Now that Sonar developers have shown us they can and will fix staff view bugs, I think we can safely dismiss the attitude that they don't care or don't have the expertise to do so. Any group of developers who've created Sonar Platinum have proven their expertise many times to this composer, I have no doubt if the will and funding is there, Sonar's staff view can be improved. What I hope for, as I've mentioned before, is to consider this: The staff view is primarily a MIDI editor, it is not an aspect of the program designed to create finished, publish-quality scores. Parts? OK... Lead sheets? Sure! Sketches for band members? That too! Advances in music notation, publishing and print quality are such that notation on the level of a fully professional score is primarily a graphics issue, and a DAW is primarily a piece of software that works in the medium of sound. I know some people want a "jack-of-all-trades" piece of software, and to a degree, all DAWS are already adaptable to a wide range of purposes. But really, most people understand the value of specialized software that does one or two things very well--which is why some music publishers still use SCORE, by Leland Smith (I used it for 10 years). This program was pre-Windows and did (does) one thing and one thing only: Output gorgeous and accurate scores.
None of the DAW notation editors are as powerful as Sibelius or SCORE, nor do they need to be. For those who are new, Sibelius isn't a DAW, it's not a music production tool, it is a graphics tool designed with the final purpose being the creation of fully realized music notation.
What Sonar's notation can use in my opinion are really only three things:
1. Bring the note resolution down to 64th notes. That includes 32nd and 64th note triplets.
2. Fix the dotted, tied and nested triplet issue (all triplets) so that they conform to SMN (standard music notation)
3. Change the way dotted notes are displayed: The dot should never be on a staff line, instead always above the line the note is on, based on SMN rules.
That's it.
If Cakewalk does this, Sonar's staff view will be equal to any DAWs MIDI editor. It can already handle mixed meters, changing meters and fractional tempos, AND, Sonar has the added value of having tabs with multiple staff views visible, and a staff view that doesn't emulate a page of printed music, but rather a score running across the entire width of the screen. I hope Sonar's developers understand what a great help that is to composers. Also, cutting and pasting section in Sonar's notation is easy, once you get the hang of it. As a tip, with the new Sonar Control Bar, here's how I set up the custom module:
Save Copy Cut
Paste Paste To: (paste special) Undo
Redo History Fit Tracks (Resize and zoom)
Sonar's market:
songwriters
composers
film composers
game composers
TV composers
arrangers
orchestrators
educators and instructors
house of worship music services
All of the above make frequent use of music notation. And these people:
sound designers
sound engineers
mixing engineers
live sound people
musicians who don't read or write SMN
amateurs who just like to fool around with the software
will also have a first class DAW in audio and plug-in usage and flexibility, which Sonar amply and competently demonstrates.
That's my opinion based on writing music in Sonar since 1991.
Jerry
http://www.jerrygerber.com