Tripecac
So what's the consensus now?
Stick with Sonar/Bandlab, or jump ship and go with Pro Studio, Cubase, or something else?
Or are we all still sitting on the fence, trying to get a firm sense of whether Bandlab will have the inspiration and resources to truly revitalise Sonar? Or will investing time (and possibly money) in Bandlab be yet another case of throwing good money after bad?
I am still using SPLAT as is. I have not changed anything or installed the CBB Version.
For me none of the current changes is going to make things better than what it is at the moment.
But I moved on to Cubase and Studio one, however, I have many projects in SPLAT and I'll just leave them there.
Personally, I am disappointed with the new acquisition of Cakewalk. But this has nothing to do with BandLab or Meng. All this time, I have been hoping a company like
Native Instrument,
RME, Focusrite or even
MicroSoft would have acquired Cakewalk and model it after Presonus
(Hardware/Software Integration). But that has never happened.
Maybe this is what BandLab will do, and if so; this will greatly change the game and trajectory.
Cakewalk/Sonar has come a long, long way but I often feel as if Cakewalk/Sonar is like a great
musician without a hit record. Like an NBA star on a bad team.
BandLab appears to have good intentions but I do not see industry dominance and or proliferation of Sonar happening soon, and Sonar will always be the tools for Project Musicians and music enthusiasts which is not a bad thing but by staying at this level, there is always a risk of changes that have not served this system well and the potential for abandonment.
Music production today is not as simple as it seem and what I have experienced, depending on your setup, most artist such as myself will spend more time fixing issues and attempting to make things work, then actually recording music, and in today's complexity, integration is everything.