bitflipperBTW, can anybody explain the term "progressive house"? What, exactly, makes it "progressive"?
This is a rather hassle-some thing that I have had a serious issue with at the Progressive Archives board ... to the point where I am no longer interested in discussing music with little boys that do not think that music exists in other parts of the world, and that most musicians are too stupid to write anything except what they are told can be done, or "must" be done, to make this "romantic", "baroque", bs, or "progressive"
There is a good side to it ... it helps identify a style ... but a "style" is not a "process" ... thus, musicologists do not like to use "styles" as a definition.
All in all, most "progressive" sites, use the bizarre things like ... jagged guitar sounds and licks, odd time changes and references ... however ... when you listen to half the stuff that they consider progressive, the format is the same as a sonata format, or the easiest, and the one format that you are first taught in school ... because you do not need to know music a whole lot to understand it!
The other bad part, is that some of the progressive definitions are messed up ... like ... this band uses these sound effects and they are "metal-prog" like Dream Theater, let's say ... and that is bizarre ... if you unplug the band ... you got what? ... at least with DT, you have a piece of music, but most others, you don't!
All in all, what has become known as "progressive" was a part of the 60's and early 70's and it was a "reaction" to the media blowup with television, that woke up half the world to what the other half was doing. It's really hard for me to accept someone calling "ITCOTCK" a progressive album, but they do not know, or discuss the lyrics ... when one piece is about the loudness and the psychotic noise ... like bombs going off by the IRA or in VietNam ... or Paris ... and you speaking to the wind, and it meaning nothing because you can not hear it, and neither can anyone else ... these ...a re still true today, and to me that is the totality of the "progessive" and its very definition.
I like it when they call ELP progressive, and then they can not discuss lyrics, and "The Endless Enigma" is another version of the original Greg Lake speaking the words that tomorrow he will be crying ... but this time he's pist and saying ... don't tell me lies ... mf'r ... and everyone thinks the music is progressive but the lyrics don't matter ... it's just another rock song.
Too much of music, is just a song ... the issue is, how strong are you to make it more than just a song ... it's an anthem ... for a period of time, and this is the reason why Jimi playing the anthem is the ultimate symbol for rock and roll, that brought "progressive" to the front, and killed on the same night ... it was played infront of garbage, and no one was paying attention ... and even today ... we treat music just like another song ... it doesn't mean anything to anyone ... it's all good clean fun and another beat-off in the bathroom!
Progressive ... deserves its claim, and it's time and place ... but it will not happen without the arts that also took it there, which the majority of progressive groups in the Internet are afraid to check out and discuss ... because that would rencer their definition stupid and totally off base, and off key!
It's hard to tell people that you can take one play in London (Peter Brook's Marat/Sade) and that you will find words from that play in at least 10 of the best known progressive bands out there ... during that time ... but it doesn't mean anything? ... I guess because musicians are silly, stupid and bizarre and do not enjoy movies, theater, literature and anything else?