Just for fun I timed loading up Sonar with approximately 40 GB of samples, all from an SSD drive and presumably into memory only (?), and copying approximately the same amount of data from an SSD drive to a regular SATA drive.
It took sonar just under 7 minutes to load; completing the copy took just under 6 minutes.
Now clearly writing to a regular drive is going to be way slower than reading from an SSD drive ... so ... what's taking all that time with sonar? I've got a suspicion: Sonar, or kontakt, or Windows, is writing all that loaded data to a working file located somewhere on my system disk (regular SATA).
I don't believe it's going to the paging file, it is set at a rather low size on the SSD manufacturer's recommendation (basically that the system should not use a paging file): 800 MB on a system with 64 Gb of memory. (edit) -- confirmed this last, by changing to a very large paging file entirely on an SSDD drive --- no significant change in load time.