mettelus
These discussions make me wonder sometimes if music hasn't taken a step backwards due to computers. We went from focus on musical content to focus on visual analysis in only a couple of decades (among other issues). It is amazing that music has been made for centuries without computers, yet we seem dependent on them in today's world.
I think that could be because of the player/composer dichotomy. Players/bands don't really need computers to do their thing. Composers were always at the mercy of visual analysis...I don't think Beethoven could have done what he did without notation, which was his piano roll view. (He also needed the righteous sample playback engine called a symphony orchestra

)
As a player, I don't need a computer but as a composer, I do. As a songwriter, playing guitar or keyboard used to be way preferable to using a computer. That changed a few years ago, and now it's actually easier for me to write songs with a computer. But that's also because I use the computer in a more limited way than when composing.
I think the analysis process is ultimately helpful if people read the article I wrote and realize that recording to a click may not be ideal. They may be tempted to record without a click, and it might turn out better. Or not. But at least they'll have had a chance to think about and compare the two. Without seeing how tempo changed in "classic" songs, they might not have been persuaded to check it out.