Aww you guys make me blush! Thanks anyway. Yeah I agree with
jb101 in that I do the mono mix outside my DAW and mixer for that matter. That is what is cool about it. Even if I am playing a CD I Only have to turn up that mono send and its all there in mono.
I remember reading some Beatles stuff and sometimes they had issues with having done say 2 or three overdubs from Geroge's or John's guitars and when they lined them all up in mono suddenly they could not hear the parts too well.
So that forced them to re do the overdubs and do things like switch guitars, pickups, pedals, EQ's and amps. Then they could hear the parts much more clearly. And of course they were basically in mono so they
had to deal with that clarity issue all the time. Mono sort of forced them to make the parts clear and more distinct from each other.
I grew up too in a mono world for a little while. All the records we had were mono up to about 1968 here in Australia. I supposed I just got used to it and thought it was the norm. I remember the record salesman saying do you want this in mono or stereo (after 1968 that is) I had to convince my father to buy a new record player that was
stereo!! I knew it was going to be good. Well we have not really looked back have we.
But as we know they did some weird things mix wise when stereo first came out. But there were still some records that used the stereo spread rather nicely too.
On the single mono speaker and down low in volume if I find things are starting to sound cluttered as well it usually means some parts have to go!!! Not just sound alteration now but maybe just too muich information in there and not enough of that elusive black backdrop that I have mentioned before. The black backdrop should still be present in a great mix. It is in leaps and bounds with Kraftwerk and Steely Dan and even Tangerine Dream despite the complexity there. TD albums sound great in mono too. (Edgar Froese would have been dealing with mono synth sources for many many years!!)