I have been seeking faster and faster interfaces and when I came across the so called "updated" technology of Ultralite Mk3 I was puzzled as to why they had not made this interface faster than it's grandpa Ultralite... I later learned that CueMix, a latency free part of the new hardware would make zero latency for... you guess it: mic, guitar and everything unfriendly to techno. I myself make Dubstep and need something good with digital and not just no latency with acoustics. Therefore, I set about for close to three months seeking out the answers. I found that Google was a poor choice as there is just not enough information the subject!
Here was my findings on my own:By themselves, the difference is very large for digital musicians: Roundtrip latency recordings...
On a buffer of 32 Sample 44.100 kHz...
My
problem:
Roundtrip is a 3.4 ms on Mk3! Very slow for MIDI users. Roundtrip on my grand-father original Ultralite from 2007 is an awesome 2.7 ms. This is a .7 ms which is way to high of a difference for me. For audio musicians the CueMix is awesome, but for us techno guys it is not so great to have the extra baggage for this technology placed on our speed. :(( Boo!
However, I found something that may be of use to some on this search:
My
solution:
With just the Input Device set to none in Preferences I got 2.4 ms on my Mk3 and the Ultralite was a 2.1 ms... hey I can live with .3 difference because it comes with CueMix, which I can use for my guitar players and singers to have zero latency. I must let the reader know you need a USB piano, like the one I have, that bypasses MIDI - or you will need the Ultralite's Input to be on, dragging down your latency. A USB piano should not be hard to come by nowadays though!
Also, when recording your techno, set it to input none and when you are recording audio set it on - as you may need your Input to be set to Ultralite mk3 for CueMix to do it's magic. Either way, it is low latency for digital guys - whohoo!