In a proper space, and with levels matched I think most of us would be hard pressed to hear a dramatic difference between monitors of a specific design, and while there will be differences between designs themselves, for the most part the differences are small.
Loudspeaker technology is pretty mature. A driver of a specific size is going to move a certain amount of air, no matter who made the driver. Some aspects, such as behavior at the extremes of the directional pattern, or extremes of the passband, may be a little more obvious, but they are still seldom dramatic.
What we pay for, when we pay $1000 instead of $100 for a pair of monitors or a microphone is that last 20%, or more likely 10%. OK, at the $100 price point we will likely give up a little bit of longevity, so let's say $500?
The biggest thing we buy, ESPECIALLY for monitors, is that which pleases our ears. I happen to really like the sound of the Equator, JBL, & Presonus monitors I auditioned. I also really like the sound of the Adam and Eve monitors I've used in the past, and I love my Urei 809s! I always preferred Altec over JBL and EV back in the bad old days too. Go figure!
There are patently poor monitors on the market - some fall apart, some are fatiguing, some are just plain inaccurate. But I think they are few and far between, and I didn't run into any this time around.
So when you are shopping for something for the studio (or the road rig) you have to keep in mind that a lot of the final decision will come down to plain old personal preference. Once you get past a certain threshold.
Yes, that means that my suggestions, and all the others, won't help anyone select a monitor. It might help you avoid one if it is particularly bad, but that's about it. And that's why, for a long time, I didn't participate in equipment threads.
I participate now mostly to try to provide options that I think folks might want to consider - and if I ever tell you that this or that is definitive then feel free to ignore me!