michael diemer
If you're a Sonar user, you need a DAW that will allow yo to have the same, or very similar workflow.
I'm not sure that this assertion is entirely correct. Up until the time I first tried Mixcraft, my only real DAW experience was Sonar (from the inception of the Cakewalk Home Studio series), and at the time Sonar was at Pro 5 or 6. Mixcraft was initially designed to be intuitive, and a DAW that anyone could use with a very shallow learning curve. When I sat down with Mixcraft, it was as though there was NO learning curve. On my first attempt using it, I created a six track background motif using loops from my library of ACIDized loops, added two stereo audio tracks from my K2661, and added and edited VSTi synth and Kontakt piano leads. I did this all in about an hour, and never once looked at the manual. Granted, I hadn't created a masterpiece, but that's not really the point. Although there are many differences between the Mixcraft and Sonar interfaces, those differences were transparent due, mostly, to Mixcraft's intuitive elegance. Mixcraft isn't a scaled down Sonar, it's just so intuitive that it seems like it is.