• SONAR
  • Lexington using more CPU? No problems (now crackling) Perf Module CPU is very active...
2016/01/05 15:11:12
Beepster
Edit: Title updated because now I'm getting crackling while recording. See my more recent posts. Oof.
 
 
Perhaps this is a sign of better resource management but I noticed that the CPU meters in my Performance module are all being pushed above 50% (but nice and evenly across all cores). This is not a particularly huge project compared to previous adventures (no synths... not an INSANE amount of tracks or clips, lots of instances of GR5 but not more than usual).
 
I haven't been experiencing problems but I'm wondering if this is part of the performance enhancements. As in Lexington is using CPU cores more evenly/properly instead of offloading tasks in a less efficient manner. I actually noticed this while I had my interface buffers set low for recording and set them higher again for editing with little change to the CPU meters (which usually makes them drop a bit).
 
As I said... no problems. Things seem to be chugging along nicely (and I'm in a full on tracking session). I'm just curious as to what this might represent.
 
I am on Win7 if that makes a difference.
 
Cheers.
2016/01/05 15:18:09
John
I have noticed this too. I'm not that happy about it. 
2016/01/05 16:10:21
Beepster
John
I have noticed this too. I'm not that happy about it. 




Interesting. I actually had a dropout while editing just now. I would normally expect a dropout when specifically doing what I was (and actually would expect more dropouts than I seem to be experiencing) but yanno... still not an enjoyable event. Certainly not heartbreaking though (I just start playback again and try not to be such a d*ck to the system).
 
Anyway. I guess I notice a little bit of extra snappiness in some regards (mostly opening projects which is nice) but I'm a little underwhelmed by the performance boost after all the fanfare.
 
Then again, as I said, I am on Win7 so maybe these improvements aren't as noticeable (or don't even apply) for me. I did ask whether they'd tested this stuff on Win7 a while back and... well didn't get much of a response.
 
Still likin' it but the CPU stuff is a little concerning because I do like to really abuse Sonar when I'm in the zone.
 
Meh... so far so good.
 
Thanks for confirming, John.
 
Cheers.
2016/01/05 22:07:31
BRuys
What OS are you guys running?  I have seen a few instances of Win 10 just using a lot of CPU all by itself.  Often the runtime broker using 20% to 60% of available CPU time.  This particular issue seems to happen more often on Windows 10 machines that were upgraded from Windows 7 or 8.x.
 
Seeing much in task manager?
2016/01/05 22:47:34
John
I'm on Windows 10 Pro 64 bit Insider Preview. 
2016/01/05 22:55:39
Noel Borthwick [Cakewalk]
Which version of sonar are you comparing to? Please submit a project if you can repro a loss of cpu perf
2016/01/05 23:28:18
John
It is Lexington Noel. 
2016/01/06 10:09:30
Noel Borthwick [Cakewalk]
Right but what are you comparing Lexington to when you say that its using more CPU?
2016/01/06 12:40:31
John
The past versions. 
2016/01/06 14:41:22
Beepster
Hi, Noel. I'll provide some more detail when I can get my brain together. I'm in the middle of something (music related) and not feelin' so hot today so want to make sure I can give proper details.
 
Nothing is screwing up. I just found the activity meter goind way more nuts than I'm used to for such a (relatively) simple project.
 
I'll be back.
 
Cheers.
© 2026 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1

Use My Existing Forum Account

Use My Social Media Account