• SONAR
  • Why doesn't Sonar have an iPad or Android app?
2016/03/11 20:05:54
MelodicJimmy
I just checked and Cubase has one and so does Logic.  I love Sonar.  Aside from notation improvements, this is really the only thing missing.  And, honestly, it seems like it'd be a pretty easy thing to do, no?  I know there's one called "DAW controller" or whatever, but why don't they make an official one? 
 
edit....
 
Just to be clear, I mean an app just to navigate the program, not a "version" of the program that runs on the tablet.  Just like a remote controller-type app. 
2016/03/11 20:12:56
Anderton
Just get a small touchscreen 
2016/03/11 20:25:42
kitekrazy1
Anderton
Just get a small touchscreen 




That's what an iPad is.  There are 3rd party ones that will control Sonar.  After awhile you'd be surprised that you stop using those apps because the novelty wears off.
2016/03/11 21:18:17
tenfoot
I have wondered this often melodicJimmy! Even one that just provided transport controls would be a start. 
 
kitekrazy1
Anderton
Just get a small touchscreen 
 
 
 



That's what an iPad is.  There are 3rd party ones that will control Sonar.  After awhile you'd be surprised that you stop using those apps because the novelty wears off.


 
 
The third party apps like touch daw are flakey at best though (erratic connection on start-up due to rtpmidi etc), so it is not hard to lose interest.  If there was a proprietary android app that worked consistently would be a different story.  I have an app for My X32 digital mixer that works flawlessly and I wouldn't be without it. 
 
And a small touch screen isn't wireless.  Try picking one up and walking into your vocal booth. 
2016/03/11 21:23:08
MelodicJimmy
"just get a small touchscreen"
 
I'm not being a jerk here, honestly.... but, what was the point of that reply?  I don't even understand what you said.  I'm asking why Sonar doesn't have an app to be able to control it remotely and you said, "just get a small touchscreen."  Why'd you say that?  Again, not being confrontational, just .... confused. 
 
Also, no, I don't think the novelty would wear off.  I think my workflow would be a lot quicker with something like that.  Plus, obviously Cubase and Logic feel the same way.....
2016/03/11 21:38:26
BenMMusTech
I've experimented with stuff, ever since the beginning...and use to ask the same question.  They're actually more trouble than they're worth...unless you need a remote control to start recording.  And for this they're many apps to achieve this.  And as Anderton says get a small touch screen, which I also have...but again it's more trouble than it's worth.
 
Ben
2016/03/11 21:51:32
MelodicJimmy
Why?
2016/03/11 22:00:45
Keni
In some situations I use v-control (free) for visuals and a Studiomix (peavey-yeah, old) for basic transport control.

If I cold afford he paid version I wouldn't need the Studiomix as the paid version has full support...

It works just fine...

For me I also use the presonus 1818 software (my interface) to remotely adjust monitor mixes and such...

I don't often need this, but it can be handy to have. Why should Cakewalk spend time on this when it's already available... I'm told the paid version of v-control allies full access to all Sonar on-screen stuff too...
2016/03/11 22:01:33
John
Its funny this has come up. I have a 10.1 inch touch tablet that runs Windows pro 10. I also have Studio One 3 which also has an iPad app and now a Windows app for windows. It is sweet. It works flawlessly without my desktop having wireless. I found this out by pure accident. Its a full remote control for Studio One and does its thing with no delay at all. The meters on it are in perfect sync with Studio One's meters. Control is instant.
 
It only works with Studio One but it works so well it is a joy to use. There is not a whole lot of information about it but it is rather simple to use.
 
Here is a screen shot of it. Most everything you see is controllable.  At the top is the time line. 
All I can say is if CW were to offer this sort of thing with its abilities it would be a real an outstanding achievement for them.  
 
