It's always hard to tell what you'll be able to hear.
As a programmer, I know I get a lot of credit for being able to implement other people's awesome tools. I think the same can be true in the studio. Listeners can't tell what part of the awesome is your gear and what part is you.
So, if I can buy my way into better, I like to. I can hear the difference between my old M-Audio FastTrack Ultra and my RME UCX.
I hate spending money for something I will not keep. I don't expect to be able to unload it used; I almost never unload used gear except as gifts. So buying something I'll still want next year is important to me.
@Mudgel, Speaking of RME... what's all the MADI stuff about? Does anyone use MADI who can explain the use case? I'm not sure I understand why it would be useful in a small studio, but I'm probably being unimaginative. I don't really know how all the parts work together in a cool MADI implementation.
I like the audient that I linked to above.
- adjustable high pass filters - useful for live sound, which I do.
- the ability to bypass the Pre's and just use the DAC by coming in on the D-Sub (I'd be surprised if it ever gets used this way.)
- The input Z control is not something I've seen on many Pres. It looks like it could be useful, if I don't set it badly out of ignorance. Is it safe to just set it high all the time? I don't know.
- Pad, phase and channel specific phantom are pretty standard at this price range.
- ** It does not have a computer controlled auto-level/gain reduction mechanism to help keep levels set in an appropriate range. **
- Because it doesn't auto-level, how bad a clip sounds is really important information. When the RME Clips I can't even tell. It's just hard limited.