• Hardware
  • I need monitors that won't lie to me (p.2)
2015/01/25 16:51:51
Godling
Quick question from a neophyte...
 
Given the freq range of monitors, their responsiveness and how awesome they generally seem (kinda assuming this is why they're good in the first place?)... do people also use them for home theatre setups? Sure they're expensive, but if you can afford it aren't they better?
2015/01/25 18:02:52
AT
As to monitors as home theater speakers, yes and no.
 
Monitors should be as flat as reasonable, rather than "sounding good."  That being said most monitors do sound good and are used as home theater speakers, as well as surround mixing, of course.
 
@
2015/01/25 18:19:33
clintmartin
You need to look at ARC 2.
2015/01/26 18:20:33
Living Room Rocker
"You want the truth...well, you can't handle the truth."  Not cheap, but the name says it all:
http://truthaudio.com/products.htm
2015/01/27 11:23:00
SuperG
M-Audio BX8 - I managed to get a pair and am very impressed.
2015/01/27 16:45:52
Sycraft
Godling
Quick question from a neophyte...
 
Given the freq range of monitors, their responsiveness and how awesome they generally seem (kinda assuming this is why they're good in the first place?)... do people also use them for home theatre setups? Sure they're expensive, but if you can afford it aren't they better?



That works fine. It isn't all that common, but it works. When you start talking high end speakers, they all sound very good, are very linear, have low distortion, etc (well made ones at least). You'll see high end HT speakers used in studios. Abbey Road uses B&W speakers, for example.
 
Going the other way works just fine, most just don't because it is inconvenient. Generally you need a receiver to do your HT processing and those have amps in them. So using passives is cheaper (since you already bought the amps) and easier because you need only to run line cord to your speakers. With active speakers you need to run line level cables, which can need to be better engineered to keep noise out over long runs (since HT gear is usually unbalanced) and you need to run power as well.
 
You can get high end processors that are just processors, no amps, and of course you don't have to use the amps in a receiver, but it just isn't done that often.
 
If you do wish to do it, you just need to make sure that you either buy a dedicated processor like the Emotiva XMC-1 or you get a receiver with preamp outputs, which not all of them have (particularly lower end ones).
2015/01/27 16:49:10
gbar
I just have a pair of LSR 305s (not doing 5.1 yet), and the only trouble I get into is that they tend to have way more bass than you hear on a tablet listening to a clip that way, so the final test is always... "does it sound good on crappy equipment?".
2015/01/27 16:53:51
Leadfoot
That's why I like the Focusrite VRM Box. It gives you a variety of listening environments to test your mixes in. I haven't used mine in a long time. It might be time to break it out again...
2015/02/01 10:39:31
thornton
adams f5 are decent price with a great sound
2015/02/01 10:47:31
davdud101
Thanks for the feedback that's coming in, guys! I gonna say- I don't really KNOW my budget right now, but then what am I to look for in a pair of monitors just on an in-person testing basis? Would I (with my untrained ears and whatnot) be able to detect something good/bad/better/worse about one pair over another?
© 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1

Use My Existing Forum Account

Use My Social Media Account