Keep in mind that I do have a hardware CS in the form of a Mackie Control. Thus I am not all that impressed with what I have tried or seen in the past with software control. The above is different though. It works and works well. It wont replace my MC but for remote use it can't be beat. 
2016/03/11 22:23:41
Orphaned at Birth
MelodicJimmy
"just get a small touchscreen"
 
I'm not being a jerk here, honestly.... but, what was the point of that reply?  I don't even understand what you said.  I'm asking why Sonar doesn't have an app to be able to control it remotely and you said, "just get a small touchscreen."  Why'd you say that?  Again, not being confrontational, just .... confused. 
 
Also, no, I don't think the novelty would wear off.  I think my workflow would be a lot quicker with something like that.  Plus, obviously Cubase and Logic feel the same way.....




As does Studio One.
 
You will find a lot here that just say some silly things when then is no other defense for Sonar when someone brings one of its many deficiencies to the fore, just look at some of the half ar$ed (and that's exactly what they are) work arounds for things Sonar lacks that other DAW's have in the 'Tip of the Week' section above.
 
I think a lot of people, including long time users are growing disillusioned with the direction Sonar is taking under the Subscription model, this is evidenced by the growing number of disgruntled posts by those same long time users to recent events and additions (and the way in which they were added) to Sonar, there is disquiet in the camp. People are leaving, contemplating leaving, flirting with other DAW's with the intention of jumping ship in significant numbers, and to be quite honest there are far better alternatives out there, Sonar is aging, has an aging core code base, some may say archaic, a HUGE backlog of bugs, a lot of which are considered as 'serious' of 'major' by a lot of folk, and some of which have been there for a decade plus and there seems no evidence that they will be fixed, yes you can point all you like to the lists of things that have been fixed in the last year, but at least be true to yourself, you know what I am saying, and you know it is true. Ongoing and new issues month after month, and indeed every month Just read these forums (at least the posts and users that are not deleted or banned, there seems to be a lot of that now days as well, and from what I have seen it is not because the truth wasn't being spoken, more so it was and it was a little to uncomfortable to confront.) But hey, we got LANDR, and the new analytic s coming, and we will be getting early releases (talk about much ado about nothing, anyone actually thought the early releases through? what are you actually getting? NOTHING, no different to just releasing a week earlier, so why the big who ha about it, it's nothing) Good to see that finally after all the requests and talk about these 3 major and often requested features they are finall being implemented (yes that was sarcasm)
 
The way I see it is that at this point in time, just going into the 2nd year of the Subscription model, most, or a large majority of people have just renewed, so that's a done deal, no need to pander to them, Cakewalk already have their money, so it's time to do whatever they feel like doing, and then later in the year and as it gets closer to the next anniversary just throw out a few trinkets to the surfs to make them happy, make them think they have gotten something worthwhile, rinse and repeat. Of course this will change as time goes on and individual renewals become more spread out over the year, it will become a less successful tactic, but as it is now, they have you at a disadvantage, they have your money, you basically paid upfront for promises, for what might come, that's one big problem with giving someone your money without actually getting anything in return at that very moment.
 
From what I have seen, I would say Sonar will be dead in 2 years, Gibson will dump it (regardless of how much Henry likes it, I'm sure he likes money, profit far more) maybe someone else will pick it up, maybe not. Seeing how the larger audio community out there either doesn't know what Sonar is, or has nothing good to say about it, just look at how most outsiders in the industry refer to it, or even worse, fail to even acknowledge it's existence, yes you will be able to provide a few hand selected articles to the contrary etc, but in the overwhelming majority everyone knows it's true, just look at the threads on this very forum regarding how Sonar isn't mentioned in such and such, is not regarded as professional, is often left out of the discussion, not used in Pro Studios, didn't have it's own sub forum on GS and on and on it goes. There is no point arguing, it's a fact.
 
But the ship will limp on, and the sheep will follow the bleatings of those in authority ever blindly, oblivious to the fact that there are far better options available.
© 2026 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1

Use My Existing Forum Account

Use My Social Media Account