From the JustWhenYouThoughtItCouln'tGetAnyWorse Department, turns out Monster - the caffeine drink company, not the cable company - is just as bad.
http://consumerist.com/2012/07/17/monster-energy-assumes-consumers-cant-distinguish-energy-drinks-from-fish-tanks/ Now
they claim to
own the word "monster" (a word which, btw, dates back to medieval times). Maybe we should throw them into a pit with Noel Lee (Monster Cable founder) and let 'em duke it out. Talk about a full-employment program for lawyers.
Which one's the bigger a-hole, the one who sued Disney over the movie "Monsters, Inc." or the one who claims consumers can't tell the difference between a fish tank and a soda?
I still think it's Mr. Lee, who although he
claims to be Chinese, may in fact actually be from another planet and does not yet understand our ways. From a Wall Street Journal article:
"We have to balance what we do legally to protect our mark with that of public opinion," says Mr. Lee, adding, "We're very sensitive to our reputation."