voon
I asked Nektar if it supports Sonar ... and they say, Cakewalk is refusing to work with them for integration of the Panorama Controller ... is that true? I'm looking for a good all in one controller to control NI Kontakt, UVI Falcon, other VSTs and a DAW. That means it has to be a good, decent general masterkeyboard, and provide good ways to switch between VST control and DAW/Mixer/Transport etc control. Panorama was one of the few contestants, but apparently they can't support Sonar due to Cakewalk not cooperating with them.
I have not heard the conversation between Nektar and CW, but there are facts from which you can make your own conclusion either what they say is true:
1) Naktar has integrated Impact controllers, they know how that goes
2)
CW provides controllers integration API, with documentation as an
open source, without any prior agreements, fees, etc.
3)
Nektar is using
proprietary protocol, and no-one knows how to get access to any related software nor documentation.
4) as such plug-in author, I can claim that
no cooperation from CW is required to integrate any controller, sure that if something is not yet available in Sonar/API, that can not be used. But the level of integration for VS-700, Mackie, etc. can be achieved.
And so the question: what they really want from CW to integrate Panorama? Till they provide reasonable answer, my opinion is that they just do not want spend time for that and blame other side without a reason.