People need to be specific about MIDI editing, it's not enough to say "better MIDI editing." You have people like williamcopper who believe that positional context within notes is a work of Satan, and some people who aren't even aware that SONAR already has three totally different ways of editing MIDI controller data. Melodyne just announced an update that includes a lot more keyboard shortcuts. This will bring smiles to many people but based on the comments in this thread, I expect to see pitchforks and torches as well...
I think a lot of the reason why Staff View is much more serviceable than it was a year ago is due to Jerry Gerber who, rather than just blathering on about how Sibelius is so awesome, posted a list of 5 specific things that if done, would make SV useable for the majority of users. Several of the fixes are from that list, and I don't think it's coincidence.
After being on the sideline for years, MIDI is making a comeback due to the popularity of virtual instruments. I know of no other company that's as willing to listen to the community as much as Cakewalk, but requests need to be very specific. For example I'm advocating for a "drum machine" mode and am coming up with a very detailed workflow. I wouldn't be surprised if that detailed workflow description makes the difference between it being implemented or not implemented.
It will be interesting to see how the feedback portal plays out. Certainly it's a more formal approach than a feature request forum.