• SONAR
  • Custom installation path please!! Bandlab
2018/04/10 12:57:00
sonarman1
Is this for real. Bandlab wont let me install CW to a custom path! I hope Bandlab has intention to update this. 
2018/04/10 13:10:56
JoeGBradford
I'm sure that is one of the issues they said they would fix so let's hope so. It is an issue for me too. I tried installing anyway but it failed with an error message half way through so I'm going to wait for an installer that gives a custom install and try again then
2018/04/11 15:45:23
SigiZ58
For me this is a showstopper, too.
I let my SPLAT as it is, no need to install the new version even I am curious. But a custom installation is requirement.
 
2018/04/11 15:58:06
tecknot
Definitely!  I would particularly like being able to install sample/loop/clip data in a different drive apart from program installation drive (C:/).  I also miss the old days for having the options to install or skip particular components like plug-ins that SONAR had when we installed off of CD ROMs (not just groups of stuff), not to mention what versions to install (32bit vs 64bit).
 
Kind regards,
 
tecknot
2018/04/11 16:07:09
a13xhp
Maybe the Bandlab Team should have waited more time instead of launching and unfinished product. I understand that it is an "early access" release and it is free (which is truly great) but not having a custom installation path option is a real problem. Also, there is a lot of misinformation about the future of the Cakewalk. Anyway, I don't care about all of this cause I am a hobbyist but if I were a professional I will distrust of a DAW with an unfinished official web page, a hasty release and an unclear business model. I hope that Meng and his team won't dissapoint with the highly expected Cakewalk roadmap.
2018/04/12 11:59:31
sonarman1
a13xhp
Maybe the Bandlab Team should have waited more time instead of launching and unfinished product. I understand that it is an "early access" release and it is free (which is truly great) but not having a custom installation path option is a real problem. Also, there is a lot of misinformation about the future of the Cakewalk. Anyway, I don't care about all of this cause I am a hobbyist but if I were a professional I will distrust of a DAW with an unfinished official web page, a hasty release and an unclear business model. I hope that Meng and his team won't dissapoint with the highly expected Cakewalk roadmap.



+1 a DAW in professional platform is not a play thing. They don't even have some kind of installation notes prepared. You have to get into the forum and read a 20 pages thread to understand what the hell is happening. This whole thing bugs me. 
2018/04/12 12:50:58
danbottomburp
They didn’t give you the option for custom install paths ,they added a startup entry without asking ,I already don’t think that much of them .poor practice in my opinion.
2018/04/13 14:44:50
ywang2363
Without custom installation path, it's my key reason that I have not updated my Splat to CbB. Please take your time to polish the new version and get very things ready including the documentation and marketing, etc. I wonder why Bandlab follow Microsoft to do the insider test version.
Just my thoughts.
 
2018/05/28 12:19:18
SigiZ58
Maybe I missed someting. But if any other person looks:
I made a first install of Bandlab CW last weekend (May 2018).
I installed almost all modules except melodyne.
Summarize: Nearly all components allowed to choose installation path. Except Studio Instruments.... Hope this will also be made customizable soon. Also the TH3 for cakewalk was on c:
 
So if anyone is interested, it now works (maybe I overlooked this somewhere else, but I think it is usefull to append this info in this thread.
 
cheers & thank you Bandlab
 
2018/05/30 14:32:42
pwalpwal
sonarman1
a13xhp
Maybe the Bandlab Team should have waited more time instead of launching and unfinished product. I understand that it is an "early access" release and it is free (which is truly great) but not having a custom installation path option is a real problem. Also, there is a lot of misinformation about the future of the Cakewalk. Anyway, I don't care about all of this cause I am a hobbyist but if I were a professional I will distrust of a DAW with an unfinished official web page, a hasty release and an unclear business model. I hope that Meng and his team won't dissapoint with the highly expected Cakewalk roadmap.



+1 a DAW in professional platform is not a play thing. They don't even have some kind of installation notes prepared. You have to get into the forum and read a 20 pages thread to understand what the hell is happening. This whole thing bugs me. 


welcome to the cakewalk


12
© 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1

Use My Existing Forum Account

Use My Social Media Account