pentimentosound
I just saw this on FB and am wondering how usb 3 will impact latency. I don't see a price yet, but there are several pages of info on their site.
Is this big news? The usb3 part?
Michael
Recommended audio interfaces: - PreSonus Studio 192 26x32 USB 3.0 Audio Interface
$899 , November 2015
- ZOOM UAC-2 USB 3.0
$299 , June 2015
$699 ZOOM UAC-8 USB 3.0 (like PreSonus Studio 192)
1.8 msec overhead round trip latency
2.2 msec round trip @ 96 kHz / 32 samples
- ZOOM TAC-2R Thunderbolt (More than twice as fast as USB 3.0)
$320 , December 2014
1.8 msec overhead round trip latency
2.2 msec round trip @ 96 kHz / 32 samples
Latency time in the TAC-2R is just 4.17 msec round trip when operating at a 44.1kHz sampling rate with a 64 sample buffer size.
USB 3.0 has a much lower latency than USB 2.0
The USB 3.0 improves upon communication model and reduces transmission latency by minimizing polling, lowering CPU usage, and allowing devices to transmit data as soon as it is ready.
USB 3.0: 1.3-1.8 msec overhead latency......750 iops
USB 2.0: 4-6 msec overhead latency............200 iops
Actually, additional 6ms latency (18ms round-trip latency at 512 samples 44khz) is too much for piano players and also for music producers which have a huge volume of virtual instruments that have dedicated audio effects.
If you assign 256 samples into buffer, you have 6ms output latency at 44khz (256 / 44100 = 0.0058 sec => ~6ms) and therefore you have 12ms latency in output trough USB 2.0 and 7.3ms latency trough USB 3.0!
I can't produce orchestral music or even playing Piano over than 13ms latency. In worst case scenario I need to set buffer to 512 samples due to a large project and this cause to have around 13ms round-trip latency and therefore I strongly recommend that use professional PCIe sound cards such as RME AIO instead of USB 2.0 audio interfaces or going with ZOOM UAC-2R which has ultra low-latency trough USB 3.0.