Well... not gonna sob story ya'll on this because it's likely not going to matter for me anyway BUT...
Due to the March 31st announcement I figured I MAY just be able to eke it out by then depending on how finances went over the months following the announcement. It's definitely an excellent deal and for my plans, tests and experiments it's probably best to stay current.
However I can get things done as is and I'd only really be staying current to test and learn about the new stuff (yanno... so I can do annoying things like try to help others, lol). For my own work the current package is obviously more than useable so waiting a while for the next deal is not going to be particularly injurous.
My point is I'm guessing there might be quite a few people out there who, like me, thought they had some extra time to take advantage of the deal and were budgeting for next month. Changing the date (or correcting such a marketing error) a couple weeks before the new cut off after a month of advertising could put some folks in a bind.
Thing is I'm so freaking lame and pathetic the extra time may not have made a difference for me anyway but it might have. Dunno. Some of the real humans out there though might simply not have planned for the extra $50 or won't see this info in time to pounce then get turned off at the change.
That said... I actually thought keeping the pricing at $99 until March was kind of extraordinarily generous... like to the point of it almost being weird and undervalueing the product. I would have thought Feb 28 was a much more reasonable time frame for such a deal/promo.
Changing it after about a month of promo, even if it was initially an error, is kind of problematic for some folks.
Again... I'll be fine. Not upset really. Just thinking this could be a not so great thing for many who got their hopes up and planned around the orginal end date.
Cheers and good luck either way.
PS: Please don't flame me, bros. Just pointing out how this might be not so good for some users and in turn sales/Cakewalk.