• SONAR
  • Anyone liking this Jamaica update?
2015/10/23 22:43:15
deswind
It appears at first blush that people are just posting problems.   Are there people who think this is worth downloading and why?
2015/10/23 22:45:09
backwoods
It's snappier and has advanced routing options
2015/10/24 00:17:38
John
I like it very much. Every update has people posting problems. Sometimes they don't become apparent until an update comes along and causes the problem to show itself. Its a use case situation. Sometimes an update will break something that was working. Though that doesn't happen often. 
 
What CW has done to ensure good service is with the Command Center we are able to roll back to the last version if that becomes necessary. I don't worry about updates.  
 
 
2015/10/24 00:23:47
gswitz
Working fine for me. I haven't used the routing stuff practically yet, but I imagine I will soon.
2015/10/24 00:44:42
mixmkr
works great for me.  Faster load time, etc...   People typically post here because they have problems...when they don't have them, they're busy recording!! 
2015/10/24 02:04:54
Ripwolf
I like the update and have already used some of the added routing flexibility in a project. I do have a problem since the Jaimaca update with the start screen being blank which is mentioned in another post on that problem, but as it doesn't hinder my workfow I didn't feel the need to rollback.
2015/10/24 02:17:53
noynekker
Jamaica Plain running rock solid here . . . though I haven't yet used any of the new routing features they've added, not sure I need them ? . . . but I can say that it's running fine for me with no issues.
2015/10/24 02:49:00
Aksuaho
Update works great here, although I have to take into account that the solo behaviour of aux tracks isn't intelligent like with buses. Also I still can't use Audiosnap cause of the still wrong / late transient detection.
2015/10/24 03:23:52
sharke
The last couple of updates with synth recording and now aux track routing and patch points have revolutionized Sonar for me. It's a HUGE workflow boost. I got so sick of traveling back and forth between the tracks and buses, whether in the track view or in the console view. If you're going to route all of your drums to a bus, what was the advantage in having that drum bus all the way behind the "curtain"? That separation had a negative psychological impact on my workflow, in that I felt disorganized and jumbled. 
 
Now my track philosophy is thus: 
 
Instead of grouping tracks to a bus I put all of those tracks in a folder and add an aux track to it, routing all of the tracks to the aux. All of the tracks are together in the folder. 
 
If I'm using an effects return that's only for a group of tracks that I have grouped in a folder, I'll set up the return as an aux track. For instance, I might be using a room reverb or a delay that's only being used for drums. It goes in the drums folder instead of behind the curtain. Far more logical and organized. 
 
If I'm using an effects return that's used widely across the whole project, I'll set up a bus for that as usual. It can stay behind the curtain, out of the way. 
 
The old way of doing things seems so archaic already. 
 
Synth recording is another major workflow improvement. It's now so much easier to print synth parts and draw a line under them. The old way of exporting or bouncing was a drag. I would be too lazy to do it, and as a result would twiddle with synth controls ad infinitum to the point where I was just chasing my tail. Now it's so easy to just record the synth, get rid of the MIDI track and turn the synth off so that I'm committed to it. 
 
And yes, it's definitely snappier for me. I can feel a good performance boost in synth heavy projects. 
 
2015/10/24 03:47:19
LJB
Mine works just fine. If there are issues I haven't found them in what I need from the SPlat.
© 2026 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1

Use My Existing Forum Account

Use My Social Media Account