Feedback that the original design was butchered to hell and back. Functions removed. Scaled back and simplified to fit into the CS suites as a crippled background need. Deteriorated audio processor was now secondary to the video focus. They went forward with a SoundBooth level editor to do a few things to make the video geeks happy enough to sell their product.
Reports are that Audition died after ver 3.
Anyone's thoughts on the glory of the CS suite Audition? In comparison with the likes of Audition 1.5 or 3. Is it really more powerful, and us dinosaurs just don't have it together enough to dance with the times.
Love all you guys and girls,
John