2007/07/30 22:04:53
fep
I've worked for a NYSE traded company that was the victim of several shakedown lawsuits. To add what Yep has said, part of the shakedown is they request outrageous amounts of records and start deposing all the executives. It is a total disruption to the Companies goal of trying to run a profitable business.

Our countries legal system is truly screwed up and it does not favor big business, it favors law firms.
2007/07/30 22:45:59
yep

ORIGINAL: fep

I've worked for a NYSE traded company that was the victim of several shakedown lawsuits. To add what Yep has said, part of the shakedown is they request outrageous amounts of records and start deposing all the executives. It is a total disruption to the Companies goal of trying to run a profitable business.

Our countries legal system is truly screwed up and it does not favor big business, it favors law firms.

Also, this kind of thing is certainly not less disruptive to small business than to big.

Fep is right on about this-- if you are a large corporation and you are having to dig up thousands of pages of documents and have seven-figure executives travelling and/or spending hours or days in depositions, then it is WAY cheaper to simply pay off the plaintiff to the tune of a few grand than to try and fight them, never mind the massive disruption and expense of having your corporate executives actually appearing in court.

If you are a small businees owner, the damage can be just as bad or worse. Very often, *you* are the one who has to physically respond to each and every demand of the opposition counsel. They can have interns and $15/hr paralegals phtotocopy demand letters en masse for outlandish correspondence requests or whatever and you are the person who has to stay up till 3am trying to dig it all up. Again, if they are demanding $1,000 plus 1% of revenues there are probably a lot of people who are paying the protection money.

I am not in favor of passing new laws, but I am in favor of spreading the word on all forums that you frequent and among all the people you come into contact with. I think Monster made a mistake and I think they will pay for it.

Cheers.
2007/07/31 08:15:57
fep
There is an infamous attorney that has become a multi-millionaire with strike suits, William Lerach. His last name has actually become a verb as in, "We were Lerached". And the settlements are several million dollars when a large corporation is "Lerached". Lerach has paralegals reviewing stock prices, if your company losses a certain amount of stock value in a short period you'll be Lerached - class action lawsuit for tens of millions making a general claim that you defrauded investors. Then you get outrageous document requests and all the execs start getting deposed as he performs a witch hunt.

We were faced with, settle or bet the company in a jury trial. Remember the Simpson trial? Betting your company in a jury trial is a risky endeavor no matter how favorable your case is. Big business vs. the class that includes poor old grannies doesn't necessarily play well in front of a jury.

I'm sorry about the OT, but this is a topic that hits a nerve. Lerach is totally gaming the legal system and imo the legal system has to change.
2007/08/02 04:40:20
Ognis
Boycott Monster Cable
companies being sued by Monster
example of despicable business practices



Monster© has not engaged despicable business practices. In fact, Monster© is expanding it's product line all the time, to offer some of the finest products on that market. Monster© Cable, is now so much more than cables. Monster© simply feels the right to preserve the name Monster©, as Monster© has evolved into so much more than the cables that made Monster© famous.

Thank you for choosing Monster© products.
2007/08/02 05:16:31
Roflcopter
Lerach is totally gaming the legal system and imo the legal system has to change.


Probably. Reading this kind of stuff doesn't make you hopeful, though. The guy know how to milk his connections:

http://www.motherjones.com/news/special_reports/coinop_congress/96mojo_400/lerach.html
2007/08/02 12:38:24
yep
ORIGINAL: Ognis

Boycott Monster Cable
companies being sued by Monster
example of despicable business practices



Monster© has not engaged despicable business practices. In fact, Monster© is expanding it's product line all the time, to offer some of the finest products on that market. Monster© Cable, is now so much more than cables. Monster© simply feels the right to preserve the name Monster©, as Monster© has evolved into so much more than the cables that made Monster© famous.

Thank you for choosing Monster© products.

This is a joke, right?

Because if Monster truly has not engaged in despicable business practices, then they should really sue whatever company is going around suing people in their name.

Cheers.
2007/08/02 12:53:28
Joe Bravo
Yes, it's a joke.
2007/08/02 17:41:41
Dave Modisette

ORIGINAL: Ognis

Boycott Monster Cable
companies being sued by Monster
example of despicable business practices



Monster© has not engaged despicable business practices. In fact, Monster© is expanding it's product line all the time, to offer some of the finest products on that market. Monster© Cable, is now so much more than cables. Monster© simply feels the right to preserve the name Monster©, as Monster© has evolved into so much more than the cables that made Monster© famous.

Thank you for choosing Monster© products.
I'll buy Cubase first.
2007/08/02 18:05:28
Ognis

ORIGINAL: Mod Bod


ORIGINAL: Ognis

Boycott Monster Cable
companies being sued by Monster
example of despicable business practices



Monster© has not engaged despicable business practices. In fact, Monster© is expanding it's product line all the time, to offer some of the finest products on that market. Monster© Cable, is now so much more than cables. Monster© simply feels the right to preserve the name Monster©, as Monster© has evolved into so much more than the cables that made Monster© famous.

Thank you for choosing Monster© products.
I'll buy Cubase first.




The Cables work best with Nuendo anyway
2007/08/02 19:44:57
Owen
If I owned a large company that was sued by Monster Cable, I would file extortion charges against them. There is much evidence on the web for the case.

Instead of filing extensions like Monster Cable does, you try to get it into court.
If there is a lawyer out there looking to get rich on a class action lawsuit, previous victims are easy to find on the net.
© 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1

Use My Existing Forum Account

Use My Social Media Account