williamcopper
`why don't we wait until sonar is a good DAW before we vote it's the best. Was just looking at staff view today, a few million years after complaints about it began: still awful. Just opened a PRV window for multiple tracks today, and got a controller pane with dozens of tiny tiny lanes, one per controller per midi channel. Too many of this kind of horrible design choices still, endlessly, present to call Sonar good.
It boggles my mind that you don't just learn a different DAW. And don't say "oh, I have all this legacy stuff." You can start on your new and wonderful DAW that automagically adapts itself to your needs, and never look back unless you have to tweak some older material. I still have ADAT tapes, old Cubase projects, Pro Tools sessions, and Master Tracks Pro MIDI files...they didn't threaten to kill me when I started using SONAR.
It's also possible to transfer material among DAWs. I've taken Pro Tools projects and mixed them in SONAR, and created files in SONAR to use in Live and Traktor.
And one last time...AFAIC the best place to edit multiple controllers is in Track View. It's MADE for that, the stock PRV isn't.
On the plus side, I do appreciate your rock-solid consistency in being able to inject negativity and your personal agenda into just about any thread.
The bottom line is this: If you don't think SONAR is the best DAW, it's
YOUR responsibility to learn the one you think
is best, so you can live happily ever instead of continuing the never-ending documentation of your self-flagellation in this forum. Peace out.